CVSテストガイドのサービスは非常に優れています。開発プロセスにおける顧客のニーズを常に考慮します。 CVS学習質問には、PDF、PC、およびAPPの3つのバージョンがあります。必要に応じて選択できます。もちろん、事前にCVS試験トレーニングの試用版を使用できます。それを使用した後、あなたはより深い経験を持つことになります。あなたの気持ちに応じて、お気に入りのCVS学習教材バージョンを選択できます。 CVS学習質問など、優れたサービス製品を選択する傾向があると思います
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Value Methodology Job Plan | 30% | - Presentation and implementation phase - Function analysis phase - Information phase - Development phase - Evaluation phase - Creative phase - Preparation phase |
| Tools and Techniques | 20% | - Function analysis system technique (FAST) - Creative thinking and idea generation methods - Decision-making and evaluation tools - Cost analysis and worth assessment |
| Standards, Ethics and Application | 10% | - SAVE International standards and guidelines - Professional ethics and responsibilities - Application in different industries and sectors |
| Value Methodology Principles and Concepts | 25% | - Definition and core concepts of Value - Value index, function and cost relationship - Origins, development and application scope of Value Methodology |
| Leadership and Facilitation | 15% | - Workshop facilitation skills - Leading value study teams - Stakeholder management and communication |
SAVE InternationalのCVS認定試験は現在で本当に人気がある試験ですね。まだこの試験の認定資格を取っていないあなたも試験を受ける予定があるのでしょうか。確かに、これは困難な試験です。しかし、難しいといっても、高い点数を取って楽に試験に合格できないというわけではないです。では、まだ試験に合格するショートカットがわからないあなたは、受験のテクニックを知りたいですか。今教えてあげますよ。PassTestのCVS問題集を利用することです。
質問 # 59
What are key factors that cause VM programs to fail?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：A、B
解説：
The correct answers are A and B . A VM program can fail when it is placed too narrowly inside one department because Value Methodology must operate as an organization-wide management process, not as the property of a single functional group. When VM is positioned inside one department, other departments may view it as that department's agenda rather than as a neutral, cross-functional decision-support process.
This weakens participation, reduces ownership of recommendations, and limits executive visibility.
An undefined implementation and change management process is also a major failure factor. VM studies produce recommendations, but the program succeeds only when those recommendations are reviewed, approved, assigned, tracked, and integrated into normal project or business controls. Without a defined implementation path, even technically strong VM proposals can remain unused. Change management is necessary because VM recommendations often alter scope, design, delivery approach, cost allocation, or stakeholder expectations.
By contrast, management support and tracking VM study results are success factors, not failure factors.
Executive support gives authority and resources, while tracking verifies savings, value improvement, and accountability.
References/topics: VM Programs; Program Organization; Management Support; Implementation Process; Change Management; Tracking VM Results.
質問 # 60
When is the most appropriate time to acquire information from the customer?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is C. Before the VM study begins . Customer information must be acquired during the Preparation Phase , also called the pre-study effort, because the VM facilitator needs accurate project knowledge before the formal study session starts. This includes the customer's objectives, needs, constraints, priorities, budget concerns, schedule requirements, performance expectations, risk issues, and definition of success. Without this information, the VM team may begin the study with an unclear scope, incomplete data, or incorrect assumptions.
The customer's input also helps the facilitator select the right team members, prepare the agenda, identify required documents, define study boundaries, and confirm the decision-making framework. By the time the team enters the Information Phase, the study should already be organized and supported by relevant background data.
Option A is weaker because waiting until the study begins reduces efficiency and may waste team time.
Option B is incorrect because the final presentation is for communicating recommendations, not collecting basic customer requirements. Option D is incorrect because conceptual development occurs after functions and ideas have already been analyzed.
References/topics: Preparation Phase; Pre-Study Activities; Customer Requirements; Study Scope; VM Job Plan; Information Readiness.
質問 # 61
What is the correct order for the management of change stages?
正解：A
解説：
The correct sequence is shock, defensive retreat, acknowledgement, adaptation to change . In Value Methodology, proposed alternatives often challenge existing assumptions, designs, ownership positions, or organizational habits. Therefore, resistance to change must be anticipated and managed as part of facilitation, presentation, and implementation. The CVS study material places team building and facilitation knowledge within the areas of team dynamics, consensus building, habits, attitudes, creativity roadblocks, and effective presentation. ( ) The first reaction to significant change is usually shock , where stakeholders are surprised or unsettled by the proposed departure from the current approach. This is followed by defensive retreat , where individuals may protect the original concept, defend prior decisions, or resist the implication that improvement is possible. The next stage is acknowledgement , where stakeholders begin to recognize the validity of the new information, value alternative, or improvement opportunity. Finally, adaptation to change occurs when the organization accepts the revised direction and begins integrating it into practice. This aligns with VM implementation guidance, where accepted alternatives must be planned, committed to, tracked, and embedded into the organization. ( ) References/topics: VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics; Change Management Strategies; Presentation Phase; Implementation Activities; Team Dynamics.
質問 # 62
Which of the following are the outputs of the Presentation Phase?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：C、D
解説：
The correct answers are C and D . The Presentation Phase is where the VM facilitator and study team formally communicate the conclusions of the VM study to decision makers. SAVE's VM Standard Reference states that, in this phase, the facilitator develops a report and/or presentation that documents and conveys the conclusions and results of the VM study.
Therefore, the VM study report is a direct output of the Presentation Phase. It records the developed value alternatives, supporting analysis, cost/performance implications, and the basis for management review. The list of VM proposals and results is also an output because decision makers must understand what proposals were generated, what benefits they offer, and what outcomes or decisions are associated with them.
Option A, list of participants, may appear in a report appendix or study record, but it is not a primary Presentation Phase output. Option B is incorrect because scheduling the VM presentation is a planning
/logistics activity, not an output of the phase. The phase produces documented results and communicates VM proposals for decision and follow-up.
References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Study Report; VM Proposals; Study Results; VM Job Plan.
質問 # 63
What reviews should be conducted during the development of VM proposals?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：B、C
解説：
The correct answers are B and C . During the Development Phase , selected ideas are converted into workable VM proposals. This phase requires disciplined review because recommendations must be technically sound, cost-supported, practical, and aligned with project objectives. All VM study team members should review the proposals because VM is a team-based methodology. The proposal must reflect multidisciplinary input, including function, cost, performance, risk, schedule, constructability, operations, and implementation concerns. A proposal developed or checked by only one person may miss critical impacts.
A midpoint review with stakeholders is also appropriate. Stakeholder review helps confirm that the developing proposals are moving in a useful direction before the team spends additional time preparing final recommendations. It allows early correction of misunderstandings, validation of assumptions, and identification of acceptance issues. This improves the quality and credibility of the final presentation.
Option A is incorrect because controversial proposals should not be discarded automatically. They should be analyzed objectively if they improve value. Option D is incorrect because the facilitator guides the process but does not serve as the sole technical reviewer.
References/topics: Development Phase; VM Proposal Development; Team Review; Stakeholder Review; Value Study Process; Proposal Validation.
質問 # 64
......
成功の喜びは大きいです。我々は弊社のソフトを通してあなたにSAVE InternationalのCVS試験に合格する喜びを感じさせると希望しています。あなたの成功も我々PassTestの成功です。だから、我々は力を尽くしてあなたにSAVE InternationalのCVS試験に合格させます。我々はSAVE InternationalのCVS試験のソフトだけでなく、各方面のアフターサービスの上で尽力します。
CVS科目対策: https://www.passtest.jp/SAVE-International/CVS-shiken.html