인재도 많고 경쟁도 많은 이 사회에, 업계인재들은 인기가 아주 많습니다.하지만 팽팽한 경쟁률도 무시할 수 없습니다.많은 PRINCE2인재들도 어려운 인증시험을 패스하여 자기만의 자리를 지키고 있습니다.우리Itcertkr에서는 마침 전문적으로 이러한 PRINCE2인사들에게 편리하게 시험을 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner패스할수 있도록 유용한 자료들을 제공하고 있습니다.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Principles | - Apply the PRINCE2 principles in context |
| People | - People management and effective collaboration |
| Practices | - Business case - Quality - Issues - Risk - Progress - Plans - Organizing |
| Processes | - Starting up a project - Managing product delivery - Controlling a stage - Closing a project - Managing a stage boundary - Initiating a project - Directing a project |
>> PRINCE2-7-Practitioner인증시험덤프 <<
PRINCE2 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner시험패스는 어려운 일이 아닙니다. Itcertkr의 PRINCE2 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner 덤프로 시험을 쉽게 패스한 분이 헤아릴수 없을 만큼 많습니다. PRINCE2 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner덤프의 데모를 다운받아 보시면 구매결정이 훨씬 쉬워질것입니다. 하루 빨리 덤프를 받아서 시험패스하고 자격증 따보세요.
질문 # 55
A new law requires everyone working on public-infrastructure projects to hold an appropriate security clearance. The project manager records the legislation as an external event in the issue register so that its effects can be assessed.
Is this an appropriate application of the issues practice, and why?
정답：C
설명：
The correct answer is A . The legislation is an external event that has already occurred : a new legal requirement now applies to people working on public-infrastructure projects. It therefore represents an issue rather than merely an uncertain future risk. Recording it in the issue register enables the project team to assess its impact and determine what action may be necessary.
The effect could be significant. Existing or planned personnel may not possess the required security clearance, which could constrain the availability of resources, delay mobilization, alter supplier arrangements, increase costs, or affect scheduled delivery. The project manager should therefore ensure the event is captured and assessed rather than waiting until every consequence is known.
Option B is incorrect because external events that affect project objectives should still be managed through the project's agreed governance and issue-management controls. Option C would delay formal management of an event whose implications may require immediate investigation and action. Option D incorrectly assumes that externally generated issues belong exclusively to the business layer. The business may need to participate in resolving some consequences, but the project team must manage impacts on the project within its authority and escalation arrangements.
The key distinction is that an issue concerns something that has happened or is currently relevant , whereas a risk concerns uncertainty about a future event.
PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Issues practice; external events; issue register; issue assessment; resource impacts; risk-versus-issue distinction.
질문 # 56
During a periodic evaluation of the security-system work package, the team manager reviews the work package description, team plan, and the related issue, risk, quality, product, and lessons information. Missing electrical cabling means that installation is now forecast to finish one week late, exceeding the work-package time tolerance.
The team manager raises the issue with the project manager and reports the current status in the checkpoint report. Is this an appropriate application of the 'evaluate a work package' activity, and why?
정답：B
설명：
The correct answer is B . During evaluate a work package , the team manager periodically assesses actual and forecast performance against the authorized work package and, where applicable, the team plan. This requires consideration of relevant product, quality, risk, issue, lesson, and progress information so that the current status and forecast completion can be determined accurately.
Here, the missing electrical cabling has caused the security-system installation to be forecast one week late and beyond the delegated work-package time tolerance. Because management by exception operates through delegated tolerances, the team manager cannot simply absorb a forecast breach that lies outside the authority provided by the project manager. The project manager must therefore be informed.
The checkpoint report is the normal mechanism by which the team manager reports work-package progress to the project manager. However, a forecast tolerance breach should also be brought promptly to the project manager's attention rather than waiting passively for routine reporting.
Option A identifies only one aspect of evaluation and fails to address the forecast tolerance breach. Option C incorrectly removes evaluation responsibility from the team manager. Option D bypasses the management hierarchy: a team manager escalates work-package exceptions to the project manager , not directly to the project board.
PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing product delivery; evaluate a work package; checkpoint reports; work-package tolerances; management by exception; escalation.
질문 # 57
While preparing the risk management approach, the project manager holds a workshop to review the project context: the historic surroundings, sustainability targets and the need to minimize disruption to residents and businesses.
Is this an appropriate application of the risk practice, and why?
정답：D
설명：
The correct answer is B . An effective risk management approach must be designed with an understanding of the specific project context and the objectives that uncertainty could affect. PRINCE2 does not prescribe a generic risk process that should be applied identically to every project without considering circumstances.
