P.S. Free 2026 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassSureExam: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fdYtkgYowqGlqVoVnrM2NMj8MHLo1xK2
Applicants of the Data-Engineer-Associate test who invest the time, effort, and preparation with updated Data-Engineer-Associate questions eventually get success. Without the latest AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam dumps, candidates fail the test and waste their time and money. As a result, preparing with actual Data-Engineer-Associate Questions is essential to clear the test.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Monitor and maintain data pipelines - Troubleshoot data workflow issues |
| Topic 2: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Apply governance and compliance best practices - Implement data security controls |
| Topic 3: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Ingest and transform data using AWS services - Build and manage data pipelines |
| Topic 4: Data Store Management | 26% | - Optimize storage performance and cost - Select appropriate data storage solutions |
>> New Data-Engineer-Associate Test Labs <<
It is browser-based; therefore no need to install it, and you can start practicing for the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam by creating the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) practice test. Our AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam dumps give help to give you an idea about the actual Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam. You can attempt multiple AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam questions on the software to improve your performance.
NEW QUESTION # 270
A company is migrating a legacy application to an Amazon S3 based data lake. A data engineer reviewed data that is associated with the legacy application. The data engineer found that the legacy data contained some duplicate information.
The data engineer must identify and remove duplicate information from the legacy application data.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: D
Explanation:
AWS Glue is a fully managed serverless ETL service that can handle data deduplication with minimal operational overhead. AWS Glue provides a built-in ML transform called FindMatches, which can automatically identify and group similar records in a dataset. FindMatches can also generate a primary key for each group of records and remove duplicates. FindMatches does not require any coding or prior ML experience, as it can learn from a sample of labeled data provided by the user. FindMatches can also scale to handle large datasets and optimize the cost and performance of the ETL job. References:
AWS Glue
FindMatches ML Transform
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
NEW QUESTION # 271
A company stores data from an application in an Amazon DynamoDB table that operates in provisioned capacity mode. The workloads of the application have predictable throughput load on a regular schedule.
Every Monday, there is an immediate increase in activity early in the morning. The application has very low usage during weekends.
The company must ensure that the application performs consistently during peak usage times.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity:
provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.
The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:
It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.
It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on- demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.
It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over-provisioning your table2.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don't need1.
It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables. You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.
It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns. You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.
Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.
It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.
1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB
2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB
3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB
[4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB
[5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog
[6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog
[7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
NEW QUESTION # 272
A company stores a 100 MB dataset in an Amazon S3 bucket as an Apache Parquet file. A data engineer needs to profile the data before performing data preparation steps on the data.
Which solution will meet this requirement in the MOST operationally efficient way?
Answer: B
Explanation:
AWS Glue DataBrew is purpose-built for data profiling and data preparation with minimal operational overhead. A DataBrew profile job automatically analyzes datasets stored in Amazon S3 and generates detailed statistics such as column completeness, distinct values, data types, min/max values, and potential data quality issues. This is exactly what is required before data preparation steps.
The dataset size (100 MB) and Parquet format are fully supported by DataBrew, and no infrastructure provisioning, cluster management, or SQL development is required. The profiling results are produced automatically and can be reviewed directly in the AWS Management Console, making this the most efficient and lowest-effort solution.
Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink is designed for real-time streaming analytics and introduces unnecessary complexity. Amazon Redshift Spectrum requires schema definition, SQL development, and additional setup, which is excessive for simple profiling. Amazon QuickSight is a visualization and BI service, not a data profiling tool.
Therefore, creating a DataBrew profile job is the most operationally efficient and exam-aligned solution.
NEW QUESTION # 273
A data engineer configures a large number of AWS Glue jobs that all start up around the same time. All the jobs run for less than 1 hour in the same subnet of the same VPC. All the AWS Glue jobs run on a G.1X worker type.
Some of the jobs occasionally fail with the following error: "The specified subnet does not have enough free addresses to satisfy the request." What is the likely root cause of the error?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Option A is correct because when many AWS Glue jobs start at the same time in the same subnet, Glue needs to create network interfaces in that subnet. If the subnet does not have enough free private IP addresses available, jobs can fail with exactly this type of error. AWS service documentation for VPC-based managed data services consistently notes that if there is no available free IP address in a specified subnet, the service cannot create or add the required ENIs and the workload can fail or degrade.
This is a subnet-level exhaustion issue, not a VPC-wide issue. A VPC can still have free addresses in other subnets while the specific subnet chosen for the jobs is out of usable addresses. That makes D incorrect.
Option B is incorrect because G.1X is a valid Glue worker type and does not inherently prevent subnet access.
Option C is also incorrect because the error is about address availability, not IAM authorization. In practice, this problem is usually resolved by using a larger subnet or spreading workloads across additional subnets so enough IPs are available when multiple Glue jobs launch concurrently. This aligns with the exam's focus on networking capacity planning for managed data services.
