無料でクラウドストレージから最新のJpexam ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B9MvDUS6nXoBabjsRET2qc7qNrdkVGiv
Jpexamに提供されている資料はIT認定試験に対して10年過ぎの経験を持っているプロフェッショナルによって研究と実践を通じて作成し出されたものです。Jpexamは最新かつ最も正確な試験ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor問題集を用意しておきます。Jpexamは皆さんの成功のために存在しているものですから、Jpexamを選択することは成功を選択するのと同じです。順調にIT認定試験に合格したいなら、Jpexamはあなたの唯一の選択です。
| Certification Vendor: | PECB |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam |
| Exam Number: | ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor |
| Available Languages: | Russian, Portuguese, Italian, Chinese, Arabic, French, German, Spanish, English |
| Passing Score: | 70% (minimum 28/40 or 56/80 correct answers) |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Related Certifications: | ISO 9001 Provisional Auditor ISO 9001 Foundation ISO 9001 Auditor |
| Exam Price: | $1000 USD |
| Exam Duration: | 180 (120 + 30 for non-native speakers) |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based, Multi-response, Open-book, Multiple choice |
| Real Exam Qty: | 40–80 |
| Recommended Training: | PECB ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course |
| Exam Registration: | PECB Official Registration |
| Sample Questions: | PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored via PECB Exams app or paper-based at authorized test centers |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended: ISO 9001 Foundation knowledge or certification; no mandatory prerequisites, but experience in quality management is advised |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://pecb.com/en/education-and-certification-for-individuals/iso-9001/iso-9001-lead-auditor |
>> ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験情報 <<
これは、今後のISO-9001-Lead-Auditorテストのために有効な試験準備資料を購入する良い方法です。 適切な選択により、半分の労力で2倍の結果が得られます。 適切な試験準備により、明確な方向性が示され、効率的な準備ができます。 ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験の準備は正しい方向を示すだけでなく、実際の試験問題のほとんどをカバーできるため、試験の内容を事前に知ることができます。 PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験準備の質問と回答をマスターし、試験気分を積極的に調整することもできます。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
質問 # 111
You are carrying out an audit to ISO 9001 at an organisation which offers regulatory consultancy services to manufacturers of cosmetics.
You are interviewing the Technical Director (TD), who manages a team of regulatory experts responsible for providing regulatory services to customers.
You: "How do you ensure your regulatory team's competence concerning regulatory requirements is maintained?" TD: "The two Regulatory Experts we employ full-time have years of experience of working in the cosmetics industry." You: "How is their regulatory competence maintained?" TD: "They are dedicated individuals with lots of contacts in the sector." You: "How does the business enable them to maintain their understanding of current regulatory requirements?" TD: "We leave that up to them."
正解：
解説：
質問 # 112
XYZ Corporation employs 100 people, and during a Stage 1 certification audit, certain issues are identified with the Quality Management System (QMS). Which two options describe the circumstances in which you could raise a nonconformity against Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015?
正解：A、E
解説：
* Understanding Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015:Clause 6.2 (Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them) specifies that organizations must:
* Establish measurable and relevant quality objectives consistent with the quality policy (Clause
6.2.1).
* Include objectives applicable to product/service conformity and customer satisfaction.
* Document these objectives and their planning as documented information (Clause 6.2.1 &
6.2.2).
* Plan how to achieve the objectives, including defining actions, resources, responsibilities, timelines, and methods for evaluation.
* Analysis of Options:
* A. Quality objectives are not being implemented by the organisation's personnel:Incorrect.
While implementation is critical, this relates more to operational aspects rather than the direct requirements of Clause 6.2. Implementation issues would typically raise concerns under Clause
9.1 (Performance Evaluation).
* B. The consultant has not interpreted ISO 9001 correctly:Incorrect. The consultant's interpretation of ISO 9001 is irrelevant in terms of Clause 6.2 compliance. The focus is on whether the organization aligns with the requirements, not the consultant's role.
