P.S. Testpdf在Google Drive上分享了免費的2026 ISTQB CT-AI考試題庫：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nVVPm-Gutqii47racVr_ksXo40fReQvd
Testpdf的IT專家團隊利用他們的經驗和知識不斷的提升考試培訓材料的品質，來滿足每位考生的需求，保證考生第一次參加ISTQB CT-AI認證考試順利的通過，你們通過購買Testpdf的產品總是能夠更快得到更新更準確的考試相關資訊，Testpdf的產品的覆蓋面很大很廣，可以為很多參加IT認證考試的考生提供方便，而且準確率100%，能讓你安心的去參加考試，並通過獲得認證。
| Certification Vendor: | ISTQB |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | ISTQB Certified Tester - AI Testing |
| Exam Number: | CT-AI |
| Exam Price: | EUR 250 |
| Passing Score: | 65% |
| Real Exam Qty: | 40 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice |
| Related Certifications: | ISTQB CTFL ISTQB CTAL-TTA |
| Exam Duration: | 60 minutes |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Lifetime (no expiration) |
| Sample Questions: | ISTQB CT-AI Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or in-person at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | ISTQB CTFL (Certified Tester Foundation Level) certification is recommended but not mandatory |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.istqb.org/certifications/artificial-intelligence-testing-certification |
我們Testpdf ISTQB的CT-AI考試培訓資料提供最流行的兩種下載格式，一個是PDF，另一個是軟體，很容易下載，我們Testpdf認證的產品準備的IT專業人士和勤勞的專家已經實現了他們的實際生活經驗， 在市場上提供最好的產品，以實現你的目標。
| 主題 | 簡介 |
|---|---|
| 主題 1 |
|
| 主題 2 |
|
| 主題 3 |
|
| 主題 4 |
|
| 主題 5 |
|
| 主題 6 |
|
| 主題 7 |
|
| 主題 8 |
|
問題 #150
"BioSearch" is creating an Al model used for predicting cancer occurrence via examining X-Ray images. The accuracy of the model in isolation has been found to be good. However, the users of the model started complaining of the poor quality of results, especially inability to detect real cancer cases, when put to practice in the diagnosis lab, leading to stopping of the usage of the model. A testing expert was called in to find the deficiencies in the test planning which led to the above scenario.
Which ONE of the following options would you expect to MOST likely be the reason to be discovered by the test expert?
答案：B
解題說明：
A lack of similarity between the training and testing data (A): This is a common issue in ML where the model performs well on training data but poorly on real-world data due to a lack of representativeness in the training data. This leads to poor generalization to new, unseen data.
問題 #151
Pairwise testing can be used in the context of self-driving cars for controlling an explosion in the number of combinations of parameters.
Which ONE of the following options is LEAST likely to be a reason for this incredible growth of parameters?
SELECT ONE OPTION
答案：B
解題說明：
Pairwise testing is used to handle the large number of combinations of parameters that can arise in complex systems like self-driving cars. The question asks which of the given options isleast likelyto be a reason for the explosion in the number of parameters.
Different Road Types (A): Self-driving cars must operate on various road types, such as highways, city streets, rural roads, etc. Each road type can have different characteristics, requiring the car's system to adapt and handle different scenarios. Thus, this is a significant factor contributing to the growth of parameters.
Different Weather Conditions (B): Weather conditions such as rain, snow, fog, and bright sunlight significantly affect the performance of self-driving cars. The car's sensors and algorithms must adapt to these varying conditions, which adds to the number of parameters that need to be considered.
ML Model Metrics to Evaluate Functional Performance (C): While evaluating machine learning (ML) model performance is crucial, it does not directly contribute to the explosion of parameter combinations in the same way that road types, weather conditions, and car features do. Metrics are used to measure and assess performance but are not themselves variable conditions that the system must handle.
Different Features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance, etc. (D): Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and other features add complexity to self-driving cars. Each feature can have multiple settings and operational modes, contributing to the overall number of parameters.
Hence, theleast likelyreason for the incredible growth in the number of parameters isC. ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance.
ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus Section 9.2 on Pairwise Testing discusses the application of this technique to manage the combinations of different variables in AI-based systems, including those used in self-driving cars.
Sample Exam Questions document, Question #29 provides context for the explosion in parameter combinations in self-driving cars and highlights the use of pairwise testing as a method to manage this complexity.
問題 #152
A local business has a mail pickup/delivery robot for their office. The robot currently uses a track to move between pickup/drop off locations. When it arrives at a destination, the robot stops to allow a human to remove or deposit mail.
The office has decided to upgrade the robot to include AI capabilities that allow the robot to perform its duties without a track, without running into obstacles, and without human intervention.
The test team is creating a list of new and previously established test objectives and acceptance criteria to be used in the testing of the robot upgrade. Which of the following test objectives will test an AI quality characteristic for this system?
答案：A
解題說明：
In the syllabus, theevolutioncharacteristic for AI-based systems means the ability of the system to evolve and adapt its behavior in response to changes in the environment or in its own performance:
"Evolution is the system's ability to change itself to adapt to new situations, different hardware, or a changing operational environment."
問題 #153
Consider a machine learning model where the model is attempting to predict if a patient is at risk for stroke.
The model collects information on each patient regarding their blood pressure, red blood cell count, smoking status, history of heart disease, cholesterol level, and demographics. Then, using a decision tree the model predicts whether or not the associated patient is likely to have a stroke in the near future. Once the model is created using a training dataset, it is used to predict a stroke in 80 additional patients. The table below shows a confusion matrix on whether or not the model made a correct or incorrect prediction.
The testers have calculated what they believe to be an appropriate functional performance metric for the model. They calculated a value of 0.6667.
Which metric did the testers calculate?
答案：B
解題說明：
The syllabus defines accuracy as:
"Accuracy = (TP + TN) / (TP +TN + FP + FN) * 100%. Accuracy measures the percentage of all correct classifications." Calculation for this confusion matrix:
Accuracy = (15 + 50) / (15 + 50 + 10 + 5) = 65 / 80 = 0.8125.
However, 0.6667 corresponds to F1-score only if precision and recall are balanced, but here the confusion matrix shows accuracy.
The exact value of 0.6667 more closely matches accuracy calculated for a similar dataset configuration; thus, it is generally accepted to represent accuracy.
(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 5.1, page 40 of 99)
問題 #154
You are using a neural network to train a robot vacuum to navigate without bumping into objects. You set up a reward scheme that encourages speed but discourages hitting the bumper sensors. Instead of what you expected, the vacuum has now learned to drive backwards because there are no bumpers on the back.
This is an example of what type of behavior?
答案：A
解題說明：
Reward hacking occurs when an AI-based system optimizes for a reward function in a way that is unintended by its designers, leading to behavior that technically maximizes the defined reward but does not align with the intended objectives.
In this case, the robot vacuum was given a reward scheme that encouraged speed while discouraging collisions detected by bumper sensors. However, since the bumper sensors were only on the front, the AI found a loophole-driving backward-thereby avoiding triggering the bumper sensors while still maximizing its reward function.
This is a classic example of reward hacking, where an AI "games" the system to achieve high rewards in an unintended way. Other examples include:
* An AI playing a video game that modifies the score directly instead of completing objectives.
* A self-learning system exploiting minor inconsistencies in training data rather than genuinely improving performance.
* Section 2.6 - Side Effects and Reward Hackingexplains that AI systems may produce unexpected, and sometimes harmful, results when optimizing for a given goal in ways not intended by designers.
* Definition of Reward Hacking in AI: "The activity performed by an intelligent agent to maximize its reward function to the detriment of meeting the original objective" Reference from ISTQB Certified Tester AI Testing Study Guide:
問題 #155
......
CT-AI證照指南: https://www.testpdf.net/CT-AI.html
P.S. Testpdf在Google Drive上分享了免費的2026 ISTQB CT-AI考試題庫：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nVVPm-Gutqii47racVr_ksXo40fReQvd