H12-831_V1.0-ENU Downloadable PDF 100% Pass | Professional Exam H12-831_V1.0-ENU Reference: HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0

BONUS!!! Download part of DumpsKing H12-831_V1.0-ENU dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KI3L8a5NjWAvjEc2EshuiXKDrT5hNj3e

Our company is a multinational company which is famous for the H12-831_V1.0-ENU training materials in the international market. After nearly ten years' efforts, now our company have become the topnotch one in the field, therefore, if you want to pass the H12-831_V1.0-ENU Exam as well as getting the related certification at a great ease, I strongly believe that the H12-831_V1.0-ENU study materials compiled by our company is your solid choice.

Huawei H12-831_V1.0-ENU Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:Huawei
Exam Name:HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0
Exam Number:H12-831_V1.0-ENU
Certificate Validity Period:3 years
Passing Score:600/1000
Exam Format:Drag-and-drop, True or false, Short response, Single-answer questions, Multiple-answer questions
Exam Price:USD 180
Exam Duration:90 minutes
Real Exam Qty:60
Available Languages:Chinese, English, Japanese
Related Certifications:HCIP-Datacom-Core Technology V1.0
Recommended Training:Huawei Official Training
Exam Registration:Pearson VUE Registration
Sample Questions:Huawei H12-831_V1.0-ENU Sample Questions
Exam Way:Online proctored or onsite at Pearson VUE test centers
Pre Condition:Recommended to have HCIA-Datacom certification or equivalent knowledge; pass H12-821 as core exam
Official Syllabus URL:https://e.huawei.com/en/talent/certification/exam/h12-831

>> H12-831_V1.0-ENU Downloadable PDF <<

Exam H12-831_V1.0-ENU Reference | H12-831_V1.0-ENU Exam Practice

You many attend many certificate exams but you unfortunately always fail in or the certificates you get can’t play the rules you wants and help you a lot. So what certificate exam should you attend and what method should you use to let the certificate play its due rule? You should choose the test Huawei certification and buys our H12-831_V1.0-ENU learning file to solve the problem. Passing the test H12-831_V1.0-ENU certification can help you increase your wage and be promoted easily and buying our H12-831_V1.0-ENU prep guide dump can help you pass the test smoothly. Our H12-831_V1.0-ENU Certification material is closely linked with the test and the popular trend among the industries and provides all the information about the test. The answers and questions seize the vital points and are verified by the industry experts. Diversified functions can help you get an all-around preparation for the test. Our online customer service replies the clients’ questions about our H12-831_V1.0-ENU certification material at any time.

Huawei H12-831_V1.0-ENU exam covers a wide range of topics, including advanced routing and switching technologies, network security, VPN technologies, and network optimization. H12-831_V1.0-ENU exam consists of multiple-choice questions, simulations, and practical exercises that test the candidate's ability to apply their knowledge in real-world scenarios. H12-831_V1.0-ENU exam is available in both English and Chinese, and candidates have three hours to complete it.

Huawei H12-831_V1.0-ENU (HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0) Exam is a certification exam that tests the skills and knowledge of candidates in advanced routing and switching technologies. H12-831_V1.0-ENU Exam is designed for professionals who are seeking to enhance their networking skills and advance their careers in the field of data communication. H12-831_V1.0-ENU exam covers advanced topics such as OSPF, BGP, MPLS, VPN, and IPv6, among others, and is an essential certification for any networking professional.

Huawei HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 Sample Questions (Q57-Q62):

