BONUS!!! Download part of Test4Engine ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1d0kmfyVtOtYXJAzLI5rQIivJ6h9evG5v
Free renewal of our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study prep in this respect is undoubtedly a large shining point. Apart from the advantage of free renewal in one year, our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine offers you constant discounts so that you can save a large amount of money concerning buying our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor training materials.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam is a certification program designed to provide individuals with the skills and knowledge necessary to become a certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is conducted by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), a leading global provider of training, examination, and certification services in the fields of information security, quality management, and business continuity.
>> Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Training <<
Considering many exam candidates are in a state of anguished mood to prepare for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam, our company made three versions of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor real exam materials to offer help. All these variants due to our customer-oriented tenets. As a responsible company over ten years, we are trustworthy. In the competitive economy, this company cannot remain in the business for long. But we keep being the leading position in contrast. We are reactive to your concerns and also proactive to new trends happened in this ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam consists of two parts: a written exam and a practical exam. The written exam consists of multiple-choice questions that test your knowledge of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard and its requirements. The practical exam involves conducting an audit of an ISMS based on the standard. This practical aspect of the exam is designed to test your ability to apply the standard in a real-world scenario.
NEW QUESTION # 307
Scenario 6: Sinvestment is an insurance company that offers home, commercial, and life insurance. The company was founded in North Carolina, but have recently expanded in other locations, including Europe and Africa.
Sinvestment is committed to complying with laws and regulations applicable to their industry and preventing any information security incident. They have implemented an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 and have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification.
Two auditors were assigned by the certification body to conduct the audit. After signing a confidentiality agreement with Sinvestment. they started the audit activities. First, they reviewed the documentation required by the standard, including the declaration of the ISMS scope, information security policies, and internal audits reports. The review process was not easy because, although Sinvestment stated that they had a documentation procedure in place, not all documents had the same format.
Then, the audit team conducted several interviews with Sinvestment's top management to understand their role in the ISMS implementation. All activities of the stage 1 audit were performed remotely, except the review of documented information, which took place on-site, as requested by Sinvestment.
During this stage, the auditors found out that there was no documentation related to information security training and awareness program. When asked, Sinvestment's representatives stated that the company has provided information security training sessions to all employees. Stage 1 audit gave the audit team a general understanding of Sinvestment's operations and ISMS.
The stage 2 audit was conducted three weeks after stage 1 audit. The audit team observed that the marketing department (which was not included in the audit scope) had no procedures in place to control employees' access rights. Since controlling employees' access rights is one of the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and was included in the information security policy of the company, the issue was included in the audit report. In addition, during stage 2 audit, the audit team observed that Sinvestment did not record logs of user activities.
The procedures of the company stated that "Logs recording user activities should be retained and regularly reviewed," yet the company did not present any evidence of the implementation of such procedure.
During all audit activities, the auditors used observation, interviews, documented information review, analysis, and technical verification to collect information and evidence. All the audit findings during stages 1 and 2 were analyzed and the audit team decided to issue a positive recommendation for certification.
Based on scenario 6, during stage 1 audit, the auditor found out that some documents regarding the ISMS had different format. What should the auditor do in this case?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The auditor should verify if the information required by the standard is documented, without necessarily focusing on the format, as long as the content meets the requirements of the standard. ISO/IEC 27001 does not mandate a specific format for documentation, only that necessary information is appropriately documented, maintained, and controlled.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 7.5 (Documented information)
NEW QUESTION # 308
After analyzing the audit conclusions, Company X decided to accept the risk related to one of the detected nonconformities. They claimed that no corrective action was necessary; however, their decision was not documented. Is this acceptable?
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001 standards, if the auditee decides to accept the risk instead of implementing corrective actions for a nonconformity, this decision should be justified and documented. Documenting such decisions is essential for maintaining the integrity of the ISMS and for demonstrating that the decision was made based on informed judgment.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 6.1 (Actions to address risks and opportunities)
NEW QUESTION # 309
You are an experienced audit team leader guiding an auditor in training, Your team is currently conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients. The auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the TECHNOLOGICAL controls listed in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) and implemented at the site.
Select four controls from the following that would you expect the auditor in training to review.
