The research and production of our 156-590 study materials are undertaken by our first-tier expert team. The clients can have a free download and tryout of our 156-590 study materials before they decide to buy our products. They can use our products immediately after they pay for the 156-590 study materials successfully. If the clients are unlucky to fail in the test we will refund them as quickly as we can. There are so many advantages of our products that we canโt summarize them with several simple words. Youโd better look at the introduction of our 156-590 Study Materials in detail as follow by yourselves.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Logs, Monitoring, and Troubleshooting | - SmartConsole logging and analysis - Troubleshooting Threat Prevention issues |
| Topic 2: IPS and Anti-Bot Technologies | - Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) configuration and tuning - Anti-Bot detection and mitigation |
| Topic 3: Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware | - File inspection and malware detection - Threat Emulation and Threat Extraction concepts |
| Topic 4: URL Filtering and Application Control | - URL filtering policy configuration - Application Control enforcement and monitoring |
| Topic 5: Threat Prevention Architecture | - Security Gateway Threat Prevention blades - Check Point Threat Prevention framework overview |
>> Reliable 156-590 Exam Topics <<
Our 156-590 study materials just need you to memorize all keypoints of the knowledge of the real exam. It is unnecessary to review all irrelevant knowledges. At present, our 156-590 exam questions have helped thousands of people pass the exam and obtain the certificate. Also, the passing rate of our 156-590 Training Materials is the highest according to our investigation. None of the other exam braindumps in the market has the pass rate high as 98% to 100% as our 156-590 learning quiz.
NEW QUESTION # 21
What information is provided by "fwaccel stats"?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. You can check the percentage of F2F connections along with the reason why those connections could not be accelerated . The command fwaccel stats is part of SecureXL performance analysis. It is used to inspect how traffic is distributed across acceleration paths and firewall paths, which is essential when Threat Prevention blades or deep inspection features push traffic away from full acceleration.
Check Point's Performance Tuning documentation shows that fwaccel stats -s provides a summary including accelerated packets, F2Fed packets, F2V packets, CPASXL packets, PSLXL packets, and related totals.
The same documentation explains that F2F packets are packets SecureXL forwarded to the Firewall kernel in the slow path. This makes the command directly useful when diagnosing performance issues caused by non- accelerated inspection, SecureXL violations, or traffic that must be inspected by firewall and Threat Prevention components. Option A is wrong because fwaccel stats does not enable QoS acceleration. Option C is too generic; the command is not merely utilization monitoring. Option D better describes fwaccel stat , which reports SecureXL status, accelerated interfaces, and accelerated features. Reference topics: SecureXL, fwaccel stats, F2F packets, accelerated path, firewall path, performance troubleshooting.
NEW QUESTION # 22
Using IPS can send a large part of traffic to F2F path.
Which command can you use to enforce traffic quotas?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. fwaccel dos rate . When IPS or other Threat Prevention inspection causes significant traffic to leave the fully accelerated SecureXL path and move to F2F, the gateway can experience higher CPU utilization because more packets require Firewall kernel processing. The fwaccel dos rate command belongs to SecureXL DoS and rate-limiting controls. Check Point's Performance Tuning guide defines fwaccel dos rate and fwaccel6 dos rate as commands that show and install the Rate Limiting policy in SecureXL. It also notes that the feature is enabled by default without rules.
This makes it the correct command for enforcing traffic quotas or rate-limiting policy in the accelerated path.
fw dos rate is not the correct Check Point syntax. fwaccel rate omits the DoS rate-limiting command hierarchy. fw ctl dos is also not the documented command for SecureXL rate policy installation. In operational performance tuning, fwaccel DoS rate controls are useful when the gateway must protect CPU resources from excessive connection rates, volumetric pressure, or inspection-heavy flows that can amplify the impact of Threat Prevention processing. Reference topics: SecureXL DoS Mitigation, Rate Limiting Policy, fwaccel dos rate, F2F path, IPS performance impact.