NEW QUESTION # 57
On the OSPFv3 network shown in the figure, area 1 is a common area. R2 generates an Inter-Area-Prefix- LSA to describe the routes of a network segment in the area. Such an LSA exists in both area 0 and area 1.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
To determine whether the statement is true or false, we need to analyze the OSPFv3 topology, the role of area types, and the behavior of Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs. Let's break it down step by step:
* Understanding the OSPFv3 Topology and Area Types :
* The figure shows three routers (R1, R2, and R3) connected in an OSPFv3 network. R1 and R2 are in Area 0 (the backbone area), while R2 and R3 are in Area 1 (a common area, also known as a standard or regular area).
* R2 is an Area Border Router (ABR) because it connects Area 0 and Area 1. ABRs are responsible for summarizing and advertising routes between areas.
* What is a Common Area in OSPFv3? :
* A " common area " in OSPFv3 refers to a standard or regular OSPF area, as opposed to special areas like Stub, Totally Stubby, Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA), or Totally NSSA. Common areas allow all types of LSAs, including inter-area, intra-area, and external LSAs, to be flooded within the area, except for restrictions in special area types.
* Since Area 1 is described as a " common area, " it behaves like a standard OSPF area, allowing the full exchange of LSAs, including Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs.
* Role of Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 3 LSA in OSPFv3) :
* Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs (Type 3 LSAs in OSPFv3) are used by ABRs to advertise prefixes from one area to another. These LSAs are critical for inter-area routing, allowing routers in one area to learn about networks in other areas.
* In this case, R2, as an ABR, generates Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs to describe routes (network segments) in Area 1 and advertises them into Area 0. Conversely, R2 also receives Inter-Area- Prefix-LSAs from Area 0 (via R1) and advertises them into Area 1.
* Does the Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA Exist in Both Area 0 and Area 1? :
* Yes, Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs exist in both areas because R2, as an ABR, floods these LSAs into both Area 0 and Area 1. Specifically:
* R2 generates Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs for network segments in Area 1 and advertises them into Area 0, where R1 (in Area 0) can receive and process them.
* Similarly, R2 receives Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs for network segments in Area 0 (from R1) and advertises them into Area 1, where R3 (in Area 1) can receive and process them.
* Since Area 1 is a common area (not a stub or NSSA), it allows Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs to be flooded within the area, ensuring that routers like R3 can learn about routes in Area 0, and routers like R1 can learn about routes in Area 1.
* Verifying the Statement :
* The statement claims that R2 generates an Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA to describe the routes of a network segment in Area 1, and such an LSA exists in both Area 0 and Area 1. This is accurate because:
* R2, as an ABR, generates Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs for Area 1's network segments and floods them into Area 0.
* R2 also receives and floods Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs from Area 0 into Area 1.
* Therefore, Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs describing routes in Area 1 exist in both Area 0 and Area 1, making the statement true.
* Conclusion :
* The statement is true because Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs generated by R2 for Area 1's network segments are flooded into both Area 0 and Area 1, and Area 1, being a common area, allows these LSAs to exist within it.
References to HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology Documents :
* HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0, Section on OSPFv3: OSPF Area Types, Inter-Area Routing, and LSA Types (specifically Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA, Type 3 LSA).
* HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0, Chapter on OSPF Routing Protocols: ABR Behavior, Common Areas, and LSA Flooding Mechanisms.


NEW QUESTION # 58
On the enterprise network shown in the figure, R3 is connected to the NMS , and all devices on the network communicate with the NMS through a VPN .
During an inspection, it is found that R3 has redundant RTs (Route Targets) .
Which of the following commands can be run on R3 to delete the redundant RTs without affecting the connectivity between all devices and the NMS?

Options:

