BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassCollection JN0-336 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15TiawPst91xXJg4ueVDaup9txjOlDaK5
Our company is a multinational company which is famous for the JN0-336 training materials in the international market. After nearly ten years' efforts, now our company have become the topnotch one in the field, therefore, if you want to pass the JN0-336 exam as well as getting the related certification at a great ease, I strongly believe that the JN0-336 Study Materials compiled by our company is your solid choice. To be the best global supplier of electronic JN0-336 study materials for our customers' satisfaction has always been our common pursuit.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: IPsec VPNs | 25% | - VPN High Availability - Policy-Based VPNs - IKE Phase 1 and Phase 2 - VPN Troubleshooting - Route-Based VPNs |
| Topic 2: High Availability Clustering | 20% | - Failover Behavior - Control and Data Plane Synchronization - Chassis Cluster Architecture - Configuration and Troubleshooting |
| Topic 3: Screen Options | 15% | - Screen Options Configuration - Attack Detection and Mitigation - Custom Screen Options |
| Topic 4: Security Policy | 25% | - Policy Components and Structure - Policy Logging - Policy Troubleshooting - Policy Scheduling |
| Topic 5: UTM (Unified Threat Management) | 15% | - Web Filtering - Antivirus - Content Filtering - Antispam |
>> Valid Test Juniper JN0-336 Test <<
Regarding the process of globalization, every fighter who seeks a better life needs to keep pace with its tendency to meet challenges. JN0-336 certification is a stepping stone for you to stand out from the crowd. Nowadays, having knowledge of the JN0-336 study braindumps become widespread, if you grasp solid technological knowledge, you are sure to get a well-paid job and be promoted in a short time. According to our survey, those who have passed the exam with our JN0-336 Test Guide convincingly demonstrate their abilities of high quality, raise their professional profile, expand their network and impress prospective employers.
NEW QUESTION # 11
What are two ways that Juniper Secure Connect provides flexibility in connection and authentication methods while ensuring that remote users are able to securely access company servers and cloud resources? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The correct answers are C and D. Juniper Secure Connect is Juniper's remote-access VPN client for SRX Series Firewalls. Juniper describes it as a flexible SSL VPN and IPsec application that gives remote workers secure access to corporate and cloud-protected resources. That directly supports option D, because SSL VPN provides a connection method that is useful when traditional IPsec ports are restricted or blocked. Juniper's Secure Connect guide also states that enabling SSL VPN gives the client flexibility in connecting to SRX Series Firewalls and that SSL VPN is enabled by default.
Option C is also correct because Juniper Secure Connect supports external authentication, allowing users to authenticate with enterprise identity systems rather than relying only on local firewall credentials. Juniper's external authentication procedure notes that this method lets users use the same username and password as their domain login and is recommended for authenticating users.
Option A is not the best answer because having a client application is not the specific connection
/authentication flexibility being tested. Option B is wrong because Kerberos is not the stated Secure Connect authentication method in this context. Reference topics: Juniper Secure Connect, remote-access VPN, SSL VPN, IPsec, external authentication.
NEW QUESTION # 12
You are deploying a new SRX Series device and you need to log denied traffic.
In this scenario, which two policy parameters are required to accomplish this task? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
The correct answers are A and C. To log denied traffic on an SRX Series Firewall, the security policy must deny the traffic and must generate a log at session initiation. Juniper's security policy monitoring documentation states that to view logs from denied connections, you enable logging on session-init. Juniper's traffic-logging guidance also states that for a security policy with a deny action, traffic logs must be generated when a session starts.
Option C is required because the policy action must be deny; otherwise the traffic is not denied by that policy.
Option A is required because denied traffic does not complete a normal permitted session lifecycle, so session- init is the correct logging stage for denied connection attempts. Option B, session-close, is used to log permitted sessions after teardown or conclusion; it is not the required parameter for denied traffic. Option D, count, increments policy counters but does not create traffic logs. The correct configuration concept is: match the unwanted traffic, apply then deny, and enable then log session-init. Reference topics: SRX security policies, deny action, session-init logging, traffic log generation, policy counters.
NEW QUESTION # 13
Exhibit
Which two statements are correct about the configuration shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
The log session-init; command within the policy configuration specifies that an event log entry will be created every time a session is initialized, meaning each new session will generate a log event. This is useful for tracking and analyzing the traffic flows entering the device.
Changing session-init to session-close in the log statement would mean that the device logs sessions when they close instead of when they open. This setting is typically used to log details about the session upon termination, which can help in analyzing the duration, end status, and other parameters of sessions, including those of unidentified flows.
NEW QUESTION # 14
You are asked to ensure that traffic that matches an IDP policy is not impacted until administrators have a chance to evaluate it.
In this scenario, which IP action should be configured for the policy?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. ip-notify. When administrators want visibility without enforcement impact, ip-notify is the correct IP action. Juniper Security Director documentation defines IP Notify as an IP action that does not take any action against future traffic but logs the event. That is exactly the requirement in the question:
traffic matching the IDP condition must not be blocked, closed, or rate-limited until administrators have reviewed the events and decided whether enforcement is appropriate.
Option A, ip-block, is wrong because it blocks future packets matching the IP action rule. That would immediately impact traffic. Option C, ip-connection-rate-limit, is wrong because it limits the connection rate and therefore changes traffic behavior before administrators complete evaluation. Option D, ip-close, is also wrong because it closes matching future sessions by sending reset packets to the client and server, which is disruptive. In a safe evaluation or tuning phase, the proper approach is to log and observe first, then move to stronger actions such as block, close, or rate-limit only after the detected condition has been validated.
Reference topics: IDP IP actions, ip-notify, event logging, non-disruptive evaluation mode, IDP policy tuning.
NEW QUESTION # 15
Using Junos Space Security Director, you want to configure a unique firewall policy for a specific SRX Series device.
Which firewall policy rules would satisfy the requirement?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. device policy rules. In Junos Space Security Director, policy scope matters. A rule intended for one specific SRX Series device must be placed in a device policy, because Juniper defines a device policy as a firewall policy created per device and used when you want to push a unique firewall policy configuration per device. Security Director also distinguishes this from group policies, which are shared with multiple devices, and from all-devices policy rules, which are global in scope rather than device-specific.
Option A is wrong because all-devices prerules are global rules evaluated before device-specific rules; they are not intended for a unique single-device exception. Option B is wrong because group policy prerules apply to devices within a group, not to one individually targeted SRX firewall. Option D is wrong because all- devices postrules are still globally scoped, even though they occur later in policy order. The clean Security Director design is to use device policy rules when the policy must apply only to one SRX device. Reference topics: Security Director, firewall policy hierarchy, device policy, group policy, all-devices prerules/postrules.
NEW QUESTION # 16
......
PassCollection is a trusted platform that is committed to helping Juniper JN0-336 exam candidates in exam preparation. The Juniper JN0-336 exam questions are real and updated and will repeat in the upcoming Juniper JN0-336 Exam Dumps. By practicing again and again you will become an expert to solve all the Juniper JN0-336 exam questions completely and before the exam time.
JN0-336 Authorized Pdf: https://www.passcollection.com/JN0-336_real-exams.html
P.S. Free 2026 Juniper JN0-336 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassCollection: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15TiawPst91xXJg4ueVDaup9txjOlDaK5