2026 Latest PassLeaderVCE JN0-336 PDF Dumps and JN0-336 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1T7r4O27foyy-tkfSpAw-EjgMBJ4tasWN
Now passing JN0-336 exam is not easy, so choosing a good training tool is a guarantee of success to get the JN0-336 certificate. If you choose our JN0-336 exam materials, we will free update within one year after you purchase. That is to say we can ensure that we will provide you with exam information and exam practice questions and answers immediately. It can let you be fully prepared for exam, and almost have 100% pass rate of JN0-336 Exam. We can not only allow you for the first time to participate in JN0-336 exam to pass it successfully, but also help you save a lot of valuable. Don't miss such a good opportunity because of your hesitation.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Security Director (Junos Space) | - Management platform
|
| Topic 2: High Availability (HA) Clustering | - HA fundamentals
|
| Topic 3: Intrusion Detection and Prevention (IDP) | - IDP concepts and architecture
|
| Topic 4: Identity-Aware Security Policies | - Identity concepts
|
| Topic 5: SSL Proxy | - SSL inspection concepts
|
| Topic 6: IPsec VPN | - Operations and troubleshooting
|
| Topic 7: Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) Cloud | - Operations
|
>> JN0-336 Latest Test Dumps <<
The high pass rate coming from our customers who have passed the exam after using our JN0-336 exam software, and our powerful technical team make us proudly say that our PassLeaderVCE is very professional. The after-sale customer service is an important standard to balance whether a company is better or not, so in order to make it, we provide available 24/7 online service, one-year free update service after payment, and the promise of "No help, full refund", so please be rest assured to choose our product if you want to pass the JN0-336 Exam.
NEW QUESTION # 32
You want to include a custom attack object named Custom-FTP-Attack and set the action to drop the packet.
Referring to the exhibit, which modifications would you make?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Add custom-attack Custom-FTP-Attack to the attacks section and change the action to drop-packet. In the exhibit, the IDP rule is built under rulebase-ips with a match block and a then block.
Attack objects belong inside the match attacks hierarchy because they define what malicious pattern the IDP rule is trying to detect. Juniper's IDP documentation states that attack objects are specified in rules to identify malicious activity and that the rule's attack objects/groups are the attacks the device matches in monitored traffic.
The enforcement behavior belongs in the then action hierarchy. The current rule uses close-client; to meet the requirement, it must be changed to drop-packet. Juniper defines Drop Packet as an IDP action that drops a matching packet before it reaches its destination without closing the connection. Option A keeps the wrong action. Option C is structurally wrong because a custom attack object is not configured under the action section. Option D is also wrong because the notification section controls logging/alert behavior, not attack matching. Reference topics: IDP rulebase, custom attack objects, match attacks hierarchy, IDP actions, drop- packet behavior.
NEW QUESTION # 33
Click the Exhibit button.
Which two statements describe the output shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
The output indicates that node1 has a priority of 200 and is marked as "Primary," which means it is currently the active node controlling traffic for redundancy group 1. The "Primary" status designates that this node is handling the traffic for the specified redundancy group.
According to the exhibit, node0 is listed with a priority of 0 and is marked as "Secondary." This status indicates that node0 is currently not controlling traffic for redundancy group 1, serving instead in a standby role ready to take over should node1 fail or become unavailable.
NEW QUESTION # 34
What are two types of attack objects included in an IDP attack object database? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
The correct answers are B and C. Juniper IDP uses attack objects as match conditions inside IDP policy rules.
Juniper states that IDP attack objects represent known and unknown attacks and that the predefined attack object database is periodically updated by Juniper Networks. The main IDP attack object types include signature attack objects, protocol anomaly attack objects, and compound attack objects.
Option C is correct because signature attack objects detect known attacks using stateful attack signatures.
Juniper defines a signature as a pattern that exists within a specific section of an attack and includes protocol, service, direction, flow, and context information to reduce false positives.
Option B is correct because protocol anomaly attack objects detect abnormal protocol behavior. Juniper explains that protocol anomaly objects identify unusual or ambiguous traffic that violates protocol specifications, RFCs, or common RFC extensions.
Option A is wrong because "statistic-based" is not one of the IDP attack object database types being tested here. Option D is wrong because "vector-based" is not a Juniper IDP attack object type. Reference topics:
IDP, attack object database, signature-based attack objects, protocol anomaly attack objects, predefined attack objects.
NEW QUESTION # 35
You have configured a new site-to-site VPN tunnel. The exhibit shows the security IPsec statistics output for the specific tunnel index from one of the tunnel-end devices.
Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
The correct answers are C and D. The exhibit shows ESP encrypted bytes = 0, ESP decrypted bytes = 0, encrypted packets = 0, and decrypted packets = 0. That means no traffic is successfully passing through the IPsec tunnel. Juniper's show security ipsec statistics command displays ESP encrypted/decrypted packet and byte counters, so zero values on these counters indicate that the tunnel is not successfully carrying protected ESP traffic.
Option C is also correct because the output shows ESP authentication failures and ESP decryption failures.
Since ESP is the IPsec protocol responsible for encrypted payload handling, failures in ESP authentication
/decryption point to an ESP/IPsec Phase 2 mismatch or incorrect configuration, such as mismatched authentication algorithm, encryption algorithm, keys, proposal parameters, or incompatible negotiated SA settings. Juniper's IPsec overview explains that Phase 2 negotiates the IPsec SA used to authenticate traffic flowing through the tunnel, so ESP-related failures belong to the IPsec/ESP configuration path rather than AH.
Option A is wrong because the AH counters and AH authentication failures are zero; the evidence is not pointing to AH. Option B is unsupported because the output does not show peer reboot behavior. Reference topics: IPsec VPN, ESP statistics, Phase 2/IPsec SA negotiation, ESP authentication failures, ESP decryption failures.
NEW QUESTION # 36
You are currenty using a third-party threat analyzer. You want your SRX Series device to send decrypted SSE traffic to......
In this scenario, which feature should you configure on the SRX device?
Answer: A,B
NEW QUESTION # 37
......
We guarantee you that our top-rated Juniper JN0-336 practice exam will enable you to pass the Juniper JN0-336 certification exam on the very first go. The authority of Security, Specialist (JNCIS-SEC) JN0-336 Exam Questions rests on its being high-quality and prepared according to the latest pattern.
JN0-336 Valid Exam Forum: https://www.passleadervce.com/JNCIS-SEC/reliable-JN0-336-exam-learning-guide.html
2026 Latest PassLeaderVCE JN0-336 PDF Dumps and JN0-336 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1T7r4O27foyy-tkfSpAw-EjgMBJ4tasWN