그리고 DumpTOP Data-Engineer-Associate 시험 문제집의 전체 버전을 클라우드 저장소에서 다운로드할 수 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gpyXqiDLb2NtaxUhVN15Lh1WeAMSv1V1
Amazon인증 Data-Engineer-Associate덤프로Amazon시험을 패스,하지 못하셨다구요? 최선을 다했는데도 실패하였다는 말은 영원히 하지마세요. Amazon인증 Data-Engineer-Associate시험을 패스하는 방법은 많고도 많습니다. DumpTOP의Amazon인증 Data-Engineer-Associate덤프로 시험에 다시 도전해보세요. DumpTOP의Amazon인증 Data-Engineer-Associate덤프는 착한 가격에 100%에 달하는 적중율과 패스율을 보장해드립니다. 시험에서 불합격성적표를 받으시면 덤프구매시 지불한 덤프비용을 환불처리해드립니다. DumpTOP의Amazon인증 Data-Engineer-Associate덤프로 시험패스를 꿈꿔보세요.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Data Store Management | 26% | - Manage data lifecycle
|
| Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Orchestrate data pipelines
|
| Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Manage data privacy and compliance
|
| Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Monitor data pipelines
|
>> Data-Engineer-Associate퍼펙트 인증덤프 <<
DumpTOP 에서는 IT인증시험에 대비한 퍼펙트한Amazon 인증Data-Engineer-Associate덤프를 제공해드립니다. 시험공부할 시간이 충족하지 않은 분들은DumpTOP 에서 제공해드리는Amazon 인증Data-Engineer-Associate덤프로 시험준비를 하시면 자격증 취득이 쉬워집니다. 덤프를 구매하시면 일년무료 업데이트서비스도 받을수 있습니다.
질문 # 181
A company stores data from an application in an Amazon DynamoDB table that operates in provisioned capacity mode. The workloads of the application have predictable throughput load on a regular schedule. Every Monday, there is an immediate increase in activity early in the morning. The application has very low usage during weekends.
The company must ensure that the application performs consistently during peak usage times.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
정답：C
설명：
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity: provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.
The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:
It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.
It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on-demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.
It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over-provisioning your table2.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don't need1.
It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables. You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.
It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns. You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.
Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.
It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.
Reference:
1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB
2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB
3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB
[4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB
[5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog
[6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog
[7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
질문 # 182
A data engineer uses Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to ingest and process records that contain user behavior data from an application every day.
The data engineer notices that the data stream is experiencing throttling because hot shards receive much more data than other shards in the data stream.
How should the data engineer resolve the throttling issue?
정답：C
질문 # 183
A data engineer is building a data pipeline on AWS by using AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) jobs. The data engineer needs to process data from Amazon RDS and MongoDB, perform transformations, and load the transformed data into Amazon Redshift for analytics. The data updates must occur every hour.
Which combination of tasks will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead? (Choose two.)
정답：C,D
설명：
The correct answer is to configure AWS Glue triggers to run the ETL jobs every hour and use AWS Glue connections to establish connectivity between the data sources and Amazon Redshift. AWS Glue triggers are a way to schedule and orchestrate ETL jobs with the least operational overhead. AWS Glue connections are a way to securely connect to data sources and targets using JDBC or MongoDB drivers. AWS Glue DataBrew is a visual data preparation tool that does not support MongoDB as a data source. AWS Lambda functions are a serverless option to schedule and run ETL jobs, but they have a limit of 15 minutes for execution time, which may not be enough for complex transformations. The Redshift Data API is a way to run SQL commands on Amazon Redshift clusters without needing a persistent connection, but it does not support loading data from AWS Glue ETL jobs. References:
AWS Glue triggers
AWS Glue connections
AWS Glue DataBrew
[AWS Lambda functions]
[Redshift Data API]
질문 # 184
A banking company uses an application to collect large volumes of transactional data. The company uses Amazon Kinesis Data Streams for real-time analytics. The company's application uses the PutRecord action to send data to Kinesis Data Streams.
