참고: Fast2test에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료, 최신 Plat-Arch-204 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=18-Gk8qERbXSH4paqnHxQEJ5R3ct0Ce09
Fast2test는 여러분의 시간을 절약해드릴 뿐만 아니라 여러분들이 안심하고 응시하여 순조로이 패스할수 있도록 도와주는 사이트입니다. Fast2test는 믿을 수 있는 사이트입니다. IT업계에서는 이미 많이 알려 져있습니다. 그리고 여러분에 신뢰를 드리기 위하여Salesforce Plat-Arch-204관련자료의 일부분 문제와 답 등 샘플을 무료로 다운받아 체험해볼 수 있게 제공합니다. 아주 만족할 것이라고 믿습니다. 우리는Fast2test제품에 대하여 아주 자신이 있습니다. 우리Salesforce Plat-Arch-204도 여러분의 무용지물이 아닌 아주 중요한 자료가 되리라 믿습니다. 여러분께서는 아주 순조로이 시험을 패스하실 수 있을 것입니다. Fast2test선택은 틀림없을 것이며 여러분의 만족할만한 제품만을 제공할것입니다.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Build Solution | 23% | - Apply data transformation and mapping - Implement idempotency and reliability mechanisms - Implement API design and security - Build scalable and resilient integration solutions |
| Topic 2: Maintain Integration | 3% | - Manage updates and change impact - Monitor performance and health - Define reporting and alerting requirements |
| Topic 3: Translate Needs to Integration Requirements | 22% | - Determine performance requirements: volume, latency, response time - Create system and integration pattern inventory - Define security and authentication specifications - Evaluate system and process constraints |
| Topic 4: Design Integration Solutions | 28% | - Analyze trade-offs, limitations and constraints - Define solution components and architecture - Choose suitable Salesforce APIs and technologies - Select appropriate integration patterns - Design error handling, recovery and monitoring |
| Topic 5: Evaluate Business Needs | 8% | - Assess business growth impact on integration - Classify data by sensitivity and security level - Determine CRM success factors for integration - Identify functional and non-functional requirements |
| Topic 6: Evaluate the Current System Landscape | 16% | - Identify system standards, limitations, boundaries and protocols - Analyze constraints and pain points in existing systems - Evaluate authentication and authorization requirements - Identify regulatory and compliance factors |
Fast2test 안에는 아주 거대한IT업계엘리트들로 이루어진 그룹이 있습니다. 그들은 모두 관련업계예서 권위가 있는 전문가들이고 자기만의 지식과 지금까지의 경험으로 최고의 IT인증관련자료를 만들어냅니다. Fast2test의 Plat-Arch-204문제와 답은 정확도가 아주 높으며 한번에 패스할수 있는 100%로의 보장도를 자랑하며 그리고 또 일년무료 업데이트를 제공합니다.
질문 # 110
Salesforce is considered to be the system of record for the customer. UC plans on using middleware to integrate Salesforce with external systems (ERP, ticketing, data lake). UC has a requirement to update the proper external system with record changes in Salesforce and vice versa. Which solution should an integration architect recommend?
정답：A
설명：
In a multi-system landscape, maintaining data synchronization requires a robust Identity Mapping strategy. The standard Salesforce architectural recommendation is to use External ID fields to store the unique identifiers from each secondary system.
By storing the ERP ID, Ticketing ID, and Data Lake ID as External IDs in Salesforce, the middleware can perform upsert operations without needing to first query Salesforce for its internal ID. This reduces the number of API calls and simplifies the integration logic. Conversely, when Salesforce pushes a change to the ERP, it sends the stored ERP ID, allowing the ERP to instantly identify the correct target record.
Option B (Caching at the middleware) is a high-maintenance "anti-pattern" that introduces a new point of failure if the cache goes out of sync with the actual systems. Option C (Change Data Capture) is a mechanism for notifying systems of changes, but it does not solve the underlying identity mapping problem. Using External IDs creates a stable, searchable, and performant cross-reference that is the backbone of any successful "hub-and-spoke" integration architecture.
질문 # 111
Universal Containers (UC) works with third-party agents on banner initial design concepts. The design files (2.5 GB) are stored in an on-premise file store. UC wants to allow agencies to view these files in the community. Which solution should an integration architect recommend?
정답：B
설명：
When dealing with extremely large files, such as the 2.5 GB design files mentioned, an architect must consider the platform's file size limits and storage costs. Salesforce Files have a maximum upload size of 2 GB through most interfaces, making Option B technically unfeasible for a 2.5 GB file. Furthermore, storing numerous large files natively in Salesforce would lead to excessive storage consumption and costs.
The most efficient and cost-effective approach is Data Virtualization or Redirection. By creating a custom object to store the file location URL (Option C), the actual file remains in the performant on-premise file store. When the community user needs to access the design, they are redirected to the source system, which handles the massive data transfer. This fulfills the requirement to "view" the files without the overhead of moving gigabytes of data through the Salesforce infrastructure. Option A is less ideal because a 2.5 GB download over a standard Request-Reply pattern would likely lead to timeouts and a poor user experience.
질문 # 112
An integration architect needs to build a solution that will use the Streaming API, but the data loss should be minimized, even when the client re-connects every couple of days. Which two types of Streaming API events should be considered?
