Um Ihre Zertifizierungsprüfungen reibungslos erfolgreich zu meistern, brauchen Sie nur unsere Prüfungsfragen und Antworten zu Microsoft AI-103 （Developing AI Apps and Agents on Azure）auswendigzulernen. Viel Erfolg!
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Knowledge Mining and Information Retrieval | - Azure AI Search configuration - RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) patterns - Indexing and semantic search |
| Topic 2: Develop Generative AI Applications and Agents | - Azure OpenAI Service integration
|
| Topic 3: Implement Computer Vision Solutions | - Image classification and object detection - OCR and document intelligence |
| Topic 4: Plan and Manage Azure AI Solutions | - Model selection and lifecycle management - Azure AI resource provisioning and configuration - Responsible AI principles and governance |
| Topic 5: Implement Natural Language Processing Solutions | - Translation and multilingual support - Language understanding and intent recognition - Text analytics and summarization |
>> AI-103 Vorbereitungsfragen <<
Wie kann man Erfolge erlangen. Es gibt nur eine Ankürzung, nämlich: die Lernhilfe zur Microsoft AI-103Zertifizierungsprüfung von ZertSoft zu benutzen. Das ist unser Vorschlag für jeden Kandidaten. Wir hoffen, dass Sie Ihren Traum erfüllen können.
90. Frage
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that ingests scanned PDF invoices stored in Azure Blob Storage. Each invoice contains printed fine items and has a table-based layout.
Extracted results are stored as structured JSON and used as grounding data for an agent in a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) solution.
You need to create a single analyzer that meets the following requirements:
- Extracts the invoice number, invoice date, vendor name, and total
amount across varying templates
- Returns confidence scores so that results with confidence below 0.80
can be routed for supervisor review
What should you use?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
The best option in this scenario is a custom Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools analyzer that defines the required fields as the extracted fields and the returned confidence scores for routing.
Custom Field Targeting with Confidence Scores: Azure Content Understanding allows you to build a document analyzer with a user-defined schema. By defining your required fields (InvoiceNumber, InvoiceDate, VendorName, and TotalAmount), the service will handle extraction across varying layouts and return a dedicated field-level confidence score. You can natively evaluate these confidence metrics to implement your supervisor routing workflow.
RAG-Ready Output Structure: The service naturally returns highly structured JSON payloads.
This makes it perfectly optimized to be ingested directly as grounding data for a Retrieval- Augmented Generation (RAG) agent.
Incorrect:
[Not C]
The prebuilt-layout analyzer extracts raw structural elements such as blocks of text, hierarchy, selection marks, and complete tables. It does not automatically classify or cleanly isolate specific target entities (like vendor name or total amount) into dedicated schema properties, leaving you with heavy post-processing work to isolate the text.
[Not D]
The prebuilt-documentSearch analyzer is optimized for broad, layout-aware text extraction for indexing. Relying on Azure AI Search's search.score for supervisor routing is conceptually flawed; search.score represents a relevance score for a search query ranking rather than an accuracy metric for data extraction confidence.
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/content-understanding/document/analyzer-improvement
91. Frage
Case Study 1 - Contoso, Ltd
Overview
Company Information
Contoso, Ltd is a multinational retail company that builds, deploys, and manages generative AI and agent-based solutions by using Microsoft Foundry.
Existing Environment
Identity Environment
Contoso uses Microsoft Entra ID for identity management, authentication, and authorization capabilities that enable agents to access organizational resources and services.
Contoso recently formed a new AI engineering team named Agent1Dev Team to optimize and maintain existing AI solutions.
The team collaborates with solution architects, DevOps engineers, and security engineers to design, implement. monitor, and secure AI applications.
Contoso also has a team named Agent1Test Team that is responsible for validating AI solutions before the solution deployments.
Generative Environment
Contoso has a Microsoft Foundry deployment that contains two projects named Project1 and Project2.
Project1
Project1 contains a customer support agent named Agent1 that assists customers with product inquiries and troubleshooting requests.
Agent1 has the following configurations:
- Agent1 uses a base model deployment.
- A safety evaluation pipeline is NOT enabled.
- Tool invocation approval workflows are NOT enabled.
