GH-500 Certification Training & GH-500 Dumps Torrent & GH-500 Exam Materials

What's more, part of that Actualtests4sure GH-500 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=11h9hhiXWpKBWAsilXdFnnfA9f2964OPE

Our GH-500 learning materials are new but increasingly popular choices these days which incorporate the newest information and the most professional knowledge of the practice exam. All points of questions required are compiled into our GH-500 Preparation quiz by experts. By the way, the GH-500certificate is of great importance for your future and education. Our GH-500 practice materials cover all the following topics for your reference.

Microsoft GH-500 Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:Microsoft
Exam Name:GitHub Advanced Security
Exam Number:GH-500
Exam Price:$165 USD
Related Certifications:GitHub Advanced Security Certification
Passing Score:700 out of 1000
Exam Duration:120 minutes
Real Exam Qty:40-60
Certificate Validity Period:1 year
Available Languages:Spanish, French, Korean, German, English, Japanese, Chinese (Simplified)
Exam Format:Case study, Drag and drop, Multiple choice
Sample Questions:Microsoft GH-500 Sample Questions
Exam Way:Online (Proctored) or In-person at a testing center
Pre Condition:No mandatory prerequisites. Recommended to have experience with GitHub and basic understanding of security concepts.
Official Syllabus URL:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/credentials/certifications/github-advanced-security/

>> New GH-500 Exam Questions <<

GH-500 Exam Fee - Valid GH-500 Test Vce

If you still worry about your GH-500 exam; if you still doubt whether it is worthy of purchasing our software, what you can do to clarify your doubts is to download our GH-500 free demo. Once you have checked our demo, you will find the study materials we provide are what you want most. Our target is to reduce your pressure and improve your learning efficiency from preparing for GH-500 Exam.

Microsoft GH-500 Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Configure and use Code Scanning with CodeQL: This domain measures skills of Application Security Analysts and DevSecOps Engineers in code scanning using both CodeQL and third-party tools. It covers enabling code scanning, the role of code scanning in the development lifecycle, differences between enabling CodeQL versus third-party analysis, implementing CodeQL in GitHub Actions workflows versus other CI tools, uploading SARIF results, configuring workflow frequency and triggering events, editing workflow templates for active repositories, viewing CodeQL scan results, troubleshooting workflow failures and customizing configurations, analyzing data flows through code, interpreting code scanning alerts with linked documentation, deciding when to dismiss alerts, understanding CodeQL limitations related to compilation and language support, and defining SARIF categories.
Topic 2
  • Describe GitHub Advanced Security best practices, results, and how to take corrective measures: This section evaluates skills of Security Managers and Development Team Leads in effectively handling GHAS results and applying best practices. It includes using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) and Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers to describe alerts and suggest remediation, decision-making processes for closing or dismissing alerts including documentation and data-based decisions, understanding default CodeQL query suites, how CodeQL analyzes compiled versus interpreted languages, the roles and responsibilities of development and security teams in workflows, adjusting severity thresholds for code scanning pull request status checks, prioritizing secret scanning remediation with filters, enforcing CodeQL and Dependency Review workflows via repository rulesets, and configuring code scanning, secret scanning, and dependency analysis to detect and remediate vulnerabilities earlier in the development lifecycle, such as during pull requests or by enabling push protection.
Topic 3
  • Configure and use secret scanning: This domain targets DevOps Engineers and Security Analysts with the skills to configure and manage secret scanning. It includes understanding what secret scanning is and its push protection capability to prevent secret leaks. Candidates differentiate secret scanning availability in public versus private repositories, enable scanning in private repos, and learn how to respond appropriately to alerts. The domain covers alert generation criteria for secrets, user role-based alert visibility and notification, customizing default scanning behavior, assigning alert recipients beyond admins, excluding files from scans, and enabling custom secret scanning within repositories.
Topic 4
  • Describe the GHAS security features and functionality: This section of the exam measures skills of Security Engineers and Software Developers and covers understanding the role of GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) features within the overall security ecosystem. Candidates learn to differentiate security features available automatically for open source projects versus those unlocked when GHAS is paired with GitHub Enterprise Cloud (GHEC) or GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES). The domain includes knowledge of Security Overview dashboards, the distinctions between secret scanning and code scanning, and how secret scanning, code scanning, and Dependabot work together to secure the software development lifecycle. It also covers scenarios contrasting isolated security reviews with integrated security throughout the development lifecycle, how vulnerable dependencies are detected using manifests and vulnerability databases, appropriate responses to alerts, the risks of ignoring alerts, developer responsibilities for alerts, access management for viewing alerts, and the placement of Dependabot alerts in the development process.
Topic 5
  • Configure and use Dependabot and Dependency Review: Focused on Software Engineers and Vulnerability Management Specialists, this section describes tools for managing vulnerabilities in dependencies. Candidates learn about the dependency graph and how it is generated, the concept and format of the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), definitions of dependency vulnerabilities, Dependabot alerts and security updates, and Dependency Review functionality. It covers how alerts are generated based on the dependency graph and GitHub Advisory Database, differences between Dependabot and Dependency Review, enabling and configuring these tools in private repositories and organizations, default alert settings, required permissions, creating Dependabot configuration files and rules to auto-dismiss alerts, setting up Dependency Review workflows including license checks and severity thresholds, configuring notifications, identifying vulnerabilities from alerts and pull requests, enabling security updates, and taking remediation actions including testing and merging pull requests.

