2026 Latest DumpsReview 312-50v13 PDF Dumps and 312-50v13 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=10pnM-xkaBUI_FCfAl7qTonuvxNWc--DN
The DumpsReview is one of the top-rated and renowned platforms that has been offering real and valid Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEH v13 AI) (312-50v13) exam practice test questions for many years. During this long time period countless Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEH v13 AI) (312-50v13) exam candidates have passed their dream certification and they are now certified ECCouncil professionals and pursuing a rewarding career in the market.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Web Application Attacks | 19% | - Hacking Web Servers and Web Applications
|
| Topic 2: Reconnaissance Techniques | 21% | - Footprinting and Reconnaissance
|
| Topic 3: Information Security and Ethical Hacking Overview | 6% | - Information Security Overview
|
| Topic 4: Cryptography and Post-Exploitation | 13% | - Post-Exploitation Techniques
|
| Topic 5: Malware Threats | 8% | - Malware and Its Types
|
| Topic 6: Wireless Network Attacks | 9% | - Wireless Hacking Methodology
|
| Topic 7: Cloud and Container Attacks | 10% | - Cloud Computing Concepts
|
| Topic 8: Mobile Platform and IoT Attacks | 7% | - Mobile Platform Attack Vectors
|
| Topic 9: Sniffing and Evasion | 10% | - Network Evasion
|
| Topic 10: Vulnerability Analysis | 7% | - Vulnerability Assessment Concepts
|
| Topic 11: Enumeration | 15% | - Enumeration Concepts
|
| Topic 12: System Hacking | 17% | - System Hacking Methodologies
|
We are engaging in this line to provide efficient reliable 312-50v13 practice materials which is to help you candidates who are headache for their 312-50v13 exams. They spend a lot of time and spirits on this exam but waste too much exam cost. Our 312-50v13 quiz question torrent can help you half work with double results. Sometimes choice is more important than choice. After purchasing our exam 312-50v13 Training Materials, you will have right ways to master the key knowledge soon and prepare for 312-50v13 exam easily, you will find clearing 312-50v13 exam seems a really easily thing.
NEW QUESTION # 391
Which of the following is a common framework applied by business management and other personnel to identify potential events that may affect the enterprise, manage the associated risks and opportunities, and provide reasonable assurance that objectives will be achieved?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Risk management framework. The question describes an enterprise-level risk management approach used by management and other personnel to identify events that may affect business objectives, manage risks and opportunities, and provide reasonable assurance that objectives will be achieved.
In CEH-aligned information security concepts, risk management focuses on identifying organizational assets, threats to those assets, and vulnerabilities, then selecting countermeasures to reduce risk and improve the organization's security posture. EC-Council risk management phases include Risk Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Treatment, Risk Tracking, and Risk Review. Qualitative risk assessment is only one method of assessing risk using descriptive ratings such as low, medium, and high; it is not the full enterprise framework. PCI-DSS applies specifically to payment card data security, and NIST SP 800-37 is a specific federal information-system risk management publication. Therefore, the best general CEH answer is Risk management framework.
NEW QUESTION # 392
Which technique is least useful during passive reconnaissance?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Passive reconnaissance involves gathering information without directly interacting with the target. WHOIS, search engines, and social media are all passive techniques highlighted in CEH v13 Reconnaissance.
Nmap scanning, however, actively probes target systems and generates traffic that can be logged and detected.
This makes it an active reconnaissance technique.
Therefore, Option D is least useful in a passive phase.
NEW QUESTION # 393
You are Maya, a security engineer at HarborPoint Cloud Services in Chicago, Illinois, performing a post-incident hardening review after an internal audit flagged multiple services that rely on legacy public-key algorithms. The engineering team must prioritize actions company-wide to reduce long-term risk from future quantum-capable adversaries while development continues on a large refactor of several services. Which proactive control should Maya recommend as the highest-priority change to embed into the organization's development lifecycle to improve future resistance to quantum-based attacks?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Embedding quantum-resistance considerations into the software development lifecycle and code reviews ensures that new and refactored services adopt algorithms and practices designed to withstand future quantum attacks, proactively reducing long-term risk.
