What's more, part of that GetValidTest 312-97 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PCTY0NIqUqX_JCYIHEtgY52OOcOPDLlH
GetValidTest is a website which can give much convenience and meet the needs and achieve dreams for many people participating 312-97 Certification exams. If you are still worrying about passing some ECCouncil certification exams, please choose GetValidTest to help you. GetValidTest can make you feel at ease, because we have a lot of ECCouncil certification exam related training materials with high quality, coverage of the outline and pertinence, too, which will bring you a lot of help. You won't regret to choose GetValidTest, it can help you build your dream career.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) Exam |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQ) |
| Exam Duration: | 240 minutes |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Related Certifications: | EC-Council DevSecOps Essentials (DSE) |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Passing Score: | 70% (may vary 60โ85% depending on exam version) |
| Recommended Training: | EC-Council DevSecOps Essentials (DSE) EC-Council DevSecOps Engineer Training (E|CDE) |
| Exam Registration: | Pearson VUE EC-Council Exams EC-Council ECDE Official Page |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored exam via EC-Council Exam Portal / Pearson VUE |
| Pre Condition: | Basic understanding of application security concepts; enrollment in EC-Council DevSecOps training recommended |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/train-certify/certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde/ |
We are committed to providing our customers with the most up-to-date and accurate EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) preparation material. That's why we offer free demos and up to 1 year of free ECCouncil Dumps updates if the 312-97 certification exam content changes after purchasing our product. With these offers, our customers can be assured that they have the latest and most reliable prepare for your EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) preparation material.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 91
Emma, a DevSecOps engineer, is responsible for maintaining the security and stability of her organization's Jenkins environment. She is concerned that running build jobs directly on the Jenkins controller could expose the system to security risks, such as potential execution of untrusted or malicious build scripts on the controller, increased risk of system instability due to resource-intensive build jobs, unauthorized users modifying job configurations and running harmful commands. To mitigate these risks, Emma needs a solution that isolates build execution from the Jenkins controller while maintaining operational efficiency. Which approach should Emma implement to improve the security of the Jenkins infrastructure?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Running builds on Jenkins agents instead of the controller isolates build execution: untrusted build scripts never run on the controller, resource-intensive jobs don't destabilize it, and the attack surface on the controller is minimized-directly addressing Emma's concerns while keeping operations efficient. Sandboxing on the controller still executes code on it, and disabling all scripting is impractical.
NEW QUESTION # 92
(Terry Diab has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company that develops software products and web applications for a call center. She would like to integrate Snyk with AWS CodeCommit to monitor and remediate vulnerabilities in the code repository. Terry pushed code to AWS CodeCommit; this triggered Amazon EventBridge Rule, which then triggered AWS CodePipeline. AWS CodePipeline passed code to Snyk CLI run. Who among the following interacts with Snyk CLI and sends the results to Snyk UI?)
Answer: A
Explanation:
In an AWS CI/CD architecture, AWS CodePipeline acts as an orchestration service that coordinates different stages but does not execute build or scan commands itself. AWS CodeBuild is the service responsible for running commands such as compiling code, executing tests, and running third-party security tools like the Snyk CLI. In Terry's workflow, CodeCommit stores the source code, EventBridge triggers the pipeline, and CodePipeline passes the source to CodeBuild. CodeBuild then executes the Snyk CLI, performs vulnerability scanning, and sends the scan results to the Snyk UI using the configured authentication token. AWS CodeDeploy is focused on application deployment and does not interact with Snyk CLI. Therefore, AWS CodeBuild is the component that interacts with Snyk CLI and communicates results back to the Snyk platform. This integration ensures that dependency vulnerabilities are detected early in the Build and Test stage.
========
NEW QUESTION # 93
(Gabriel Bateman has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company that develops virtual classroom software for online teaching. He would like to clone the BDD security framework on his local machine using the following URL,https://github.com/continuumsecurity/bdd-security.git. Which of the following command should Gabriel use to clone the BBD security framework?)
Answer: D
Explanation:
To clone a repository from GitHub, the correct command is git clone followed by the accurate repository URL. The organization name continuumsecurity and repository name bdd-security must be spelled correctly for the command to succeed. Options using github clone are invalid because github is not a standard Git command-line utility. Options with misspelled organization names will result in errors. Cloning security testing frameworks during the Code stage enables DevSecOps engineers to evaluate, customize, and integrate security automation tools into development workflows, supporting secure application development and testing practices.
NEW QUESTION # 94
SinCaire is a software development company that develops web applications for various clients.
To measure the successful implementation of DevSecOps, the organization enforced U.S.
General Service Administrator (GSA) high-value DevSecOps metrics. Which of the following metrics implemented by SinCaire can measure the time between the code commit and production, and tracks the bug fix and new features throughout the development, testing, and production phases?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Change lead time measures the duration between a code commit and its successful deployment into production. This metric tracks how efficiently new features, bug fixes, and changes move through development, testing, and release stages. It is a key DevSecOps performance indicator used to assess pipeline efficiency and the effectiveness of automation and security integration.
Mean time to recovery focuses on restoring service after incidents, change volume measures the number of changes rather than delivery speed, and time to value is a broader business metric.
Change lead time directly reflects how well DevSecOps practices enable rapid yet secure delivery, making it the correct metric for measuring commit-to-production flow across all phases.
NEW QUESTION # 95
Kenji Watanabe, a DevSecOps engineer at a Tokyo gaming studio, needs a testing tool that combines code instrumentation with live traffic analysis, so it can pinpoint the exact line of vulnerable code triggered when a QA tester clicks through the application during functional testing. Which approach should Kenji choose?
Answer: C
Explanation:
IAST works by instrumenting the application with agents that monitor code execution from within while the application is exercised through normal functional or QA testing, allowing it to correlate detected vulnerabilities directly back to specific lines of source code in real time -- precisely what Kenji needs. Penetration testing is typically a manual or semi-manual black-box/gray-box assessment performed by security testers simulating real-world attacks, and does not inherently tie findings to exact source lines through instrumentation during routine QA clicks. Threat modeling is a design-time planning activity performed before code execution. Chaos engineering intentionally injects failures into production or production-like systems to test resilience, not to detect code-level vulnerabilities during functional testing. Because Kenji wants instrumented, line- level detection during live QA interaction, IAST is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 96
......
312-97 Useful Dumps: https://www.getvalidtest.com/312-97-exam.html
P.S. Free 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by GetValidTest: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PCTY0NIqUqX_JCYIHEtgY52OOcOPDLlH