Microsoft GitHub Advanced Security Sample Questions (Q95-Q100):

NEW QUESTION # 95
What is the minimum role needed in order to view the secret scanning alerts list within the Security tab of a repository?

Answer: A

Explanation:
Viewing and filtering alerts from secret scanning
Who can use this feature?
Repository owners, organization owners, security managers, and users with the admin role Note: About the secret scanning alerts page When you enable secret scanning for a repository or push commits to a repository with secret scanning enabled, GitHub scans the contents for secrets that match patterns defined by service providers.
When secret scanning detects a secret, GitHub generates an alert. GitHub displays an alert in the Security tab of the repository


NEW QUESTION # 96
When configuring code scanning with CodeQL, what are your options for specifying additional queries?
(Each answer presents part of the solution. Choose two.)

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
You can customize CodeQL scanning by including additional query packs or by specifying individual queries :
* Packs : These are reusable collections of CodeQL queries bundled into a single package.
* Queries : You can point to specific files or directories containing .ql queries to include in the analysis.
github/codeql refers to a pack by name but is not a method or field. Scope is not a valid field used for configuration in this context.
: GitHub Docs - Customizing CodeQL Workflows


NEW QUESTION # 97
A colleague ignores a code scanning alert. What are the implications of the colleague's action? (Each answer presents part of the solution. Choose three.)

Answer: B,C,E

Explanation:
Ignoring an unresolved code scanning alert leaves the underlying security issue present in the application.
GitHub identifies several risks through CodeQL data-flow analysis, including data being used insecurely, dangerous arguments reaching sensitive functions, and sensitive information being leaked. These are precisely the kinds of vulnerabilities for which code scanning traces data from a source to a potentially unsafe sink.
GitHub does not automatically remove an unresolved alert merely because sixty days have elapsed. Likewise, webhooks and the code scanning API can expose alert events and enable integrations, but they do not automatically eliminate the vulnerability. Proper remediation requires fixing the affected code or intentionally dismissing an alert with an appropriate reason after security review. Therefore, A, B, and E describe the relevant security implications.


NEW QUESTION # 98
When using CodeQL, what extension stores query suite definitions?

Answer: D

Explanation:
Query suite definitions in CodeQL are stored using the .qls file extension. A query suite defines a collection of queries to be run during an analysis and allows for grouping them based on categories like language, security relevance, or custom filters.
In contrast:
.ql files are individual queries.
.qll files are libraries used by .ql queries.
.yml is used for workflows, not query suites.


NEW QUESTION # 99
Hotspot Question
You have a GitHub Enterprise Server instance named Server1 that contains multiple organizations. Server1 uses GitHub Advanced Security and has GitHub Secret Protection enabled. Repository administrators can change the secret scanning settings of their respective repository.
You discover the following issues:
- The developers at your company bypass secret scanning push protection by asking the repository administrators to temporarily disable secret scanning.
- Some security-critical secret scanning alerts are dismissed by non-
security staff without review.
You need to configure enterprise governance to meet the following requirements:
- Ensure that the repository administrators can no longer manage or
modify secret scanning.
- Ensure that dismissing secret scanning alerts requires the approval
of designated users.
What should you do for each requirement? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
Box 1: Prevent the repository administrators from managing secret scanning To solve this problem, you should prevent the repository administrators from managing secret scanning.
Enforces Compliance: Preventing local administrators from disabling security features stops them from creating temporary, unsafe workarounds for developers.
Centralizes Control: GitHub Enterprise Server allows enterprise or organization owners to enforce policies globally.
Maintains Security Baseline: Locking the setting ensures that
Box 2: Enable delegated alert dismissal for secret scanning
To resolve this problem, you must configure Delegated Alert Dismissal for secret scanning. This feature forces non-security users to submit a dismissal request instead of bypassing or directly closing an alert, requiring a mandatory review by authorized stakeholders.
Note:
Create Organization-Level Security Configurations
Enforcing this behavior at the organization or enterprise level ensures repository administrators cannot change or weaken these safety settings locally.
1. Navigate to the Organization Settings.
2. In the left sidebar, click Code security and select Configurations.
3. Click New configuration (or edit an existing custom configuration).
-> 4. Under the Secret scanning section, locate the dropdown for Prevent direct alert dismissals and set it to Enabled.
5. Save the configuration and Apply it to all relevant repositories across the organization.
Reference:
https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-11-secret-scanning-and-push-protection-are-enabled-by-default-on-new-public-repositories/
https://github.blog/changelog/2025-06-03-custom-roles-can-now-review-secret-scanning-alert-dismissal-requests/


NEW QUESTION # 100
......

GH-500 Exam Fee: https://www.actualtests4sure.com/GH-500-test-questions.html

DOWNLOAD the newest Actualtests4sure GH-500 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=11h9hhiXWpKBWAsilXdFnnfA9f2964OPE