Microsoft인증 AZ-802덤프로Microsoft시험을 패스,하지 못하셨다구요? 최선을 다했는데도 실패하였다는 말은 영원히 하지마세요. Microsoft인증 AZ-802시험을 패스하는 방법은 많고도 많습니다. Fast2test의Microsoft인증 AZ-802덤프로 시험에 다시 도전해보세요. Fast2test의Microsoft인증 AZ-802덤프는 착한 가격에 100%에 달하는 적중율과 패스율을 보장해드립니다. 시험에서 불합격성적표를 받으시면 덤프구매시 지불한 덤프비용을 환불처리해드립니다. Fast2test의Microsoft인증 AZ-802덤프로 시험패스를 꿈꿔보세요.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Implement and manage high availability | - Load balancing and redundancy
|
| Secure Windows Server hybrid infrastructures | - Security configuration
|
| Disaster recovery and migration | - Migration scenarios
|
| Manage hybrid compute and virtualization | - Virtual machines
|
| Monitoring and troubleshooting | - System monitoring
|
| Networking and storage infrastructure | - Storage management
|
Fast2test 에서 제공해드리는 Microsoft AZ-802덤프는 아주 우수한 IT인증덤프자료 사이트입니다. IT업계엘리트한 강사들이 퍼펙트한 Microsoft AZ-802 덤프문제집을 제작하여 디테일한 시험문제와 답으로 여러분이 아주 간단히Microsoft AZ-802시험을 패스할 수 있도록 최선을 다하고 있습니다.
질문 # 536
You have a server that runs Windows Server 2025 Standard and has the Hyper-V role installed. You need to upgrade the server to Windows Server 2025 Datacenter. The solution must minimize downtime. What should you run?
정답：D
설명：
Windows Server lets you change a server ' s edition in place using DISM with the /Set-Edition (or /Online
/Set-Edition) option and a valid edition key, which upgrades Standard to Datacenter without requiring a full reinstall and needs only a single restart to complete, minimizing downtime for the Hyper-V host and preserving its running virtual machines and configuration. Setup.exe would perform a full in-place OS upgrade rather than an edition change, which is unnecessary and far more disruptive when the OS version itself is not changing, slmgr.vbs manages license activation rather than edition conversion, and convert.exe is unrelated (it converts file systems). DISM is Microsoft ' s documented tool for this specific Standard-to- Datacenter edition upgrade scenario, and running DISM /Online /Set-Edition:ServerDatacenter /ProductKey:
< key > /AcceptEula is the documented command sequence for completing it with a single reboot. After the reboot, the server retains its existing roles, features, and settings, including the Hyper-V role and any virtual machines already configured, since an edition change preserves the installation rather than replacing it.
질문 # 537
You deploy Azure Migrate to an on-premises network. You have an on-premises physical server named Server1 that runs Windows Server and has the following configuration: Operating system disk 600 GB, Data disk 3 TB, NIC Teaming: Enabled, Mobility service: installed, Windows Firewall: Enabled, Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Enabled. You need to ensure that you can use Azure Migrate to migrate Server1.
Solution: You disable NIC Teaming on Server1. Does this meet the goal?
정답：A
설명：
The Azure Migrate physical server migration support matrix explicitly lists teamed network interface cards as an unsupported source-machine configuration for agent-based, Mobility-service physical server migration, and Server1 ' s configuration table shows NIC Teaming as Enabled, which is precisely the condition the support matrix flags as a blocker. Disabling NIC teaming on Server1 directly removes that one unsupported configuration item, which is the actual root cause preventing the migration from proceeding, and doing so allows the Mobility service already installed on Server1 to establish the network connectivity Azure Migrate needs without the teaming configuration interfering. Reviewing the rest of Server1 ' s configuration confirms that the operating system disk size, the data disk size, the Windows Firewall state, and the Microsoft Defender Antivirus state are all already within Azure Migrate ' s supported limits and were never the actual blocking factor in the first place, so no additional remediation beyond disabling NIC teaming is required. Because this solution directly addresses the one configuration item the support matrix actually flags as unsupported, disabling NIC Teaming on Server1 does meet the stated goal.
질문 # 538
You have a user named User1 and the resources shown in the following table. User1 has a computer named Computer1 that runs Windows 11. User1 works from home and establishes a Point-to-Site (P2S) connection to GW1 to access AppSvr1. You deploy the resources shown in the following table. User1 cannot access AppSvr2. You need to ensure that User1 can access AppSvr2. What should you do? (Exhibits: resource tables for VNet1/AppSvr1/GW1 and the peered VNet2/AppSvr2.)