* C. Establishing quality objectives did not include top management:Incorrect. While top management involvement is vital for QMS effectiveness (Clause 5.1), this is not a direct requirement of Clause 6.2. Top management alignment is implied but not explicitly mandated for establishing quality objectives.
* D. Quality objectives were not established in alignment with the organisation's quality policy:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 requires that quality objectives be consistent with the organization's quality policy, ensuring they reflect its purpose, strategic direction, and commitment to continual improvement. Misalignment would constitute a nonconformity.
* E. The organisation cannot afford to undertake quality objectives all at once:Incorrect.
Financial constraints are not directly addressed in Clause 6.2. The clause focuses on planning to achieve objectives, which includes defining the necessary resources but does not demand achieving all objectives simultaneously.
* F. Quality objectives are not maintained as documented information:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 specifically requires that quality objectives be maintained as documented information. Failure to document the objectives is a direct violation of this clause.
* Why Options D and F Are Correct:
* D: Misalignment between the quality objectives and the quality policy directly violates Clause
6.2.1, which mandates that objectives support the strategic direction of the organization.
* F: Lack of documentation for quality objectives breaches the requirement to maintain them as documented information under Clause 6.2.1.
* Relevant References:
* Clause 6.2.1: Establishing quality objectives aligned with the quality policy.
* Clause 6.2.2: Maintaining documented information for quality objectives and planning to achieve them.
* Clause 5.1.1: Top management's responsibility to ensure alignment between the QMS and strategic direction.
質問 # 113
Scenario 5: Mechanical-Electro (ME) Audit Stages
Mechanical-Electro, better known as ME, is an American company that provides mechanical and electrical services in China. Their services range from air-conditioning systems, ventilation systems, plumbing, to installation of electrical equipment in automobile plants, electronic manufacturing facilities, and food processing plants.
Due to the fierce competition from local Chinese companies and failing to meet customer requirements, ME ' s revenue dropped significantly. In addition, customers ' trust and confidence in the company decreased, and the reputation of the company was damaged.
In light of these developments, the top management of ME decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After having an effective QMS in place for over a year, they applied for a certification audit.
A team of four auditors was appointed for the audit, including Li Na as the audit team leader. Initially, the audit team conducted a general review of ME ' s documents, including the quality policy, operational procedures, inventory lists, QMS scope, process documentation, training records, and previous audit reports.
Li Na stated that this would allow the team to maintain a systematic and structured approach to gathering documents for all audit stages. While reviewing the documented information, the team observed some minor issues but did not identify any major nonconformities. Therefore, Li Na claimed that it was not necessary to prepare a report or conduct a meeting with ME ' s representatives at that stage of the audit. She stated that all areas of concern would be discussed in the next phase of the audit.
Following the on-site activities and the opening meeting with ME ' s top management, the audit team structured an audit test plan to verify whether ME's QMS conformed to Clause 8.2.1 (Customer Communication) of ISO 9001.
To do so, they gathered information through group interviews and sampling. Li Na conducted interviews with departmental managers in the first group and then with top management. In addition, she chose a sampling method that sufficiently represented customer complaints from both areas of ME ' s operations.
The team members were responsible for the sampling procedure. They selected a sample size of 4 out of 45 customer complaints received weekly for electrical services and 2 out of 10 complaints for mechanical services.
Afterward, the audit team evaluated the evidence against the audit criteria and generated the audit findings.
According to scenario 5, Li Na conducted group interviews with departmental managers and top management by herself. Is this in accordance with audit best practices?
正解：B
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 (Conducting Interviews), group interviews should be conducted with at least two auditors to ensure objectivity and accuracy.
This prevents bias or misinterpretation of responses.
It allows for cross-validation of information.
It ensures that the audit results remain objective and impartial.
Since Li Na conducted the group interviews alone, she did not follow audit best practices. The correct approach would have been to have another auditor present during the interviews.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 (Conducting Interviews)
質問 # 114
The following are stages of an audit, put them in the order they would be conducted.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Establishing the audit programme objectives
Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities
Establishing the audit programme
Initiating the audit
Preparing all audit activity
Conducting the audit activities
To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.
