P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by BootcampPDF: https://drive.google.com/open?id=17E-laPHpiRktr7BLDgP6mHEraRYYMT9e
Each format of the PECB Certification Exams not only offers updated exam questions but also additional benefits. A free trial of the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam dumps prep material before purchasing, up to 1 year of free updates, and a money-back guarantee according to terms and conditions are benefits of buying PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) real questions today. A support team is also available 24/7 to answer any queries related to the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam dumps.
| Certification Vendor: | PECB |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Exam |
| Exam Number: | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Available Languages: | English, French, Spanish |
| Related Certifications: | PECB Certified Lead Auditor PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Foundation PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based questions, Multiple choice questions |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Recommended Training: | PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training |
| Exam Registration: | PECB Official Certification Page |
| Sample Questions: | PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online or onsite proctored exam |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended prior knowledge of ISO/IEC 27001 and information security management principles. Prior auditing experience is recommended but not mandatory. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://pecb.com/en/education-and-certification-for-individuals/iso-iec-27001/lead-auditor |
>> Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Braindumps Questions <<
Everyone is not willing to fall behind, but very few people take the initiative to change their situation. Take time to make a change and you will surely do it. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor actual test guide can give you some help. Our company aims to help ease the pressure on you to prepare for the exam and eventually get a certificate. Obtaining a certificate is equivalent to having a promising future and good professional development. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials have a good reputation in the international community and their quality is guaranteed. Why don't you there have a brave attempt? You will certainly benefit from your wise choice.
To become certified as an ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, individuals must possess a strong understanding of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard and its requirements, as well as the auditing process and techniques. They must also have practical experience in auditing an ISMS. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam is designed to test an individual’s knowledge, skills, and abilities in these areas and assess their readiness to perform as a lead auditor.
NEW QUESTION # 224
Access Control System, CCTV and security guards are form of:
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 225
EquiBank is undergoing an external audit of its financial management system. The auditors evaluate the logic of transactions processed by EquiBank's financial software. To ensure accuracy, they use simulations to validate operations, calculations, and controls programmed in the software applications. What type of Computer-Assisted Audit Technique (CAAT) is used?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
C . Correct Answer:
Data test techniques simulate transactions within financial software to verify logic, calculations, and programmed controls.
ISO 19011:2018 recognizes CAATs as audit tools that validate data processing integrity.
A . Incorrect:
Plotting and cartography software is used for geospatial analysis, not financial transaction testing.
B . Incorrect:
Utility software supports general IT functions but does not conduct audit simulations.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.10 (Use of CAATs in Auditing)
NEW QUESTION # 226
You are performing an ISMS audit at a European-based residential nursing home called ABC that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify the effectiveness of the continual improvement process.
During the audit, you learned most of the residents' family members (90%) receive WeCare medical devices promotion advertisements through email and SMS once a week via ABC's healthcare mobile app. All of them do not agree on the use of the collected personal data for marketing or any other purposes than nursing and medical care on the signed service agreement with ABC. They have very strong reason to believe that ABC is leaking residents' and family members' personal information to a non-relevant third party and they have filed complaints.
The Service Manager says that, after investigation, all these complaints have been treated as nonconformities.
The corrective actions have been planned and implemented according to the nonconformity and corrective management procedure (Document reference ID: ISMS_L2_10.1, version 1).
You write a nonconformity which you will follow up on later. Select the words that best complete the sentence:
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
One possible way to complete the sentence is:
"When reviewing the effectiveness of action taken in response to a nonconformity, an auditor seeks evidence of change that will prevent recurrence of the issue." According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.1, the organization shall continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the ISMS by evaluating the performance and the effectiveness of the ISMS, ensuring that the policy and objectives are aligned with the strategic direction of the organization, and taking actions to achieve the intended outcomes of the ISMS. One of the ways to achieve continual improvement is to identify and correct nonconformities and take actions to eliminate their causes and prevent their recurrence.
Therefore, when reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective actions, an auditor should look for evidence that the organization has analyzed the root cause of the nonconformity, implemented appropriate changes to the ISMS, and verified that the changes have resulted in the desired improvement and prevented the recurrence of the issue. References: =
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.1, Nonconformity and corrective action
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.2, Continual improvement
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 19, Audit Process
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 21, Audit Findings
NEW QUESTION # 227
Select the correct sequence for the information security risk assessment process in an ISMS.
