BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassLeaderVCE ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xZ1YiWzt6Ff_9f_u81vRlvEY-eqP08-r
In spite of the high-quality of our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study braindumps, our after-sales service can be the most attractive project in our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor guide questions. We have free online service which means that if you have any trouble using our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Learning Materials or operate different versions on the platform mistakenly, we can provide help for you remotely in the shortest time.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Conducting an Audit | - Audit execution
|
| Closing the Audit | - Audit reporting and follow-up
|
| Fundamentals of Information Security Auditing | - Audit principles based on ISO 19011
|
| Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 | - ISO/IEC 27001 requirements (Clauses 4โ10)
|
| Planning and Initiating an Audit | - Audit program and planning activities
|
>> Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Torrent <<
If you feel nervous about your exam, then our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam materials will be your bets choice. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Soft test engine can stimulate the real exam environment, so that your confidence for your exam will be strengthened. In addition, we provided you with free demo to have a try before buying ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Cram. You can enjoy free update for one year, so that you can obtain the latest version timely, and the latest version for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor training materials will be sent to your email automatically. You just need to check your email.
NEW QUESTION # 233
Scenario 2: Knight is an electronics company from Northern California, US that develops video game consoles. Knight has more than 300 employees worldwide. On the fifth anniversary of their establishment, they have decided to deliver the G-Console, a new generation video game console aimed for worldwide markets. G-Console is considered to be the ultimate media machine of 2021 which will give the best gaming experience to players.
The console pack will include a pair of VR headset, two
games, and other gifts.
Over the years, the company has developed a good reputation by showing integrity, honesty, and respect toward their customers. This good reputation is one of the reasons why most passionate gamers aim to have Knight's G-console as soon as it is released in the market.
Besides being a very customer-oriented company, Knight
also gained wide recognition within the gaming industry because of the developing quality. Their prices are a bit higher than the reasonable standards allow.
Nonetheless, that is not considered an issue for most loyal customers of Knight, as their quality is top-notch.
Being one of the top video game console developers in the world, Knight is also often the center of attention for malicious activities. The company has had an operational ISMS for over a year. The ISMS scope includes all departments of Knight, except Finance and HR departments.
Recently, a number of Knight's files containing proprietary information were leaked by hackers. Knight's incident response team (IRT) immediately started to analyze every part of the system and the details of the incident.
The IRT's first suspicion was that Knight's employees used weak passwords and consequently were easily cracked by hackers who gained unauthorized access to their accounts. However, after carefully investigating the incident, the IRT determined that hackers accessed accounts by capturing the file transfer protocol (FTP) traffic.
FTP is a network protocol for transferring files between accounts. It uses clear text passwords for authentication.
Following the impact of this information security incident and with IRT's suggestion, Knight decided to replace the FTP with Secure Shell (SSH) protocol, so anyone capturing the traffic can only see encrypted data.
Following these changes, Knight conducted a risk assessment to verify that the implementation of controls had minimized the risk of similar incidents. The results of the process were approved by the ISMS project manager who claimed that the level of risk after the implementation of new controls was in accordance with the company's risk acceptance levels.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Which risk treatment option has Knight used in replacing FTP with SSH? Refer to scenario 2.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Risk modification involves implementing controls to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. By replacing FTP with SSH, Knight has modified the risk associated with the transfer of files by ensuring that the data is encrypted, thereby reducing the likelihood of unauthorized access through traffic capturing1. References: = This answer is based on the standard risk treatment options provided in ISO/IEC 27001, which include avoiding, modifying, sharing, or retaining risks as part of the risk management process
NEW QUESTION # 234
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader, assisting an auditor in training to write their first audit report.
You want to check the auditor in training's understanding of terminology relating to the contents of an audit report and chose to do this by presenting the following examples.
For each example, you ask the auditor in training what the correct term is that describes the activity Match the activity to the description.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
1. An auditor using a copy of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 to check that its requirements are met:
Termed: Reviewing audit criteria.
Justification: The auditor is comparing the auditee's information security management system (ISMS) against the established criteria outlined in the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard. This activity falls under the use of audit criteria to determine conformity or nonconformity.
2. An auditor's note that the auditee is not adhering to its clear desk policy:
Termed: Identifying an audit finding.
Justification: The auditor has observed a deviation from the auditee's established policy on clear desks. This observation is documented as a potential nonconformity, which requires further investigation and evaluation.
3. An auditor making a decision regarding the auditee's conformity or otherwise to criteria:
Termed: Determining an audit conclusion.
Justification: Based on the collected audit evidence and evaluation against the established criteria, the auditor forms an opinion about the overall compliance of the auditee's ISMS. This opinion is the audit conclusion and is a key element of the audit report.
4. An auditor examining verifiable records relevant to the audit process:
Termed: Collecting audit evidence.
