DOWNLOAD the newest Dumpkiller Data-Engineer-Associate PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aAzNTYjslCqxMy2_GvArk5jf9WU8S4p1
The Dumpkiller Data-Engineer-Associate exam software is loaded with tons of useful features that help in preparing for the exam efficiently. The Data-Engineer-Associate questions desktop Data-Engineer-Associate exam software has an easy-to-use interface. Dumpkiller provides Amazon certification exam questions for desktop computers. Before purchasing, you may try a free demo to see how it gives multiple Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Questions for Amazon certification preparation. You may schedule the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate questions in the Data-Engineer-Associate exam software at your leisure and keep track of your progress each time you try the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate questions, which preserves your score. However, it is only compatible with Windows.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Apply governance and compliance best practices - Implement data security controls |
| Topic 2: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Ingest and transform data using AWS services - Build and manage data pipelines |
| Topic 3: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Monitor and maintain data pipelines - Troubleshoot data workflow issues |
| Topic 4: Data Store Management | 26% | - Optimize storage performance and cost - Select appropriate data storage solutions |
>> Exam Data-Engineer-Associate Dump <<
If you want to prepare for your exam in a paper version, our Data-Engineer-Associate test materials can do that for you. Data-Engineer-Associate PDF version is printable and you can print them into hard one, and take some notes on them. In addition, we offer you free demo to have a try, so that you can have a better understanding of what you are going to buy. We are pass guarantee and money back guarantee for Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps, if you fail to pass the exam, we will give you full refund. Online and offline chat service are available, if you have any questions about Data-Engineer-Associate exam materials, you can have a conversation with us, and we will give you reply soon as possible.
NEW QUESTION # 236
A retail company uses Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL to process and store live transactional dat a. The company uses an Amazon Redshift cluster for a data warehouse.
An extract, transform, and load (ETL) job runs every morning to update the Redshift cluster with new data from the PostgreSQL database. The company has grown rapidly and needs to cost optimize the Redshift cluster.
A data engineer needs to create a solution to archive historical data. The data engineer must be able to run analytics queries that effectively combine data from live transactional data in PostgreSQL, current data in Redshift, and archived historical data. The solution must keep only the most recent 15 months of data in Amazon Redshift to reduce costs.
Which combination of steps will meet these requirements? (Select TWO.)
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
The goal is to archive historical data from an Amazon Redshift data warehouse while combining live transactional data from Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with current and historical data in a cost-efficient manner. The company wants to keep only the last 15 months of data in Redshift to reduce costs.
Option A: "Configure the Amazon Redshift Federated Query feature to query live transactional data that is in the PostgreSQL database." Redshift Federated Query allows querying live transactional data directly from Aurora PostgreSQL without having to move it into Redshift, thereby enabling seamless integration of the current data in Redshift and live data in PostgreSQL. This is a cost-effective approach, as it avoids unnecessary data duplication.
Option C: "Schedule a monthly job to copy data that is older than 15 months to Amazon S3 by using the UNLOAD command. Delete the old data from the Redshift cluster. Configure Amazon Redshift Spectrum to access historical data in Amazon S3." This option uses Amazon Redshift Spectrum, which enables Redshift to query data directly in S3 without moving it into Redshift. By unloading older data (older than 15 months) to S3, and then using Spectrum to access it, this approach reduces storage costs significantly while still allowing the data to be queried when necessary.
Option B (Redshift Spectrum for live PostgreSQL data) is not applicable, as Redshift Spectrum is intended for querying data in Amazon S3, not live transactional data in Aurora.
Option D (S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval) is not suitable because Glacier is designed for long-term archival storage with infrequent access, and querying data in Glacier for analytics purposes would incur higher retrieval times and costs.
Option E (materialized views) would not meet the need to archive data or combine it from multiple sources; it is best suited for combining frequently accessed data already in Redshift.
Reference:
Amazon Redshift Federated Query
Amazon Redshift Spectrum Documentation
Amazon Redshift UNLOAD Command
NEW QUESTION # 237
A company has multiple applications that use datasets that are stored in an Amazon S3 bucket. The company has an ecommerce application that generates a dataset that contains personally identifiable information (PII).
The company has an internal analytics application that does not require access to the PII.
To comply with regulations, the company must not share PII unnecessarily. A data engineer needs to implement a solution that with redact PII dynamically, based on the needs of each application that accesses the dataset.
Which solution will meet the requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Option B is the best solution to meet the requirements with the least operational overhead because S3 Object Lambda is a feature that allows you to add your own code to process data retrieved from S3 before returning it to an application. S3 Object Lambda works with S3 GET requests and can modify both the object metadata and the object data. By using S3 Object Lambda, you can implement redaction logic within an S3 Object Lambda function to dynamically redact PII based on the needs of each application that accesses the data. This way, you can avoid creating and maintaining multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction.
