As the quick development of the world economy and intense competition in the international, the world labor market presents many new trends: company’s demand for the excellent people is growing. As is known to us, the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization certification is one mainly mark of the excellent. If you don’t have enough ability, it is very possible for you to be washed out. On the contrary, the combination of experience and the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Certification could help you resume stand out in a competitive job market.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Configuration management for optimization - Report generation and interpretation - Nokia NetAct and performance tools - Automated optimization features |
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Handover optimization - Coverage optimization methods - Interference analysis and mitigation - Capacity optimization strategies - Parameter tuning best practices - Load balancing techniques |
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - SRAN network architecture overview - Single RAN integration principles - Radio access concepts and principles - SRAN solution components and functions |
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Optimization case studies - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Common performance issues diagnosis - Network failure identification and resolution - Root cause analysis methodologies |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - KPI definition and measurement - Performance data collection and analysis - Threshold configuration and alerting - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards - Real-time network monitoring techniques |
>> Valid Exam SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Blueprint <<
The MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice test is available in three compatible and user-friendly formats. These formats are SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization desktop practice test software, MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization web-based practice exam, and Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization PDF dumps file. All three formats of SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study material contain actual and verified MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Dumps that will help you boost your exam preparation. The Nokia desktop practice test software and web-based SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice test both simulate the actual exam environment and identify your mistakes.
NEW QUESTION # 23
Which port must be opened in NetAct for the connection from TraceSynthesis to NetAct?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
The connection from TraceSynthesis to NetAct is typically based on secure web/API communication, which uses HTTPS . The standard HTTPS port is 443 . Therefore, port 443 must be opened in NetAct/firewall rules to allow TraceSynthesis to communicate with NetAct.
The other options are not the best answer:
8443 is often used as an alternative HTTPS/application-server port, but it is not the standard answer here.
22 is used for SSH, mainly for secure shell access or file transfer.
8080 is commonly used for unsecured HTTP or proxy/application access, not the secure NetAct connection expected here.
So the required port is:
443.
NEW QUESTION # 24
Which of the following statements about CBRA , or contention-based random access , is correct?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In contention-based random access , the UE chooses a random access preamble by itself from a configured pool of available contention-based preambles. This is typically used when the UE does not yet have a dedicated connection or when the network has not assigned a dedicated preamble.
Because multiple UEs may choose the same preamble at the same time, preamble collision is possible . That is why CBRA requires a contention resolution step.
Option C describes contention-free random access , not CBRA. In contention-free random access, the network assigns a dedicated preamble to the UE, so collision risk is avoided and contention resolution is not required.
Option A is not the correct CBRA principle being tested. RACH false detection can be a receiver/design issue, but it does not define the CBRA procedure.
Option D describes a possible NSA signaling behavior around access failure handling, but it is not the core correct definition of CBRA.
Therefore, the correct CBRA statement is:
The UE autonomously selects a preamble from the configured range and starts the random access procedure.
NEW QUESTION # 25
The slice type SST value for Extreme Broadband is typically:
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In 5G network slicing, SST means Slice/Service Type . It identifies the high-level service category of a network slice.
Typical standardized SST values are:
SST = 1 # eMBB, enhanced Mobile Broadband
SST = 2 # URLLC, Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication
SST = 3 # MIoT/mMTC, Massive IoT or massive Machine Type Communication
SST = 4 # V2X-related slice type
"Extreme Broadband" is normally aligned with eMBB , because it refers to high data rate, high capacity, and broadband user experience.
Therefore, the SST value for Extreme Broadband is:
1.
NEW QUESTION # 26
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.
NEW QUESTION # 27
A customer complains about coverage reduction after modernization of 4G TDD 4x4 sites to Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 with AEHC module 64T64R . Which of the following statements regarding RF design changes to increase the coverage is correct?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In a Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 AEHC 64T64R deployment, LTE and NR share the same Massive MIMO active antenna system. Public Nokia material identifies AEHC as an AirScale Massive MIMO
64T64R B41 radio product, and Nokia's AirScale Massive MIMO portfolio is designed for high-capacity 5G
/RAN deployments.
Unlike a passive antenna system where coverage is changed mainly by physical/electrical RET, Massive MIMO coverage is strongly influenced by beamforming profiles and beamforming weight parameters . In concurrent LTE/NR operation, the RF design must consider the shared active antenna behavior, not independent passive RET-style tilt control per technology.
Therefore, for concurrent 4G/5G mMIMO coverage adjustment, the correct statement is:
The tilt/coverage behavior for both 4G and 5G is controlled by mMIMOSecSectorBFProfName and beamforming weight profile parameters.
NEW QUESTION # 28
......
However, when asked whether the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization latest dumps are reliable, costumers may be confused. For us, we strongly recommend the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam questions compiled by our company, here goes the reason. On one hand, our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization test material owns the best quality. When it comes to the study materials selling in the market, qualities are patchy. But our Nokia test material has been recognized by multitude of customers, which possess of the top-class quality, can help you pass exam successfully. On the other hand, our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Latest Dumps are designed by the most experienced experts, thus it can not only teach you knowledge, but also show you the method of learning in the most brief and efficient ways.
SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Valid Exam Guide: https://www.examstorrent.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-exam-dumps-torrent.html