BONUS!!! Laden Sie die vollständige Version der Zertpruefung Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsfragen kostenlos herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GpBJDS-npu6FrkkKUBTklCyRdKfMCHf-
Die Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Dumps von Zertpruefung sind die Unterlagen, die von vielen Kadidaten geprüft sind. Und es kann die sehr hohe Durchlaufrate garantieren. Wenn Sie nach der Nutzung der Dumps bei der Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierung durchgefallen sind, geben wir Zertpruefung Ihnen voll Geld zurück. Oder können Sie auch die kostlosen aktualisierten Dumps bekommen. Mit der Garantie sorgen Sie sich bitte nicht.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Data Store Management | 26% | - Optimize storage performance and cost - Manage data lifecycle and storage tiers - Design and implement data storage solutions
|
| Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Encrypt data at rest and in transit - Protect sensitive data - Implement access control and authentication
|
| Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Implement data quality and validation - Transform and enrich data
|
| Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Automate operational tasks - Monitor and troubleshoot data pipelines
- Ensure reliability and scalability |
>> Data-Engineer-Associate Fragen&Antworten <<
Im Zertpruefung können Sie kostenlos einen Teil der Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsfragen und Antworten zur Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung herunterladen, so dass Sie die Glaubwürdigkeit unserer Produkte testen können. Mit unseren Produkten können Sie 100% Erfolg erlangen und der Spitze in der IT-Branche einen Schritt weit nähern
238. Frage
A company stores daily records of the financial performance of investment portfolios in .csv format in an Amazon S3 bucket. A data engineer uses AWS Glue crawlers to crawl the S3 data.
The data engineer must make the S3 data accessible daily in the AWS Glue Data Catalog.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
To make the S3 data accessible daily in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, the data engineer needs to create a crawler that can crawl the S3 data and write the metadata to the Data Catalog. The crawler also needs to run on a daily schedule to keep the Data Catalog updated with the latest data. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
Create an IAM role that has the necessary permissions to access the S3 data and the Data Catalog. The AWSGlueServiceRole policy is a managed policy that grants these permissions1.
Associate the role with the crawler.
Specify the S3 bucket path of the source data as the crawler's data store. The crawler will scan the data and infer the schema and format2.
Create a daily schedule to run the crawler. The crawler will run at the specified time every day and update the Data Catalog with any changes in the data3.
Specify a database name for the output. The crawler will create or update a table in the Data Catalog under the specified database. The table will contain the metadata about the data in the S3 bucket, such as the location, schema, and classification.
Option B is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it configures the output destination to a new path in the existing S3 bucket. This is unnecessary and may cause confusion, as the crawler does not write any data to the S3 bucket, only metadata to the Data Catalog.
Option C is incorrect because it allocates data processing units (DPUs) to run the crawler every day. This is also unnecessary, as DPUs are only used for AWS Glue ETL jobs, not crawlers.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and C. It configures the output destination to a new path in the existing S3 bucket and allocates DPUs to run the crawler every day, both of which are irrelevant for the crawler.
1: AWS managed (predefined) policies for AWS Glue - AWS Glue
2: Data Catalog and crawlers in AWS Glue - AWS Glue
3: Scheduling an AWS Glue crawler - AWS Glue
[4]: Parameters set on Data Catalog tables by crawler - AWS Glue
[5]: AWS Glue pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
239. Frage
A hotel management company receives daily data files from each of its hotels. The company wants to upload its data to AWS. The company plans to use Amazon Athena to access the files. The company needs to protect the files from accidental deletion. The company will develop an application on its on-premises servers to automatically forward the files to a fully managed AWS ingestion service.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (150-250 words)
Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a fully managed data ingestion service that enables reliable and scalable delivery of streaming and batch data into Amazon S3 with minimal operational overhead. This directly satisfies the requirement for a fully managed AWS ingestion service while avoiding the need to provision, scale, or manage infrastructure.
By using the Amazon Kinesis Agent on the on-premises servers, the company can automatically forward daily data files to Kinesis Data Firehose. Firehose handles buffering, retry logic, scaling, and delivery without requiring administrative effort. Delivering the data to Amazon S3 allows seamless integration with Amazon Athena, which natively queries data stored in S3 without requiring data movement or transformation.
Enabling Amazon S3 versioning protects files from accidental deletion by preserving previous versions of objects. This aligns with AWS best practices for data durability and governance, especially for analytics workloads and compliance requirements.
Other options introduce unnecessary operational complexity. AWS DataSync with Amazon EFS is not optimized for Athena-based analytics. AWS Glue jobs and Amazon RDS are unsuitable for file-based analytical access. A self-managed Apache Kafka solution with Amazon MSK significantly increases operational overhead.
Therefore, option B is the most efficient, scalable, and operationally optimal solution according to AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate best practices.
240. Frage
A company needs to build a data lake in AWS. The company must provide row-level data access and column- level data access to specific teams. The teams will access the data by using Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift Spectrum, and Apache Hive from Amazon EMR.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
Option D is the best solution to meet the requirements with the least operational overhead because AWS Lake Formation is a fully managed service that simplifies the process of building, securing, and managing data lakes. AWS Lake Formation allows you to define granular data access policies at the row and column level for different users and groups. AWS Lake Formation also integrates with Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift Spectrum, and Apache Hive on Amazon EMR, enabling these services to access the data in the data lake through AWS Lake Formation.
Option A is not a good solution because S3 access policies cannot restrict data access by rows and columns.