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
1. Understanding VPN Route Targets (RTs) in MPLS VPNs
* Route Targets (RTs) define which VPN routes should be imported and exported among PE routers.
* Import-extcommunity: Specifies which VPN routes should be accepted into a VRF.
* Export-extcommunity: Specifies which VPN routes should be advertised from a VRF.
* Correctly configuring RTs ensures proper route exchange between VPN sites.
2. Analyzing the RTs in the Diagram
R3 ' s Current Configuration:
plaintext
CopyEdit
vpn-target 3:1 export-extcommunity
vpn-target 3:2 export-extcommunity
vpn-target 1:3 export-extcommunity
vpn-target 1:3 import-extcommunity
vpn-target 3:1 import-extcommunity
vpn-target 3:2 import-extcommunity
R1 ' s Configuration:
plaintext
CopyEdit
vpn-target 1:3 export-extcommunity
vpn-target 3:1 import-extcommunity
R2 ' s Configuration:
plaintext
CopyEdit
vpn-target 2:3 export-extcommunity
vpn-target 3:2 import-extcommunity
* R3 has redundant RTs because it both exports and imports unnecessary RTs.
* We need to remove only redundant RTs without affecting NMS connectivity.
3. Evaluating Each Answer Choice
A). " undo vpn-target 3:1 import-extcommunity " ( # Incorrect)
* R1 exports RT 1:3, and R3 imports it as 3:1.
* Removing 3:1 import-extcommunity would block R3 from receiving routes from R1, disrupting connectivity to NMS.
* Thus, this option is incorrect.
B). " undo vpn-target 1:3 export-extcommunity " ( # Correct)
* R3 exports RT 1:3, but there is no need for R3 to advertise routes with 1:3.
* R1 already exports 1:3, and R3 only needs to import it.
* Removing vpn-target 1:3 export-extcommunity does not affect connectivity but eliminates redundancy.
* # This is a correct choice.
C). " undo vpn-target 1:3 import-extcommunity " ( # Incorrect)
* R3 needs to import 1:3 to receive routes from R1 (which is required for NMS communication).
* If removed, R3 will not receive necessary routes, breaking connectivity.
* Thus, this option is incorrect.
D). " undo vpn-target 2:3 export-extcommunity " ( # Correct)
* R2 exports RT 2:3, but R3 does not need to receive it.
* This RT is redundant and can be removed without affecting connectivity.
* # This is a correct choice.
4. Evaluating the Answer Choices
Option
Correct?
Reasoning
A
# Incorrect
R3 must import 3:1 from R1 to maintain connectivity.
B
# Correct
Removing export-extcommunity 1:3 eliminates redundancy without affecting connectivity.
C
# Incorrect
Removing import-extcommunity 1:3 would block R3 from receiving necessary routes.
D
# Correct
Removing export-extcommunity 2:3 eliminates redundancy without affecting connectivity.
# Correct answer: B and D.
Final Conclusion:
* Route Targets (RTs) are used in MPLS VPNs to control route import/export policies.
* R3 has redundant RTs, and removing unnecessary exports (1:3 and 2:3) optimizes configuration.
* Correct commands to remove redundancy without affecting connectivity are:
* # undo vpn-target 1:3 export-extcommunity
* # undo vpn-target 2:3 export-extcommunity
* Thus, the correct answer is: B and D.
Reference:
HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 - MPLS VPN RT and Route Control Huawei Official HCIP-Datacom Study Guide - Route Targets in MPLS VPNs Huawei Documentation on BGP MPLS VPN RT Configuration


NEW QUESTION # 59
On the OSPFv3 network shown in the figure:
* Area 1 is a stub area
* Area 2 is a common area
* Area 3 is an NSSA
* The IPv6 address of Loopback0 on R6 is 2000::6/128.
* The router ID of each router is 10.0.X.X, where X is the router number.

Which of the following statements are true?

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
To determine the correct answers, we need to analyze OSPFv3 behavior and Inter-Area-Prefix LSAs (Type 3 LSAs).
1. Understanding OSPFv3 Inter-Area-Prefix LSAs (Type 3 LSAs)
* Type 3 LSAs (Inter-Area-Prefix LSAs) are generated by an ABR (Area Border Router) to advertise networks between areas.
* If a router in one area learns a prefix from another area, it generates a Type 3 LSA to advertise it further.
* Stub areas (Area 1) do not allow external LSAs, including Type 3 LSAs for external routes.
* NSSA areas (Area 3) accept external routes but redistribute them as Type 7 LSAs before being converted to Type 5 LSAs by an NSSA ABR.
2. Analyzing Each Answer Option:
# A. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R1 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 0. " # TRUE
* R6 has 2000::6/128 in Area 2.
* R2 is the ABR that brings this prefix into Area 0 as a Type 3 LSA.
* R1, being in Area 0, learns this LSA from R2.
* Thus, this statement is correct.
# B. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R1 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 3. " # FALSE
* R1 is not an ABR for Area 3, so it does not generate an LSA for 2000::6/128 in Area 3.
* Instead, R3 (the ABR between Area 0 and Area 3) would be responsible for propagating routes.
* This statement is false.
# C. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R2 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 1. " # FALSE
* Area 1 is a stub area and does not accept external LSAs (including Type 3 LSAs from other areas).
* R2 cannot generate and send a Type 3 LSA for 2000::6/128 into Area 1.
* This statement is false.
# D. " The Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R3 and describes 2000::6/128 exists in Area 2. " # TRUE
* R3 is an ABR and learns 2000::6/128 from R2 (which originally learned it from R6 in Area 2).
* Since Area 2 is a normal (non-stub, non-NSSA) area, Type 3 LSAs are allowed.
* R3 generates and advertises this Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA for 2000::6/128 into Area 2.
* Thus, this statement is correct.


