テストAI-103の認定に合格すると、あなたの就労能力が社会から認められ、良い仕事を見つけることができます。 AI-103クイズトレントを習得して試験に合格した場合。同僚、上司、親relative、友人、社会から尊敬されます。総じて、AI-103テスト準備を購入すると、試験に合格するだけでなく、キャリアと将来についての夢を実現するのに役立ちます。ですから、AI-103試験の教材を購入してすぐに行動を起こすことをheしないでください。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Implement computer vision solutions | 10-15% | - Analyze visual content
|
| Implement text analysis and information extraction solutions | 10-15% | - Analyze and extract information
|
| Implement agentic solutions | 20-25% | - Manage agent operations
|
| Plan and manage Azure AI solutions | 25-30% | - Manage AI solution lifecycle
|
| Implement generative AI solutions | 25-30% | - Develop generative AI applications
|
すべての人々がAI-103試験に合格し、関連する認定を短時間で取得できるように、3つの異なるバージョンのAI-103学習教材を設計しました。製品は、すべての人が同時に学習とテストを行うための実際の試験をシミュレートすることを試みることができ、学習コースでの学習不足に適した環境を提供することができます。当社からAI-103学習教材を購入して使用すると、実際の試験のようにAI-103学習テストを練習し、AI-103試験に簡単に合格できます。
質問 # 38
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that contains a customer support agent grounded in internal documentation.
After a recent update, users report the following issues:
* Some answers are unsupported by retrieved documents.
* A small number of responses are flagged for policy violations.
You need to evaluate each issue.
Which observability signals should you use for each issue? To answer, drag the appropriate observability signals to the correct issues. Each observability signal may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Unsupported responses: Groundedness evaluation metrics
Policy violations: Risk and safety metrics
For unsupported responses, use Groundedness evaluation metrics . In a Retrieval Augmented Generation scenario, the key question is whether the generated answer is supported by the retrieved context. Microsoft Foundry built-in evaluators define Groundedness as the RAG metric that measures how grounded a response is in retrieved context and returns a model-based score; Groundedness Pro evaluates whether the response is grounded in retrieved context by using Azure AI Content Safety. This directly matches answers that are unsupported by internal documentation.
For policy violations, use Risk and safety metrics . Microsoft Foundry risk and safety evaluators assess generated responses for safety risks such as hate and unfairness, sexual content, violence, self-harm, protected material, indirect attacks, code vulnerability, ungrounded attributes, prohibited actions, and sensitive data leakage. The guidance states that these evaluators assign risk and safety severity or pass/fail outcomes for AI responses and agent behavior.
Latency breakdown traces diagnose performance, not correctness or policy compliance. Token usage analytics diagnose cost and prompt/response size, not unsupported claims or safety violations. Reference topics:
Microsoft Foundry observability, RAG evaluators, groundedness, risk and safety evaluators, and agent quality evaluation.
質問 # 39
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that contains a customer support agent built by using the Foundry Agent Service.
The agent uploads user-provided screenshots to Azure Storage through a ticketing tool and receives a blob URL for additional reasoning.
You need to use image moderation during agent runs and prevent harmful content from being returned during runs. Azure Al Content Safety must access the images by using the blob URL. The solution must follow the principle of least privilege.
What should you configure for Content Safety? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Guardrails: Select User input, Output, Tool response, and Tool call and set Action to Block.
Storage access: A system-assigned managed identity that is assigned the Storage Blob Data Contributor role The guardrail must be applied to User input, Output, Tool response, and Tool call with the action set to Block
. Microsoft Foundry guardrails support four intervention points: user input, tool call, tool response, and output. This scenario includes user-provided screenshots, a ticketing tool that uploads images and returns blob URLs, and final agent responses. Applying blocking controls at all four points ensures harmful image-related content is inspected throughout the agent run and prevented from continuing or being returned to the user.
Microsoft's guardrails guidance also states that tool call and tool response controls are specifically required when harmful content can pass through agent tools.
For storage, configure the Azure AI Content Safety resource with a system-assigned managed identity and grant it Storage Blob Data Contributor on the storage account or container. The Content Safety image moderation quickstart states that images can be supplied by blob storage URL and that the Content Safety resource must be given storage access by enabling its system-assigned managed identity and assigning Storage Blob Data Contributor or Owner; Contributor is the least-privileged valid option shown. Reference topics: Foundry guardrails, agent intervention points, image moderation, managed identity, and Azure Storage RBAC.
質問 # 40
Case Study 1 - Contoso, Ltd
Overview
Company Information
Contoso, Ltd is a multinational retail company that builds, deploys, and manages generative AI and agent-based solutions by using Microsoft Foundry.
Existing Environment
Identity Environment
Contoso uses Microsoft Entra ID for identity management, authentication, and authorization capabilities that enable agents to access organizational resources and services.