NEW QUESTION # 274
A company stores datasets in JSON format and .csv format in an Amazon S3 bucket. The company has Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server databases, Amazon DynamoDB tables that are in provisioned capacity mode, and an Amazon Redshift cluster. A data engineering team must develop a solution that will give data scientists the ability to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The best solution to meet the requirements of giving data scientists the ability to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL with the least operational overhead is to use AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, use Amazon Athena to query the data, use SQL for structured data sources, and use PartiQL for data that is stored in JSON format.
AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to prepare, clean, enrich, and move data between data stores1. AWS Glue crawlers are processes that connect to a data store, progress through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then create metadata tables in the Data Catalog2. The Data Catalog is a persistent metadata store that contains table definitions, job definitions, and other control information to help you manage your AWS Glue components3. You can use AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server, and Amazon DynamoDB, and store the metadata in the Data Catalog.
Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL or Python4. Amazon Athena also supports PartiQL, a SQL-compatible query language that lets you query, insert, update, and delete data from semi-structured and nested data, such as JSON. You can use Amazon Athena to query the data from the Data Catalog using SQL for structured data sources, such as .csv files and relational databases, and PartiQL for data that is stored in JSON format. You can also use Athena to query data from other data sources, such as Amazon Redshift, using federated queries.
Using AWS Glue and Amazon Athena to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL is the least operational overhead solution, as you do not need to provision, manage, or scale any infrastructure, and you pay only for the resources you use. AWS Glue charges you based on the compute time and the data processed by your crawlers and ETL jobs1. Amazon Athena charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries. You can also reduce the cost and improve the performance of your queries by using compression, partitioning, and columnar formats for your data in Amazon S3.
Option B is not the best solution, as using AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, and use Redshift Spectrum to query the data, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena. Redshift Spectrum is a feature of Amazon Redshift, a fully managed data warehouse service, that allows you to query and join data across your data warehouse and your data lake using standard SQL. While Redshift Spectrum is powerful and useful for many data warehousing scenarios, it is not necessary or cost-effective for querying all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL. Redshift Spectrum charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries, which is similar to Amazon Athena, but it also requires you to have an Amazon Redshift cluster, which charges you based on the node type, the number of nodes, and the duration of the cluster5. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of data and complex queries. Moreover, using Redshift Spectrum would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to provision and manage the cluster, and create an external schema and database for the data in the Data Catalog, instead of querying it directly from Amazon Athena.
Option C is not the best solution, as using AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, use AWS Glue jobs to transform data that is in JSON format to Apache Parquet or .csv format, store the transformed data in an S3 bucket, and use Amazon Athena to query the original and transformed data from the S3 bucket, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena with PartiQL. AWS Glue jobs are ETL scripts that you can write in Python or Scala to transform your data and load it to your target data store. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance of analytical queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and providing efficient compression and encoding schemes6. While using AWS Glue jobs and Parquet can improve the performance and reduce the cost of your queries, they would also increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, as you would have to write, run, and monitor the ETL jobs, and store the transformed data in a separate location in Amazon S3. Moreover, using AWS Glue jobs and Parquet would introduce additional latency, as you would have to wait for the ETL jobs to finish before querying the transformed data.
Option D is not the best solution, as using AWS Lake Formation to create a data lake, use Lake Formation jobs to transform the data from all data sources to Apache Parquet format, store the transformed data in an S3 bucket, and use Amazon Athena or Redshift Spectrum to query the data, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena with PartiQL. AWS Lake Formation is a service that helps you centrally govern, secure, and globally share data for analytics and machine learning7. Lake Formation jobs are ETL jobs that you can create and run using the Lake Formation console or API. While using Lake Formation and Parquet can improve the performance and reduce the cost of your queries, they would also increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, as you would have to create, run, and monitor the Lake Formation jobs, and store the transformed data in a separate location in Amazon S3. Moreover, using Lake Formation and Parquet would introduce additional latency, as you would have to wait for the Lake Formation jobs to finish before querying the transformed data. Furthermore, using Redshift Spectrum to query the data would also incur the same costs and complexity as mentioned in option B. Reference:
What is Amazon Athena?
Data Catalog and crawlers in AWS Glue
AWS Glue Data Catalog
Columnar Storage Formats
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
AWS Glue Schema Registry
What is AWS Glue?
Amazon Redshift Serverless
Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters
[Querying external data using Amazon Redshift Spectrum]
[Using stored procedures in Amazon Redshift]
[What is AWS Lambda?]
[PartiQL for Amazon Athena]
[Federated queries in Amazon Athena]
[Amazon Athena pricing]
[Top 10 performance tuning tips for Amazon Athena]
[AWS Glue ETL jobs]
[AWS Lake Formation jobs]
NEW QUESTION # 275
......
Our Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions just focus on what is important and help you achieve your goal. With high-quality Data-Engineer-Associate guide materials and flexible choices of learning mode, they would bring about the convenience and easiness for you. Every page is carefully arranged by our experts with clear layout and helpful knowledge to remember. In your every stage of review, our Data-Engineer-Associate practice prep will make you satisfied.
Data-Engineer-Associate Practical Information: https://www.passsureexam.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-pass4sure-exam-dumps.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassSureExam Data-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fdYtkgYowqGlqVoVnrM2NMj8MHLo1xK2