P.S. Free 2026 Relativity RCA dumps are available on Google Drive shared by BraindumpsPrep: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14MoDrC2DpqTNF3PtGlCQ35OGI_sLe2ih
The desktop Relativity RCA practice exam software has all specifications of the web-based format. It is offline software that enables users to go through the Selling Relativity Certified Administrator (RCA) practice exam without having any internet connection. Windows computers support the desktop Relativity Certified Administrator (RCA) practice exam software.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Search and Analytics | - Search functionality
|
| Topic 2: Review and Production | - Document review workflows
|
| Topic 3: Workspace Administration | - Security and permissions
|
| Topic 4: Data Management | - Object and metadata management
|
| Topic 5: System Administration | - Application management
|
The BraindumpsPrep is committed to making the Relativity RCA exam practice test question the ideal study material for quick and complete Relativity Certified Administrator (RCA) exam preparation. To achieve this objective the "BraindumpsPrep" is offering real, valid, and updated RCA Exam Practice test questions in three different formats. These formats are BraindumpsPrep RCA PDF dumps files, desktop practice test software, and web-based practice test software.
NEW QUESTION # 52
What production numbering should be used when reproducing documents with the same Bates numbering?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Existing production numbering . Relativity's official production set documentation states that Existing production numbering should be selected when you want to re-use the Bates numbering fields from a previously run production set . This is the exact numbering option designed for scenarios where documents are being reproduced but must retain the same Bates values from an earlier production. Relativity further explains that this option is appropriate when you need to change the produced images, produce only a subset of documents from the existing production, or otherwise reissue the same produced documents while preserving the prior numbering.
This aligns directly with re-production workflows. Relativity's re-production documentation also notes that re- production jobs reuse the numbering format and Bates numbers from the original productions , reinforcing that the platform supports maintaining the original numbering scheme instead of assigning new Bates values. That is critical in litigation workflows where Bates continuity must be preserved for references in correspondence, court filings, and prior productions. The other options do not fit this requirement. Page level numbering and document field numbering generate or rely on other numbering methods, while original image numbering is not the production numbering choice used for preserving prior Bates values in a re- production. Therefore, when reproducing documents and keeping the same Bates numbering, the correct production numbering method is Existing production numbering .
NEW QUESTION # 53
You grant the permissions below so that a reviewer on your team can begin creating and running aiR for Review projects. What problem will this reviewer encounter when attempting to analyze documents using aiR for Review?
Object Security:
* aiR for Review Project: View, Edit, Add
* aiR for Review Prompt Criteria: View, Edit, Add
Tab Visibility:
* aiR for Review Projects
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . Relativity's official aiR for Review permissions documentation states that to create and run an aiR for Review project, a user needs object permissions for aiR for Review Project and aiR for Review Prompt Criteria , tab visibility for aiR for Review Projects , and the Run aiR for Review Job permission under Other Settings. The documentation also explicitly states that a user can run the job without permissions for the analysis types, but will not be able to see the results . The analysis-type objects listed by Relativity are aiR Relevance Analysis , aiR Issue Analysis , aiR Key Analysis , and aiR Summaries .
That is exactly the problem in this scenario: the reviewer has enough permissions to create the project shell and prompt criteria, but no permissions were granted for the analysis result objects themselves. As a result, they can initiate work but will not be able to see the analysis results. Option B is incorrect because Viewer highlighting also depends on having analysis-type view permissions. Option C is incorrect because instance- level jobs visibility is a separate permission model. Option D is also incorrect because the provided permissions already include the aiR for Review Projects tab, and the missing issue is not dashboard tab access but the lack of object security for the individual analysis result types . Therefore, the reviewer's main issue is that they will not be able to view any aiR for Review results without the required analysis- type object permissions .
NEW QUESTION # 54
A client sends you a data set they want processed that is comprised entirely of large Excel files. What is the best Excel Text Extraction Method to get the data to review as quickly as possible?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Relativity. Relativity's Processing throughput guidance states that internal performance testing has shown the Relativity text extraction method to be at least two times faster than the native method on Excel, Word, and PowerPoint file types, and also less error-prone than native extraction.
Since the question asks for the best method to get a large Excel-only data set to review as quickly as possible, the documented speed advantage makes Relativity the best answer.
The native-based methods are slower according to that same documentation, even though they may have other use cases. The processing profile documentation also shows that native/failover combinations are available configurations, but the performance guidance specifically favors the Relativity extraction method for speed on Excel files. "Extract and place inline" is not the documented Excel text extraction method choice for this question. Therefore, the fastest and most review-efficient choice for large Excel files is Relativity.
NEW QUESTION # 55
You need a user to perform some admin operations, including creating groups, managing users, and assigning permissions. However, you do not want them to review the Processing or Production queues. How should you configure the user's permissions?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Add them to an instance-level group with permissions to create groups, manage users, and assign permissions. Relativity's instance security model allows administrators to assign instance- level permissions to groups through the Admin Security dialog. The documentation explains that permissions can be managed granularly through object security, tab visibility, and admin operations, which means a user can be given specific administrative rights without being made a full system administrator.
This matters because the System Administrators group grants broad access to admin-level permissions and tabs, including queue management. Relativity's documentation specifically notes that system admins have access to all admin-level capabilities such as queue management, users, and groups tabs . If you do not want the user reviewing Processing or Production queues, giving full System Admin membership is broader than necessary. A workspace admin group is also insufficient for this requirement because creating groups, managing users, and assigning instance-level permissions are administrative functions controlled at the instance level. Therefore, the correct configuration is to place the user in an instance-level group with only the permissions they need.
NEW QUESTION # 56
What object security permission should you give users to decide whether a document is privileged?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Document - Edit. Relativity's workspace security documentation explicitly states:
Use the document Edit permission to tag documents with workspace coding values using layouts. Deciding whether a document is privileged is a coding decision made on the document, typically through a coding layout and fields such as Privileged or Privilege Designation. That activity requires the ability to edit document-level coding values, which is exactly what Document - Edit provides.
The other permissions serve different purposes. Layout - Edit is for editing the layout object itself, not for making coding calls on documents. Field - Edit is for editing field properties and administration, not for reviewers coding documents. Relativity even warns not to assign coding users rights to edit fields or layouts when what they really need is to code documents. Document - Local Access is tied to actions like opening natives in their native applications, downloading, or copying text, not making privilege determinations.
Therefore, from an RCA permissions standpoint, the correct permission to let users decide whether a document is privileged is Document - Edit.
NEW QUESTION # 57
......
Let me be clear here a core value problem of BraindumpsPrep. All Relativity exams are very important. In this era of rapid development of information technology, BraindumpsPrep just one of the questions providers. Why do most people to choose BraindumpsPrep ? Because the BraindumpsPrep exam information will be able to help you pass the test. It provides the information which is up to date. With BraindumpsPrep Relativity RCA Test Questions, you will become full of confidence and not have to worry about the exam. However, it lets you get certified effortlessly.
Valid Test RCA Fee: https://www.briandumpsprep.com/RCA-prep-exam-braindumps.html
P.S. Free & New RCA dumps are available on Google Drive shared by BraindumpsPrep: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14MoDrC2DpqTNF3PtGlCQ35OGI_sLe2ih