If you still worry too much about purchasing professional AZ-802 test guide on the internet, I can tell that it is quite normal. Useful certification AZ-802 guide materials will help your preparing half work with double results. If you consider about our AZ-802 exam questoins quality, you can free downlaod the demo of our AZ-802 Exam Questions. We have thought of your needs and doubts considerately on the AZ-802 study guide. Our certification AZ-802 guide materials are collected and compiled by experience experts who have worked in this line more than 10 years.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Secure and manage Windows Server environments | - Security and compliance
|
| Hybrid infrastructure management | - Monitoring and update management
|
| Networking and high availability | - High availability and disaster recovery
|
| Compute, storage, and virtualization | - Storage and file services
|
>> AZ-802 Certification Training <<
If you want our AZ-802 study materials to download and print, the PDF version is perfect for you since it has the function of being printable. And the PDF version of our AZ-802 exam questions can be noted when you want to memory something as well as to indicate the keypoints. Also, our AZ-802 Preparation exam is unlimited in number of devices, making it easy for you to learn anytime, anywhere.
NEW QUESTION # 364
You have an on-premises Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain that syncs with a Microsoft Entra ID tenant. Group writeback is enabled in Microsoft Entra Connect. The AD DS domain contains a server named Server1. Server1 contains a shared folder named share1. You have an Azure Storage account named storage2 that uses Microsoft Entra ID-based access control. The storage2 account contains a share named share2. You need to create a security group that meets the following requirements: can contain users from the AD DS domain; can be used to authorize user access to share1 and share2. What should you do?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Azure Files ' Microsoft Entra ID Kerberos authentication for a storage account share currently requires that the security group placed on the share ' s access control list be a Microsoft Entra security group with assigned membership; groups with dynamic membership rules are not supported for this purpose, and a Microsoft 365 group is a different kind of object that is likewise not a supported security principal for this access-control scenario. Creating the group in the Microsoft Entra tenant as a standard security group with assigned membership therefore satisfies the share2 requirement directly. Because Group writeback is already enabled in Microsoft Entra Connect, a cloud-created Microsoft Entra security group (with assigned, not dynamic, membership - writeback also does not support dynamic groups) is written back down into the on-premises AD DS domain as a corresponding group object, which is what allows it to be used in an NTFS or share permission entry on share1 and to contain (or be evaluated against) users whose accounts live in the on- premises AD DS domain. Creating the group directly in the on-premises AD DS domain (option A) would satisfy share1 but would not automatically exist as a Microsoft Entra security group usable for storage2 ' s Entra-ID-based access control unless synced up, which is not how writeback operates (writeback is one- directional, cloud to on-premises). Creating the group in the Entra tenant with assigned membership is therefore the single action that satisfies both requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 365
You have a failover cluster named Cluster1 that hosts an application named App1. The General tab in App1 Properties is shown in the General exhibit. The Failover tab in App1 Properties is shown in the Failover exhibit. Server1 shuts down unexpectedly. You need to ensure that when you start Server1, App1 continues to run on Server2. Solution: From the General settings, you increase the priority of Server2 in the Preferred Owners list. Does this meet the goal?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Preferred Owners list on a clustered role ' s General tab only sets placement priority -- which node Failover Clustering tries first when the role needs to start or move -- it does not control whether a role automatically fails back to a node once that node returns to and rejoins the cluster. That failback behavior is governed exclusively by the separate Failback settings on the Failover tab, specifically the choice between Prevent failback and Allow failback, with Allow failback optionally restricted to a scheduled time window.
Reordering or increasing Server2 ' s priority within the Preferred Owners list on the General tab therefore does nothing to change whether App1 automatically fails back to Server1 once Server1 finishes restarting and rejoins the cluster; if Allow failback remains configured on the Failover tab, App1 could still move back to Server1 automatically regardless of how the Preferred Owners priorities are arranged. To actually guarantee App1 keeps running on Server2 after Server1 comes back online, the administrator needs to set Failback to Prevent failback on the Failover tab instead, so increasing Server2 ' s priority in the Preferred Owners list does not meet the stated goal.
NEW QUESTION # 366
You have two servers named Server1 and Server2 that run Windows Server. Both servers have the Hyper-V server role installed. Server1 hosts three virtual machines named VM1, VM2, and VM3. The virtual machines replicate to Server2. Server1 experiences a hardware failure. You need to bring VM1, VM2, and VM3 back online as soon as possible. From the Hyper-V Manager console on Server2, what should you run for each virtual machine?