NEW QUESTION # 60
On the OSPFv3 network shown in the figure:
* Area 1 is a stub area, Area 2 is a common area, and Area 3 is an NSSA (Not-So-Stubby Area).
* The IPv6 address of Loopback0 on R6 is 2000::6/128.
* The router ID of each router is 10.0.X.X, where X is the router number.
* The stub no-summary command is configured in Area 1 on R2.
Which of the following statements is true?

Answer: B

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Understanding OSPFv3 Areas and Routing Behavior
* OSPFv3 Area Types in the Network:
* Area 1 (Stub Area): Does not accept external LSAs (Type 5) but can receive Inter-Area-Prefix- LSAs (Type 3).
* Area 2 (Common Area): Fully functional area that allows both Type 3 (Inter-Area) and Type 5 (External) LSAs.
* Area 3 (NSSA - Not-So-Stubby Area): Does not accept Type 5 (External) LSAs but allows ASBRs to inject external routes using Type 7 LSAs, which are later converted to Type 5 in other areas.
* Effect of stub no-summary Command on Area 1 (Configured on R2):
* This command prevents Type 3 LSAs from entering Area 1, meaning R4 will not learn about
2000::6/128 from other areas.
* R4 only has a default route (::/0) provided by R2 but not individual routes like 2000::6/128.
Route and Packet Flow Analysis
A: "The LSDB of R4 contains the Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA that is generated by R1 and describes 2000::6
/128." # (False)
* R4 is in Area 1 (a totally stub area), which does not receive Type 3 LSAs.
* Since 2000::6/128 is an external route from Area 2, it will not be present in R4's LSDB.
* Thus, R4 does NOT have the Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA for 2000::6/128.
# Statement A is incorrect.
B: "The path for data packets from R4 to 2000::6 is R4 -> R1 -> R5 -> R3 -> R6." # (False)
* R4 is in a totally stub area (Area 1), and it does not have a specific route for 2000::6/128.
* It only has a default route (::/0) pointing to R2.
* If R4 forwards traffic, it will send it to R2, NOT via R1, R5, and R3.
# Statement B is incorrect.
C: "The routing table of R4 does not contain the route 2000::6/128." # (True - Correct Answer)
* R4 is in a totally stub area (Area 1), meaning it only receives a default route from R2 (::/0).
* It does NOT receive specific routes like 2000::6/128.
# Statement C is correct.
D: "The path for data packets from R4 to 2000::6 is R4 -> R2 -> R6." # (False)
* While R4 does forward all unknown traffic to R2 (due to the default route), R2 will NOT directly forward to R6.
* R2 is an ABR (Area Border Router), and the actual path to 2000::6 must traverse Area 2, likely through other routers.
# Statement D is incorrect.
Final Conclusion:
# C. The routing table of R4 does not contain the route 2000::6/128.
Thus, the correct answer is: C. The routing table of R4 does not contain the route 2000::6/128.


NEW QUESTION # 61
As shown in the figure, all routers run OSPF, because R3 is in the backbone area, so in the LSDB of R3 There are no three types of LSAO

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 62
......

Exam H12-831_V1.0-ENU Reference: https://www.dumpsking.com/H12-831_V1.0-ENU-testking-dumps.html

BONUS!!! Download part of DumpsKing H12-831_V1.0-ENU dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KI3L8a5NjWAvjEc2EshuiXKDrT5hNj3e