AZ-802トレーニングの質問のインストールまたは使用を懸念しているお客様がいるかもしれません。これについて心配する必要はありません。高品質と高効率に加えて、思いやりのあるサービスも当社の大きな利点です。 AZ-802学習教材の一貫した目的は、時間の節約と効率の向上です。これにより、レビュープロセスにプレッシャーや不安が充満することはなくなります。高品質と高効率に加えて、思いやりのあるサービスも当社の大きな利点です。すべてのお客様に24時間のオンラインアフターサービスを提供します。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Networking and high availability | - High availability and disaster recovery
|
| Topic 2: Compute, storage, and virtualization | - Virtual machines and containers
|
| Topic 3: Secure and manage Windows Server environments | - Security and compliance
|
| Topic 4: Hybrid infrastructure management | - Azure integration
|
私たちのAZ-802試験参考書を利用し、AZ-802試験に合格できます。おそらくあなたは私たちのAZ-802試験参考書を信じられないでしょう。でも、あなたはAZ-802試験参考書を買ったお客様のコメントを見ると、すぐ信じるようになります。あなたは心配する必要がないです。早くAZ-802試験参考書を買いましょう！
質問 # 383
You have five on-premises file servers that run Windows Server and contain up to 10 shares each.
You need to migrate all the shares to Azure Files.
The solution must meet the following requirements:
Retain the file metadata, NTFS permissions, and folder structure.
Minimize how long it takes to complete the migration.
Minimize administrative effort.
What should you use?
正解：E
解説：
Azure Storage Mover is a fully managed migration service designed to transfer on-premises file shares to Azure Storage, including Azure Files.
It supports migration from SMB shares while preserving the source directory structure, supported file metadata, timestamps, attributes, and NTFS access control lists.
Storage Mover provides centralized management of migration projects and supports multiple migration jobs, reducing the administrative effort required to migrate several file servers.
It uses Azure-native transfer mechanisms that can provide better migration performance than traditional SMB- based copying. Incremental transfers can also reduce downtime during final migration cutover.
Azure File Sync primarily synchronizes file servers with Azure Files. Robocopy requires more manual orchestration, while AzCopy and Storage Explorer are not the preferred solutions for centrally coordinating this multi-server SMB migration.
Therefore, Azure Storage Mover is correct.
質問 # 384
You need to ensure that VM3 meets the technical requirement. What should you install first?
正解：C
解説：
The requirement is that VMs must be configured to enable per-folder quotas. VM3 already has the File and Storage Services role installed, but native NTFS quotas only apply per volume and per user; they cannot restrict the amount of data stored inside an individual folder. File Server Resource Manager (FSRM) is the Windows Server feature that adds true folder-level quota management, letting an administrator define hard or soft quota limits (and quota templates) scoped to specific folders rather than entire volumes, which is exactly the granularity the requirement calls for. Enhanced Storage is an unrelated feature that supports certain storage devices with enhanced storage access (IEEE 1667), Windows Standards-Based Storage Management provides SMI-S/WMI-based management of storage arrays and has nothing to do with folder-level quotas, and the iSNS Server service is used for discovery of iSCSI targets and initiators on a network, also unrelated to quota enforcement. None of those three alternatives provide any per-folder capacity restriction capability, so installing FSRM is the necessary first step before per-folder quotas can be configured on VM3.
質問 # 385
You deploy Azure Migrate to an on-premises network. You have an on-premises physical server named Server1 that runs Windows Server and has the following configuration: Operating system disk 600 GB, Data disk 3 TB, NIC Teaming: Enabled, Mobility service: installed, Windows Firewall: Enabled, Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Enabled. You need to ensure that you can use Azure Migrate to migrate Server1.
Solution: You disable Microsoft Defender Antivirus on Server1. Does this meet the goal?