To complete the sequence click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022, the standard for information security management systems (ISMS), the correct sequence for the information security risk assessment process is as follows:
* Establish information security criteria
* Identify the information security risks
* Analyse the information security risks
* Evaluate the information security risks
The first step is to establish the information security criteria, which include the risk assessment methodology, the risk acceptance criteria, and the risk evaluation criteria. These criteria define how the organization will perform the risk assessment, what level of risk is acceptable, and how the risks will be compared and prioritized.
The second step is to identify the information security risks, which involve identifying the assets, threats, vulnerabilities, and existing controls that are relevant to the ISMS. The organization should also identify the potential consequences and likelihood of each risk scenario.
The third step is to analyse the information security risks, which involve estimating the level of risk for each risk scenario based on the criteria established in the first step. The organization should also consider the sources of uncertainty and the confidence level of the risk estimation.
The fourth step is to evaluate the information security risks, which involve comparing the estimated risk levels with the risk acceptance criteria and determining whether the risks are acceptable or need treatment.
The organization should also prioritize the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and the objectives of the ISMS.
References: ISO 27001:2022 Clause 6.1.2 Information security risk assessment, ISO 27001 Risk Assessment
& Risk Treatment: The Complete Guide - Advisera, ISO 27001 Risk Assessment: 7 Step Guide - IT Governance UK Blog
NEW QUESTION # 228
Scenario 3: Rebuildy is a construction company located in Bangkok.. Thailand, that specializes in designing, building, and maintaining residential buildings. To ensure the security of sensitive project data and client information, Rebuildy decided to implement an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001. This included a comprehensive understanding of information security risks, a defined continual improvement approach, and robust business solutions.
The ISMS implementation outcomes are presented below
* Information security is achieved by applying a set of security controls and establishing policies, processes, and procedures.
* Security controls are implemented based on risk assessment and aim to eliminate or reduce risks to an acceptable level.
* All processes ensure the continual improvement of the ISMS based on the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) model.
* The information security policy is part of a security manual drafted based on best security practices Therefore, it is not a stand-alone document.
* Information security roles and responsibilities have been clearly stated in every employees job description
* Management reviews of the ISMS are conducted at planned intervals.
Rebuildy applied for certification after two midterm management reviews and one annual internal audit Before the certification audit one of Rebuildy's former employees approached one of the audit team members to tell them that Rebuildy has several security problems that the company is trying to conceal. The former employee presented the documented evidence to the audit team member Electra, a key client of Rebuildy, also submitted evidence on the same issues, and the auditor determined to retain this evidence instead of the former employee's. The audit team member remained in contact with Electra until the audit was completed, discussing the nonconformities found during the audit. Electra provided additional evidence to support these findings.
At the beginning of the audit, the audit team interviewed the company's top management They discussed, among other things, the top management's commitment to the ISMS implementation. The evidence obtained from these discussions was documented in written confirmation, which was used to determine Rebuildy's conformity to several clauses of ISO/IEC 27001 The documented evidence obtained from Electra was attached to the audit report, along with the nonconformities report. Among others, the following nonconformities were detected:
* An instance of improper user access control settings was detected within the company's financial reporting system.
* A stand-alone information security policy has not been established. Instead, the company uses a security manual drafted based on best security practices.
After receiving these documents from the audit team, the team leader met Rebuildy's top management to present the audit findings. The audit team reported the findings related to the financial reporting system and the lack of a stand-alone information security policy. The top management expressed dissatisfaction with the findings and suggested that the audit team leader's conduct was unprofessional, implying they might request a replacement. Under pressure, the audit team leader decided to cooperate with top management to downplay the significance of the detected nonconformities. Consequently, the audit team leader adjusted the report to present a more favorable view, thus misrepresenting the true extent of Rebuildy's compliance issues.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Is it acceptable for the auditor to prioritize keeping the evidence provided by Electra over the evidence provided by the former employee?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
B . Correct Answer: ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems) states Both sources should have been retained, reviewed, and verified rather than selectively prioritizing one over the other.
A . Incorrect:
A former employee may have insider knowledge, but their credibility must be verified-it is not inherently more reliable.
C . Incorrect:
While a client is independent, their evidence is not automatically more credible than a former employee's.
Relevant Standard Reference:
NEW QUESTION # 229
......
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Practice Questions: https://www.bootcamppdf.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor_exam-dumps.html
BONUS!!! Download part of BootcampPDF ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=17E-laPHpiRktr7BLDgP6mHEraRYYMT9e