- Conversation memory constraints are NOT configured.
Agent1 interacts with customers by using digital support channels and answers general questions about Contoso products.
Project1 is deployed to an Azure region located in the European Union (EU).
Agent1Dev Team will use Project1 to optimize and maintain Agent1.
Project2
Project2 contains a deployed video generation model. The marketing department at Contoso has access to Project2 and plans to use the model to develop a video creation solution.
Development of the solution is incomplete.
Data Environment
Contoso stores product-related information in Azure resources that support AI applications.
The Azure environment contains an Azure Blob Storage account named storage1 that stores product detail sheets for all the Contoso products.
The product sheets include specifications, feature descriptions, and product support information that Agent1 can use to answer customer questions. The product sheets are stored in the PDF format.
Problem Statements
Contoso identifies the following issues:
- Agent1 has only general knowledge of the Contoso products.
- A recent chat interaction with Agent1 was analyzed for sentiment. The results of the analysis have NOT been processed yet.
- Agent1 does NOT use the detailed product information in the product sheets stored in storage1 when responding to customer questions.
- The finance department at Contoso reports that vendor invoices must be reviewed manually to ensure that the invoices match the terms defined in the vendor contracts. The invoices contain tables, logos, and varied layouts that make the documents difficult to process consistently.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to implement the following changes:
- Implement a solution for Project1 that analyzes the vendor invoices by evaluating both the visual layout and the textual content of the invoices, so that the invoice details can be verified against the vendor contract terms.
- Update the base model deployment used by Agent1 and standardize the model version to ensure continuity and consistent responses.
- Enable Agent1 to retrieve and use the detailed product information from the product sheets stored in storage1.
- Implement an indexing solution for the product sheets that Agent1 can use to answer customer questions.
- Complete the development of the video creation solution.
Technical Requirements
Contoso identifies the following technical requirements:
- The model deployment used by Agent1 must support scalable, high-throughput generative AI workloads and dynamically scale to handle variable customer support traffic, without requiring reserved throughput capacity.
- The product sheets must be processed by using an indexing pipeline that enables semantic and vector search, so that Agent1 can retrieve the relevant product information.
- Responses generated by using the product sheet information must be relevant, complete, and accurate.
- Agent1 must be able to use the product sheets to answer natural language questions about product details.
- The model version used by Agent1 must remain consistent to ensure stable responses.
- The data processed by the model must remain within the EU.
Security and Compliance Requirements
Contoso identifies the following security and compliance requirements:
- API keys must NOT be used to access Foundry-deployed models.
- Access to the Azure resources must follow the principle of least privilege.
- The developers at Contoso must authenticate to Microsoft Foundry resources by using Microsoft Entra authentication.
- Access to Project1 must be assigned to the members of Agent1Dev Team by using a security group named SC_Agent1_Dev.
- Access to Project1 must be assigned to the members of Agent1Test Team by using a security group named SC_Agent1_Test.
- Agent1 must never reveal customer information, even if a document that contains customer data is added erroneously to the product sheet repository in storage1.
- The product sheets might contain images that include embedded text. Agent1 must be protected from malicious instructions potentially hidden within the images.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
- Users that interact with Agent1 must have a personalized experience in future interactions, including the ability for Agent1 to retain conversation context and recall relevant information from previous interactions.
- Agent1 must answer questions only about the products sold by Contoso.
Hotspot Question
You need to configure the model deployment for Agent1 to meet the technical requirements.
What should you configure? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Antwort:
Begründung:
92. Frage
Note: This section contains one or more sets of questions with the same scenario and problem. Each question presents a unique solution to the problem. You must determine whether the solution meets the stated goals. More than one solution in the set might solve the problem. It is also possible that none of the solutions in the set solve the problem.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return. As a result, these questions do not appear on the Review Screen.
You have a multimodal Al generative model that accepts image uploads and uses extracted image text to generate responses.
You discover that users can upload unsafe images and embed hidden instructions into images to manipulate the model.
You need to implement controls to mitigate the risk.
Solution: You configure protected material detection.
