BONUS!!! Download part of PDFDumps OGEA-103 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TPZe99g4WrYLkMl-6ZTXoE-k2nkLGqDf
If you want to maintain your job or get a better job for making a living for your family, it is urgent for you to try your best to get the OGEA-103 certification. We are glad to help you get the certification with our best OGEA-103 study materials successfully. Our company has done the research of the study material for several years, and the experts and professors from our company have created the famous OGEA-103 learning prep for all customers.
| Certification Vendor: | The Open Group |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam |
| Exam Number: | OGEA-103 |
| Available Languages: | Japanese, English, Chinese (Simplified) |
| Real Exam Qty: | 48 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice (Part 1), Scenario-based (Part 2) |
| Related Certifications: | TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Foundation TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Practitioner |
| Exam Duration: | 150 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Lifetime |
| Exam Price: | USD 550 |
| Passing Score: | 60% (Part 1) and 60% (Part 2) |
| Sample Questions: | The Open Group OGEA-103 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Pearson VUE testing centers or Online Proctored |
| Pre Condition: | None |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.opengroup.org/certifications/togaf-certification-portfolio |
A free demo of any The Open Group OGEA-103 exam dumps format will be provided by PDFDumps to the one who wants to assess before purchasing. The desktop Customer Experience OGEA-103 Practice Exam software is compatible with windows based computers. There is a 24/7 customer support team of PDFDumps always to fix any problems.
The TOGAF framework is a globally recognized standard for enterprise architecture design and development. The Open Group, a leading technology standards organization, developed the framework to provide a common language, methodology, and tools for enterprise architecture development. The OGEA-103 Exam is based on the TOGAF 9.2 standard, which is the latest version of the framework.
NEW QUESTION # 101
Consider the following statement.
According to the TOGAF standard, a governed approach of a particular deliverable will ensure adherence to the principles, standards, and requirements of the existing or developing architectures.
Which deliverable does this refer to?
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to the TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, an architecture contract is "a formal agreement between a service provider and a service consumer that defines the mutual commitments and expectations for the delivery of an architecture" 1. An architecture contract is a governed approach of aparticular deliverable that will ensure adherence to the principles, standards, and requirements of the existing or developing architectures, as it specifies the roles, responsibilities, deliverables, quality criteria, and acceptance criteria for the architecture work 1. The other options are not correct, as they are not governed approaches of a particular deliverable, but rather different types of deliverables within the architecture development process. An architecture vision is "a high-level, aspirational view of the target architecture" 1. A statement of architecture work is "a document that defines the scope and approach that will be used to complete an architecture project"
1. An architecture definition document is "a document that describes the baseline and target architectures for one or more domains" 1. References: 1: TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, Part I: Introduction, Chapter 3:
Definitions.
NEW QUESTION # 102
This deliverable is most often produced as an output of the Preliminary Phase. It can also be created because of an approved architecture change request.
What is this deliverable?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation from Expert in Enterprise Architecture, guiding in TOGAF and ArchiMate:
The Statement of Architecture Work is a key governance and control document in TOGAF. It defines:
Scope of the architecture work
Constraints and assumptions
Deliverables and milestones
Roles, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria
Governance and approval mechanisms
Why Option C is correct:
The Statement of Architecture Work is most commonly produced in the Preliminary Phase to formally define how architecture work will be conducted once the Architecture Capability is established.
It may also be re-created or updated following an approved Architecture Change Request, ensuring controlled continuation or re-initiation of architecture activities.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A . Architecture Vision: This is produced in Phase A, not the Preliminary Phase.
B . Requirements Impact Assessment: This is associated with change management and requirements handling, not a standard Preliminary Phase output.
D . Request for Architecture Work: This is typically an input to Phase A, not a primary output of the Preliminary Phase.
Authoritative TOGAF
Reference:
TOGAF Architecture Capability Framework
TOGAF ADM - Preliminary Phase
TOGAF Architecture Governance
NEW QUESTION # 103
Exhibit
Consider the illustration showing an architecture development cycle Which description matches the phase of the ADM labeled as item 2?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Based on the illustration, the phase of the ADM labeled as item 2 is the Implementation Governance phase.
This phase provides architectural oversight for the implementation. It ensures that the implementation project conforms to the architecture. It also provides a framework for monitoring and managing the implementation.
The Implementation Governance phase involves the following activities:
* Finalizing the Architecture Roadmap and the supporting Implementation and Migration Plan
* Assigning an Architecture Board to oversee the implementation
* Establishing Architecture Contracts with the implementation partners
* Reviewing and approving the implementation project plans and deliverables
* Performing Architecture Compliance reviews to ensure alignment with the architecture
* Performing Architecture Audit reviews to ensure quality and performance of the architecture
* Resolving any architecture issues or change requests that arise during the implementation
* Maintaining the architecture lifecycle and ensuring its continuity
The Implementation Governance phase is essential for ensuring that the architecture is realized as intended and that it delivers the expected business value and outcomes.
References: : Implementation Governance
NEW QUESTION # 104
Consider the following ADM phases objectives.
Which phase does each objective match?