正解：A
解説：
Microsoft Defender Antivirus running on the source server is not a documented blocker for Azure Migrate ' s agent-based, Mobility-service physical server migration, so disabling it addresses nothing on Azure Migrate ' s actual current support-matrix requirements for Server1. Reviewing Server1 ' s full configuration against that support matrix, the operating system disk at 600 GB and the data disk at 3 TB are both comfortably within the documented 2 TB or 4 TB OS disk limits and the 32 TB data disk limit respectively, and neither the Windows Firewall state nor the Microsoft Defender Antivirus state appears anywhere in the documented list of unsupported source configurations at all. The configuration detail that Azure Migrate ' s physical server migration support matrix does flag as unsupported is the enabled NIC teaming on Server1, and disabling antivirus protection does nothing to change that networking configuration. Because the antivirus state was never actually the blocking factor, and the real blocker -- NIC teaming -- remains enabled and unaddressed after this solution is applied, disabling Microsoft Defender Antivirus on Server1 does not meet the stated goal.
質問 # 386
Your network contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest that has a Windows Server 2008 R2 forest functional level. The forest contains the domains shown in the following table. You need to perform an in-place upgrade of the domain controllers in east.contoso.com to Windows Server 2025. The solution must minimize administrative effort. What should you do first? (Exhibit: domain functional levels table.)
Domain functional levels
正解：A
解説：
Adding or in-place upgrading a domain controller to Windows Server 2025 requires the forest functional level to be at least Windows Server 2016, and a forest functional level can never exceed the domain functional level of any domain in the forest, including the forest root. Because contoso.com, the forest root, is currently at the Windows Server 2012 R2 domain functional level, the forest functional level is capped below Windows Server 2016 even though east.contoso.com already sits at the Windows Server 2016 domain functional level.
Raising contoso.com ' s domain functional level to Windows Server 2016 removes that ceiling and is therefore the necessary first step before the forest functional level can be raised and the east.contoso.com domain controllers upgraded in place to Windows Server 2025 with minimal additional effort. Extending the schema or attempting to raise the forest functional level directly would fail at this point, since the forest-level ceiling imposed by contoso.com ' s own domain functional level has not yet been lifted.
質問 # 387
You are remediating the firewall security risks to meet the security requirements. What should you configure to reduce the risks?
正解：D
解説：
Server administrators can be prevented from configuring Windows Defender Firewall rules by defining firewall policy centrally in a Group Policy Object and linking it to the servers ' organizational unit(s); domain- based GPO firewall policy overrides any local, administrator-configured Windows Defender Firewall rules on the domain-joined servers, since Group Policy-delivered firewall settings take precedence over local policy.
Adaptive network hardening in Microsoft Defender for Cloud only generates recommendations to tighten network security group (NSG) rules protecting Azure resources -- it has no visibility into or control over host- based Windows Defender Firewall configuration on on-premises servers. A network security group (NSG) in Sub1 filters traffic at the Azure virtual network boundary and has no bearing on the on-premises Chicago office servers described in the scenario. An Azure Firewall policy governs the centrally managed Azure Firewall network virtual appliance, not the host-based Windows Defender Firewall running locally on each on- premises server. Because the servers in question are on-premises and domain-joined, only a Group Policy Object can centrally enforce and lock down their local Windows Defender Firewall configuration, preventing server administrators from modifying the rules directly on each machine. Therefore, configuring a GPO is the correct way to reduce this security risk.
質問 # 388
......
MicrosoftのAZ-802認定試験に受かるのはあなたの技能を検証することだけでなく、あなたの専門知識を証明できて、上司は無駄にあなたを雇うことはしないことの証明書です。当面、IT業界でMicrosoftのAZ-802認定試験の信頼できるソースが必要です。CertJukenはとても良い選択で、AZ-802の試験を最も短い時間に縮められますから、あなたの費用とエネルギーを節約することができます。それに、あなたに美しい未来を作ることに助けを差し上げられます。
AZ-802復習攻略問題: https://www.certjuken.com/AZ-802-exam.html