多くの人にとって、AI-103試験に合格することは非常に難しいことがわかっています。正しい教材を選択することは非常に重要であるため、すべての人は教材にもっと注意を払う必要があります。正しいAI-103準備資料を選択するのが難しい場合は、良いニュースがあります。会社の多くの専門家や教授によって設計されたAI-103準備ガイドは、すべての人々が模擬試験に合格し、最短時間でMicrosoft認定を取得するのに役立ちます。また、合格率は98％以上です。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Implement generative AI solutions | 25-30% | - Optimize and evaluate models
|
| Plan and manage Azure AI solutions | 25-30% | - Plan Azure AI resources
|
| Implement text analysis and information extraction solutions | 10-15% | - Analyze and extract information
|
| Implement computer vision solutions | 10-15% | - Analyze visual content
|
| Implement agentic solutions | 20-25% | - Build AI agents
|
弊社のAI-103質問トレントは、手頃な価格であるだけでなく、市場で他の教育プラットフォームであるAI-103試験と比較して、ユーザーのインスタントアップグレードを容易にするための更新だけでなく、完全に練習をサポートすることもできます質問は、高品質のパフォーマンスを持っていると言うことができます。 AI-103学習教材をダウンロードして学習することを後悔することは決してありません。また、最初の試行でAI-103試験に合格します。
質問 # 55
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that contains a prompt agent used by a customer support web app.
The agent is invoked from a Python service that does NOT run in the Foundry portal.
You need to implement end-to-end tracing to capture latency breakdowns and exceptions across agent runs.
Which two components can you use? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：A、D
解説：
To implement end-to-end tracing for a Microsoft Foundry prompt agent invoked from an external Python service, you should use a combination of Azure Application Insights, the Azure AI Projects SDK, and OpenTelemetry.
Core Components
Azure Application Insights: This serves as the centralized telemetry store. You must connect an Application Insights resource to your Foundry project via the Tracing tab in the Foundry portal to enable ingestion.
Azure AI Projects SDK (azure-ai-projects): Used in your Python service to create an AIProjectClient, which authenticates and communicates with the Foundry agent.
OpenTelemetry Python SDK: Foundry tracing is built on the OpenTelemetry standard. You will need opentelemetry-sdk and azure-monitor-opentelemetry to instrument your external service.
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/observability/how-to/trace-agent-setup
質問 # 56
You have an application that processes scanned PDF invoices. The invoices have varied layouts and include multipage tables.
You have a pipeline that uses optical character recognition (OCR) and extracts totals and invoice numbers. The results are often incorrect because the document structure is ignored.
You need to implement a solution that provides OCR, layout analysis, and template-generalizing field extraction. The solution must NOT require training a custom model. The solution must minimize administrative effort.
What should you include in the solution?
正解：A
解説：
The most appropriate solution is Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools.
The Azure Content Understanding service natively combines advanced Optical Character Recognition (OCR), deep layout analysis, and pre-built generative capabilities. It handles varied document structures, multi-page tables, and template-generalizing field extraction without requiring custom machine learning model training. It operates as a low-administration, out-of-the- box solution perfectly aligned with document intelligence needs.
Incorrect:
[Not A]
Azure Language in Foundry Tools: Azure AI Language focuses primarily on unstructured text analytics, sentiment analysis, text summarization, and conversational capabilities. It lacks the built-in document layout analysis, table parsing, and visual OCR capabilities necessary to process complex scanned PDF invoice structures.
[Not C]
Azure Machine Learning model: Building, training, deploying, and managing a custom model in Azure Machine Learning requires significant data science expertise. This approach introduces high administrative overhead, complex infrastructure management, and manual pipeline maintenance, which violates the requirement for low administration.
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/5706482/azure-document-intelligence-and-content-understand
質問 # 57
You need to recommend a solution to assess the responses generated by Agent1 when the agent uses the product information stored in storage1. The solution must meet the technical requirements.
