Reliable Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Simulator & SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Dumps Guide

The best way for candidates to know our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization training dumps is downloading our free demo. We provide free PDF demo for each exam. This free demo is a small part of the official complete Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization training dumps. The free demo can show you the quality of our exam materials. You can download any time before purchasing. You can tell if our products and service have advantage over others. I believe our Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization training dumps will be the highest value with competitive price comparing other providers.

Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionWeightObjectives
Performance Troubleshooting20-25%- Optimization case studies
- Troubleshooting tools utilization
- Root cause analysis methodologies
- Network failure identification and resolution
- Common performance issues diagnosis
SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports10-15%- Report generation and interpretation
- Configuration management for optimization
- Nokia NetAct and performance tools
- Automated optimization features
Radio Network Optimization Techniques25-30%- Capacity optimization strategies
- Parameter tuning best practices
- Load balancing techniques
- Coverage optimization methods
- Interference analysis and mitigation
- Handover optimization
SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals15-20%- Radio access concepts and principles
- SRAN solution components and functions
- Single RAN integration principles
- SRAN network architecture overview
Radio Network Performance Monitoring20-25%- Real-time network monitoring techniques
- Performance data collection and analysis
- Performance monitoring tools and dashboards
- KPI definition and measurement
- Threshold configuration and alerting

>> Reliable Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Simulator <<

The Ultimate Guide to Passing Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam

The PDF version of our Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam materials has the advantage that it can be printable. After printing, you not only can bring the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study guide with you wherever you go since it does not take a place, but also can make notes on the paper at your liberty, which may help you to understand the contents of our MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning prep better.

Nokia MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 Sample Questions (Q24-Q29):

NEW QUESTION # 24
A customer complains about coverage reduction after modernization of 4G TDD 4x4 sites to Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 with AEHC module 64T64R . Which of the following statements regarding RF design changes to increase the coverage is correct?

Answer: B

Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In a Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 AEHC 64T64R deployment, LTE and NR share the same Massive MIMO active antenna system. Public Nokia material identifies AEHC as an AirScale Massive MIMO
64T64R B41 radio product, and Nokia's AirScale Massive MIMO portfolio is designed for high-capacity 5G
/RAN deployments.
Unlike a passive antenna system where coverage is changed mainly by physical/electrical RET, Massive MIMO coverage is strongly influenced by beamforming profiles and beamforming weight parameters . In concurrent LTE/NR operation, the RF design must consider the shared active antenna behavior, not independent passive RET-style tilt control per technology.
Therefore, for concurrent 4G/5G mMIMO coverage adjustment, the correct statement is:
The tilt/coverage behavior for both 4G and 5G is controlled by mMIMOSecSectorBFProfName and beamforming weight profile parameters.


NEW QUESTION # 25
Which of the following statements does not apply to mmWave radio propagation ?

Answer: C

Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
At mmWave / FR2 frequencies , radio propagation is more challenging than in low-band or mid-band spectrum. Diffraction becomes weaker, blockage is more severe, foliage attenuation is high, and building penetration loss is significant. This is why mmWave networks usually require dense site grids, line-of-sight or near-line-of-sight paths, and strong beamforming. Industry mmWave references consistently describe high path loss, high penetration loss, and the need for directional antenna systems to compensate for these losses.
Option C does not apply because water absorption and atmospheric absorption generally become more relevant at higher frequencies, not lower. Rain, humidity, and oxygen/water-vapor absorption are important considerations for mmWave link budgets.
So the statement that does not apply to mmWave propagation is:
Low water absorption at high frequencies.


NEW QUESTION # 26
What is the role of admission control in 5G networks ?

Answer: B

Explanation:
The correct answer is D .
Admission control is responsible for deciding whether a new UE connection, bearer, service, or session can be accepted by the cell without negatively affecting existing users and services.
In 5G RAN, admission control checks available radio resources such as:
* PRB availability
* PDCCH/PUCCH capacity
* UE context capacity
* QoS requirements
* GBR or non-GBR bearer requirements
* Cell load and congestion status
It does not directly manage modulation schemes; that is handled by link adaptation. It also does not directly increase spectral efficiency or optimize downlink throughput, although good admission control indirectly protects user experience and avoids overload.
So the main role of admission control is:
To check whether there are enough resources for new connections.


NEW QUESTION # 27
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.


NEW QUESTION # 28
Evaluate the impact of extended FR2 cell range on power consumption.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In FR2/mmWave , uplink coverage is often the limiting factor because UE transmit power is much lower than gNodeB transmit power, and mmWave propagation suffers from high path loss and blockage. Ericsson's mmWave coverage discussion also notes that high-band coverage is limited by uplink signal quality and high- band propagation characteristics.
When the FR2 cell range is extended, UEs farther from the serving cell must transmit uplink signals over a more difficult radio path. This usually requires higher UE transmit power, more robust MCS, more repetitions or retransmissions, and potentially longer uplink activity. As a result, UE battery consumption can increase.
Therefore, extended FR2 range generally:
Increases power consumption because UEs need more energy to transmit uplink signals.


NEW QUESTION # 29
......

MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 Questions are Very Beneficial for Strong Preparation. The top objective of GetValidTest is to offer real Nokia Exam SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam questions so that you can get success in the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization actual test easily. The Nokia Exam MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 valid dumps by the GetValidTest are compiled by a team of experts. We have hired these SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam professionals to ensure the top quality of our product. This team works together and compiles the most probable MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 exam questions. So you can trust Nokia Exams Practice questions without any doubt.

SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Dumps Guide: https://www.getvalidtest.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-exam.html