S3 access policies are based on the identity and permissions of the requester, the bucket and object ownership, and the object prefix and tags. S3 access policies cannot enforce fine-grained data access control at the row and column level.
Option B is not a good solution because it involves using Apache Ranger and Apache Pig, which are not fully managed services and require additional configuration and maintenance. Apache Ranger is a framework that provides centralized security administration for data stored in Hadoop clusters, such as Amazon EMR.
Apache Ranger can enforce row-level and column-level access policies for Apache Hive tables. However, Apache Ranger is not a native AWS service and requires manual installation and configuration on Amazon EMR clusters. Apache Pig is a platform that allows you to analyze large data sets using a high-level scripting language called Pig Latin. Apache Pig can access data stored in Amazon S3 and process it using Apache Hive. However, Apache Pig is not a native AWS service and requires manual installation and configuration on Amazon EMR clusters.
Option C is not a good solution because Amazon Redshift is not a suitable service for data lake storage.
Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehouse service that allows you to run complex analytical queries using standard SQL. Amazon Redshift can enforce row-level and column-level access policies for different users and groups. However, Amazon Redshift is not designed to store and process large volumes of unstructured or semi-structured data, which are typical characteristics of data lakes. Amazon Redshift is also more expensive and less scalable than Amazon S3 for data lake storage.
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
What Is AWS Lake Formation? - AWS Lake Formation
Using AWS Lake Formation with Amazon Athena - AWS Lake Formation
Using AWS Lake Formation with Amazon Redshift Spectrum - AWS Lake Formation Using AWS Lake Formation with Apache Hive on Amazon EMR - AWS Lake Formation Using Bucket Policies and User Policies - Amazon Simple Storage Service Apache Ranger Apache Pig What Is Amazon Redshift? - Amazon Redshift
241. Frage
A data engineer must manage the ingestion of real-time streaming data into AWS. The data engineer wants to perform real-time analytics on the incoming streaming data by using time-based aggregations over a window of up to 30 minutes. The data engineer needs a solution that is highly fault tolerant.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
This solution meets the requirements of managing the ingestion of real-time streaming data into AWS and performing real-time analytics on the incoming streaming data with the least operational overhead. Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink is a fully managed service that allows you to run Apache Flink applications without having to manage any infrastructure or clusters. Apache Flink is a framework for stateful stream processing that supports various types of aggregations, such as tumbling, sliding, and session windows, over streaming data. By using Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, you can easily connect to Amazon Kinesis Data Streams as the source and sink of your streaming data, and perform time-based analytics over a window of up to 30 minutes. This solution is also highly fault tolerant, as Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink automatically scales, monitors, and restarts your Flink applications in case of failures. References:
* Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink
* Apache Flink
* Window Aggregations in Flink
242. Frage
A company currently stores all of its data in Amazon S3 by using the S3 Standard storage class.
A data engineer examined data access patterns to identify trends. During the first 6 months, most data files are accessed several times each day. Between 6 months and 2 years, most data files are accessed once or twice each month. After 2 years, data files are accessed only once or twice each year.
The data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy to develop new data storage rules. The new storage solution must continue to provide high availability.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
To achieve the most cost-effective storage solution, the data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy that transitions objects to lower-cost storage classes based on their access patterns, and deletes them when they are no longer needed. The storage classes should also provide high availability, which means they should be resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
* Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. It offers the same high durability, throughput, and low latency as S3 Standard, but with a lower storage cost and a retrieval fee2. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed once or twice each month. S3 Standard-IA also provides high availability, as it stores data redundantly across multiple Availability Zones1.
* Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is rarely accessed and can tolerate a 12- hour retrieval time. It is ideal for long-term archiving and digital preservation3. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed only once or twice each year. S3 Glacier Deep Archive also provides high availability, as it stores data across at least three geographically dispersed Availability Zones1.
* Delete objects when they are no longer needed. The data engineer can specify an expiration action in the S3 Lifecycle policy to delete objects after a certain period of time. This will reduce the storage cost and comply with any data retention policies.
Option C is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it transitions objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after
6 months. S3 One Zone-IA is similar to S3 Standard-IA, but it stores data in a single Availability Zone. This means it has a lower availability and durability than S3 Standard-IA, and it is not resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, it does not provide high availability as required.
Option B is incorrect because it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is a storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is accessed infrequently and can tolerate a retrieval time of minutes to hours. It is more expensive than S3 Glacier Deep Archive, and it is not suitable for data that is accessed only once or twice each year3. Therefore, it is not the most cost-effective option.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and B. It transitions objects to S3 One Zone- IA after 6 months, which does not provide high availability, and it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years, which is not the most cost-effective option.
References:
* 1: Amazon S3 storage classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* 2: Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* 3: Amazon S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [4]: Expiring objects - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [5]: Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [6]: Examples of S3 Lifecycle configuration - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [7]: Amazon S3 Lifecycle further optimizes storage cost savings with new features - What's New with AWS
243. Frage
......
Wenn Sie sich zur Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung anmelden, sollen Sie sofort gute Lernmaterialien oder Prüfungsunterlagen wählen, um sich gut auf die Prüfung vorzubereiten. Denn die Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine schwierige Prüfung und Sie müssen dafür ausreichende Vorbereitungen haben.
Data-Engineer-Associate Vorbereitung: https://www.zertpruefung.de/Data-Engineer-Associate_exam.html
Außerdem sind jetzt einige Teile dieser Zertpruefung Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsfragen kostenlos erhältlich: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GpBJDS-npu6FrkkKUBTklCyRdKfMCHf-