Contoso recently formed a new AI engineering team named Agent1Dev Team to optimize and maintain existing AI solutions.
The team collaborates with solution architects, DevOps engineers, and security engineers to design, implement. monitor, and secure AI applications.
Contoso also has a team named Agent1Test Team that is responsible for validating AI solutions before the solution deployments.
Generative Environment
Contoso has a Microsoft Foundry deployment that contains two projects named Project1 and Project2.
Project1
Project1 contains a customer support agent named Agent1 that assists customers with product inquiries and troubleshooting requests.
Agent1 has the following configurations:
- Agent1 uses a base model deployment.
- A safety evaluation pipeline is NOT enabled.
- Tool invocation approval workflows are NOT enabled.
- Conversation memory constraints are NOT configured.
Agent1 interacts with customers by using digital support channels and answers general questions about Contoso products.
Project1 is deployed to an Azure region located in the European Union (EU).
Agent1Dev Team will use Project1 to optimize and maintain Agent1.
Project2
Project2 contains a deployed video generation model. The marketing department at Contoso has access to Project2 and plans to use the model to develop a video creation solution.
Development of the solution is incomplete.
Data Environment
Contoso stores product-related information in Azure resources that support AI applications.
The Azure environment contains an Azure Blob Storage account named storage1 that stores product detail sheets for all the Contoso products.
The product sheets include specifications, feature descriptions, and product support information that Agent1 can use to answer customer questions. The product sheets are stored in the PDF format.
Problem Statements
Contoso identifies the following issues:
- Agent1 has only general knowledge of the Contoso products.
- A recent chat interaction with Agent1 was analyzed for sentiment. The results of the analysis have NOT been processed yet.
- Agent1 does NOT use the detailed product information in the product sheets stored in storage1 when responding to customer questions.
- The finance department at Contoso reports that vendor invoices must be reviewed manually to ensure that the invoices match the terms defined in the vendor contracts. The invoices contain tables, logos, and varied layouts that make the documents difficult to process consistently.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to implement the following changes:
- Implement a solution for Project1 that analyzes the vendor invoices by evaluating both the visual layout and the textual content of the invoices, so that the invoice details can be verified against the vendor contract terms.
- Update the base model deployment used by Agent1 and standardize the model version to ensure continuity and consistent responses.
- Enable Agent1 to retrieve and use the detailed product information from the product sheets stored in storage1.
- Implement an indexing solution for the product sheets that Agent1 can use to answer customer questions.
- Complete the development of the video creation solution.
Technical Requirements
Contoso identifies the following technical requirements:
- The model deployment used by Agent1 must support scalable, high-throughput generative AI workloads and dynamically scale to handle variable customer support traffic, without requiring reserved throughput capacity.
- The product sheets must be processed by using an indexing pipeline that enables semantic and vector search, so that Agent1 can retrieve the relevant product information.
- Responses generated by using the product sheet information must be relevant, complete, and accurate.
- Agent1 must be able to use the product sheets to answer natural language questions about product details.
- The model version used by Agent1 must remain consistent to ensure stable responses.
- The data processed by the model must remain within the EU.
Security and Compliance Requirements
Contoso identifies the following security and compliance requirements:
- API keys must NOT be used to access Foundry-deployed models.
- Access to the Azure resources must follow the principle of least privilege.
- The developers at Contoso must authenticate to Microsoft Foundry resources by using Microsoft Entra authentication.
- Access to Project1 must be assigned to the members of Agent1Dev Team by using a security group named SC_Agent1_Dev.
- Access to Project1 must be assigned to the members of Agent1Test Team by using a security group named SC_Agent1_Test.
- Agent1 must never reveal customer information, even if a document that contains customer data is added erroneously to the product sheet repository in storage1.
- The product sheets might contain images that include embedded text. Agent1 must be protected from malicious instructions potentially hidden within the images.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
- Users that interact with Agent1 must have a personalized experience in future interactions, including the ability for Agent1 to retain conversation context and recall relevant information from previous interactions.
- Agent1 must answer questions only about the products sold by Contoso.
You need to recommend a solution to support the planned changes and technical requirements for Agent1 to use the product information stored in storage1. What should you include in the recommendation?
正解：A
解説：
The best choice to include to support this scenario is Azure AI Search.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Azure AI Search acts as the primary knowledge base and indexing infrastructure for AI agents. It ingests raw unstructured data directly from Azure Blob Storage, indexes it, and creates vector embeddings.
Natural Language Queries: It supports semantic ranking and vector search. This allows the Foundry agent to handle user questions written in natural language and find exact matches or conceptual relevance.
Relevance and Accuracy: By leveraging grounding data through an indexer, it ensures the agent's responses are strictly tied back to the product detail sheets, preventing hallucinations and verifying accuracy.
