IT업계에 종사하시는 분은 국제공인 IT인증자격증 취득이 얼마나 힘든지 알고 계실것입니다. 특히 시험이 영어로 되어있어 부담을 느끼시는 분도 계시는데 Itexamdump를 알게 된 이상 이런 고민은 버리셔도 됩니다. Itexamdump의Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization덤프는 모두 영어버전으로 되어있어Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험의 가장 최근 기출문제를 분석하여 정답까지 작성해두었기에 문제와 답만 외우시면 시험합격가능합니다.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Nokia NetAct and performance tools - Configuration management for optimization - Report generation and interpretation - Automated optimization features |
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - SRAN network architecture overview - Radio access concepts and principles - Single RAN integration principles - SRAN solution components and functions |
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Network failure identification and resolution - Optimization case studies - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Root cause analysis methodologies - Common performance issues diagnosis |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Performance data collection and analysis - KPI definition and measurement - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Threshold configuration and alerting - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards |
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Capacity optimization strategies - Parameter tuning best practices - Coverage optimization methods - Interference analysis and mitigation - Handover optimization - Load balancing techniques |
>> Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization공부자료 <<
Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization 덤프로 많은 분들께서 Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험을 패스하여 자격증을 취득하게 도와드렸지만 저희는 자만하지않고 항상 초심을 잊지않고 더욱더 퍼펙트한Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization덤프를 만들기 위해 모든 심여를 기울일것을 약속드립니다.
질문 # 26
Which of the following statements about CBRA , or contention-based random access , is correct?
정답：C
설명：
The correct answer is B .
In contention-based random access , the UE chooses a random access preamble by itself from a configured pool of available contention-based preambles. This is typically used when the UE does not yet have a dedicated connection or when the network has not assigned a dedicated preamble.
Because multiple UEs may choose the same preamble at the same time, preamble collision is possible . That is why CBRA requires a contention resolution step.
Option C describes contention-free random access , not CBRA. In contention-free random access, the network assigns a dedicated preamble to the UE, so collision risk is avoided and contention resolution is not required.
Option A is not the correct CBRA principle being tested. RACH false detection can be a receiver/design issue, but it does not define the CBRA procedure.
Option D describes a possible NSA signaling behavior around access failure handling, but it is not the core correct definition of CBRA.
Therefore, the correct CBRA statement is:
The UE autonomously selects a preamble from the configured range and starts the random access procedure.
질문 # 27
In a high-mobility network, the maximum cell size must be restricted to 33 km . Which PRACH format and restricted-set type should be used?
정답：C
설명：
The correct answer is Format 1 / Type B .
For PRACH planning, the selected preamble format must support the required cell radius. Format 0 is too short for a 33 km cell because it is typically suitable only up to around 14.5 km . Format 2 is also not suitable because its practical maximum cell radius is around 29.5 km , which is below the required 33 km . Therefore, a longer PRACH format is needed.
Because the scenario mentions high mobility , an unrestricted PRACH set is not preferred. High-mobility environments require a restricted set to handle Doppler effects and reduce ambiguity in PRACH preamble detection. Between the restricted-set options, Type B is the correct choice for this 33 km high-mobility case.
A matching Nokia-style question source also lists this exact scenario with Format 1 / Type B as option A.
질문 # 28
Which statement is not true about MantaRay SON ?
정답：B
설명：
The correct answer is B .
The statement "Energy savings management is not covered" is not true . Nokia describes MantaRay SON as supporting radio network performance, quality, and energy efficiency optimization. Nokia also references AI-powered energy savings management and RAN energy efficiency use cases under its SON/MantaRay automation portfolio.
The other statements are aligned with Nokia SON/MantaRay positioning. Nokia describes MantaRay SON as an automation layer within the MantaRay SMO framework, with support for multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality and an application ecosystem. Nokia also has historical EdenNet SON material, including EdenNet SON Energy Saving Management.
Therefore, the statement that is not true is:
Energy savings management is not covered.
질문 # 29
Consider that the UE is performing handover from LTE to NR with the help of features CB007742 / CB008731 . Referring to the picture below, at what stage can the handover be triggered from LTE to NR?
정답：D
설명：
The correct answer is C: From Stage 3 .
In LTE-to-NR mobility, the handover or redirection decision is normally based on a combination of:
LTE serving-cell signal level becoming weak enough, and
NR neighbor-cell signal level becoming strong enough.
From the diagram:
In Stage 1 , LTE is still good and NR is still weak, so LTE-to-NR HO should not be triggered.
In Stage 2 , the NR neighbor signal is improving, but the required combined LTE/NR mobility condition is not yet fully satisfied.
In Stage 3 , the NR neighbor signal has crossed the required NR threshold, while the LTE serving-cell signal has degraded enough to justify moving the UE from LTE to NR. This is the first valid stage where LTE-to- NR HO can be triggered.
In Stage 4 , NR is already clearly strong, but the handover could already have been triggered earlier in Stage 3.
질문 # 30
In the case of 5G SA, which of the following triggers the Radio Link Failure, or RLF, handling mechanism?
정답：D
설명：
The correct answer is C.
In 5G SA, Radio Link Failure handling is mainly UE-driven. The UE monitors the radio link quality using lower-layer indications such as in-sync and out-of-sync indications. If the UE receives enough out-of-sync indications, it starts the relevant RLF timer, commonly associated with T310 behavior. If the link does not recover before the timer expires, the UE declares Radio Link Failure and starts recovery, such as RRC re- establishment.
The gNodeB can detect uplink problems and may release or reconfigure the UE, but the classical RLF handling mechanism is triggered at the UE side.
So the correct answer is:
UE indication timer only.
질문 # 31
......
경쟁율이 심한 IT시대에Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization인증시험을 패스함으로 IT업계 관련 직종에 종사하고자 하는 분들에게는 아주 큰 가산점이 될수 있고 자신만의 위치를 보장할수 있으며 더욱이는 한층 업된 삶을 누릴수 있을수도 있습니다. Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험을 가장 쉽게 합격하는 방법이 Itexamdump의Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization 덤프를 마스터한느것입니다.
SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization인증문제: https://www.itexamdump.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization.html