BTW, DOWNLOAD part of RealExamFree JN0-336 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1M3Viu9phCyqUNRzlTxz74hU_OOnmH7P6
Therefore, make the most of this opportunity of getting these superb exam questions for the Security, Specialist (JNCIS-SEC) certification exam. We guarantee you that our top-rated Juniper JN0-336 Practice Exam (PDF, desktop practice test software, and web-based practice exam) will enable you to pass the JN0-336 certification exam on the very first go.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: SSL Proxy | - SSL inspection concepts
|
| Topic 2: High Availability (HA) Clustering | - Chassis cluster operations
|
| Topic 3: Identity-Aware Security Policies | - Identity concepts
|
| Topic 4: IPsec VPN | - Operations and troubleshooting
|
| Topic 5: Intrusion Detection and Prevention (IDP) | - IDP concepts and architecture
|
| Topic 6: Security Director (Junos Space) | - Management platform
|
| Topic 7: Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) Cloud | - ATP Cloud concepts
|
>> JN0-336 Reliable Guide Files <<
If you are going to purchase JN0-336 test materials online, the safety of the website is significant. We provide you with a clean and safe online shopping environment if you buying JN0-336 trining materials form us. We have professional technicians to exam the website every day, therefore the safety for the website can be guaranteed. Moreover, JN0-336 Exam Materials are high quality and accuracy, and you can pass the exam just one time. We offer you free update for 356 days for JN0-336 traing materials and the update version will be sent to your email automatically.
NEW QUESTION # 64
Which action will the SRX Series device take if traffic matches the custom attack object shown in the exhibit?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. the action taken is defined in the IDP policy that includes this attack object. The exhibit defines a custom attack object named BGP-DEFEND under the security idp custom-attack hierarchy.
The custom object includes metadata such as recommended-action drop, severity critical, and signature match conditions such as BGP update AS-path context and pattern 65501. However, an attack object by itself does not determine the final enforcement behavior. The attack object defines what to match; the IDP policy rule that references the object defines what action to take when that match occurs. Juniper describes attack objects as objects used inside IDP rules to identify malicious activity, while IDP rules include rule actions such as drop-packet, drop-connection, close-client, close-server, recommended, and others.
Option B is wrong because the firewall security policy enables IDP inspection by applying an IDP policy, but the IDP action is not selected directly by the normal security policy. Options C and D are too absolute. Even though the custom object shows recommended-action drop, that is only used if the IDP rule action invokes recommended behavior. Without seeing the IDP policy rule action, you cannot conclude reject or drop.
Reference topics: IDP custom attack objects, IDP policy rule actions, recommended action, signature-based attack matching.
NEW QUESTION # 65
What are two ways to help reduce false positives for an IDP rule? (Choose two.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The correct answers are B and C. IDP false positives occur when legitimate traffic matches an attack signature or attack object incorrectly. One valid way to reduce false positives is to remove the problematic attack object from the IDP rule, especially when that object is not relevant to the protected application, server role, or traffic direction. Juniper defines attack objects as the items specified in IDP rules to identify malicious activity, so removing an irrelevant or noisy attack object directly reduces unwanted matches.
Option C is also correct because Juniper specifically recommends using an exempt rulebase when an IDP rule uses an attack object group containing attack objects that produce false positives or irrelevant log records.
Exempt rules can exclude a specific source, destination, or source/destination pair from matching an IDP rule, preventing unnecessary alarms.
Option A is wrong because changing the action to a lower severity response does not reduce the false positive; it only changes what happens after the false match occurs. Option D is wrong because a terminal rule at the end of the rule base does not prevent earlier false-positive matches. Reference topics: IDP, attack objects, exempt rulebase, false-positive tuning, IDP rule matching.
NEW QUESTION # 66
Which two statements about unified security policies are correct? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,D
NEW QUESTION # 67
You are implementing an SRX Series device at a branch office that has low bandwidth and also uses a cloud-based VoIP solution with an outbound policy that permits all traffic.
Which service would you implement at your edge device to prioritize VoIP traffic in this scenario?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The service that you would implement at your edge device to prioritize VoIP traffic in this scenario is AppQoS. AppQoS is a feature that enables you to allocate bandwidth and prioritize traffic based on application signatures or custom rules. AppQoS can enhance the quality of service and experience for critical or latency-sensitive applications, such as VoIP. You can configure AppQoS policies to assign different classes of service (CoS) values or queue numbers to different applications or traffic flows. You can also define bandwidth limits, guarantees, or bursts for each class or queue. Reference: =
[Application Quality of Service Overview], [Configuring Application Quality of Service]
NEW QUESTION # 68
Using Junos Space Security Director, you want to configure a unique firewall policy for a specific SRX Series device.
Which firewall policy rule would satisfy the requirement?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. device policy rules. In Junos Space Security Director, a firewall rule that must apply uniquely to one SRX Series device belongs in the device-specific policy layer, not in global or group-level policy. Juniper's Security Director documentation states that a device can have a device-specific policy and can also be part of multiple group policies; the rule processing order places policies applied before device- specific policies first, then device-specific policies, then policies applied after device-specific policies. Juniper also explains that rules applied before device-specific policies take priority and cannot be overridden, while rules applied after device-specific policies can be overridden by adding a rule in the device-specific policy.
Option A is wrong because all-devices prerules are global mandatory rules applied before device-specific policy, not unique device exceptions. Option B is wrong because group policy prerules apply to a group of devices, not one specific SRX. Option D is wrong because all-devices postrules are still global policy rules, although they can be overridden. For a unique policy requirement on one SRX device, device policy rules are the precise Security Director construct. Reference topics: Security Director, firewall policies, device-specific policies, policy rule precedence, global/group/device rule hierarchy.
NEW QUESTION # 69
......
Being a social elite and making achievements in your own field may be the dream of all people. However, only a very few people seize the initiative in their life. Perhaps our research data will give you some help. As long as you spend less time on the game and spend more time on learning, the JN0-336 Study Materials can reduce your pressure so that users can feel relaxed and confident during the preparation and certification process.
Latest JN0-336 Test Format: https://www.realexamfree.com/JN0-336-real-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free 2026 Juniper JN0-336 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by RealExamFree: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1M3Viu9phCyqUNRzlTxz74hU_OOnmH7P6