FP2模擬テストは、シラバスの変更とCSI理論と実践の最新の進展に応じて何百人もの専門家によって改訂された高品質の製品であり、各学生が重要なコンテンツの学習を完了することができるように焦点を絞ってターゲットを絞っています 最短時間で。 FP2トレーニング準備では、FP2試験を受ける前に20〜30時間の練習をするだけで済みます。 一方、FP2試験の質問を使用すると、Financial Planning II (FPII)試験の焦点が失われることを心配する必要はありません。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Planning Practice | 10% | - Financial plan development process - Client engagement and data gathering |
| Retirement Planning | 20% | - Retirement income needs analysis - Government and private retirement programs - Retirement savings and withdrawal strategies |
| Family Law | 15% | - Marriage, cohabitation, and separation agreements - Support obligations and asset division |
| Savings Planning & Debt Management | 10% | - Debt management and repayment plans - Savings vehicles and strategies |
| Investment and Tax Planning | 10% | - Investment portfolio construction - Tax-efficient investing and income planning |
| Insurance Planning | 10% | - Life, disability, and critical illness insurance - Property and liability risk management |
| Estate Planning | 10% | - Estate taxation and wealth transfer - Wills, trusts, and powers of attorney |
| Financial Planning for Small Business | 15% | - Succession planning and exit strategies - Business structure and financial considerations |
FP2試験問題の最大の利点は、時間と市場の試練に耐えることです。それは、誠実で温かいサービスです。受験者がFP2試験に合格できるように、完璧な製品とサービスシステムを確立しています。対応する製品とサービスをお楽しみいただける、適切で満足のいくFP2試験問題を提供できます。絶対に100％良いとは言えませんが、すべての顧客にサービスを提供するために最善を尽くしています。このようにして初めて、顧客を維持し、長期的な協力パートナーになれます。 FP2テストガイドへの転送をお試しください。
質問 # 15
The following table outlines details for a life insurance policy issued in 1995:
Details
Amounts
Cash surrender value
$8,000
Premiums paid
$6,000
Dividends declared
$1,500
Net cost of pure insurance
$750
Marginal tax rate
30%
Assuming the policy is completely surrendered, what are the taxes payable?
正解：A
解説：
The taxable policy gain is determined by comparing the policy's surrender proceeds with its adjusted cost basis (ACB).
For this policy, the simplified ACB calculation is:
Premiums paid # policy dividends # net cost of pure insurance
Therefore:
$6,000 # $1,500 # $750 = $3,750 ACB
CRA guidance confirms that the ACB of a life insurance policy is increased principally by premiums and reduced by specified amounts including the net cost of pure insurance; policy dividends to which the policyholder becomes entitled also reduce the ACB.
The policy gain on surrender is therefore:
$8,000 cash surrender value # $3,750 ACB = $4,250 taxable policy gain
Apply the 30% marginal tax rate:
$4,250 × 30% = $1,275
Therefore, option C is correct.
The $4,250 amount itself is not the tax payable; it is the amount included in taxable income under the simplified calculation. Applying the client's marginal tax rate determines the resulting tax liability.
FPII reference/topic: Insurance Planning - permanent life insurance; cash surrender; adjusted cost basis; net cost of pure insurance; policy gains.
質問 # 16
Kienle has provided his advisor with the following information:
($)
Income last year
50,000
Pension adjustment last year
2,500
Unused contribution room from previous years
3,500
Assuming he has never over-contributed, what is the maximum amount that Kienle can put into his Registered Retirement Savings Plan without incurring a penalty?
正解：D
解説：
Kienle's available RRSP contribution room is $10,000.
The starting point is 18% of the previous year's earned income:
$50,000 × 18% = $9,000
The pension adjustment reflects retirement benefits accrued through an employer-sponsored pension arrangement and reduces the amount of new RRSP room generated:
$9,000 # $2,500 = $6,500
Kienle also has $3,500 of unused RRSP contribution room carried forward from previous years:
$6,500 + $3,500 = $10,000
Therefore, the maximum contribution shown by the facts is $10,000, corresponding to option C.
CRA's RRSP methodology follows this structure: unused room from the prior year, plus the lesser of 18% of prior-year earned income or the annual RRSP dollar limit, reduced by the applicable pension adjustment and modified where relevant by other pension adjustments or reversals.
Because 18% of $50,000 is only $9,000, the statutory annual dollar ceiling is not the limiting factor in this scenario. The unused $3,500 remains available because unused RRSP deduction room carries forward.
FPII reference/topic: Retirement Planning - RRSP deduction limits; pension adjustments; carry-forward contribution room.