Here is a brief explanation of each stage:
Establishing the audit programme objectives: This is the first stage of the audit process, where the purpose, scope, and criteria of the audit programme are defined. The audit programme objectives should be aligned with the strategic direction and policies of the organization, and should address the needs and expectations of the interested parties12.
Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities: This is the second stage of the audit process, where the factors that can affect the achievement of the audit programme objectives are identified and assessed. The audit programme risks and opportunities should consider the internal and external issues, the requirements and changes of the interested parties, and the results and feedback from previous audits12.
Establishing the audit programme: This is the third stage of the audit process, where the audit programme is designed and implemented. The audit programme should include the audit programme procedures, the audit programme resources, the audit methods and techniques, the audit frequency and schedule, and the audit programme performance indicators12.
Initiating the audit: This is the fourth stage of the audit process, where the audit is prepared and planned. The audit initiation involves selecting the audit team, establishing the contact with the auditee, defining the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, developing the audit plan, and conducting the document review123.
Preparing all audit activity: This is the fifth stage of the audit process, where the audit activities are organized and coordinated. The audit preparation involves assigning the audit tasks, communicating with the auditee and the audit team, arranging the logistics, preparing the working documents, and conducting the opening meeting123.
Conducting the audit activities: This is the sixth and final stage of the audit process, where the audit evidence is collected and evaluated. The audit conduct involves performing the audit activities, such as interviews, observations, document reviews, and tests, documenting the audit findings, preparing the audit conclusions, and conducting the closing meeting123.
I hope this helps you with your ISO 9001 Lead Auditor objectives and content. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. # References: 1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems 2: Audit Process | Flowchart | Summary - Accountinguide 3: What are the Stages of the Auditing Process & Why it is Important ...
質問 # 115
An audit team leader arrives at a printing company to carry out a Stage 2 audit for a certification body. At a meeting with the Quality Manager, she is told that they have won their biggest contract from a computer manufacturer to print and compile computer documentation packages. The Quality Manager wants the ISO
9001 certificate to cover the new contract.
During the audit, a team member found that some print jobs had been rejected by several clients over some months due to spelling errors in the print run. The Print Manager blames the new employees they had to take on because of a big contract.
The auditor finds that the responsibility for checking spelling errors is placed on the printer that sets up the print run.
In line with the policy of the certification body, the audit team raise improvement opportunities in the audit report. Which three of the following options would represent acceptable opportunities for improvement in the report?
正解：A、D、H
解説：
According to the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Improvement Opportunities1, an improvement opportunity is a suggestion made by the auditor for the auditee to consider that, if implemented, may enhance the performance of the QMS. Improvement opportunities are not mandatory, but they should be based on objective evidence and aligned with the audit criteria and objectives. Improvement opportunities should also be realistic, feasible, and beneficial for the auditee. In this case, the evidence statements that represent acceptable improvement opportunities in the report are A, C, and E, because they address the potential causes and effects of the spelling errors in the print run, and propose possible actions that may improve the quality of the products and services, and the effectiveness of the QMS. These options are consistent with the requirements and principles of ISO 9001, such as clause 6.1 on actions to address risks and opportunities, clause 8.1 on operational planning and control, clause 8.5.1 on control of production and service provision, and clause 10.2 on nonconformity and corrective action. The other options are not appropriate improvement opportunities, because they are either irrelevant, unrealistic, or unhelpful for the auditee. For example, option B may contradict the audit objective and scope, option D may imply a lack of auditor competence or impartiality, option F may not address the root cause of the problem, option G may not be applicable or effective, and option H may not be feasible or justified. References: ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Improvement Opportunities, ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Audit Evidence
質問 # 116
......
ISO-9001-Lead-Auditorコンポーネント: https://www.jpexam.com/ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor_exam.html
P.S. JpexamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいISO-9001-Lead-Auditorダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B9MvDUS6nXoBabjsRET2qc7qNrdkVGiv