Itcertkr 는 완전히 여러분이 인증시험준비와 안전이 시험패스를 위한 완벽한 덤프제공사이트입니다.우리 Itcertkr의 덤프들은 응시자에 따라 ,시험 ,시험방법에 따라 제품의 완성도도 다릅니다.그 말은 즉 알 맞춤 자료입니다.여러분은 Itcertkr의 알맞춤 덤프들로 아주 간단하고 편안하게 패스할 수 있습니다.많은 Juniper인증관연 응시자들은 모두 우리Itcertkr가 제공하는 JN0-352문제와 답 덤프로 자격증 취득을 했습니다.때문에 우리Itcertkr또한 업계에서 아주 좋은 이미지를 가지고 잇습니다
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Routing Policy and Filtering | - Policy statements - Route filtering and preference control |
| Topic 2: Layer 2 Switching Technologies | - VLANs and trunking - Ethernet switching concepts - Spanning Tree Protocol (STP/RSTP/MSTP) |
| Topic 3: Network Services | - Basic multicast concepts - NAT concepts in Junos |
| Topic 4: High Availability | - Redundancy concepts in enterprise networks - VRRP configuration and behavior |
| Topic 5: Routing Protocols | - BGP fundamentals and policy control - OSPF configuration and troubleshooting - IS-IS overview |
| Topic 6: Operations and Troubleshooting | - Troubleshooting routing and switching issues - Junos CLI monitoring tools |
Itcertkr의Juniper JN0-352 덤프 구매 후 등록된 사용자가 구매일로부터 일년 이내에Juniper JN0-352시험에 실패하셨다면 Itcertkr메일에 주문번호와 불합격성적표를 보내오셔서 환불신청하실수 있습니다.구매일자 이전에 발생한 시험불합격은 환불보상의 대상이 아닙니다. 개별 인증사는 불합격성적표를 발급하지 않기에 재시험신청내역을 환불증명으로 제출하시면 됩니다.
질문 # 34
You are asked to configure a redundant trunk group (RTG). Which two requirements would accomplish this task? (Choose two.)
정답：A,D
질문 # 35
Your switches are managed using Junos Space Network Director. You want to secure the switches using a Network Director filter profile. A filter profile containing one term shown in the exhibit is deployed to ports on managed devices.
Which traffic will be accepted by the filter?
정답：B
질문 # 36
Which statement describes how nonstop active routing (NSR) maintains routing protocol information during a Routing Engine switchover?
정답：D
설명：
Nonstop active routing's defining architectural feature is that the backup Routing Engine runs a fully live, active instance of the routing protocol daemon (rpd) in parallel with the primary Routing Engine's rpd instance, continuously, from the moment NSR and its prerequisite GRES are established - not merely at the instant a switchover begins. As protocol adjacencies form, routes are learned, and the RIB is updated on the primary Routing Engine, that same protocol and RIB state is mirrored in real time to the backup Routing Engine's rpd process through an internal synchronization mechanism, so the backup's protocol state remains a live, up-to-date replica of the primary's at essentially every moment during normal operation. When a switchover occurs, the backup Routing Engine simply assumes the primary role with protocol adjacencies, routing tables, and forwarding state already fully populated and current, allowing it to continue operating without re-establishing neighbor relationships or re-learning the network topology, which is what makes the switchover genuinely nonstop and invisible to neighboring routers. This is fundamentally different from graceful restart, where the restarting router must rebuild its state by requesting help from cooperating neighbors after the fact. The Packet Forwarding Engine plays no role in synchronizing protocol-layer information such as LSAs or BGP updates; that is strictly an rpd-to-rpd function coordinated through the Routing Engine synchronization infrastructure. Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Routing - High Availability, Nonstop Active Routing Architecture and rpd Synchronization.
질문 # 37
You implement FBF on router R1 so that traffic from subnet 172.25.0.0/24 uses ISP-A and traffic from subnet
172.25.1.0/24 uses ISP-B. You create forwarding instances for ISP-A and ISP-B. You also configure static default routes inside each instance. However, the static default routes remain inactive.
In this scenario, which action would complete the FBF implementation?
정답：B
설명：
A classic and well-documented gotcha in filter-based forwarding deployments is that the static default route configured inside each forwarding instance frequently references a next-hop address that Junos cannot resolve, simply because the interface and other directly connected routes needed to validate that next hop as reachable exist only in the master inet.0 table by default, not automatically inside the newly created forwarding instance's own table. Since a static route's next hop must be resolvable against routes present within its own routing table to become active, the static default routes inside the ISP-A and ISP-B forwarding instances remain inactive precisely because the necessary interface/next-hop routes were never made visible inside those instances. The standard solution taught for this exact FBF scenario is to configure a routing information base (RIB) group that explicitly imports the relevant interface routes between the master inet.0 table and each forwarding instance's table, allowing the static default route's next hop inside each instance to resolve correctly against the leaked routes and become active. Applying a firewall filter without ever attaching it to an interface accomplishes nothing, since an unapplied filter never evaluates any traffic. Increasing the static route's preference value only affects which competing route wins selection and does nothing to resolve an unreachable next hop. Changing the instance type away from forwarding (to virtual-router) would in fact break FBF entirely, since filter-based forwarding specifically depends on the forwarding instance type working together with a routing-instance firewall filter action. Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Routing - Protocol Independent Routing, Filter-Based Forwarding and RIB Group Route Leaking.
질문 # 38
Which two statements are correct about IS-IS? (Choose two.)
정답：B,C
질문 # 39
......
Juniper JN0-352인증시험도 어려울 뿐만 아니라 신청 또한 어렵습니다.Juniper JN0-352시험은 IT업계에서도 권위가 있고 직위가 있으신 분들이 응시할 수 있는 시험이라고 알고 있습니다. 우리 Itcertkr에서는Juniper JN0-352관련 학습가이드를 제동합니다. Itcertkr 는 우리만의IT전문가들이 만들어낸Juniper JN0-352관련 최신, 최고의 자료와 학습가이드를 준비하고 있습니다. 여러분의 편리하게Juniper JN0-352응시하는데 많은 도움이 될 것입니다.
JN0-352최신 덤프문제모음집: https://www.itcertkr.com/JN0-352_exam.html