The LouisShopping project operates in a sensitive environment. Historic surroundings create potential heritage risks; sustainability targets introduce environmental and benefits-related uncertainty; and the requirement to minimize disruption creates stakeholder, operational, schedule, and reputational exposure.
Reviewing these factors enables the project manager to determine appropriate risk procedures, responsibilities, assessment scales, escalation arrangements, review frequencies, and reporting mechanisms.
Option A is incorrect because contextual information is not itself a complete set of individually formulated risks. An individual risk should normally express the relevant uncertainty in a sufficiently clear form- commonly identifying its cause, uncertain event, and effect on objectives. Option C reverses the sequence: the overall management approach establishes how risks will be identified, assessed, treated, monitored, and communicated; specific responses are subsequently developed for identified risks. Option D is fundamentally incorrect because risk exists in relation to objectives. Without understanding what the project is trying to achieve, the significance of uncertainty cannot be assessed coherently.
PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Risk practice; project context; risk management approach; objectives; risk identification and assessment; tailoring risk management.
질문 # 58
The Chief Technology Officer is an influential stakeholder who strongly supports several unproven technologies for the shopping centre. Concerned about delivery risk and reputation, the project executive asks the project manager to limit the CTO's contact with the project team and other stakeholders.
Is this an appropriate approach to leading successful change, and why?
정답：A
설명：
The correct answer is D . PRINCE2 7 recognizes that successful change depends on understanding and actively engaging people who can influence the project, its outputs, and the eventual adoption of those outputs. The Chief Technology Officer is explicitly described as an influential stakeholder. Limiting that person's involvement simply because some preferred technologies are unproven would sacrifice potentially valuable organizational influence instead of managing the disagreement constructively.
The appropriate response is to maintain engagement while separately assessing the technical and delivery risks associated with the proposed technologies. Stakeholder engagement and risk management are complementary activities: an influential stakeholder can remain involved even when particular proposals require challenge, evaluation, or risk responses. Continued engagement also helps the project understand expectations, build support, and facilitate adoption of the eventual solution across the wider organizational ecosystem.
Options A and B treat stakeholder exclusion as a risk-control technique, which is inconsistent with effective change leadership. Option C is too narrow because merely recording technological concerns as risks does not address the people and stakeholder dimension. Risks should be managed, but the stakeholder relationship should also be deliberately maintained.
The scenario therefore distinguishes between managing the uncertainty attached to an idea and excluding the person advocating it . PRINCE2 supports the former, not the latter.
PRINCE2 7 reference topics: People; leading successful change; stakeholder engagement; organizational ecosystem; relationships and communication.
질문 # 59
At the end of the initiation stage, the Regeneration Manager submits the project plan and business case for review. The Portfolio Director releases funding for both stages 2 and 3 and instructs the project manager to provide only a progress report at the end of stage 2, without a project board decision before stage 3 begins.
Is this an appropriate application of the 'manage by stages' principle, and why?
정답：A
설명：
The correct answer is D . Under the manage by stages principle, a PRINCE2 project is divided into management stages that create defined governance and decision points. The project manager manages the current authorized stage, while the project board retains control over whether the project should proceed into the next management stage.
At a stage boundary, the project manager normally provides the information required for the project board to assess performance, review the updated business case and project plan, consider risks and issues, and evaluate the next stage plan. The board can then decide whether continued investment remains justified and whether the next stage should be authorized. PeopleCert guidance describes management stages as controlled segments with review points at which continuation can be approved or stopped.
Releasing funding for stages 2 and 3 does not remove the governance requirement to reassess the project before stage 3 starts. Option A confuses the project manager's delegated day-to-day authority within an authorized stage with authority to proceed automatically across stage boundaries. Option B concerns reporting customization rather than stage authorization. Option C incorrectly focuses on which corporate entity provides funding rather than the PRINCE2 control mechanism being tested.
PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Manage by stages; Managing a stage boundary; Directing a project; continued business justification; authorization of a stage.
질문 # 60
......
많은 사이트에서 PRINCE2인증 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner시험대비덤프를 제공해드리는데Itcertkr를 최강 추천합니다. Itcertkr의PRINCE2인증 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner덤프에는 실제시험문제의 기출문제와 예상문제가 수록되어있어 그 품질 하나 끝내줍니다.적중율 좋고 가격저렴한 고품질 덤프는Itcertkr에 있습니다.
PRINCE2-7-Practitioner최신 업데이트버전 인증덤프: https://www.itcertkr.com/PRINCE2-7-Practitioner_exam.html