Option A is not a good solution because it involves creating and managing multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction for each application. This option adds complexity and storage cost to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration. Moreover, S3 bucket policies cannot enforce fine-grained data access control at the row and column level, so they are not sufficient to redact PII.
Option C is not a good solution because it involves using AWS Glue to transform the data for each application. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that can extract, transform, and load (ETL) data from various sources to various destinations, including S3. AWS Glue can also convert data to different formats, such as Parquet, which is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytics. However, in this scenario, using AWS Glue to redact PII is not the best option because it requires creating and maintaining multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction for each application. This option also adds extra time and cost to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration.
Option D is not a good solution because it involves creating and configuring an API Gateway endpoint that has custom authorizers. API Gateway is a service that allows youto create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. API Gateway can also integrate with other AWS services, such as Lambda, to provide custom logic for processing requests. However, in this scenario, using API Gateway to redact PII is not the best option because it requires writing and maintaining custom code and configuration for the API endpoint, the custom authorizers, and the REST API call. This option also adds complexity and latency to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration.
References:
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
Introducing Amazon S3 Object Lambda - Use Your Code to Process Data as It Is Being Retrieved from S3 Using Bucket Policies and User Policies - Amazon Simple Storage Service AWS Glue Documentation What is Amazon API Gateway? - Amazon API Gateway
NEW QUESTION # 238
A company uses an Amazon QuickSight dashboard to monitor usage of one of the company's applications.
The company uses AWS Glue jobs to process data for the dashboard. The company stores the data in a single Amazon S3 bucket. The company adds new data every day.
A data engineer discovers that dashboard queries are becoming slower over time. The data engineer determines that the root cause of the slowing queries is long-running AWS Glue jobs.
Which actions should the data engineer take to improve the performance of the AWS Glue jobs? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,E
Explanation:
Partitioning the data in the S3 bucket can improve the performance of AWS Glue jobs by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and processed. By organizing the data by year, month, and day, the AWS Glue job can use partition pruning to filter out irrelevant data and only read the data that matches the query criteria. This can speed up the data processing and reduce the cost of running the AWS Glue job.
Increasing the AWS Glue instance size by scaling up the worker type can also improve the performance of AWS Glue jobs by providing more memory and CPU resources for the Spark execution engine. This can help the AWS Glue job handle larger data sets and complex transformations more efficiently. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant, as they do not affect the performance of the AWS Glue jobs. Converting the AWS Glue schema to the DynamicFrame schema class does not improve the performance, but rather provides additional functionality and flexibility for data manipulation. Adjusting the AWS Glue job scheduling frequency does not improve the performance, but rather reduces the frequency of data updates. Modifying the IAM role that grants access to AWS Glue does not improve the performance, but rather affects the security and permissions of the AWS Glue service. References:
* Optimising Glue Scripts for Efficient Data Processing: Part 1 (Section: Partitioning Data in S3)
* Best practices to optimize cost and performance for AWS Glue streaming ETL jobs (Section:
Development tools)
* Monitoring with AWS Glue job run insights (Section: Requirements)
* AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide (Chapter 5, page 133)
NEW QUESTION # 239
A company receives a daily file that contains customer data in .xls format. The company stores the file in Amazon S3. The daily file is approximately 2 GB in size.
A data engineer concatenates the column in the file that contains customer first names and the column that contains customer last names. The data engineer needs to determine the number of distinct customers in the file.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST operational effort?
Answer: C
Explanation:
AWS Glue DataBrew is a visual data preparation tool that allows you to clean, normalize, and transform data without writing code. You can use DataBrew to create recipes that define the steps to apply to your data, such as filtering, renaming, splitting, or aggregating columns. You can also use DataBrew to run jobs that execute the recipes on your data sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, or Amazon Aurora. DataBrew integrates with AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a centralized metadata repository for your data assets1.
The solution that meets the requirement with the least operational effort is to use AWS Glue DataBrew to create a recipe that uses the COUNT_DISTINCT aggregate function to calculate the number of distinct customers. This solution has the following advantages:
* It does not require you to write any code, as DataBrew provides a graphical user interface that lets you explore, transform, and visualize your data. You can use DataBrew to concatenate the columns that contain customer first names and last names, and then use the COUNT_DISTINCT aggregate function to count the number of unique values in the resulting column2.
* It does not require you to provision, manage, or scale any servers, clusters, or notebooks, as DataBrew is a fully managed service that handles all the infrastructure for you. DataBrew can automatically scale up or down the compute resources based on the size and complexity of your data and recipes1.
* It does not require you to create or update any AWS Glue Data Catalog entries, as DataBrew can automatically create and register the data sources and targets in the Data Catalog. DataBrew can also use the existing Data Catalog entries to access the data in S3 or other sources3.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests creating and running an Apache Spark job in an AWS Glue notebook. This solution has the following disadvantages:
* It requires you to write code, as AWS Glue notebooks are interactive development environments that allow you to write, test, and debug Apache Spark code using Python or Scala. You need to use the Spark SQL or the Spark DataFrame API to read the S3 file and calculate the number of distinct customers.