Incorrect:
[Not B]
Grounding with Bing Search: This tool connects the agent to the live internet. Because the product sheets are proprietary company data stored securely inside your private Azure Blob Storage account, Bing Search cannot access them and will not help answer specific questions about Contoso products.
[Not D]
Why Document Intelligence is Incorrect
Extraction vs. Retrieval: Azure Document Intelligence is used to extract structure, text, tables, and form fields from files to turn unstructured data into structured data formats.
Missing Search Infrastructure: It does not possess a native search indexer, vector database, or semantic query engine to accept natural language user questions and dynamically return grounded answers. It is instead used as a tool prior to or alongside Azure AI Search to help clean and structure highly complex layouts during the data ingestion pipeline.
Scenario:
Technical Requirements;
Responses generated by using the product sheet information must be relevant, complete, and accurate.
*-> Agent1 must be able to use the product sheets to answer natural language questions about product details.
Data environment: The Azure environment contains an Azure Blob Storage account named storage1 that stores product detail sheets for all the Contoso products.
Planned changes: Enable Agent1 to retrieve and use the detailed product information from the product sheets stored in storage1.
Reference:
https://pub.towardsai.net/build-a-rag-powered-ai-agent-with-microsoft-foundry-and-foundry-iq-via-the-azure-portal-7eb138b4ae8f
質問 # 41
You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure Al Foundry instance named AI1.
You have an app that automatically triages and resolves issues presented in the log files of a system.
You create an incident manager agent and a DevOps agent that collaborate to resolve the issues.
You need to ensure that the incident manager agent can assign work to the DevOps agent. The solution must minimize development effort.
What should you do?
正解：A
解説：
Ensuring that an incident manager agent can assign work to a DevOps agent in Azure AI Foundry is primarily achieved through a Connected Agents configuration. This setup allows a "main" agent to delegate tasks to "specialized" agents via natural language or defined function calls.
Key Implementation Steps
1. Configure Connected Agents
Within the Azure AI Foundry portal, you must register the DevOps agent as a "Connected Agent" of the incident manager.
2. Define Tool-Based Delegation
Use the ConnectedAgentToolDefinition in the Azure Python SDK or C# SDK to programmatically link them. This exposes the DevOps agent to the incident manager as a callable "tool".
3. Implement Handoff Orchestration Patterns
Choose an orchestration pattern that fits the triage-to-resolve workflow.
4. Manage Context and State
5. Enable Permissions and Roles
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-foundry/agents/how-to/connected-agents
質問 # 42
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that contains an internal Q & A agent.
Users report the following issues when they ask the agent questions:
* An increase in the following response: "No relevant information found"
* Periodic HTTP 429 rate limit exceeded errors during peak hours
You need to identify whether each issue is caused by model unavailability, resource limits, or inference failures.
What should you do? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Metrics to enable: Model Availability Rate and Provisioned Utilization
Diagnostic log to collect: trace
The correct metrics are Model Availability Rate and Provisioned Utilization . Model Availability Rate identifies whether failures are caused by service-side model unavailability because it is calculated from total calls minus server errors. Provisioned Utilization identifies resource-limit conditions because Microsoft states that when utilization reaches or exceeds 100%, calls are throttled and HTTP 429 errors are returned. This directly maps to the reported peak-hour rate-limit errors.
The correct diagnostic log is trace . For an internal Q & A scenario, trace logging is required to analyze question-answering behavior, including unanswered questions. Microsoft's custom question answering analytics guidance states that diagnostic logging stores telemetry and chat logs and instructs enabling Trace in addition to Audit, RequestResponse, and AllMetrics. The sample Kusto queries for unanswered questions inspect the answer, question, score, and knowledge base ID, and filter unanswered results by a score of zero.
RequestResponse is useful for request status and latency, and Audit is for administrative operations, but neither is the best diagnostic category for analyzing Q & A inference behavior such as "No relevant information found." Reference topics: Foundry monitoring, model availability, provisioned utilization, diagnostic logging, custom question answering analytics, and trace logs.
質問 # 43
......
SWREGの支払いには税金がかかります。 特に一部の国では、AI-103試験のテストエンジンにSWREGの支払いを使用する場合、国によって知的財産税が徴収されます。 お金を節約したい場合は、PayPalを選択してください。 ここでは、PayPalを選択するのにPayPalは必要ありません。 実際、ここにはクレジットカードが必要です。 PayPal支払いをクリックすると、AI-103試験テストエンジンのクレジットカード支払いに自動的に振り替えられます。 一方、PayPalには売り手のアカウントに厳しい制限があり、買い手の利益を維持できるため、AI-103試験のテストエンジンで安心して購入を共有できます。
AI-103資料的中率: https://www.shikenpass.com/AI-103-shiken.html