質問 # 17
Spouse A, age 69, has been making regular contributions to a spousal Registered Retirement Savings Plan for spouse B, age 65. Assuming Spouse A has sufficient unused contribution room to carry forward, how long can they continue making contributions on behalf of Spouse B?
正解：A
解説：
The relevant age for determining how long contributions can continue to a spousal RRSP is the age of the spouse who is the annuitant of that RRSP-Spouse B.
CRA confirms that even after a contributor has passed the age at which contributions to the contributor's own RRSP are permitted, the contributor may continue making deductible contributions to a spouse's or common- law partner's RRSP, provided the contributor has RRSP deduction room and the spouse is 71 or younger on December 31 of the contribution year.
Accordingly, Spouse A's reaching age 71 does not by itself terminate the ability to contribute to Spouse B's spousal RRSP. Since Spouse B is currently 65, contributions can continue until December 31 of the calendar year in which Spouse B turns 71, assuming Spouse A continues to have available RRSP deduction room.
The "first 60 days" concept concerns which taxation year certain RRSP contributions may be deducted against; it does not extend an RRSP's statutory contribution eligibility beyond the end of the year in which its annuitant turns 71.
Therefore, option B correctly identifies the deadline.
FPII reference/topic: Retirement Planning - spousal RRSPs; contribution age limits; contributor deduction room; age-71 rules.
質問 # 18
Kimberly, age 24, has few assets, and is single with no children. Kimberly has a 10-year-old niece Tanya who she would like her entire estate to be distributed to at death. She consults with her lawyer Jackie to write a will. What is the most important clause Jackie should add in Kimberly's will?
正解：C
解説：
A discretionary encroachment clause is particularly important because Tanya is only 10 years old and may inherit Kimberly's estate while still a minor. Rather than requiring the estate property simply to remain untouched until Tanya reaches the stipulated distribution age, an encroachment provision permits the trustee to use trust capital for Tanya's benefit when appropriate.
The clause can authorize payments for matters such as education, health care, maintenance, accommodation, and general welfare. Estate-planning guidance concerning trusts for minors commonly provides trustees with authority to encroach upon income and capital for the minor's benefit before final distribution.
Option B is not the appropriate solution because Kimberly is Tanya's aunt. A will-maker's nomination of a guardian generally concerns the will-maker's own minor children and does not allow an aunt simply to replace the legal decision-making authority of Tanya's parents.
Trustee investment and administrative powers in option A are useful provisions, but they do not specifically address the beneficiary's need to access inheritance funds during minority. Funeral and debt-payment provisions likewise do not solve that central issue.
The discretionary encroachment clause therefore gives the estate trustee the flexibility necessary to provide appropriately for Tanya before she reaches the age for outright distribution.
FPII reference/topic: Estate Planning - wills; minor beneficiaries; testamentary trusts; trustee discretion; encroachment on capital.
質問 # 19
Hannah would like to replace her current vehicle and is considering leasing instead of financing. Hannah commutes a considerable distance from outside the city each day for her work. She thinks leasing would allow her to always have a newer and more reliable vehicle. What is an important factor for Hannah to consider before making her decision?
正解：B
解説：
Hannah's long daily commute makes the lease's kilometre allowance a critical consideration. Vehicle leases normally specify a maximum number of kilometres that may be driven during the lease term. Where actual usage exceeds the contractual allowance, the lessee can be charged an excess-kilometre fee when the vehicle is returned. Because Hannah travels a considerable distance each day, her annual driving is likely to be substantially higher than that of a typical driver, increasing the risk of a material end-of-lease charge.
Leasing may provide access to a newer vehicle and can produce lower periodic payments than financing an equivalent vehicle, but this advantage can be offset by kilometre charges, wear-and-tear charges, and the absence of vehicle ownership at the end of the term.
Option A is not generally correct because routine maintenance remains the lessee's responsibility unless a specific maintenance package is included. Option B is not inherently true; lease payments are frequently lower than financing payments because the lessee finances primarily the vehicle's depreciation during the lease term. Option D is similarly not a general leasing requirement.
For Hannah, expected annual mileage should therefore be calculated before selecting leasing over financing.
FPII reference/topic: Savings Planning and Debt Management - vehicle acquisition; leasing versus financing; cash-flow and contractual considerations.
質問 # 20
......
FP2認定試験の準備をするために、CertShiken の専門家たちは彼らの豊富な知識と実践を生かして特別なトレーニング資料を研究しました。CertShiken のCSIのFP2問題集はあなたが楽に試験に受かることを助けます。CertShiken のCSIのFP2練習テストはFP2試験問題と解答、 FP2 問題集、FP2 書籍やFP2勉強ガイドに含まれています。
FP2最新テスト: https://www.certshiken.com/FP2-shiken.html