Fortinet NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0인증시험은 전문적인 관련지식을 테스트하는 인증시험입니다. KoreaDumps는 여러분이Fortinet NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0인증시험을 통과할 수 잇도록 도와주는 사이트입니다. 여러분은 응시 전 저희의 문제와 답만 잘 장악한다면 빠른 시일 내에 많은 성과 가 있을 것입니다.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Events, Forensics, and Threat Hunting | 25% | - Forensic analysis and incident investigation - Security event and alert analysis - Threat hunting data interpretation - Threat hunting profiles and queries |
| Topic 2: Monitoring and Troubleshooting | 10% | - System monitoring and health checks - Performance and issue diagnosis - Log and alert troubleshooting |
| Topic 3: FortiEDR System Architecture and Deployment | 25% | - Architecture and technical positioning - Multi-tenancy deployment - Inventory management and system tools - API-based management operations - Installation and deployment process |
| Topic 4: Integration and Security Fabric | 15% | - Fortinet Security Fabric integration - FortiXDR deployment and configuration |
| Topic 5: Security Settings and Policies | 25% | - Playbooks creation and management - Communication control policies - Security policies configuration - Fortinet Cloud Service (FCS) integration |
인터넷에는Fortinet인증 NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0시험대비공부자료가 헤아릴수 없을 정도로 많습니다.이렇게 많은Fortinet인증 NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0공부자료중 대부분 분들께서 저희KoreaDumps를 선택하는 이유는 덤프 업데이트가 다른 사이트보다 빠르다는 것이 제일 큰 이유가 아닐가 싶습니다. KoreaDumps의 Fortinet인증 NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0덤프를 구매하시면 덤프가 업데이트되면 무료로 업데이트된 버전을 제공받을수 있습니다.
질문 # 11
Refer to the Exhibit:
Based on the FortiEDR status output shown in the exhibit, what are two reasons for the degraded state?
(Choose two answers)
정답：C,D
설명：
The correct answers are B and C .
The exhibit shows:
FortiEDR Service: Up
FortiEDR Driver: Up
FortiEDR Status: Degraded (no configuration)
This means the local Collector service and driver are running, but the Collector has not received valid configuration. In FortiEDR, a Collector must register and communicate with the FortiEDR Aggregator to receive its configuration. The guide states that the Collector initially sends registration information to the FortiEDR Aggregator using SSL, sends ongoing health/status/security-event information, and receives its configuration from the Aggregator.
During installation, a non-customized Windows Collector requires the correct Aggregator address , Aggregator port 8081 , and registration password . The guide explicitly states that the Aggregator port should be specified as 8081 , and that the registration password must be entered during installation.
Therefore, an incorrect registration password or incorrect port number can prevent proper registration
/configuration retrieval, resulting in a degraded/no-configuration state.
Option A is not the best answer because Windows Firewall being enabled by itself does not automatically cause this FortiEDR status; only if it blocks required FortiEDR communication would it matter, and the option is too generic. Option D is also not correct as written because the Collector receives configuration from the Aggregator , not directly from the Central Manager. The guide describes Collector-to-Aggregator communication for registration and configuration.
=========
질문 # 12
Refer to the exhibit:
You are asked to block applications based on hash attributes. Which two factors must you consider when applying the hash value? (Choose two answers)
정답：C,D
설명：
The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide states that when manually adding applications to be blocked, you can define the application using Hash or using any combination of File Name / Path / Signer attributes. This means hashes can be used independently and do not require filename, path, or signer attributes.
The guide also states that each hash is a unique identifier of an individual application, and the exhibit itself shows the hash field note: "SHA-1 or SHA-2 or MD5." Therefore, the hash must use a supported hash format, making D correct.
For multiple hash entries, the uploaded guide text says they must be comma separated , while the exhibit note says "You can enter multiple hashes comma separated." So the technically exact guide wording supports comma separation, not line separation. However, given your answer choices, A is clearly trying to test the requirement that multiple hashes must be separated correctly. The option wording says "line- separated," which is not exact against the guide; the better wording would be comma-separated . Since no
"comma-separated" option is provided, A is the intended separation-related answer, but the wording is flawed.
Option B is definitely wrong because hash mode is an alternative to attributes. Option C is also not the best answer because, although each hash uniquely identifies a file/application variant, the operational requirement is not that "hashes must be unique to each application" in the way the option implies. Hashes may represent different variants of the same application.
