SAVE International試験に合格し、関連する認定を取得するすべての顧客のニーズを満たすために、当社の専門家はすべての顧客向けに更新システムを設計しました。 CVS試験問題は毎日更新されます。 当社のIT専門家は、CVS試験準備が更新されているかどうかを確認する責任を負います。 CVSテストの質問が更新されると、すぐにシステムがお客様にメッセージを送信します。 CVS試験準備を使用する場合、更新システムをお楽しみいただき、CVS試験にCertified Value Specialist合格することができます。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Value Methodology Core Competencies | - Function Analysis - VM Facilitation and Leadership - Advanced VM Practice (Leadership-level application) - VM Study Execution and Team Management - Value Methodology Foundations
|
あなたはCVS試験を準備していて精確の資料がありませんなら、我々JPNTestの資料を参考しましょう。我々はあなたが一発で試験に合格するのを保証します。我々は試験に対応する弊社のCVS問題集を継続してアップグレードしています。あなたの持っているすべての商品は一年の無料更新を得られています。あなたは十分の時間でCVS試験を準備することができます。
質問 # 31
Which of the following are techniques the VM facilitator might use for a VM study team that is having difficulty completing the FAST diagram?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：A、C
解説：
The correct answers are A and D . When a VM study team struggles to complete a FAST diagram, the facilitator should guide the team through questioning, not take control of the technical work. Asking whether a function is missing is an appropriate facilitation technique because a break in the How/Why logic often means the team has skipped a needed function, used an unclear verb-noun statement, or failed to connect a supporting function to a higher-order function. This keeps ownership with the team while helping them complete the logic chain.
Reviewing the level of abstraction is also correct. FAST diagramming requires functions to be placed at the right level: not too broad, not too detailed, and consistent with the project scope. If one function is stated at a strategic level and another at a component-detail level, the FAST diagram becomes difficult to organize.
Option B is incorrect because the facilitator should not reorganize the functions for the team; that weakens team participation and ownership. Option C is incorrect because not every identified function must appear in the final FAST diagram. Only functions that support the logical function model should be used.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; Facilitation; Function Logic; Level of Abstraction.
質問 # 32
Which of the following are typically documented on an Implementation Form?
Choose 3 answers.
正解：A、B、E
解説：
The correct answers are B, D, and E . An Implementation Form is used after VM proposals have been developed, presented, reviewed, and moved into disposition or execution tracking. Its purpose is to identify each accepted or pending value alternative clearly enough that management, the project team, and follow-up reviewers can track what proposal is being implemented, who developed or owns it, and how it will be handled.
The SAVE International Study Guide describes Implementation Activities as ensuring accepted value alternatives are implemented and that projected benefits are realized. It further identifies activities such as conducting an implementation meeting, determining the disposition of each value alternative, establishing action plans, obtaining commitments, setting timeframes, tracking value achievement, and validating benefits.
( )
Therefore, an implementation form normally requires traceable proposal identifiers: the VM proposal number
, the title of the VM proposal , and the developer or originator/responsible party . These fields allow each proposal to be tracked from study recommendation through acceptance, rejection, modification, and completion. A creative idea list belongs to the Creativity Phase record, not implementation tracking. Risk impacts may support development or recommendation documentation, but they are not as fundamental as proposal identity and responsibility fields on the implementation form.
References/topics: Implementation Phase; VM Proposal Tracking; Action Plans; Follow-Up; Value Study Recommendation Documentation.
質問 # 33
Unwanted functions
Choose 3 answers.
正解：A、C、D
解説：
The correct answers are A, C, and E . In Value Methodology, an unwanted function is a negative or undesirable function created by the selected design approach, process method, or operating solution. The SAVE glossary defines an unwanted function as one identified by the customer, user, or stakeholder as undesirable and caused by the approach used to achieve the subject's purpose. The SAVE Value Methodology Standard similarly classifies it as a negative secondary function caused by the method used to achieve the basic function, such as heat generated by lighting that then requires cooling. ( UW Courses ) Therefore, C is correct because unwanted functions are typically byproducts of how another required or basic function is performed. A is correct because these negative functions can reduce performance, quality, reliability, safety, or user satisfaction. E is correct because unwanted functions consume resources through added mitigation, maintenance, energy, rework, or corrective measures.
Option D is incorrect because Value Index is used broadly in Function Analysis to compare cost and worth and select improvement opportunities, not to define unwanted functions. ( UW Courses ) Option B is too broad; unwanted functions may become targets for elimination, but that is not their defining characteristic.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Function Classification; Secondary Functions; Unwanted Functions; Function Cost and Worth.
質問 # 34
Which of the following are reasons why the VM facilitator and VM study team members should participate in the Implementation Meeting?
Choose 3 answers
正解：A、D、E
解説：
The correct answers are A, C, and E . The Implementation Meeting is not merely another presentation session; it is the point where management and the project team review the preliminary VM report, determine the disposition of each value alternative, establish action plans for accepted alternatives, obtain implementation commitments, and set timeframes for review and implementation. ( ) The VM facilitator and study team members should participate because they understand the technical basis, assumptions, cost comparisons, performance effects, and risk considerations behind the proposals. Therefore, they are needed to answer cost-impact questions , because accepted alternatives often depend on capital cost, operating cost, life-cycle cost, and implementation-cost implications. They are also needed to respond to technical questions , since the proposal write-ups include descriptions, sketches, assumptions, calculations, vendor information, performance data, and possible negative factors. ( ) They should also address the level of effort required for implementation , because implementation requires action steps, responsibilities, timing, resources, and follow-through. Option B is less appropriate because formal presentation occurs in the Presentation Phase. Option D is not the main purpose; the meeting disposes developed value alternatives, not creates a new set of alternative proposals.
References/topics: Implementation Phase; Implementation Meeting; Disposition of Value Alternatives; Cost Impact; Technical Clarification; Implementation Effort.
質問 # 35
The project team expresses uncertainty about how their tasks align with the overall objectives of the VM Job Plan. What steps should the VM facilitator take to enhance understanding of the VM Job Plan?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：A、B
解説：
The correct answers are A and B . The issue in the scenario is not lack of a deadline; it is lack of shared understanding of how individual responsibilities support the VM Job Plan. SAVE describes Value Methodology as a multidisciplinary team process used to improve project value through function analysis, and the VM Standard requires the Value Study Team to include experienced professionals and project stakeholders selected for their expertise and project experience. Therefore, pairing project and VM team members for deeper role discussion is appropriate because it builds cross-functional understanding, clarifies responsibilities, and improves team integration.
Option B is also correct because the facilitator should actively guide discussion so team members understand how their tasks contribute to the structured Job Plan. SAVE's Study Guide states that the Job Plan supports team synergy within a structured process rather than a collection of individual opinions, and each phase provides information and understanding needed for the next phase. SAVE's glossary also defines a facilitator as a substantively neutral person who enables the group to improve problem solving, decision making, and effectiveness while leading the group through the VM Job Plan.
Option C is weaker because a low-interaction lecture does not address uncertainty effectively. Option D manages schedule compliance, not understanding or alignment.
References/topics: VM Facilitation; Team Dynamics; VM Job Plan; Multidisciplinary Team; Facilitator Role.
質問 # 36
......
この情報の時代の中に、たくさんのIT機構はSAVE InternationalのCVS認定試験に関する教育資料がありますけれども、受験生がこれらのサイトを通じて詳細な資料を調べられなくて、対応性がなくて受験生の注意 に惹かれなりません。
CVSテストトレーニング: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/CVS-mondaishu