CIPP-E Latest Cram Materials - Test CIPP-E Cram

DOWNLOAD the newest Exam4Docs CIPP-E PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XJiaAUEhyQJBGx3PkPv_pe0PePy8c28B

During review, you can contact with our after-sales if there are any problems with our CIPP-E exam torrent. They will help you 24/7 all the time. These services assure you avoid any loss. Besides, our passing rate of CIPP-E practice materials has reached up to 98 to 100 percent up to now, so you cannot miss this opportunity. Besides, free updates of CIPP-E Exam Torrent will be sent to your mailbox freely for one year, hope you can have a great experience during usage of our practice materials.

IAPP CIPP-E Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:IAPP (International Association of Privacy Professionals)
Exam Name:Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe Exam
Exam Number:CIPP-E
Exam Format:Scenario-based questions, Multiple-choice questions
Real Exam Qty:90
Available Languages:English, French, German
Exam Duration:150 minutes
Exam Price:$550 USD
Certificate Validity Period:2 years
Related Certifications:CIPP/C
CIPT
CIPM
CIPP/US
Passing Score:300 out of 500
Recommended Training:IAPP Official CIPP/E Training
Exam Registration:IAPP Official Registration
Pearson VUE Scheduling
Sample Questions:IAPP CIPP-E Sample Questions
Exam Way:Computer-based; online remote proctoring or in-person at Pearson VUE test centers
Pre Condition:No formal prerequisites; recommended for professionals working with European data protection, compliance, legal, IT or privacy roles
Official Syllabus URL:https://iapp.org/certify/cipp-e/

>> CIPP-E Latest Cram Materials <<

CIPP-E Latest Cram Materials - 100% Unparalleled Questions Pool

If candidates want to obtain certifications candidates should notice studying methods. If you do not want to purchase our IAPP CIPP-E new exam bootcamp materials and just want to study yourself, willpower is the most important. Passing so many exams is really not easy. Reasonable studying methods and relative work experience make you half the work with double the results. CIPP-E New Exam Bootcamp materials will be a shortcut for you.

The CIPP/E certification exam covers the principles of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the EU-U.S. and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks, as well as other international data protection laws and frameworks. CIPP-E exam consists of 90 multiple-choice questions that must be completed within two and a half hours. Passing the exam requires a score of 300 out of 500 points. A CIPP/E certification is valid for two years, and re-certification is required every two years to maintain the credential.

IAPP CIPP-E Certification is a valuable credential for anyone working in the field of privacy and data protection. By demonstrating expertise in this field, individuals can enhance their professional reputation, open up new career opportunities, and contribute to the important work of protecting personal data and privacy in today's digital age.

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) Sample Questions (Q183-Q188):

NEW QUESTION # 183
To which of the following parties does the territorial scope of the GDPR NOT apply?

Answer: C

Explanation:
The territorial scope of the GDPR is determined by Article 3 of the Regulation, which sets out two main criteria for applying the GDPR to the processing of personal data: the establishment criterion and the targeting criterion. The establishment criterion applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the EU, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the EU or not. The targeting criterion applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the EU by a controller or processor not established in the EU, where the processing activities are related to the offering of goods or services to such data subjects in the EU or the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the EU. In addition, the GDPR applies to the processing of personal data by a controller not established in the EU, but in a place where Member State law applies by virtue of public international law.
Therefore, the territorial scope of the GDPR does not depend on the membership of a country to a particular international agreement or organisation, but on the location and activities of the controller or processor and the data subjects involved in the processing. The Paris Agreement is an international treaty on climate change that aims to limit global warming and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It does not have any direct or indirect relevance to the GDPR or the protection of personal data. Hence, being a party to the Paris Agreement does not affect the applicability of the GDPR to a country or a controller or processor established in that country.
The other options are incorrect because they are either directly or indirectly related to the GDPR or the protection of personal data. The European Economic Area (EEA) consists of all EU member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. The EEA Agreement allows these three countries to participate in the EU' s internal market and to adopt most of the EU legislation, including the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR applies to all EEA countries as if they were EU member states. The Treaty of Lisbon is an international agreement that amends the two treaties which form the constitutional basis of the EU. The Treaty of Lisbon introduces several changes to the EU's institutional structure, decision-making process, and policy areas, including the recognition of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU as legally binding. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU includes the right to the protection of personal data as a fundamental right, and provides the legal basis for the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR applies to all EU member states that are parties to the Treaty of Lisbon. The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of 27 member states that are located primarily in Europe. The EU has developed an internal single market through a standardised system of laws that apply in all member states, including the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR applies to all EU member states by virtue of their membership to the EU. References: Art. 3 GDPR - Territorial scope, Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3) - version adopted after public consultation, Paris Agreement - Wikipedia, European Economic Area - Wikipedia, Treaty of Lisbon - Wikipedia, European Union - Wikipedia Reference: https://www.complianceweek.com/understanding-the-territorial-scope-of-the-gdpr/24693.article


NEW QUESTION # 184
Which mechanism, introduced by the GDPR as a means of ensuring both compliance and transparency, allows for the possibility of personal data transfers to third countries under Article 42?

