What's more, part of that Real4Prep 312-97 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E3KObNcibFZDohF4LCSUpco1NApkDO4x
Passing the 312-97 exam rests squarely on the knowledge of exam questions and exam skills. Our 312-97 training quiz has bountiful content that can fulfill your aims at the same time. We know high efficient 312-97 practice materials play crucial roles in your review. Our experts also collect with the newest contents of 312-97 Study Guide and have been researching where the exam trend is heading and what it really want to examine you.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Cloud-Native DevSecOps | - Cloud security compliance - Serverless security - Cloud security principles (AWS, Azure) - Container and Kubernetes security |
| Topic 2: DevSecOps Pipeline - Code Stage | - Static Application Security Testing (SAST) - Secret management and prevention - Secure coding practices and guidelines - Code review and security analysis |
| Topic 3: DevSecOps Pipeline - Test Stage | - API security testing - Security regression testing - Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) |
| Topic 4: DevSecOps Pipeline - Plan Stage | - Threat modeling methodologies - Risk assessment and management - Compliance and regulatory alignment - Security requirement engineering |
| Topic 5: DevSecOps Pipeline - Release & Deploy Stage | - Policy as Code implementation - Infrastructure as Code (IaC) security - Configuration management security - Orchestration and deployment security |
| Topic 6: DevSecOps Pipeline - Build Stage | - Automated build security - Build pipeline security controls - Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Container security fundamentals |
| Topic 7: Understanding DevOps Culture | - DevOps lifecycle and workflows - DevOps fundamentals and principles - Collaboration and communication models |
| Topic 8: DevSecOps Pipeline - Operate & Monitor Stage | - Continuous security monitoring - Threat detection and response - Logging and security analytics - Incident response and management |
| Topic 9: DevSecOps Governance and Culture | - DevSecOps maturity model - Team roles and responsibilities - Security policy and framework - Continuous improvement practices |
| Topic 10: Introduction to DevSecOps | - Key components and toolchain - DevSecOps vs traditional security - DevSecOps concepts and philosophy - Shift-left security approach |
>> ECCouncil 312-97 Exam Demo <<
Before purchasing our 312-97 practice guide, we will offer you a part of questions as free demo for downloading so that you can know our 312-97 exam question style and PDF format deeper then you will feel relieved to purchase certification 312-97 study guide. We try our best to improve ourselves to satisfy all customers' demands. If you have any doubt or hesitate, please feel free to contact us about your issues. If you have doubt about our 312-97 Exam Preparation questions the demo will prove that our product is helpful and high-quality.
NEW QUESTION # 148
Robert Wheeler has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company for the past 5 years. His organization develops software products and web applications related to AutoCAD.
Rob would like to integrate Rapid7 tCell Next-Gen Cloud WAF and RASP Tool with AWS CloudFront to protect application by identifying suspicious actors, enforcing content security policies (CSPs), and securing against unvalidated HTTP redirections on web applications. How can Rob deploy the tCell agent as a CloudFormation stack into his organization AWS account?
Answer: B
Explanation:
When integrating security controls at the CDN edge with AWS CloudFront, the typical deployment model uses Lambda@Edge, which allows code to execute at CloudFront edge locations on viewer request/response or origin request/response events. Deploying the tCell agent "as a CloudFormation stack" describes packaging the required AWS resources (IAM roles, functions, permissions, and CloudFront associations) into infrastructure-as-code, but the actual attachment point for CloudFront request/response processing is Lambda@Edge. Option C correctly reflects this: "plugging into CloudFront through Lambda@Edge." Standard Lambda functions run in regional AWS environments and cannot directly run at CloudFront edge locations in the same way; therefore, "CloudFront through Lambda Function" is not the best match for edge enforcement needs like CSP handling and redirect protections. Options that claim "plugging into CloudFormation" misunderstand CloudFormation's role: it deploys resources, but it is not the runtime integration point. Hence, CloudFront + Lambda@Edge is the correct deployment approach.
NEW QUESTION # 149
SecureSphere Ltd. recently experienced a critical vulnerability in their CI/CD pipeline during a deployment. A malicious actor exploited a misconfigured script, injecting malicious code into the pipeline. The incident resulted in the unauthorized deployment of compromised applications. The DevSecOps team quickly responded by integrating a tool that used AI-driven vulnerability detection and real-time code analysis to identify and remediate similar issues before deployment. Identify the tool SecureSphere Ltd. likely implemented to prevent such vulnerabilities in the future.
