What's more, part of that Actual4test VNX301 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vdm5ZINQSpWId7U2LKP8bHZBiYEA4ywE
Versa Networks Certification evolves swiftly, and a practice test may become obsolete within weeks of its publication. We provide free updates for Versa Networks VNX301 Exam Questions for three months after the purchase to ensure you are studying the most recent Versa Networks solutions. Furthermore, Actual4test is a very responsible and trustworthy platform dedicated to certifying you as a specialist.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
>> Reliable VNX301 Exam Blueprint <<
Versa Networks VNX301 certified examinations questions are collected and edited by latest exam teaching program and real test questions materials. We are engaged in updating our training materials constantly. If you are afraid that once you purchase our current version of VNX301 Certified examinations questions, then there is new update version, current version will be out, please rest assured that you can download free our latest version one we release new version within one year.
NEW QUESTION # 59
Examine the exhibit below.
An SD-WAN administrator has configured Direct Internet Access (DIA) for INET and INET-2 and wants to use SaaS Application Monitoring and SD-WAN policies to steer certain applications to the best Internet path on a certain VOS device.
Which two statements are true regarding the configuration shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
The correct answers are B and D . In the exhibit, the Next-Hop Selection Method is configured as Load Balance , and both INET and INET-2 have the same next-hop priority value of 1 . Versa SD-WAN guidance states that load balancing between WAN paths is achieved by configuring at least two circuits with equal priority. Therefore, when both INET and INET-2 satisfy the SLA requirements, sessions can be load-balanced across those two internet circuits.
Option D is also correct because the exhibit shows SLA Violation Action: Forward . This means that if no next hop is SLA-compliant, the VOS device is still allowed to forward traffic instead of dropping it. This behavior is consistent with Versa SD-WAN traffic-steering concepts, where forwarding profiles define circuit or path priorities, connection methods, load-balancing behavior, and SLA handling for traffic that matches an SD-WAN policy.
Option A is incorrect because the exhibit does not use the Automatic next-hop selection method. Versa' s performance-based SaaS optimization uses monitoring metrics to select the best path when configured for automatic/performance-based selection, but this exhibit shows Load Balance instead. Option C is not the best answer because LTE has lower priority 2 and would be considered only after the higher- priority INET and INET-2 paths are unavailable or unusable, not merely when one INET circuit fails.
NEW QUESTION # 60
A tenant has two internet circuits and one LTE backup circuit. The forwarding profile lists the internet circuits with priority 1 and LTE with priority 2. The next-hop selection method is Load Balance. What is the expected behavior while both internet circuits are healthy?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . In Versa SD-WAN forwarding profiles, next-hop priorities define which circuits are preferred. When the Load Balance next-hop selection method is used and two circuits share the same priority, sessions can be distributed across those equal-priority paths as long as they are usable and SLA- compliant. A lower priority number represents a more preferred group than a higher priority number.
Therefore, two circuits with priority 1 are preferred over LTE with priority 2 .
In this scenario, both internet circuits are healthy and both have priority 1. The VOS device should load- balance sessions across those two circuits. LTE remains available as a lower-priority backup path and would normally be considered only when the preferred internet circuits are unavailable, fail path checks, or no longer meet the applicable policy conditions.
Traffic is not replicated because replication is a separate feature and not implied by Load Balance. The branch does not drop traffic while valid paths exist. LTE is not preferred merely because its priority number is higher; in path selection, priority 1 is preferred over priority 2.
NEW QUESTION # 61
Examine the exhibit below.
You are onboarding the SOLDEU-R2 branch device using the staging script. You cannot get a Versa- Provider-Controller-VR IP address assigned, indicating that the IPsec tunnel to the corrector has not come up.
You verified that the cables have been connected to the correct ports.
What has caused this issue?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The issue is caused by specifying the incorrect WAN port in the staging script. In the exhibit, the SOLDEU- R2 branch is physically connected to the Internet cloud through vni-0/0 , while vni-0/1 is shown as the inter- device link toward SOLDEU-R1. However, the show interfaces brief output shows that the WAN IP address
192.168.122.121/24 has been assigned to vni-0/1.0 , not to the Internet-facing interface. Since the cables are confirmed to be connected correctly, the mismatch must be in the staging script interface selection, not in the cabling.