Answer: A

Explanation:
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) introduces a mechanism for personal data transfers to third countries or international organisations that do not ensure an adequate level of data protection, based on approved certifications. According to Article 42 of the GDPR, the European Commission, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the national data protection authorities (DPAs) shall encourage the establishment of data protection certification mechanisms and of data protection seals and marks, for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the GDPR of processing operations by controllers and processors. The specific needs of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises shall be taken into account.
The GDPR also provides that the certification mechanisms shall be voluntary and available via a transparent process. The certification shall be issued by the competent supervisory authority or by the certification bodies accredited by the supervisory authority or by the national accreditation body. The certification shall be valid for a maximum period of three years and may be renewed, under the same conditions, if the relevant requirements continue to be met. The certification shall be withdrawn, as the case may be, by the competent supervisory authority or by the certification bodies, where the requirements for the certification are not or are no longer met.
The GDPR further stipulates that the certification shall be issued to a controller or processor who has demonstrated, in accordance with the approved certification criteria, that the processing of personal data is in compliance with the GDPR. The certification shall specify the scope and purpose of the processing, the criteria applied and the duration of the validity of the certification. The certification shall not reduce the responsibility of the controller or the processor for compliance with the GDPR and shall not be interpreted as an endorsement of the quality or reliability of the products or services of the controller or the processor by the supervisory authority or the certification body.
The GDPR also states that the certification mechanisms shall contribute to the proper application of the GDPR, taking account of the specific features of the various processing sectors and the different risks for the rights and freedoms of data subjects. The certification mechanisms shall allow for the verification of compliance with the GDPR of processing operations by controllers and processors not established in the EU, regardless of the location of the processing. The certification mechanisms shall also provide for the possibility to demonstrate compliance with the GDPR for personal data transfers to third countries or international organisations under Article 46, which sets out the rules and requirements for the transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations based on appropriate safeguards, such as binding corporate rules, standard contractual clauses, codes of conduct or certification mechanisms.
Reference:
GDPR, Articles 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 and 49.
EDPB Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation 2016/679, pages 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Free CIPP/E Study Guide, pages 9, 10, 11 and 12.


NEW QUESTION # 185
As a result of the European Court of Justice's ruling in the case of Google v. Spain, search engines outside the EEA are also likely to be subject to the Regulation's right to be forgotten. This holds true if the activities of an EU subsidiary and its U.S. parent are what?

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to the CIPP/E study guide, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in the case of Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez1 that an Internet search engine operator is responsible for the processing of personal data that appear on web pages published by third parties, and that such operator must comply with the EU data protection law when it has an establishment in the EU. The CJEU held that Google Spain and Google Inc. were inextricably linked in their businesses, since Google Spain promoted and sold advertising space offered by Google Inc., which oriented its activity towards the inhabitants of Spain. Therefore, Google Inc. was subject to the EU data protection law through its subsidiary Google Spain, even though the personal data processing was carried out by Google Inc. outside the EU. This implies that search engines outside the EEA are also likely to be subject to the Regulation's right to be forgotten if they have an establishment in the EU that is inextricably linked to their parent company. Reference: 1: CIPP/E study guide, page 16; Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja Gonzalez


NEW QUESTION # 186
WP29's "Guidelines on Personal data breach notification under Regulation 2016/679'' provides examples of ways to communicate data breaches transparently. Which of the following was listed as a method that would NOT be effective for communicating a breach to data subjects?

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to the WP29's "Guidelines on Personal data breach notification under Regulation 2016/679'', the communication of a personal data breach to the data subjects should be clear, concise, transparent, easily accessible and understandable, and use clear and plain language. The communication should also be made as soon as reasonably feasible and in close cooperation with the supervisory authority. The guidelines provide some examples of methods that may be effective for communicating a breach to data subjects, such as a direct electronic message (e.g. email, SMS, direct message), a postal notification, a prominent advertisement in print media, or a notice on the homepage of the affected website. However, the guidelines also state that a notice on a corporate blog or social media would not be an effective method of communication, as it would not reach all the affected data subjects and would not allow them to take immediate action to protect themselves. Therefore, the correct answer is C. A notice on a corporate blog. Reference:
WP29's "Guidelines on Personal data breach notification under Regulation 2016/679'', pages 20-211


NEW QUESTION # 187
A private company has establishments in France, Poland, the United Kingdom and, most prominently, Germany, where its headquarters is established. The company offers its services worldwide. Most of the services are designed in Germany and supported in the other establishments. However, one of the services, a Software as a Service (SaaS) application, was defined and implemented by the Polish establishment. It is also supported by the other establishments.
What is the lead supervisory authority for the SaaS service?

Answer: D

Explanation:
According to the GDPR, the lead supervisory authority (LSA) is the one located in the EU member state where the controller or processor has its main establishment or single establishment. The main establishment is the place where the decisions on the purposes and means of the processing of personal data are taken. In this case, the SaaS service was defined and implemented by the Polish establishment, so the decisions on the processing of personal data for this service are taken in Poland. Therefore, the LSA for the SaaS service is the supervisory authority of the Republic of Poland.
Reference:
GDPR Article 4(16): Definition of main establishment
GDPR Article 56: Competence of the lead supervisory authority
GDPR Recital 36: Determination of the main establishment
IAPP CIPP/E Study Guide, Chapter 5, Section 5.1: Lead Supervisory Authority


NEW QUESTION # 188
......

Test CIPP-E Cram: https://www.exam4docs.com/CIPP-E-study-questions.html

P.S. Free & New CIPP-E dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Exam4Docs: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XJiaAUEhyQJBGx3PkPv_pe0PePy8c28B