NEW QUESTION # 394
Ron, a security professional, was pen testing web applications and SaaS platforms used by his company.
While testing, he found a vulnerability that allows hackers to gain unauthorized access to API objects and perform actions such as view, update, and delete sensitive data of the company. What is the API vulnerability revealed in the above scenario?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The scenario describes an API vulnerability where unauthorized users are able to view, modify, or delete sensitive data by interacting with API objects. This indicates a failure in access control-specifically, a lack of Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) validation.
Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC):
* ABAC is an advanced access control model that evaluates access permissions based on attributes of the user, the resource, and the environment (e.g., user role, data sensitivity, location, etc.).
* When ABAC is not properly implemented ("No ABAC validation"), APIs may allow users to access or manipulate objects they shouldn't have access to.
* In APIs, this typically results in vulnerabilities like Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), where users can tamper with object identifiers (IDs) to access or alter data that doesn't belong to them.
This is one of the top risks highlighted by the OWASP API Security Top 10 (e.g., Broken Object Level Authorization).
Incorrect Options:
* A. Code injection refers to injecting malicious code (e.g., SQLi, XSS), not improper access control.
* B. Improper use of CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) may lead to unauthorized data exposure but doesn't describe unauthorized object access in an API.
* D. Business logic flaws relate to weaknesses in application workflows and rules, not direct access control failures.
Reference - CEH v13 Official Courseware:
* Module 14: Hacking Web Applications
* Section: "API Security Threats"
* Subsection: "Access Control Failures in APIs (IDOR, BOLA, ABAC-related flaws)"
* OWASP API Security Top 10: 2023 - A1: Broken Object Level Authorization CEH iLabs and CEH Engage also demonstrate API-based attack vectors exploiting access control weaknesses.
NEW QUESTION # 395
Study the Snort rule given below:
[Image shows two Snort rules with alert messages for NETBIOS DCERPC ISystemActivator bind attempt, targeting TCP ports 135 and 445. References include CVE: CAN-2003-0352.]
Answer: D
Explanation:
The Snort rule in the image is detecting suspicious bind attempts over DCERPC (Distributed Computing Environment/Remote Procedure Call), specifically targeting ports 135 (RPC) and 445 (SMB) with crafted content. The rule references CVE CAN-2003-0352.
CVE-2003-0352 is associated with the DCOM RPC vulnerability in Microsoft Windows that was exploited by the MS Blaster (also known as Lovsan) worm in 2003.
Key Indicators from the Snort Rule:
alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 135
content includes DCERPC binding pattern (|05| and |0b| with specific binary patterns) Reference to CVE-2003-0352 Class type: attempted-admin The MS Blaster worm exploited this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted RPC request to port 135, allowing remote code execution.
From CEH v13 Courseware:
Module 6: Malware Threats
Module 11: Session Hijacking
Discussion of historic worms and their exploit signatures, including MS Blaster.
Incorrect Options:
A). WebDav: Typically uses HTTP/HTTPS and was exploited by Nimda.
B). SQL Slammer: Targeted UDP port 1434 (SQL Server), not TCP 135/445.
D). MyDoom: Spread via email and exploited Windows file-sharing mechanisms (port 3127), not DCERPC.
Reference:CEH v13 Study Guide - Module 6: Malware Threats # Classic Worm AttacksCVE Details:
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2003-0352Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-026 - RPC Vulnerability
NEW QUESTION # 396
......
DumpsReview is a platform that will provide candidates with most effective 312-50v13 study materials to help them pass their 312-50v13 exam. It has been recognized by all of our customers, because it was compiled by many professional experts of our website. Not only did they pass their 312-50v13 Exam but also got a satisfactory score. These are due to the high quality of our 312-50v13 study torrent that leads to such a high pass rate as more than 98%. You will never feel dispointment about our 312-50v13 exam questions.
312-50v13 Exam Questions Vce: https://www.dumpsreview.com/312-50v13-exam-dumps-review.html
What's more, part of that DumpsReview 312-50v13 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=10pnM-xkaBUI_FCfAl7qTonuvxNWc--DN