Answer: B,E,H,K
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), an organization should select and implement appropriate controls to achieve its information security objectives1. The controls should be derived from the results of risk assessment and risk treatment, and should be consistent with the Statement of Applicability (SoA), which is a document that identifies the controls that are applicable and necessary for the ISMS1. The controls can be selected from various sources, such as ISO/IEC 27002:2013, which provides a code of practice for information security controls2. Therefore, if an auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the technological controls listed in the SoA and implemented at the site of an organization that stores data on behalf of external clients, four controls that would be expected to review are:
* How protection against malware is implemented: This is a technological control that aims to prevent, detect and remove malicious software (such as viruses, worms, ransomware, etc.) that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information or information systems2. This control is related to control A.12.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* How the organisation evaluates its exposure to technical vulnerabilities: This is a technological control that aims to identify and assess the potential weaknesses or flaws in information systems or networks that could be exploited by malicious actors or cause accidental failures2. This control is related to control A.12.6.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* How access to source code and development tools are managed: This is a technological control that aims to protect the intellectual property rights and integrity of software applications or systems that are developed or maintained by the organization or its external providers2. This control is related to control A.14.2.5 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems: This is a technological control that aims to
* monitor and restrict physical access to the premises or facilities where information or information systems are stored or processed2. This control is related to control A.11.1.4 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
The other options are not examples of technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. For example, the development and maintenance of an information asset inventory (related to control A.8.1.1), rules for transferring information within the organization and to other organizations (related to control A.13.2.1), confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements (related to control A.13.2.4), verification checks on personnel (related to control A.7.1.2), remote working arrangements (related to control A.6.2.1), information security within supplier agreements (related to control A.15.1.1), business continuity arrangements (related to control A.17), information deletion (related to control A.8.3), information security awareness, education and training (related to control A.7.2), equipment maintenance (related to control A.11.2), and how power and data cables enter the building (related to control A.11) are not technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO/IEC
27002:2013 - Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for information security controls
NEW QUESTION # 310
Which of the following is not a type of Information Security attack?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Vehicular incidents are not a type of information security attack. A vehicular incident is an event that involves a vehicle or its driver causing damage or injury to people or property. A vehicular incident may have an impact on information security if it affects the availability or integrity of information or systems that are transported or accessed by vehicles, but it is not an intentional or malicious attack on information security.
Legal incidents are a type of information security attack that involve legal actions or disputes that may compromise the confidentiality or integrity of information or systems. Technical vulnerabilities are a type of information security attack that exploit weaknesses or flaws in software or hardware that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information or systems. Privacy incidents are a type of information security attack that involve unauthorized access or disclosure of personal or sensitive information that may compromise the confidentiality or integrity of information or systems. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO
27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 25. : [ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB], page 13.
NEW QUESTION # 311
The following options are key actions involved in a first-party audit. Order the stages to show the sequence in which the actions should take place.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
The correct order of the stages is:
* Prepare the audit checklist
* Gather objective evidence
* Review audit evidence
* Document findings
* Audit preparation: This stage involves defining the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and plan. The auditor also prepares the audit checklist, which is a list of questions or topics that will be covered during the audit. The audit checklist helps the auditor to ensure that all relevant aspects of the ISMS are addressed and that the audit evidence is collected in a systematic and consistent manner12.
* Audit execution: This stage involves conducting the audit activities, such as opening meeting, interviews, observations, document review, and closing meeting. The auditor gathers objective evidence, which is any information that supports the audit findings and conclusions. Objective evidence can be qualitative or quantitative, and can be obtained from various sources, such as records, statements, physical objects, or observations123.
* Audit reporting: This stage involves reviewing the audit evidence, evaluating the audit findings, and documenting the audit results. The auditor reviews the audit evidence to determine whether it is sufficient, reliable, and relevant to support the audit findings. The auditor evaluates the audit findings to determine the degree of conformity or nonconformity of the ISMS with the audit criteria. The auditor
* documents the audit results in an audit report, which is a formal record of the audit process and outcomes. The audit report typically includes the following elements123:
* An introduction clarifying the scope, objectives, timing and extent of the work performed
* An executive summary indicating the key findings, a brief analysis and a conclusion
* The intended report recipients and, where appropriate, guidelines on classification and circulation
* Detailed findings and analysis
* Recommendations for improvement, where applicable
* A statement of conformity or nonconformity with the audit criteria
* Any limitations or exclusions of the audit scope or evidence
* Any deviations from the audit plan or procedures
* Any unresolved issues or disagreements between the auditor and the auditee
* A list of references, abbreviations, and definitions used in the report
* A list of appendices, such as audit plan, audit checklist, audit evidence, audit team members, etc.
* Audit follow-up: This stage involves verifying the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee to address the audit findings. The auditor monitors the progress and completion of the corrective actions, and evaluates their impact on the ISMS performance and conformity. The auditor may conduct a follow-up audit to verify the corrective actions on-site, or may rely on other methods, such as document review, remote interviews, or self-assessment by the auditee.
The auditor documents the follow-up results and updates the audit report accordingly123.
References:
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, pages 19-25
* ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
* The ISO 27001 audit process | ISMS.online
NEW QUESTION # 312
......
Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Topic: https://www.test4engine.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor_exam-latest-braindumps.html
BONUS!!! Download part of Test4Engine ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1d0kmfyVtOtYXJAzLI5rQIivJ6h9evG5v