Justification: The auditor is gathering objective and verifiable information to support their findings and conclusions. This information comes from various sources, including documents, records, interviews, and observations.
NEW QUESTION # 235
You are an experienced ISMS auditor, currently providing support to an ISMS auditor in training who is carrying out her first initial certification audit. She asks you what she should be verifying when auditing an organisation's Information Security objectives. You ask her what she has included in her audit checklist and she provides the following replies.
Which three of these responses would you cause you concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC
27001:2022?
Answer: A,C,E
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 6.2 requires an organization to establish information security objectives at relevant functions and levels1. The objectives should be consistent with the information security policy; measurable (if practicable) or capable of being evaluated; monitored; communicated; updated as appropriate1. Therefore, when auditing an organization's information security objectives, an ISMS auditor should verify these aspects in accordance with the audit criteria.
Three responses from the ISMS auditor in training that would cause concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 are:
* I am going to check that top management have determined the Information Security objectives for the current year. If not, I will check that this task has been programmed to be completed: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives at relevant functions and levels, not just at the top management level. It also implies that the auditor in training is willing to accept a delay or postponement in determining the information security objectives, which may affect the ISMS performance and effectiveness.
* I am going to check that the Information Security objectives are written down on paper so that everyone is clear on what needs to be achieved, how it will be achieved, and by when it will be achieved: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives that are measurable (if practicable) or capable of being evaluated, not just written down on paper. It also implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the flexibility and suitability of different media or formats for documenting and communicating information security objectives, such as electronic or digital records, posters, newsletters, etc.
* I am going to check that a completion date has been set for each objective and that there are no objectives with missing 'achieve by' dates: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives that are monitored, not just completed by a certain date. It also implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the possibility and necessity of updating information security objectives as appropriate, such as when changes occur in the internal or external context of the organization, or when new risks or opportunities arise.
The other responses from the ISMS auditor in training are acceptable and do not cause concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022. For example, checking how each Information Security objective has been communicated to those who need to be aware of it in order for the objective to be achieved is relevant to verifying the communication aspect of clause 6.2; checking that there is a process in place to periodically revisit Information Security objectives, with a view to amending or cancelling them if circumstances necessitate this is relevant to verifying the updating aspect of clause 6.2; checking that the necessary budget, manpower and materials to achieve each objective has been determined is relevant to verifying the planning aspect of clause 6.2; checking that all the Information Security objectives are measurable. If they are not measurable the organisation will not be able to track progress against them is relevant to verifying the measurability aspect of clause 6.2. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 236
As the Information Security Management System audit team leader, you are conducting a second-party audit of an international logistics company on behalf of an online retailer. During the audit, one of your team members reports a nonconformity relating to control 5.18 (Access rights) of Appendix A of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. She found evidence that removing the server access protocols of 20 people who left in the last 3 months took up to 1 week whereas the policy required removing access within 24 hours of their departure.
When the auditee was asked why there was a delay in removing access they replied, 'no one was available in the IT department during that period as a result of COVID-19. As soon as an IT officer became available the rights were removed.
You note that she intends to raise a minor non-conformity against Access rights control (5.18). How should you respond to this?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 237
After completing Stage 1 and in preparation for a Stage 2 initial certification audit, the auditee informs the audit team leader that they wish to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites that have recently been acquired by the organisation.
Considering this information, what action would you expect the audit team leader to take?
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, a certification body should establish criteria for determining audit time and audit team composition based on factors such as the scope of certification, size and complexity of the organization, risks associated with its activities, etc2. Therefore, if an auditee requests to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites after completing Stage 1 of an initial certification audit, the audit team leader should obtain information about the additional sites to inform the certification body, so that they can review and approve the change in scope and adjust the audit time and audit team accordingly2. The other options are not appropriate actions for the audit team leader to take in this situation. For example, increasing the length of the Stage 2 audit to include the extra sites without informing the certification body may violate their procedures and policies; arranging to complete a remote Stage 1 audit of the two sites using a video conferencing platform may not be feasible or effective depending on the nature and location of the sites; and informing the auditee that the request can be accepted but a full Stage 1 audit must be repeated may not be necessary or reasonable if there are no significant changes in the auditee's ISMS since Stage 12. References: ISO/IEC
17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 238
......
Why is PassLeaderVCE PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification training so popular, especially among the same trade? Firstly, we really know what the candidates need. Secondly, Our PassLeaderVCE PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are concerned on one thing only โ how to help the candidates to pass PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor test. Thirdly, Our PassLeaderVCE PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study guide is very technical and original. We provide you with the latest test questions and test answers. And the price is very cost-effective.
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Questions: https://www.passleadervce.com/ISO-27001/reliable-ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-exam-learning-guide.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassLeaderVCE ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xZ1YiWzt6Ff_9f_u81vRlvEY-eqP08-r