Answer: A
Explanation:
GitLab Duo is GitLab's suite of AI capabilities, including AI-assisted vulnerability explanation and resolution and real-time code assistance, which fits SecureSphere's need for AI-driven vulnerability detection and real-time code analysis in the pipeline. Veracode and SonarQube are analysis tools without the described AI-driven assistance, and Kubiya is a conversational DevOps assistant, not a code-vulnerability tool.
NEW QUESTION # 150
Diego Fuentes works for a Madrid-based e-commerce company. He wants to ensure that every open-source library pulled into the build has a documented pedigree of components, versions, and licenses so his team can respond quickly if a new CVE is disclosed for a nested dependency.
What artifact should Diego generate as part of the Build stage?
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is a formal, machine-readable inventory of all components, libraries, and dependencies (including transitive/nested ones) used to build software, along with their versions and licenses. Tools that generate SBOMs in formats like SPDX or CycloneDX allow security teams to rapidly cross-reference newly disclosed CVEs against exactly what is deployed, which is precisely Diego's goal. An Infrastructure as Code template defines and provisions infrastructure resources, not application dependency pedigree. A container image manifest describes image layers and configuration but not a full dependency/license inventory. A Git commit signature verifies commit authenticity via cryptographic signing but says nothing about dependency composition. Because Diego needs a documented, queryable component inventory for rapid CVE response, an SBOM is the correct artifact.
NEW QUESTION # 151
George Lennon is working as at InfoWorld Pvt. Solution as a DevSecOps engineer. His colleague, Sarah Mitchell, is a senior software developer. George told her to participate in a bug bounty program conducted by AWS for python and Java code developers. He informed Sarah that the challenge is a fun-based solution for bashing bugs, encouraging team building, and bringing friendly competition to enhance the quality of the code and application performance.
Acting on George's advice, Sarah participated in the bug bounty program and scored the highest points in the challenge, and she received a reward of $10,000. Based on the given information, which of the following bug bounty programs did Sarah participate?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The description matches AWS BugBust, which AWS positions as a gamified, team-based bug fixing challenge rather than a classic external "bug bounty" for finding vulnerabilities in AWS itself.
The key hints are "fun-based solution for bashing bugs," "encouraging team building," and
"friendly competition," along with scoring points and awarding prizes. BugBust focuses on improving code quality by motivating developers to find and fix issues (often via static analysis findings) in languages like Java and Python. Participants earn points for remediations and compete on leaderboards, which aligns directly with Sarah "scored the highest points" and received a cash reward. The other names (BugFixer, BugFinder, BugHunt) are plausible- sounding but do not match the commonly referenced AWS gamified program described. In a DevSecOps context, this type of program supports culture by incentivizing secure coding habits, encouraging shared ownership of quality, and making remediation visible and rewarding across the engineering team.
NEW QUESTION # 152
Hassan Al-Rashid, a build engineer at a Dubai fintech, wants to ensure that build artifacts cannot be tampered with between the CI pipeline and the artifact repository, and that consumers can cryptographically verify an artifact's origin and build process. Which framework/practice should Hassan adopt?
Answer: B
Explanation:
SLSA is a security framework specifically designed to protect the software supply chain by defining a set of increasing levels of build integrity requirements, including provenance generation, tamper-resistant build pipelines, and cryptographic attestations that let consumers verify how, where, and from what source an artifact was built. This directly addresses Hassan's need for tamper-evidence and origin verification between CI and the artifact repository. The OWASP Top 10 catalogs common web application vulnerability categories but does not define supply-chain build integrity controls. CIS Benchmarks provide configuration hardening guidance for operating systems and platforms, not build provenance. MITRE ATT&CK is a knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques used for threat intelligence and detection engineering, not artifact integrity. Because Hassan specifically needs tamper resistance and provenance verification for build artifacts, SLSA is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 153
......
What is more, some after-sales services behave indifferently towards exam candidates who eager to get success, our 312-97 practice materials are on the opposite of it. So just set out undeterred with our 312-97 practice materials, These 312-97 practice materials win honor for our company, and we treat it as our utmost privilege to help you achieve your goal. Our 312-97 practice materials are made by our responsible company which means you can gain many other benefits as well.
312-97 Certification Exam Infor: https://www.real4prep.com/312-97-exam.html
P.S. Free 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Real4Prep: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E3KObNcibFZDohF4LCSUpco1NApkDO4x