In this highly competitive modern society, everyone needs to improve their knowledge level or ability through various methods so as to obtain a higher social status. Under this circumstance passing AB-650 exam becomes a necessary way to improve oneself. And you are lucky to find us for we are the most popular vendor in this career and have a strong strength on providing the best AB-650 Study Materials. And the price of our AB-650 practice engine is quite reasonable.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Manage and secure AI services in Microsoft 365 | 35-40% | - Implement and manage agents and Agent 365
|
| Configure and manage Microsoft 365 tenants and workloads | 20-25% | - Manage Microsoft 365 workloads
|
| Govern and secure Microsoft 365 tenants and workloads | 40-45% | - Manage identities in Microsoft Entra
|
>> Latest AB-650 Test Blueprint <<
Our AB-650 exam prep will give you a complete after-sales experience. You can consult online no matter what problems you encounter. You can get help anywhere, anytime in our AB-650 test material. AB-650 test questions have very high quality services in addition to their high quality and efficiency. If you use AB-650 test material, you will have a very enjoyable experience while improving your ability. We have always advocated customer first. If you use our learning materials to achieve your goals, we will be honored. AB-650 exam prep look forward to meeting you.
NEW QUESTION # 58
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that contains an agent named Agent1. Agent1 uses a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server named MCP1.
An MCP server named MCP2 has Status set to Available. MCP2 exposes procurement data but has NOT completed a security review.
You need to prevent Agent1 from invoking MCP2. The solution must ensure that MCP1 and Agent1 remain available.
What should you do in Microsoft Agent 365?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Microsoft Agent 365 provides centralized governance of tools and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that AI agents use to access external services and organizational data.
Option D is correct because the Microsoft 365 admin center ' s Tools management interface enables administrators to block an individual MCP server without disabling the agent or unrelated MCP servers.
In this scenario, MCP2 is currently marked Available but has not completed its security review. Allowing agents to invoke MCP2 could expose procurement information before appropriate security controls have been validated.
Administrators can navigate to the Microsoft 365 admin center, select Agents # Tools # Registry, locate MCP2, and select Block.
Blocking MCP2 changes its availability and prevents agents from using the tools exposed by that server.
MCP1 remains available because it is a separate MCP server, and Agent1 itself is not disabled.
Option A is incorrect because agent management rules do not provide the direct server-specific blocking action requested.
Option B is incorrect because the Agent Registry manages agents, whereas the Tools Registry provides MCP server controls.
Option C is incorrect because policy templates are not the direct mechanism for blocking an individual MCP server.
Therefore, blocking MCP2 from Tools satisfies the requirements.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/admin/manage/manage-plugins-skills-mcp-servers
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/admin/manage/agent-tools-overview
NEW QUESTION # 59
You need to evaluate the configuration of AU1.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra administrative units support dynamic device membership based on device attributes. AU1 uses the following membership rule:
(device.deviceTrustType -eq " Workplace " ) -and
(device.deviceOSType -in [ " Windows " , " Android " ])
Statement 1: No.
Admin1 holds the Global Administrator role. However, AU1 uses dynamic membership, which prevents administrators from manually adding or removing members. Membership is determined exclusively by the configured rule.
Additionally, Device1 is Microsoft Entra joined, corresponding to deviceTrustType = AzureAD, rather than Workplace. Therefore, Device1 does not satisfy the rule.
Statement 2: Yes.
Device2 runs Windows 11 and is Microsoft Entra registered.
Microsoft Entra registered devices have a deviceTrustType value of Workplace, and Windows matches the permitted operating system list. Therefore, Device2 satisfies both conditions and is automatically included in AU1.
Statement 3: Yes.
The planned Android devices must be Microsoft Entra registered. Registered Android devices satisfy the Workplace trust condition and, when their recorded operating system value is Android, also satisfy the OS condition.
Consequently, they are automatically added to AU1 through dynamic membership processing. Group1 membership itself does not determine AU1 membership.
Administrators should verify the actual deviceOSType value because some Android Enterprise registrations use more specific operating system identifiers.
Microsoft References:
* Manage dynamic membership in administrative units .
* Microsoft Entra dynamic membership rules and device attributes .
NEW QUESTION # 60
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that contains a Microsoft Entra security group named Group1. The subscription has self-service password reset (SSPR) disabled.
You need to pilot SSPR for Group1. The solution must require users to use a mobile app notification to reset their password.
What should you configure in the Password reset settings?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra self-service password reset (SSPR) allows users to reset their passwords without contacting an administrator or helpdesk. Administrators can configure which authentication methods users must complete to verify their identities.
Option A is correct because Authentication methods controls the verification methods available during password reset, including Microsoft Authenticator push notifications.