질문 # 13
Refer to the exhibit.
Based on the threat hunting event details shown in the exhibit, which two statements about the event are true?
(Choose two answers)
정답：A,D
설명：
The correct answers are B and D .
The exhibit shows a Process Creation activity event where cmd.exe is the source process and PING.EXE is the target process. The displayed Executing user is R2D2-KVM63\fortinet, and the command line shows fortinet.com, which means the user fortinet executed a ping command targeting fortinet.com.
The FortiEDR guide explains that Threat Hunting activity events consist of a source , an action , and a target
. It also states that Process Actions have another process as the target and include process-related actions such as Process Creation .
The exhibit also shows file-related details for the executable, including the executable path, product, SHA1 hash, and command line. In FortiEDR Threat Hunting, process execution events are tied to executable-file metadata, so the event is associated with the executable file involved in the process action. This supports B in the exam's intended wording.
Option A is not reliable because the screenshot does not prove MITRE details are unavailable; it only shows that no MITRE detail is visible in the current portion of the details pane. The guide states that MITRE indications appear when an activity event has related MITRE information.
Option C is wrong because the screenshot shows the process status as Running and does not show a block indicator. A green check does not mean blocked; it indicates a trusted/signed/allowed status context. There is no evidence that PING.EXE was blocked.
질문 # 14
Refer to the exhibit.
What observation can you make about the ConnectivityTestAppNew.exe incident? (Choose one answer)
정답：D
설명：
The correct answer is B .
In the exhibit, the incident status clearly shows Unhandled at the incident level and also on the event rows.
The FortiEDR guide explains that every detected security event is initially marked as unread and unhandled
, and these statuses help multiple FortiEDR Central Manager users track whether anyone has read and handled the message.
The guide also states that when a FortiEDR Central Manager user marks a security event as Handled , all users see it as handled. The process is performed by selecting the event and clicking Handle Incident or the flag icon, then saving the incident handling details.
So the valid observation from the exhibit is that the incident has not been handled by a console administrator .
Option A is not supported by the exhibit. There is no visible evidence that the policy is in Simulation mode.
Option C is wrong because the incident is still visible, not archived or deleted. Option D is wrong because the status is explicitly Unhandled ; it was not handled automatically by a Communication Control policy.
=========
질문 # 15
Refer to the Exhibit:
Based on the event shown in the exhibit, which two statements about the event are true? (Choose two answers)
정답：B,D
설명：
The correct answers are A and B .
The exhibit shows the event classification as Malicious , classified by FortinetCloudServices , and the history states that device R2D2-kvm63 was moved from the Training Collector Group to the High Security Collector Group . This is a Playbook action. The FortiEDR guide explains that after classification changes, the Overview pane displays the history of automatic FortiEDR actions, including Playbook policy-related actions .
The guide specifically lists Move device to High Security Group under Investigation actions in Playbook policies. It states that a checkmark in a classification column means the device is automatically moved to the High Security Collector Group when a security event with that classification is triggered. So the exhibit proves that Playbooks are configured for this event.
The second correct answer is B because the triggered rule is under Training * Extended Detection . The FortiEDR guide states that the eXtended Detection Policy logs events and displays them in the Incidents tab, but no blocking options are provided for this policy.
Option C is wrong because moving a device to the High Security Collector Group is not the same as isolating the device. Isolation would block communication to/from the affected Collector. The exhibit shows a Collector Group move, not isolation.
Option D is wrong because Extended Detection does not block. The guide explicitly says Extended Detection events are logged and displayed, with no blocking options provided.
=========
질문 # 16
......
KoreaDumps에서 제공해드리는 IT인증시험대비 덤프를 사용해보신적이 있으신지요? 만약에 다른 과목을 사용해보신 분이라면 Fortinet NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0덤프도 바로 구매할것입니다. 첫번째 구매에서 패스하셨다면 덤프에 신뢰가 있을것이고 불합격받으셨다하더라도 바로 환불해드리는 약속을 지켜드렸기때문입니다. 처음으로 저희 사이트에 오신 분이라면Fortinet NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0덤프로 첫구매에 도전해보지 않으실래요? 저희 덤프로 쉬운 자격증 취득이 가능할것입니다.
NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0최고덤프: https://www.koreadumps.com/NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0_exam-braindumps.html