A data engineer has observed network outages during certain times of day. The data engineer wants to configure exactly-once delivery for the entire processing pipeline.
Which solution will meet this requirement?
정답：A
설명：
For exactly-once delivery and processing in Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, the best approach is to design the application so that it handlesidempotency. By embedding aunique IDin each record, the application can identify and remove duplicate records during processing.
* Exactly-Once Processing:
* Kinesis Data Streams does not natively support exactly-once processing. Therefore,idempotency should be designed into the application, ensuring that each record has a unique identifier so that the same event is processed only once, even if it is ingested multiple times.
* This pattern is widely used for achieving exactly-once semantics in distributed systems.
Reference:Building Idempotent Applications with Kinesis
Alternatives Considered:
B (Checkpoint configuration): While updating the checkpoint configuration can help with some aspects of duplicate processing, it is not a full solution for exactly-once delivery.
C (Design data source): Ensuring events are not ingested multiple times is ideal, but network outages can make this difficult, and it doesn't guarantee exactly-once delivery.
D (Using EMR): While using EMR with Flink or Spark could work, it introduces unnecessary complexity compared to handling idempotency at the application level.
References:
Amazon Kinesis Best Practices for Exactly-Once Processing
Achieving Idempotency with Amazon Kinesis
질문 # 185
A company receives test results from testing facilities that are located around the world. The company stores the test results in millions of 1 KB JSON files in an Amazon S3 bucket. A data engineer needs to process the files, convert them into Apache Parquet format, and load them into Amazon Redshift tables. The data engineer uses AWS Glue to process the files, AWS Step Functions to orchestrate the processes, and Amazon EventBridge to schedule jobs.
The company recently added more testing facilities. The time required to process files is increasing. The data engineer must reduce the data processing time.
Which solution will MOST reduce the data processing time?
정답：D
설명：
Problem Analysis:
Millions of 1 KB JSON files in S3 are being processed and converted to Apache Parquet format using AWS Glue.
Processing time is increasing due to the additional testing facilities.
The goal is to reduce processing time while using the existing AWS Glue framework.
Key Considerations:
AWS Glue offers the dynamic frame file-grouping feature, which consolidates small files into larger, more efficient datasets during processing.
Grouping smaller files reduces overhead and speeds up processing.
Solution Analysis:
Option A: Lambda for File Grouping
Using Lambda to group files would add complexity and operational overhead. Glue already offers built-in grouping functionality.
Option B: AWS Glue Dynamic Frame File-Grouping
This option directly addresses the issue by grouping small files during Glue job execution.
Minimizes data processing time with no extra overhead.
Option C: Redshift COPY Command
COPY directly loads raw files but is not designed for pre-processing (conversion to Parquet).
Option D: Amazon EMR
While EMR is powerful, replacing Glue with EMR increases operational complexity.
Final Recommendation:
Use AWS Glue dynamic frame file-grouping for optimized data ingestion and processing.
AWS Glue Dynamic Frames
Optimizing Glue Performance
질문 # 186
......
최근들어 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate시험이 큰 인기몰이를 하고 있는 가장 핫한 IT인증시험입니다. Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프는Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate시험 최근문제를 해석한 기출문제 모음집으로서 시험패스가 한결 쉬워지도록 도와드리는 최고의 자료입니다. Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate인증시험을 패스하여 자격증을 취득하면 보다 쉽고 빠르게 승진할수 있고 연봉인상에도 많은 도움을 얻을수 있습니다.
Data-Engineer-Associate최신덤프: https://www.dumptop.com/Amazon/Data-Engineer-Associate-dump.html
DumpTOP Data-Engineer-Associate 최신 PDF 버전 시험 문제집을 무료로 Google Drive에서 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gpyXqiDLb2NtaxUhVN15Lh1WeAMSv1V1