NEW QUESTION # 23
What type of layer is the threat Prevention?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Ordered . Threat Prevention policy uses ordered policy layers. Check Point documentation states that you can create a Threat Prevention Rule Base with multiple Ordered Layers , and that Ordered Layers help organize the Rule Base according to organizational needs, such as services or networks. Each Policy Layer calculates its action separately from other layers, and when there is one layer in the policy package, the first matched rule is enforced.
This is a core certification distinction. Access Control can use ordered and inline layers, but Threat Prevention is treated as an ordered layer policy model. The policy evaluates rules in order and applies the appropriate Threat Prevention profile, blades, protection behavior, and tracking according to rule matching. Option C describes when Threat Prevention is applied in the traffic flow-after Access Control accepts the connection-but it does not answer the question about the layer type. Option A is incorrect because Threat Prevention is not both ordered and inline in this context. Option B is incorrect because inline layers are not the Threat Prevention layer type being tested here. Reference topics: Threat Prevention Policy Layers, Ordered Layers, first-match behavior, policy-layer calculation, Threat Prevention Rule Base.
NEW QUESTION # 24
What happens to traffic that matches the Access Control Policy but not the Threat Prevention Policy?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. The traffic is not dropped. It is simply not inspected by the Threat Prevention Engine . Access Control and Threat Prevention are separate enforcement stages. The Access Control policy first decides whether the connection is allowed, rejected, or dropped. If Access Control accepts the connection, Threat Prevention is then applied only if the connection matches a Threat Prevention rule and therefore receives a Threat Prevention profile. Check Point documentation describes Threat Prevention policy as the mechanism used to activate only the protections needed and prevent attacks that most threaten the network. It also explains that Threat Prevention policy layers calculate their action separately and that in a single layer, the first matched rule is enforced.
Therefore, if accepted traffic does not match the Threat Prevention rulebase, no Threat Prevention profile is selected for that connection. The traffic is not blocked merely because of the non-match; it passes according to the Access Control decision, but without Threat Prevention inspection. Option A is too aggressive and incorrect. Option B incorrectly assumes logging. Option C is directionally true but incomplete because the key point is that Threat Prevention inspection is not applied. Reference topics: Access Control before Threat Prevention, Threat Prevention Rule Base, profile selection, unmatched traffic, ordered layer evaluation.
NEW QUESTION # 25
What are the logical components of a SNORT rule?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Rule Header and Rule Options . Check Point supports SNORT rule import so administrators can create custom IPS protections from SNORT signatures. The official Check Point SNORT Signature Support documentation states that SNORT rules use signatures to define attacks and that a SNORT rule has a rule header and rule options . It also provides the syntax structure, where the first section contains action, protocol, source, destination, ports, and direction, while the options section contains keywords such as message and content match criteria.
The Rule Header defines the traffic selector and enforcement context: protocol, source address, source port, direction, destination address, and destination port. The Rule Options define the detection logic and metadata inside parentheses, such as msg, content, and other matching keywords. "Rule body" is not the formal Check Point/SNORT term in this context, and "rule start/rule stop" is not a recognized logical construction. This matters because imported SNORT rules become IPS protections, so syntax correctness affects whether the Management Server can parse, import, and enforce the custom signature. Reference topics: SNORT Signature Support, Custom IPS Protections, Rule Header, Rule Options, imported SNORT protections.
NEW QUESTION # 26
......
Reliable 156-590 156-590 exam questions pdf, exam questions answers and latest test book can help customer success in their field. CheckPoint offers 365 days updates. Customers can download Latest 156-590 Exam Questions pdf and exam book. And Check Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS) 156-590fee is affordable. It is now time to begin your preparation by downloading the free demo of Check Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS) 156-590 Exam Dumps.
Exam 156-590 Training: https://www.validbraindumps.com/156-590-exam-prep.html