Does this meet the goal?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
The solution does not meet the goal. Protected material detection is intended to identify large language model output that matches known protected text or code, such as copyrighted text, selected web content, song lyrics, articles, recipes, or code. Microsoft describes protected material detection as a control for preventing AI- generated content from reproducing known protected material, not as a control for image safety or prompt injection.
The stated risk has two parts: users can upload unsafe images, and users can embed hidden instructions in images to manipulate the model. Unsafe image uploads require image moderation, because Azure AI Content Safety provides image APIs that detect harmful content across modalities and can support blocking decisions by harm category and severity. Hidden instructions extracted from images are indirect prompt injection or document attacks; Microsoft Prompt Shields are the capability designed to detect user prompt attacks and document attacks, including harmful instructions embedded in third-party content.
Therefore, protected material detection alone does not mitigate either primary risk. Reference topics: Azure AI Content Safety, image moderation, Prompt Shields, document attacks, indirect prompt injection, and protected material detection.
93. Frage
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that contains an agent. The agent has a Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool that queries a knowledge base stored in Azure AI Search.
Some agent runs return answers from the base model without invoking the knowledge base, which results in responses without grounded citations.
You are provided with the following code snippet that runs the agent.
You need to add the correct tool _choiceparameter to the code to deterministically force the agent to invoke the MCP tool on each run.
What should you add?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
To deterministically force the agent to invoke your Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool on every run, you must pass tool_choice="required" into the run_create_and_process method.
The 'required' tool choice: Setting this parameter to 'required' forces the underlying Azure OpenAI model to invoke one of your available tools on every response, ensuring the agent doesn't guess answers from the base model.
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/agents/concepts/tool-best-practice
94. Frage
You have a Python application named App1 that integrates with a Microsoft Foundry project named Project1.
You need to ensure that App1 meets the following requirements:
* Authenticates by using a Microsoft Entra managed identity
* Sends prompts to a deployed model by using the Azure OpenAI Responses API How should you complete the Python code? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Antwort:
Begründung:
Explanation:
credential = DefaultAzureCredential
response = openai_client.responses.create
The correct authentication class is DefaultAzureCredential because the requirement is Microsoft Entra-based authentication, and this credential supports managed identity in hosted Azure environments. The Microsoft Foundry quickstart for Python shows the project client being created with AIProjectClient (endpoint=PROJECT_ENDPOINT, credential=DefaultAzureCredential()), which enables the Foundry SDK to authenticate without using API keys or embedded secrets. The same guidance shows creating an OpenAI- compatible client from the project by calling project.get_openai_client().
The correct Responses API method is create because the application must send a new prompt to the deployed model and receive generated output. Microsoft's Foundry quickstart demonstrates the exact pattern: response
= openai.responses.create(model= " gpt-5-mini " , input= " ... " ), followed by reading response.output_text.
The retrieve operation is used to fetch an existing response, not submit a new inference request, and compact is not the correct method for generating a model response. AzureKeyCredential would violate the Microsoft Entra managed identity requirement, while ClientSecretCredential uses an application secret rather than managed identity. Reference topics: Microsoft Foundry SDK, AIProjectClient, Microsoft Entra authentication, DefaultAzureCredential, and Azure OpenAI Responses API.
95. Frage
......
Wenn Ihr Budget beschränkt ist und Sie brauchen vollständiges Schulungsunterlagen, versuchen Sie mal unsere Schulungsunterlagen zur Microsoft AI-103 Zertifizierungsprüfung von ZertSoft. Sie können Ihren Erfolg in der Prüfung garantieren. ZertSoft ist eine populäre Website für Schulungsmaterialien zur Zeit im Internet. AI-103 Prüfung wird ein Meilenstein in Ihrem Berufsleben sein. Sie ist wichtiger als je zuvor in der konkurrenzfähigen Geseschaft. Wir versprechen, dass Sie nur einmal Microsoft AI-103 Prüfung ganz leicht bestehen können. Und Ihre späte Arbeit und Alltagsleben werden sicher interessanter sein. Außerdem können Sie auch neue Gelegenheiten und Wege finden. Es ist wirklich preiswert. Der Wert, den ZertSoft Ihnen verschafft, ist sicher viel mehr als den Preis.
AI-103 Examsfragen: https://www.zertsoft.com/AI-103-pruefungsfragen.html