* It requires you to provision and manage a development endpoint, which is a serverless Apache Spark environment that you can connect to your notebook. You need to specify the type and number of workers for your development endpoint, and monitor its status and metrics.
* It requires you to create or update the AWS Glue Data Catalog entries for the S3 file, either manually or using a crawler. You need to use the Data Catalog as a metadata store for your Spark job, and specify the database and table names in your code.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests creating an AWS Glue crawler to create an AWS Glue Data Catalog of the S3 file, and running SQL queries from Amazon Athena to calculate the number of distinct customers.
This solution has the following disadvantages:
* It requires you to create and run a crawler, which is a program that connects to your data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then creates metadata tables in the Data Catalog. You need to specify the data store, the IAM role, the schedule, and the output database for your crawler.
* It requires you to write SQL queries, as Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in S3 using standard SQL. You need to use Athena to concatenate the columns that contain customer first names and last names, and then use the COUNT(DISTINCT) aggregate function to count the number of unique values in the resulting column.
Option C is incorrect because it suggests creating and running an Apache Spark job in Amazon EMR Serverless to calculate the number of distinct customers. This solution has the following disadvantages:
* It requires you to write code, as Amazon EMR Serverless is a service that allows you to run Apache Spark jobs on AWS without provisioning or managing any infrastructure. You need to use the Spark SQL or the Spark DataFrame API to read the S3 file and calculate the number of distinct customers.
* It requires you to create and manage an Amazon EMR Serverless cluster, which is a fully managed and scalable Spark environment that runs on AWS Fargate. You need to specify the cluster name, the IAM role, the VPC, and the subnet for your cluster, and monitor its status and metrics.
* It requires you to create or update the AWS Glue Data Catalog entries for the S3 file, either manually or using a crawler. You need to use the Data Catalog as a metadata store for your Spark job, and specify the database and table names in your code.
:
1: AWS Glue DataBrew - Features
2: Working with recipes - AWS Glue DataBrew
3: Working with data sources and data targets - AWS Glue DataBrew
[4]: AWS Glue notebooks - AWS Glue
[5]: Development endpoints - AWS Glue
[6]: Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog - AWS Glue
[7]: Crawlers - AWS Glue
[8]: Amazon Athena - Features
[9]: Amazon EMR Serverless - Features
[10]: Creating an Amazon EMR Serverless cluster - Amazon EMR
[11]: Using the AWS Glue Data Catalog with Amazon EMR Serverless - Amazon EMR
NEW QUESTION # 240
A ride-sharing company stores records for all rides in an Amazon DynamoDB table. The table includes the following columns and types of values:
RideID | RiderID | DriverID | RideStatus | TripStartTime | TripEndTime
XA1231 | AXEF1 | BN123 | Active | 2025-02-11 | NULL
XA1232 | AXEF2 | BN124 | Completed | 2025-02-11 | 2025-02-11
The table currently contains billions of items. The table is partitioned by RideID and uses TripStartTime as the sort key. The company wants to use the data to build a personal interface to give drivers the ability to view the rides that each driver has completed, based on RideStatus. The solution must access the necessary data without scanning the entire table.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Option C is correct because the required access pattern is: find all completed rides for a specific driver. In DynamoDB, when you need to query data efficiently by attributes that are not part of the base table primary key, you typically create a global secondary index (GSI). AWS documentation states that a GSI can have a key schema that is different from the base table and can use top-level attributes such as DriverID and RideStatus as its partition and sort keys. That makes it possible to query directly for a given driver and then narrow the results to completed rides, without scanning the full table.
Option A is incorrect because a local secondary index (LSI) must use the same partition key as the base table.
Since the table partition key is RideID, an LSI cannot be created with DriverID as the partitioning access path.
Option B uses RiderID, which does not satisfy the requirement to retrieve rides by driver. Option D is also wrong because filter expressions are applied after items are read and therefore do not avoid scanning large amounts of data. The study guide emphasizes choosing the correct data model and access pattern for the workload, which places this question in the Data Storage and Management domain.
NEW QUESTION # 241
......
To make sure your possibility of passing the certificate, we hired first-rank experts to make our Data-Engineer-Associate exam materials. So the proficiency of our team is unquestionable. They help you to review and stay on track without wasting your precious time on useless things. By handpicking what the Data-Engineer-Associate study questions usually tested in exam and compile them into our Data-Engineer-Associate practice guide, they win wide acceptance with first-rank praise.
Latest Data-Engineer-Associate Dumps Ppt: https://www.dumpkiller.com/Data-Engineer-Associate_braindumps.html
2026 Latest Dumpkiller Data-Engineer-Associate PDF Dumps and Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aAzNTYjslCqxMy2_GvArk5jf9WU8S4p1