정답：A
설명：
In a robust event-driven architecture, "durability" is the ability of a system to retain events so that a subscriber can retrieve them even after being offline. For an architect needing to minimize data loss over "every couple of days," the selection must focus on event types that support a high retention window.
Salesforce provides two modern event types specifically designed for high-scale, durable messaging:
Change Data Capture (CDC): This automatically broadcasts changes to Salesforce records (Create, Update, Delete, Undelete). CDC events are highly durable and are retained in the event bus for 72 hours (3 days).
High-Volume Platform Events: These are custom events defined by the architect. Like CDC, High-Volume Platform Events also provide a 72-hour retention window.
Earlier versions of the Streaming API, such as PushTopic Events and Generic Events (Option C and parts of A), typically offered a 24-hour retention window, which would not satisfy the requirement of a client re-connecting "every couple of days" (potentially 48-72 hours later).
By utilizing CDC and High-Volume Platform Events, the architect can leverage the Replay ID. When the client re-connects, it can send the Replay ID of the last event it successfully processed. Salesforce then "replays" all events that occurred during the client's downtime from that specific point, up to the 72-hour limit. This mechanism ensures zero data loss for planned or unplanned outages lasting up to three days, making it the most resilient choice for the specified requirements.
질문 # 113
Northern Trail Outfitters has a registration system that is used for workshops offered at its conferences. Attendees use Salesforce Community to register for workshops, but the scheduling system manages workshop availability based on room capacity. It is expected that there will be a big surge of requests for workshop reservations when the conference schedule goes live. Which Integration pattern should be used to manage the influx in registrations?
정답：C
설명：
When dealing with a "big surge" or high-volume influx of requests, a synchronous pattern like Request and Reply (Option A) can lead to significant performance bottlenecks. In a synchronous model, each Salesforce user thread must wait for the external scheduling system to respond, which could lead to "Concurrent Request Limit" errors during peak times.
The Remote Process Invocation-Fire and Forget pattern is the architecturally sound choice for managing surges. In this pattern, Salesforce captures the registration intent and immediately hands it off to an asynchronous process or a middleware queue. Salesforce does not wait for the external system to process the room capacity logic; instead, it receives a simple acknowledgment that the message was received.23 This pattern decouples the front-end user experience from the back-end processing limits. Middleware can then "drip-feed" these registration4s into the scheduling system at a rate it can handl5e. If the scheduling system becomes overwhelmed or goes offline, the messages remain safely in the queue. Option C (Batch) is unsuitable because users expect near real-time feedback on their registration attempt, even if the final confirmation is sent a few minutes later. By utilizing Fire and Forget, NTO ensures a responsive Community Experience during the critical launch window while maintaining system stability.
질문 # 114
Universal Containers (UC) is currently managing a custom monolithic web service that runs on an on-premise server. This monolithic web service is responsible for Point-to-Point (P2P) integrations between Salesforce and a legacy billing application, a cloud-based ERP, and a data lake. UC has found that the tight interdependencies are causing failures. What should an integration architect recommend to decouple the systems and improve performance?
정답：A
설명：
The primary architectural flaw in UC's current landscape is the reliance on a monolithic P2P integration layer. In such designs, any failure in one integration thread or a surge in volume for one system can monopolize resources (CPU, memory, threads), causing the entire service-and thus all other integrations-to fail. This lack of isolation leads to the "tight interdependencies" described.
To effectively decouple these systems, the architect should recommend a Microservices Architecture. By breaking the monolithic service into smaller, independent, and modular components, each integration (Billing, ERP, Data Lake) becomes its own isolated service. This approach provides several key architectural benefits:
Isolation of Failure: If the connection to the legacy billing application fails or times out, it no longer impacts the ERP or Data Lake integrations.
Independent Scalability: If the Data Lake integration requires high throughput, that specific microservice can be scaled horizontally without wasting resources on the others.
Technology Agility: Each microservice can be updated or patched independently, allowing for faster maintenance cycles.
Furthermore, moving a "monolithic" service to the cloud (Option B) is simply a "lift and shift" that preserves the underlying fragility. While the Bulk API (Option A) is excellent for high-volume data loading, it does not solve the fundamental problem of system interdependency and orchestration failure. Transitioning to a modular, service-oriented design allows UC to implement modern integration patterns, such as asynchronous queuing between the microservices, which significantly improves the overall resilience and performance of the Salesforce-to-back-office landscape.
질문 # 115
......
Salesforce인증Plat-Arch-204시험은 국제적으로 승인해주는 IT인증시험의 한과목입니다. 근 몇년간 IT인사들에게 최고의 인기를 누리고 있는 과목으로서 그 난이도 또한 높습니다. 자격증을 취득하여 직장에서 혹은 IT업계에서 자시만의 위치를 찾으련다면 자격증 취득이 필수입니다. Salesforce인증Plat-Arch-204시험을 패스하고 싶은 분들은Fast2test제품으로 가보세요.
Plat-Arch-204유효한 시험덤프: https://kr.fast2test.com/Plat-Arch-204-premium-file.html
그리고 Fast2test Plat-Arch-204 시험 문제집의 전체 버전을 클라우드 저장소에서 다운로드할 수 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=18-Gk8qERbXSH4paqnHxQEJ5R3ct0Ce09