Answer: D
Explanation:
1E: To identify delivery vehicles (projects programs portfolios) that will deliver the Target Architecture 2F: To confirm readiness and ability to undergo change 3E: To determine whether an incremental approach is required and if so identify Transition Architectures that will deliver continuous business value 4G: To perform appropriate governance functions while the solution is being implemented
NEW QUESTION # 105
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect within a clinical research and health technologies company. The company is dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and advancements. The company has multiple divisions that cover different aspects of the business.
The company ' s Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF standard.
In addition to the EA program, the company has a number of management
frameworks in use. The Architecture Board includes representatives from each division of the company. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as the preferred approach for projects.
Many of the company ' s rivals have begun using Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and the indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA department has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request which was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to investigate the implementation of Al in the company.
Areas for evaluation include:
How can staff use Al daily in their current roles?
How can Al enhance access to care for patients, and how to make that experience seamless?
How can Al offer new workplace platforms and tools to increase efficiency?
Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve the goals. Many are not confident that the company ' s risk management processes are adequate for a company-wide integration of generative Al. There are also questions from staff about whether enough specific guidelines and polices have been put in place for responsible use of Al.
Refer to the scenario
You have been assigned to the architecture development and asked how to address the concerns and manage risk for the project. How do you begin?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In this scenario you are right at the start of an ADM cycle: a Request for Architecture Work has been approved to investigate AI, and there are strong stakeholder concerns and risk questions. According to the TOGAF standard, the correct place to start is Phase A: Architecture Vision, with a strong focus on stakeholder management and capturing their concerns and required views.
Option A is the only answer that correctly reflects this:
Stakeholder analysis & Stakeholder Map (Phase A core task)TOGAF explicitly states that in Phase A you must:
Identify stakeholders
Analyze and group them by common concerns
Use a Stakeholder Map to understand their influence, interest, and required engagement Determine which views/viewpoints are needed to address their concerns in the architecture description coe.
qualiware.com+1
Option A says:
"analysis of the stakeholders ... define groups of stakeholders who have common concerns and include development of a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document." This is exactly how TOGAF describes stakeholder management and views in Phase A:
Stakeholder Map to classify and prioritize stakeholders
Concerns and required views captured and traced
These elements feeding into the Architecture Vision deliverable Visual Paradigm TOGAF+1 Concerns, views, and Architecture VisionTOGAF emphasizes that architecture views are constructed to address specific stakeholder concerns; you do not just build generic models. opengroup.org+1 Option A explicitly links concerns # views # Architecture Vision, which aligns with TOGAF guidance for early phases.
Capturing this in the Architecture Vision provides a high-level, shared understanding of what the AI initiative is trying to achieve and how stakeholder issues (e.g., responsible AI, risk processes, change in way of working) will be addressed.
Risk management and "architecting with agility"In the scenario, the CIO has encouraged architecting with agility. TOGAF is compatible with incremental and iterative development of the target architecture, especially when there is high uncertainty and risk. conexiam.com Option A includes:
"a requirement that there be progressive development of the target architecture to ensure there is regular feedback." This "progressive development" and frequent feedback loop is exactly how you mitigate risk in an AI-heavy, change-sensitive initiative:
Frequent stakeholder feedback
Early validation of assumptions
Ability to adjust scope, constraints, and principles as risk and understanding evolve This directly addresses management's worry about the change in the way of working and whether risk management and responsible AI policies are adequate: these become explicit stakeholder concerns and requirements that are iteratively refined.
Why the other options are weaker / not TOGAF-aligned as a starting point Option B Focuses mainly on a Communications Plan and powerful stakeholders.
While TOGAF does expect a stakeholder communications plan, it is derived from a proper stakeholder analysis and Stakeholder Map, not a substitute for it.
It also treats risk as a "component of the architecture" rather than something to be addressed early through stakeholder concerns, principles, and iteration.
Option C
Jumps straight to a solution concept diagram and benefits diagram and defers risk evaluation to when the Architecture Roadmap is defined (Phase E).
In TOGAF, risk and stakeholder concerns must be addressed already in Phase A and refined throughout, not postponed to roadmap development.
Option D
Proposes creating draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology models and putting them into the Architecture Vision.
This is too detailed for the starting point: Phase A is about high-level vision, not full draft core architecture models (those belong in Phases B, C, D).
It also doesn't emphasize Stakeholder Mapping and grouping by concerns, which is central to resolving the worries about way of working, risk, and responsible AI.
In summary, Option A is the best and TOGAF-consistent way to begin:
Start in Phase A: Architecture Vision
Perform stakeholder analysis and create a Stakeholder Map
Define stakeholder concerns and relevant views
Record them in the Architecture Vision
Add an explicit requirement for progressive (iterative) development of the target architecture for continuous feedback and risk mitigation
NEW QUESTION # 106
......
Test OGEA-103 Result: https://www.pdfdumps.com/OGEA-103-valid-exam.html
2026 Latest PDFDumps OGEA-103 PDF Dumps and OGEA-103 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TPZe99g4WrYLkMl-6ZTXoE-k2nkLGqDf