VNet1, AppSvr1, and GW1
VNet2 (peered) and AppSvr2
정답：A
설명：
A point-to-site VPN client profile embeds the address-space routes that existed in Azure at the moment the profile was generated and downloaded onto Computer1. When VNet2, hosting AppSvr2, is peered with VNet1 after User1 ' s VPN client profile was already configured and downloaded, the previously issued profile has no route entry for VNet2 ' s address space baked into it, so traffic aimed at AppSvr2 never gets forwarded across the existing tunnel even though the VNet peering itself is fully established and healthy on the Azure side. Microsoft ' s documented point-to-site troubleshooting guidance for exactly this symptom is to, if needed, reset the gateway and then download and reinstall the VPN client on the affected computer so it picks up a refreshed profile that includes routes for the newly peered network, which restores connectivity to AppSvr2 without requiring any changes to the peering configuration itself, to network security groups, or to Computer1 ' s local Windows Defender Firewall settings. Creating a route table on GatewaySubnet or adding a service endpoint to VNet2 would not address a client-side profile that is simply missing the newly peered address space, since the routing problem in this case lives in the already-downloaded client configuration rather than in Azure ' s own routing tables.
질문 # 539
Your network contains an on-premises Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain. The domain contains the servers shown in the following table.
For each server. Windows Defender Firewall is configured to allow only communication between servers on the same segment. Server! has the following connection security rule:
* Name: Rule1
* Rule type: Isolation
* Requirement: Require authentication for inbound connections and request authentication for outbound connections
* Authentication method: Computer (Kerberos V5)
* Profile: Domain. Private. Public
Server2 does not have any connection security rules.
Server3 has the following connection security rule:
* Name: Rute3
* Rule type: Server-to-server
* Endpoints:
o Computers in Endpoint 1:192.168.50/24
o Computers in Endpoint 2: 192.168.1.0/24
* Requirement Request authentication (or inbound and outbound connections
* Authentication method: Computer (Kerberos V5)
* Profile: Domain. Private. Public
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Exhibit
정답：
설명：
Explanation:
A connection security rule only adds an authentication (IPsec) requirement to traffic that a firewall rule already permits; it does not, by itself, open or expand what a firewall rule allows. Because each server ' s Windows Defender Firewall is configured to allow communication only between servers on the same network segment, Server1 and Server2 (both on 192.168.1.0/24) are already permitted to communicate, so Server1 ' s Isolation rule, which only requests (not requires) outbound authentication, does not block that traffic even without a matching rule on Server2. Server3 sits on a different segment (192.168.5.0/24) from both Server1 and Server2, and because the firewall ' s same-segment scope restriction governs whether traffic is allowed at all, neither Server2 ' s attempt to reach Server3 nor Server3 ' s attempt to reach Server1 succeeds, regardless of the Server-to-server connection security rule configured on Server3, since that rule can only add authentication to already-permitted traffic and cannot bypass the firewall ' s segment-based scope restriction.
질문 # 540
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a failover cluster named Cluster1 that hosts an application named App1. The General tab in App1 Properties is shown in the General exhibit: Preferred Owners lists Server1 and Server2, both unchecked, with the Up/Down reordering controls disabled; Priority is Medium; the role is Running on Server2. The Failover tab in App1 Properties is shown in the Failover exhibit: Maximum failures in the specified period is 3, Period (hours) is 6, and Failback is currently set to " Allow failback " / " Immediately. " Server1 shuts down unexpectedly. You need to ensure that when you start Server1, App1 continues to run on Server2. Solution:
You increase Maximum failures in the specified period for the App1 cluster role. Does this meet the goal?
App1 Properties - General tab
App1 Properties - Failover tab
정답：A
설명：
The " Maximum failures in the specified period " setting on the Failover tab controls how many times the Cluster service will attempt to restart or move a clustered role within a rolling time window before giving up and leaving that role in a failed state -- it governs retry behavior after repeated failures of the role itself, not whether a role fails back to a node that has just come back online. The Failback setting shown on the same tab, currently " Allow failback " / " Immediately, " is the setting that actually controls return-to-preferred- owner behavior, and increasing the failure-count threshold does nothing to change that Failback configuration. Because App1 ' s Failback setting remains " Allow failback, " App1 would still automatically move back to Server1 as soon as Server1 restarts and a preferred owner order caused it to be favored, regardless of how high the maximum-failures threshold is set. Increasing this value therefore has no effect on preventing App1 from returning to Server1 once Server1 restarts, so this solution does not meet the goal.
질문 # 541
......
Microsoft인증AZ-802시험의자격증은 여러분에 많은 도움이 되리라 믿습니다. 하시는 일에서 한층 더 업그레이드될 것이고 생활에서도 분명히 많은 도움이 될 것입니다. 자격증취득 즉 재산을 얻었죠.Microsoft인증AZ-802시험은 여러분이 it지식테스트시험입니다. Fast2test에서는 여러분의 편리를 위하여 Fast2test만의 최고의 최신의Microsoft AZ-802덤프를 추천합니다. Fast2test를 선택은 여러분이 최고의 선택입니다. Fast2test는 제일 전면적인Microsoft AZ-802인증시험자료의 문제와 답을 가지고 잇습니다.
AZ-802유효한 공부: https://kr.fast2test.com/AZ-802-premium-file.html