If you are very tangled in choosing a version of SC-500 practice prep, or if you have any difficulty in using it, you can get our help. We provide you with two kinds of consulting channels. You can contact our online staff or you can choose to email us on the SC-500 Exam Questions. No matter which method you choose, as long as you ask for SC-500 learning materials, we guarantee that we will reply to you as quickly as possible.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Manage and monitor security posture | 20-25% | - Implement activity and event collection in Microsoft Sentinel - Implement Microsoft Security Copilot configuration - Manage security posture using Microsoft Defender for Cloud |
| Secure storage, databases, and networking | 25-30% | - Implement security for storage accounts - Implement security for Azure network services - Implement security for databases |
| Manage identity, access, and governance | 20-25% | - Secure secrets and keys using Azure Key Vault - Implement governance with Azure Policy and Defender for Cloud - Secure access to resources using Microsoft Entra ID |
| Secure compute | 20-25% | - Implement security for application platform services - Implement security for AI workloads - Implement security for servers and virtual machines (VMs) |
Tracking and reporting features of this SC-500 practice test enables you to assess and enhance your progress. The third format of iPassleader product is the desktop Microsoft SC-500 practice exam software. It is an ideal format for those users who don’t have access to the internet all the time. After installing the software on Windows computers, one will not require the internet. The desktop SC-500 Practice Test software specifies the web-based version.
NEW QUESTION # 132
An administrator discovers that an application service principal has accumulated unnecessary permissions over time. Which concept should be applied to reduce security risk?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Regular access reviews help identify excessive permissions and support least-privilege principles. Reviewing and removing unused privileges reduces the attack surface. Privileged Identity Management primarily addresses privileged role governance, while scaling and geo- redundancy are unrelated to authorization risk reduction.
NEW QUESTION # 133
You have an Azure SQL Database logical server named Server1 that contains multiple databases.
The databases contain legacy SQL authentication logins that must no longer be usable for sign-in but must NOT be removed from the databases.
You need to ensure that SQL authentication is denied for connections.
What should you do?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra-only authentication on an Azure SQL logical server disables SQL authentication for all databases hosted on that server. Existing SQL authentication logins remain in the databases, but they can no longer be used to establish connections because only Microsoft Entra identities are accepted for authentication.
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql/database/authentication-aad-configure?view=azuresql&tabs=azure-portal
NEW QUESTION # 134
You need to delegate a user to implement the planned change for Defender for Cloud. The solution must follow the principle of least privilege.
Which user should you choose?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Admin1 is the visible least-privilege delegate for the planned Defender for Cloud change. Defender for Cloud administration should be delegated to the user with the specific security or Defender permissions needed for the task, not to broader administrators unless required. Choosing a higher privileged account would violate the least-privilege requirement. The source file's case-study background is not visible, so the answer follows the displayed answer selection and the general Defender for Cloud RBAC model. The SC-500 study guide places these tasks under security posture, event collection, Defender CSPM, EASM, Sentinel, and Security Copilot operations. The exam expects the control that minimizes analyst effort while preserving correct permissions and data flow. The selected answer reflects that service boundary and avoids a broader or merely investigative alternative. The result is a direct exam-style implementation choice: it changes the required security behavior without relying on unrelated monitoring, manual cleanup, or excessive privilege. Official Microsoft source
/topic: SC-500 Study Guide > Defender for Cloud least-privilege administration; Microsoft Learn > built-in Azure roles for Defender for Cloud.
NEW QUESTION # 135
You have an Azure virtual network named VNet1 that contains three subnets named Subnet1, Subnet2 and Subnet3. A single network security group (NSG) named NSG1 is associated with all the subnets. You have the following virtual machines:
*VM1 on Subnet1
*VM2 on Subnet2
VM3 on Subnet3
You create two application security groups named ASG1 and ASG2. VM2 is a member of ASG1, and VM3 is a member of ASG2.
You need to ensure that only VM2 can connect to VM3. The solution must continue to work if the private IP address of VM2 changes.
How should you configure the inbound rule on NSG1 ? To answer, drag the settings to the correct configurations. Each setting may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Source: ASG1; Destination: ASG2
The requirement is identity-stable network filtering between virtual machines even if VM2 receives a different private IP address. Application security groups solve exactly that problem: rules refer to VM membership instead of a fixed IP. Because VM2 is a member of ASG1 and VM3 is a member of ASG2, the inbound allow rule on the shared NSG must use ASG1 as source and ASG2 as destination. Choosing IP addresses would fail the change-resilience requirement. The important exam skill is separating data-plane access, management-plane administration, and network reachability. A storage, database, or firewall setting must be selected because it enforces the exact path requested in the scenario. Distractors often look plausible because they improve security generally, but they do not satisfy the protocol, scope, or automation requirement stated in the question. The result is a direct exam-style implementation choice: it changes the required security behavior without relying on unrelated monitoring, manual cleanup, or excessive privilege.
Official Microsoft source/topic: SC-500 Study Guide > NSGs and ASGs; Microsoft Learn > Application security groups in network security rules.
NEW QUESTION # 136
You have an Azure subscription that has the Microsoft Defender for Cloud Foundational Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) plan enabled.
You have an Amazon Web Services (AWS) account connected to Defender for Cloud for posture management.
In Defender for Cloud, security recommendations for the resources in Azure and AWS have a risk level of Not evaluated.
You need to ensure that Defender for Cloud assigns a risk level to the recommendations.
What should you do?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Defender CSPM must be enabled because Microsoft Defender for Cloud ' s risk prioritization capability is part of the paid Defender CSPM plan and isn ' t included with Foundational CSPM. Foundational CSPM provides baseline posture-management functions and security recommendations, but recommendations can remain Not evaluated for risk when the resources aren ' t protected by Defender CSPM. Microsoft explicitly identifies Defender CSPM as the prerequisite for recommendation risk prioritization.
Defender CSPM enriches recommendations with contextual risk factors such as Internet exposure, resource sensitivity, exploitability, lateral-movement potential, and business impact . Those factors are used to classify recommendations into risk levels such as Critical, High, Medium, and Low.
Enabling Defender for Servers Plan 2 supplies workload protection capabilities for servers but doesn ' t enable CSPM risk prioritization across Azure and AWS recommendations. Azure Arc onboarding isn ' t required merely to obtain risk levels for an already connected AWS environment. Similarly, assigning the CIS AWS Foundations standard changes which compliance assessments are evaluated; it doesn ' t activate Defender for Cloud ' s recommendation risk-ranking engine.
Therefore, the required change is to upgrade from Foundational CSPM to Defender CSPM .
NEW QUESTION # 137
......
Our SC-500 learning materials will aim at helping every people fight for the SC-500 certificate and help develop new skills. If we want to survive in this competitive world, we need a comprehensive development plan to adapt to the requirement of modern enterprises. We sincerely recommend our SC-500 Preparation exam for our years' dedication and quality assurance will give you a helping hand. You can just free download the free demo of our SC-500 study materials to know how excellent our SC-500 exam questions are.
Latest SC-500 Exam Objectives: https://www.ipassleader.com/Microsoft/SC-500-practice-exam-dumps.html