ITDumpsKR는 여러분이 빠른 시일 내에SAVE International CVS인증시험을 효과적으로 터득할 수 있는 사이트입니다.SAVE International CVS덤프는 보장하는 덤프입니다. 만약 시험에서 떨어지셨다고 하면 우리는 무조건 덤프전액 환불을 약속 드립니다. 우리ITDumpsKR 사이트에서SAVE International CVS관련자료의 일부분 문제와 답 등 샘플을 제공함으로 여러분은 무료로 다운받아 체험해보실 수 있습니다. 체험 후 우리의ITDumpsKR에 신뢰감을 느끼게 됩니다. ITDumpsKR의SAVE International CVS덤프로 자신 있는 시험준비를 하세요.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Professional Practice Requirements | - Project documentation and reporting - Value study facilitation |
| Value Methodology Overview | - Principles of Value Engineering / Value Analysis
|
| Job Plan Phases | - Function Analysis Phase
|
>> SAVE International CVS인증시험 인기 시험자료 <<
SAVE International인증CVS시험은 현재 치열한 IT경쟁 속에서 열기는 더욱더 뜨겁습니다. 응시자들도 더욱더 많습니다. 하지만 난이도난 전혀 낮아지지 않고 이지도 어려운 시험입니다. 어쨌든 개인적인 지식 장악도 나 정보기술 등을 테스트하는 시험입니다. 보통은SAVE International인증CVS시험을 넘기 위해서는 많은 시간과 신경이 필요합니다.
질문 # 73
A VM study team member determined that the VM proposal will not meet the goals of the study subject.
What should the VM facilitator do?
Choose 2 answers.
정답：C,D
설명：
The correct answers are A and B . During the Development Phase , a VM proposal must be sufficiently developed to demonstrate that it supports the study objectives, required functions, performance expectations, constraints, risks, and value improvement goals. If a team member determines that a proposal will not meet the goals of the study subject, the facilitator should not simply discard it without traceability. The proper action is to document the reasons the proposal does not meet the goals. This preserves the analytical basis for the decision and shows that the alternative was considered objectively rather than rejected informally.
The facilitator should also review the results with stakeholders because the proposal may affect owner requirements, scope intent, user expectations, cost targets, or implementation priorities. Stakeholder review confirms whether the proposal should be revised, deferred, combined with another alternative, or formally eliminated.
Option C is incorrect because completing a proposal that is already known not to meet study goals wastes team effort unless stakeholders specifically redirect the team. Option D is incorrect because disregarding the proposal without documentation violates disciplined VM practice and weakens decision transparency.
References/topics: Development Phase; VM Proposal Development; Stakeholder Review; Value Alternative Validation; Documentation of Rejected Alternatives.
질문 # 74
A team wants to skip Function Analysis because the design solution already appears obvious. What is the best CVS-level response?
정답：B
설명：
The correct answer is C . Function Analysis is not an optional administrative exercise. SAVE's VM Standard states that, for a study to qualify as a Value Study, the team must follow an organized Job Plan and perform Function Analysis as defined in the standard. It also states that the team defines functions using active verb
/measurable noun language and analyzes them to determine which need improvement, elimination, or creation.
Option A is wrong because expert confidence does not replace the VM process. Experts are valuable, but they often carry design bias. Option B destroys the logic of the Job Plan because Development should refine selected ideas, not bypass function understanding. Option D may provide useful cost intelligence, but benchmarking does not identify required functions or function relationships. The disciplined CVS answer is that Function Analysis protects the team from solution fixation. It reveals what must be accomplished, which functions consume resources, and where value mismatches exist. Skipping it reduces VM to ordinary design review.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Valid Value Study; VM Job Plan Discipline.
질문 # 75
Which of the following strategies should be used to enhance understanding of VM proposals presented during the Presentation Phase?
Choose 2 answers.
정답：B,D
설명：
The correct answers are C and D . In the Presentation Phase, the purpose is not simply to display information, but to communicate the developed VM proposals clearly enough for decision makers to understand the recommendation, its basis, and its value improvement opportunity. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard states that the Presentation Phase should develop a report and/or presentation that documents and conveys the adequacy of the developed alternatives and their associated value improvement opportunity. ( ) Using baseline and proposed graphics at a similar level of complexity helps the audience compare the current condition against the recommended alternative without distortion. If one graphic is overly detailed and the other is simplified, the comparison may become misleading or difficult to evaluate. Providing clear explanations and context is equally important because graphics alone rarely communicate assumptions, functional trade-offs, cost implications, risks, or implementation constraints.
Option A is incorrect because relying only on graphics removes the technical reasoning needed for acceptance. Option B is also incorrect because excessive graphics can dilute the message and distract from the proposal's functional and value basis.
References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Proposal Communication; Baseline vs Proposed Comparison; Decision-Maker Understanding; VM Report and Presentation.
질문 # 76
SMART stands for
정답：A
설명：
The correct answer is F: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Timebound . In Value Methodology, SMART thinking is used to make recommendations, implementation actions, objectives, and follow-up responsibilities clear enough to be managed. A VM proposal or implementation action should not be vague, general, or open-ended. It must state exactly what is to be done, how success will be measured, whether the action can realistically be achieved, how it supports the study objective or project need, and when it must be completed.
"Specific" requires a clear action or target. "Measurable" means the result can be checked through cost, performance, schedule, quality, or other defined criteria. "Attainable" confirms that the action is practical within available resources and constraints. "Relevant" ensures alignment with the value study objectives, functions, and stakeholder requirements. "Timebound" creates accountability through a completion date or defined time frame.
The incorrect options replace key SMART terms with weaker or incorrect words such as Standards , Accountable , or Reasonable . These may be useful concepts in management, but they do not form the standard SMART acronym used in VM action planning.
References/topics: Implementation Phase; VM Action Planning; Proposal Follow-Up; Performance Objectives; VM Programs.
질문 # 77
Place the process flow chart for the Function Performance Specification in the correct order.
정답：
설명：
Explanation:
Need # Function # Specific Requirement # Product
The correct order is Need # Function # Specific Requirement # Product . This is the exact logic of the Function Performance Specification process. The VM Guide figure for Function Performance Specification shows the sequence as "Need Function Specific Requirement Product" , where a user need is translated into a function, then into measurable requirements, and finally into a product solution.
The sequence is important because Value Methodology begins with the user's need or desire , not with a predetermined product. After the need is understood, the VM team defines the function that satisfies that need, normally in active verb/measurable noun format. SAVE's study-guide material explains that work functions are quantitative and stated using an active verb and measurable noun. The next step is the specific requirement , where the function is converted into measurable performance or quality criteria, such as assessment criteria, level, and flexibility. Only after the need, function, and requirement are clear should the team identify the product , which is the solution provided to satisfy the defined need. Starting with "Product" would be a classic VM error because it locks the team into a solution before understanding function.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Function Performance Specification; Need; Function; Specific Requirement; Product; Performance Criteria.
질문 # 78
......
ITDumpsKR SAVE International CVS 덤프는SAVE International CVS실제시험 변화의 기반에서 스케줄에 따라 업데이트 합니다. 만일 테스트에 어떤 변화가 생긴다면 될수록 2일간의 근무일 안에SAVE International CVS 덤프를 업데이트 하여 고객들이 테스트에 성공적으로 합격 할 수 있도록 업데이트 된 버전을 구매후 서비스로 제공해드립니다. 업데이트할수 없는 상황이라면 다른 적중율 좋은 덤프로 바꿔드리거나 덤프비용을 환불해드립니다.
CVS완벽한 시험덤프공부: https://www.itdumpskr.com/CVS-exam.html