正解：C
解説：
A Retrieval Augmented Generation evaluator is required because Agent1 will retrieve product-sheet content and use it as grounding context when generating answers. Foundry RAG evaluators assess both retrieval quality and the quality of the final grounded response. This directly supports Contoso's requirement that answers based on the product sheets be relevant, complete, and accurate.
The appropriate evaluation suite can include groundedness , which determines whether the answer is supported by the retrieved product information without fabrication; relevance , which evaluates whether the answer accurately and completely addresses the customer's question; and response completeness , which measures whether critical expected information is missing. Retrieval evaluators can additionally determine whether the indexing and search pipeline returned context chunks relevant to the query.
A coherence evaluator assesses readability and logical organization but does not establish that claims are supported by storage1. A custom guardrail controls or blocks behavior rather than measuring RAG quality.
Fine-tuning changes model behavior and does not evaluate whether retrieved documentation was selected and used correctly.
The AI-103 Study Guide includes evaluating models and applications for fabrications, relevance, quality, and safety , as well as monitoring grounding quality and retrieval relevance.
質問 # 58
You have an app named App1 that uses a Microsoft Foundry multimodal model deployment.
App1 runs optical character recognition (OCR) on uploaded images and appends the OCR output to the prompt as additional context.
Some uploaded images contain embedded text.
You need to prevent potentially malicious instructions from being processed by the model.
What should you use?
正解：D
解説：
To prevent potentially malicious instructions embedded within untrusted external sources (such as text extracted from uploaded images via OCR) from being processed by the model, you should use Prompt Shields for Documents (specifically designed for Indirect Prompt Attacks or Cross- Domain Prompt Injections).
Key Features to Implement
Prompt Shields for Documents: This specific component of Azure AI Content Safety / Prompt Shields analyzes external data--like text pulled from files, emails, or OCR outputs--appended to the prompt. It identifies and neutralizes hidden adversarial instructions trying to trick the model into overriding its system protocols.
Spotlighting: A native capability within Microsoft Foundry's Prompt Shields, Spotlighting uses advanced text-formatting techniques to separate valid user commands from the untrusted document text. This prevents the model from mistaking malicious instructions embedded inside the OCR output for instructions from the developer or end-user.
Reference:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/azure-ai-foundry-blog/azure-ai-announces-prompt-shields-ga/4236033
質問 # 59
You need to ensure that Agent1Dev Team can access Agent1. The solution must meet the security and compliance requirements.
How should you complete the Python code? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
credential = DefaultAzureCredential()
agent = project_client.agents.get(agent_name=myAgent)
The correct authentication option is DefaultAzureCredential() because the case study states that API keys must not be used to access Foundry-deployed models and that Contoso developers must authenticate to Microsoft Foundry resources by using Microsoft Entra authentication. It also states that access to Project1 must be assigned to Agent1Dev Team by using the security group SC_Agent1_Dev . Microsoft Foundry authentication guidance recommends Microsoft Entra ID for production workloads because it supports least- privilege RBAC, per-principal auditing, and keyless authentication. AzureKeyCredential() would violate the no-API-key requirement, and None would not provide a valid credential.
The correct agent operation is get because the task is to access an existing agent named Agent1, not create a new version or retrieve a specific published version. Microsoft Foundry SDK examples show AIProjectClient created with DefaultAzureCredential() and then using project agent operations to create, retrieve, or interact with agents by name. To meet the compliance requirement, the group SC_Agent1_Dev must also be granted the appropriate project-scoped Foundry role, such as Foundry User, for Project1. Reference topics: Microsoft Entra authentication, Foundry RBAC, AIProjectClient, and project agent access.
質問 # 60
......
チャンスはいつも準備がある人のために存在しています。IT業界で就職する前に、あなたはMicrosoftのAI-103試験に合格したら、あなたに満足させる仕事を探す準備をよくしました。MicrosoftのAI-103試験に合格しがたいですが、我々JPNTestの提供するMicrosoftのAI-103試験の資料を通して多くの人は試験に合格しました。あなたはその中の一員になりたいですか。我々の商品にあなたを助けさせましょう。
AI-103資格専門知識: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/AI-103-mondaishu