Versa documentation states that during SD-WAN staging, the branch establishes an IKE session with the Controller, and after that the Controller assigns an IP address to the branch device. Versa troubleshooting guidance also states that after transport connectivity to the Controller is established, the branch forms IKE-based IPsec connectivity, and if this succeeds, the ptvi interface toward the Controller comes up. If IKE/IPsec fails, the ptvi interface remains down. Because the staged WAN IP is placed on the wrong VNI interface, the branch cannot reach the Controller over the intended Internet transport, so the Controller tunnel does not come up.
NEW QUESTION # 62
Examine the exhibit below.
You are configuring an IPsec tunnel towards a non-SD-WAN site over the INETTransport-VR. The site IP address is 10.1.1.1. This tunnel is for traffic between the 192.168.100.0/24 and the 192.168.200.0/24 LAN networks. The tunnel does not establish.
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . The exhibit shows that the IPsec VPN is being configured with Tunnel Routing Instance: XIAN-Control-VR . However, the question states that the tunnel is toward a non-SD-WAN site over the INET-Transport-VR . For a site-to-site IPsec tunnel, the tunnel routing instance must match the routing instance used to reach the peer public IP address. In this case, the remote non-SD-WAN peer is
10.1.1.1 , and the intended underlay transport is INET-Transport-VR , not the Control VR.
Versa troubleshooting documentation explains that routing instances are used to define where traffic is sourced and forwarded. For example, configuration examples select routing instances when enabling services or initiating tests, and traffic must use the correct WAN or transport routing instance to reach the remote endpoint. Versa branch troubleshooting also emphasizes that after transport connectivity is available, the branch establishes IKE-based IPsec connectivity; if that connectivity fails, the IPsec-related interface remains down.
Changing the routing instance to global would not be correct because the intended path is specifically INET-Transport-VR. A higher precedence value is not required to establish the tunnel. The policy selector shown already defines local-to-remote interesting traffic, and the key failure is the incorrect tunnel routing instance.
NEW QUESTION # 63
In an HA active-active deployment, one device has two WAN networks, INET-1 and MPLS-1 , and its peer also has two WAN networks, INET-2 and MPLS-2 . In this scenario, how many subinterfaces will be created on the cross-connect link between the devices by an HA active-active workflow?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is D . In a Versa HA active-active branch deployment, the cross-connect link between the two CPE devices is used to extend WAN transport reachability between the peers. Versa SD-WAN design documentation explains that, in an HA active-active design, a cross-connect cable between the two devices extends one device's transport VR to the other device and vice versa. For example, the documentation describes the cross-connect as extending the MPLS-Transport-VR to one device and the Internet- Transport-VR to the peer device.
In the question, there are four total WAN networks across the HA pair: INET-1 , MPLS-1 , INET-2 , and MPLS-2 . The HA active-active workflow must create separate logical subinterfaces on the cross-connect link for each WAN network so that each transport segment can be extended and kept logically separated across the two appliances. Therefore, the number of subinterfaces created on the cross-connect link equals the total number of WAN networks across the HA pair, which is four .
Options A, B, and C are incorrect because they undercount the number of required transport extensions. Two subinterfaces would only account for two WAN networks, but this design has four separate WAN transport networks.
NEW QUESTION # 64
......
Nowadays, all of us are living a fast-paced life and we have to deal with things with high-efficience. We also develope our VNX301 practice materials to be more convenient and easy for our customers to apply and use. The most advanced operation system in our VNX301 Exam Questions which can assure you the fastest delivery speed, and your personal information will be encrypted automatically by our operation system. Within several minutes, you will receive our VNX301 study guide!
VNX301 Question Explanations: https://www.actual4test.com/VNX301_examcollection.html
2026 Latest Actual4test VNX301 PDF Dumps and VNX301 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vdm5ZINQSpWId7U2LKP8bHZBiYEA4ywE