In the legacy SSPR configuration, administrators navigate to Microsoft Entra admin center # Entra ID # Password reset # Authentication methods.
The Mobile app notification method allows users to verify their identities by responding to a Microsoft Authenticator notification.
An important configuration consideration is that the legacy SSPR experience supports app notifications when two authentication methods are required for password reset. When only one method is required, the mobile application verification code is supported instead.
To restrict the pilot to Group1, administrators must separately configure Properties, enable SSPR for selected users, and select Group1.
Option B configures administrator-specific password reset requirements. Option C controls SSPR enablement and targeting, but not the authentication method itself. Option D controls registration requirements, and Option E configures password reset notifications.
Current documentation qualification: Microsoft has deprecated management of authentication methods through legacy SSPR policies. For new deployments, administrators should configure Microsoft Authenticator through the centralized Authentication methods policy.
NEW QUESTION # 61
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a user named User1.
You create an outbound anti-spam policy named Policy1 as shown in the following exhibit.
You assign Policy1 to User1.
What is the maximum number of email messages that User1 can send in a 24-hour period?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 outbound anti-spam policies allow administrators to configure hourly external and internal recipient limits, along with an overall daily recipient limit.
The exhibit specifies three restrictions: an external limit of 10 per hour, an internal limit of 20 per hour, and a combined daily limit of 1,000.
The maximum combined hourly allowance is calculated as follows:
10 + 20 = 30
Across 24 hours, the theoretical maximum is:
30 ร 24 = 720
Therefore, Option B (720) is the intended answer because the combined hourly restrictions impose a tighter limit than the configured daily maximum of 1,000.
Option A represents the maximum combined allowance for one hour rather than 24 hours.
Option C incorrectly considers only the daily limit without applying the hourly restrictions.
Option D incorrectly adds the daily limit to the hourly allowances, even though the restrictions operate together.
Technical distinction: Microsoft ' s current documentation specifies these limits in terms of recipients rather than individual email messages. The calculation of 720 messages assumes one recipient per message, with both hourly allowances fully utilized. Messages addressed to multiple recipients consume more of the recipient allowance, so the exact number of messages can be lower.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/outbound-spam-policies-configure
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/outbound-spam-sending-limits-troubleshoot
NEW QUESTION # 62
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription.
Your company has multiple branch offices, including a branch office named Branch1. The users in Branch1 connect to Microsoft 365 by using a corporate web proxy.
On the Network connectivity page in the Microsoft 365 admin center, Branch1 displays the following network insight:
"We're detecting WebSocket (WSS) connection failures to the domain: *.cloud.microsoft, which causes Copilot to not work correctly for your users." HTTPS access to Microsoft 365 apps from Branch1 succeeds.
You need to resolve the insight without changing connectivity for the other branch offices.
What should you configure?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Microsoft 365 Copilot relies on secure WebSocket (WSS) connections to support real-time, bidirectional communication between client applications and Microsoft cloud services.
Option A is correct because the reported Network connectivity insight specifically identifies WebSocket connection failures for hosts within *.cloud.microsoft.
Microsoft documentation explains that this insight occurs when a network device or web proxy prevents successful WebSocket connections. Administrators should configure the affected proxy to permit WebSocket protocol connections, including the HTTP-to-WebSocket upgrade process, for the required Microsoft 365 endpoints.
Because the problem affects only Branch1, the configuration should be applied to the Branch1 web proxy policy. This resolves the connectivity issue without changing policies for other offices.
Option B is incorrect because the reported failure concerns WebSocket connectivity, not DNS resolution or regional endpoint selection.
Option C is incorrect as the best answer because TLS inspection can interfere with WebSocket connections, but the scenario does not establish that TLS inspection is the cause. Exempting endpoints from TLS inspection may be appropriate after further diagnosis, but allowing the required WebSocket protocol directly addresses Microsoft ' s reported insight.
Option D is incorrect because standard HTTPS connectivity already succeeds. Allowing HTTPS alone does not guarantee successful WebSocket protocol upgrades.
Therefore, the Branch1 proxy must allow WSS connections to the required Microsoft 365 hosts.
Microsoft References:
* Microsoft 365 Network Insights .
* Review Microsoft 365 network connection failures and WebSocket errors .
NEW QUESTION # 63
......
Our AB-650 learning materials will aim at helping every people fight for the AB-650 certificate and help develop new skills. If we want to survive in this competitive world, we need a comprehensive development plan to adapt to the requirement of modern enterprises. We sincerely recommend our AB-650 Preparation exam for our years' dedication and quality assurance will give you a helping hand. You can just free download the free demo of our AB-650 study materials to know how excellent our AB-650 exam questions are.
AB-650 Reliable Exam Papers: https://www.pdfdumps.com/AB-650-valid-exam.html