Answer: C
Explanation:
A Planned Failover in Hyper-V Replica requires the source (primary) virtual machine to be gracefully shut down and reachable so that any final, not-yet-replicated changes can be sent across before the role formally switches to the replica -- a precondition that cannot be met when the primary host itself has suffered a hardware failure and is unreachable. Because Server1 has failed and VM1, VM2, and VM3 cannot be contacted, gracefully shutting them down is impossible, ruling out Planned Failover as an option. Instead, the administrator must perform an Unplanned Failover from Hyper-V Manager on Server2, which brings each replica virtual machine online using whatever data was most recently replicated (and, if recovery points are configured, the most recent available recovery point) without requiring any action on, or connectivity to, the failed primary host. This is the recovery path specifically documented for unexpected primary-host outages, in direct contrast to Planned Failover, which is reserved for scheduled maintenance or controlled, orderly migrations where the primary is still running. " Start " merely powers on an existing VM without invoking replica failover logic, and " Move " performs a live or quick migration that requires the source host to be online, so neither applies here. Therefore, Unplanned Failover is the correct action for each virtual machine.
NEW QUESTION # 367
You have two servers named Host1 and Host2 that run Windows Server 2022 and are members of a workgroup named Contoso. Both servers have the Hyper-V server role installed and are identical in hardware and configuration. Host1 contains three virtual machines. Each server is located in a separate site that connects by using a high-speed WAN link. You need to replicate the virtual machines from Host1 to Host2 for a disaster recovery solution. Which three actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer: A,C,E
Explanation:
Because Host1 and Host2 are members of a workgroup rather than joined to an Active Directory domain, Kerberos authentication cannot be used for Hyper-V Replica, since Kerberos fundamentally depends on domain trust relationships that do not exist between workgroup-joined machines. In a workgroup or cross- domain scenario, Hyper-V Replica instead requires certificate-based authentication over HTTPS, together with opening the associated TCP port exceptions in the Windows Firewall so that replication traffic between the two hosts is permitted. Before any virtual machine can be replicated to Host2, that server must first be configured and explicitly enabled as a Replica server, since a Hyper-V host does not accept incoming replication traffic by default. Once Host2 is enabled as a Replica server and certificate-based authentication with the necessary firewall exceptions is in place, replication is then turned on individually for each of the three virtual machines on Host1 by running the Enable Replication wizard against each one. Live Migration is an unrelated high-availability feature used to move a running virtual machine between cluster nodes without downtime, and it plays no role in establishing Hyper-V Replica for disaster recovery, so enabling live migration is not one of the required actions.
NEW QUESTION # 368
You deploy Azure Migrate to an on-premises network. You have an on-premises physical server named Server1 that runs Windows Server and has the following configuration: Operating system disk 600 GB, Data disk 3 TB, NIC Teaming: Enabled, Mobility service: installed, Windows Firewall: Enabled, Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Enabled. You need to ensure that you can use Azure Migrate to migrate Server1.
Solution: You disable Microsoft Defender Antivirus on Server1. Does this meet the goal?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender Antivirus running on the source server is not a documented blocker for Azure Migrate ' s agent-based, Mobility-service physical server migration, so disabling it addresses nothing on Azure Migrate ' s actual current support-matrix requirements for Server1. Reviewing Server1 ' s full configuration against that support matrix, the operating system disk at 600 GB and the data disk at 3 TB are both comfortably within the documented 2 TB or 4 TB OS disk limits and the 32 TB data disk limit respectively, and neither the Windows Firewall state nor the Microsoft Defender Antivirus state appears anywhere in the documented list of unsupported source configurations at all. The configuration detail that Azure Migrate ' s physical server migration support matrix does flag as unsupported is the enabled NIC teaming on Server1, and disabling antivirus protection does nothing to change that networking configuration. Because the antivirus state was never actually the blocking factor, and the real blocker -- NIC teaming -- remains enabled and unaddressed after this solution is applied, disabling Microsoft Defender Antivirus on Server1 does not meet the stated goal.
NEW QUESTION # 369
......
According to the candidate's demand, Real4test will update Microsoft AZ-802 dumps. Real4test is a composite of top IT experts, certified trainers and competent authors for Microsoft AZ-802 exam. They collate the braindumps, guarantee the quality! No matter how the times change, Real4test good quality will never change. After the majority of candidates purchase our products, they passed Microsoft AZ-802 Certification Exam, which indicates Real4test has high quality.
AZ-802 Reliable Exam Simulator: https://www.real4test.com/AZ-802_real-exam.html