BONUS!!! Download part of Dumpleader 312-97 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dH5z7dcyfiXpUj-1hj3ts_UYw0pB1-nK
With our ECCouncil 312-97 study matetials, you can make full use of those time originally spent in waiting for the delivery of exam files so that you can get preparations as early as possible. There is why our ECCouncil 312-97 learning prep exam is well received by the general public.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Related Certifications: | CSA (Certified Secure Application Developer) CND (Certified Network Defender) CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based Questions, Multiple Choice |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Exam Price: | $250 (USD) |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | Minimum 2 years of experience in cybersecurity or software development is recommended; CEH certification is a recommended prerequisite |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/item/exam-312-97-ec-certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde |
>> ECCouncil 312-97 Practice Guide <<
Our 312-97 learning materials will aim at helping every people fight for the 312-97 certificate and help develop new skills. If we want to survive in this competitive world, we need a comprehensive development plan to adapt to the requirement of modern enterprises. We sincerely recommend our 312-97 Preparation exam for our years' dedication and quality assurance will give you a helping hand. You can just free download the free demo of our 312-97 study materials to know how excellent our 312-97 exam questions are.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 59
A rapidly growing fintech startup is developing a mobile banking application that allows users to perform transactions, manage accounts, and apply for loans. The company follows a microservices architecture with multiple teams working on different components of the system. Developers frequently push code changes, but the current deployment process has become a bottleneck due to manual testing, inconsistent builds, and late-stage integration failures. Recently, an incident occurred where a small bug in the payment's module caused failed transactions for thousands of users. The issue remained undetected until production because the team lacked automated testing and continuous integration (CI) practices. The CTO has decided to implement a CI/CD pipeline to automate code integration, testing, and deployment. The goal is to ensure every code commit is automatically built, tested, and deployed if it passes all checks. As the lead DevOps engineer, you need to recommend an open-source CI/CD tool that integrates well with microservices, supports automated testing, and provides early feedback on code issues. Which tool would be the choice?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Jenkins is the open-source automation server widely used to build CI/CD pipelines that automatically build, test, and deploy every commit, integrates well with microservices via plugins and pipelines-as-code, and gives early feedback on code issues. Snyk is a security scanner, TeamCity is commercial (proprietary), and GitHub Actions is SaaS tied to GitHub rather than the classic open-source choice.
NEW QUESTION # 60
Kenji Watanabe, a DevSecOps engineer at a Tokyo gaming studio, needs a testing tool that combines code instrumentation with live traffic analysis, so it can pinpoint the exact line of vulnerable code triggered when a QA tester clicks through the application during functional testing. Which approach should Kenji choose?
Answer: A
Explanation:
IAST works by instrumenting the application with agents that monitor code execution from within while the application is exercised through normal functional or QA testing, allowing it to correlate detected vulnerabilities directly back to specific lines of source code in real time -- precisely what Kenji needs. Penetration testing is typically a manual or semi-manual black-box/gray-box assessment performed by security testers simulating real-world attacks, and does not inherently tie findings to exact source lines through instrumentation during routine QA clicks. Threat modeling is a design-time planning activity performed before code execution. Chaos engineering intentionally injects failures into production or production-like systems to test resilience, not to detect code-level vulnerabilities during functional testing. Because Kenji wants instrumented, line- level detection during live QA interaction, IAST is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 61
Steven Gerrard has been working as a DevSecOps engineer at an IT company that develops software products and applications related to the healthcare industry. His organization has been using Azure DevOps services to securely and quickly develop software products. To ensure that the deployed infrastructure is in accordance with the architecture and industrial standards and the security policies are appropriately implemented, she would like to integrate InSpec with Azure.
Therefore, after installation and configuration of InSpec, she created InSpec profile file and upgraded it with personal metadata and Azure resource pack information; then she wrote the InSpec tests. Which of the following commands should Steven use to run InSpec tests to check the compliance of Azure infrastructure?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Chef InSpec executes compliance tests using the inspec exec command. When testing Azure infrastructure, InSpec requires a target specification using the -t flag with the Azure transport identifier azure://. The correct command is inspec exec inspec-tests/integration/ -t azure://.
Options using exe instead of exec are invalid due to incorrect command spelling. Options that use the -it flag misuse command-line parameters that are not intended for target selection. Running InSpec tests in this way allows DevSecOps teams to validate that Azure resources comply with architectural, security, and regulatory requirements. Integrating these checks into the Build and Test stage ensures continuous compliance and reduces the risk of insecure infrastructure reaching production environments.
NEW QUESTION # 62
(Timothy Dalton has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer in an IT company located in Auburn, New York. He would like to use Jenkins for CI and Azure Pipelines for CD to deploy a Java-based app to an Azure Container Service (AKS) Kubernetes cluster. Before deploying Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Cluster, Timothy wants to create a Resource group named Jenkins in southindia location. Which of the following commands should Timothy run?.)
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure resource groups are created using the Azure CLI command az group create. The --name parameter specifies the resource group name, and --location defines the Azure region. Option A uses the correct CLI prefix (az), command group (group create), and valid parameters. Options B, C, and D are incorrect due to invalid command abbreviations or incorrect CLI prefixes (azure instead of az). Creating a resource group is a foundational step in the Release and Deploy stage, as it provides a logical container for AKS clusters, networking components, and related resources, enabling organized, secure, and manageable deployments.
========
NEW QUESTION # 63
Scott Morrison is working as a senior DevSecOps engineer at SUTRE SOFT Pvt. Ltd. His organization develops software and applications for IoT devices. Scott created a user story; he then created abuser stories under the user story. After that, he created threat scenarios under the abuser story, and then he created test cases for the threat scenarios. After defining the YAML, Scott would like to push the user-story driven threat model to the ThreatPlaybook server. Which of the following command Scott should use?
Answer: D
Explanation:
ThreatPlaybook uses the playbook apply feature command to push user-story-driven threat models to the server. The -f flag specifies the path to the YAML file containing the defined user stories, abuser stories, and threat scenarios, while the -p flag specifies the target project. Option C correctly combines these parameters. The -y flag is invalid in this context, and options that misuse -t instead of -p do not correctly identify the project destination. Executing this command during the Plan stage enables teams to integrate threat modeling early, ensuring security risks are identified and addressed before development and deployment proceed.
NEW QUESTION # 64
......
312-97 Reliable Test Test: https://www.dumpleader.com/312-97_exam.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Dumpleader 312-97 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dH5z7dcyfiXpUj-1hj3ts_UYw0pB1-nK