P.S. Free & New ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TestInsides: https://drive.google.com/open?id=17Vo2pwos8yX03hkVyyLQ0nEtDQM1GEqi
If you still worry about your ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts exam; if you still doubt whether it is worthy of purchasing our software, what you can do to clarify your doubts is to download our ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts free demo. Once you have checked our demo, you will find the study materials we provide are what you want most. Our target is to reduce your pressure and improve your learning efficiency from preparing for ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Exam.
| Certification Vendor: | Guidewire |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | ClaimCenter Business Analyst - Mammoth Proctored Exam |
| Exam Number: | ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts |
| Related Certifications: | Guidewire InsuranceSuite Analyst Certification |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Select, Scenario-based Questions, Multiple Choice |
| Real Exam Qty: | 50-70 (varies by version) |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Registration: | Guidewire Education Portal |
| Sample Questions: | Guidewire ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored (Mammoth Proctored Exam) |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended: Guidewire InsuranceSuite Analyst foundational training (no strict formal prerequisite publicly specified) |
>> ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Exam Questions Fee <<
Our ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts training materials impressed all our customers by the help as well as our after-sales services. We offer the most considerate after-sales services for you 24/7 with the help of patient staff and employees. They are all patient and enthusiastic to offer help on ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Study Guide. If you have some questions about our ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts exam braindumps, ask for our after-sales agent, they will solve the problems for you as soon as possible.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 36
Whenever the Total Loss Calculator determines that a vehicle is a total loss, Succeed Insurance wants to create a custom history event with the exposure name and total loss score.
Which step in the claim setup process flow must be completed before the history event can be created?
Answer: B
Explanation:
250 to 350 words From Exact Extract of Guidewire ClaimCenter Business Analyst documentation:
In Guidewire ClaimCenter workflow analysis and configuration, defining the correct sequence of operations is critically dependent on Data Availability and Data Dependency.
The specific requirement here dictates that the custom history event must capture theTotal Loss Score. In the context of the ClaimCenter object model and process flow, the Total Loss Score is anoutputvalue generated specifically by theTotal Loss Calculatorengine. Before this calculator runs, the score attribute is effectively null or non-existent.
Therefore, to satisfy the business requirement, the step that writes the history event must be placedafterthe step that generates the data it needs to record.
* Process Logic:If the Business Analyst were to place the history event creation stepbeforethe Total Loss Calculator (Option B) orbeforethe Vehicle Incident (Option D), the system would attempt to write a record containing a score that has not yet been calculated. This would result in either a system error or a history event with a blank/zero value, failing to meet the business requirement.
* Dependency Chain:The workflow dependency is: Vehicle Data Entry -> Total Loss Calculation -> Score Generation -> History Event Creation.
* Implementation Note:In a typical Guidewire implementation, this logic is often handled via "Event Fired" rules or specific "Exit Points" in the workflow. The system waits for the confirmation that the Total Loss calculation service has successfully returned a result. Once that transaction is committed and the score is persisted on the Vehicle or Exposure entity, the subsequent rule to generate the History Event can trigger successfully.
Consequently,Option Cis the only viable placement in the process flow. It ensures that the prerequisite action (calculation) is complete and the required data payload (the score) is available for the subsequent action (logging the history event).
NEW QUESTION # 37
Succeed Insurance requires that a new 'Driver under 18?' field be added to the vehicle incident screen for personal auto claims to indicate whether or not the driver of the vehicle was a minor when the loss occurred.
The field will be set by calculating the driver's age using the date of loss and the driver's date of birth.
There are two validation requirements:
* The field must be set if the 'Date of Birth' field for the driver is not null.
* No payments can be made for collision exposures if the 'Date of Birth' field for the driver of the vehicle is null.
A Business Analyst (BA) documents the validation requirements in the validation tab of the User Story Card
'Adjudicate - Update Maintain Vehicle Incident for Personal Auto Claims' as shown in the exhibit.
What information in the two validation examples is either missing or incorrectly documented? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The User Story Card exhibit contains several documentation errors when compared to standard Guidewire requirements gathering best practices and the specific scenario provided.
* Missing Requirement Number and Logic Gap (Option C):
* Traceability:In the second row of the exhibit (the payment validation rule), the "Requirement Number" column is completely blank. Traceability back to the original requirements document is mandatory for all entries.
* Logic Precision:The requirement explicitly states that the rule applies to"personal auto claims"
. However, the logic documented in the "Rules" column (If Exposure Type = VehicleDamage Then Block...) doesnotcheck the Policy Type. It relies solely on the Exposure Type, which could exist on Commercial Auto policies as well. To accurately reflect the business requirement, the condition If PolicyType = Personal Auto must be added (similar to how it was done in the first row).
* Missing DV/LV Context for Validation (Option D):
* UI Anchoring:The second requirement is a validation rule that triggers an error ("Driver's Date of Birth is required..."). For the system to highlight the specific field on the screen (the "Driver Date of Birth" widget) when the error occurs, the rule must be associated with the specificDetail View (DV)orList View (LV)where that field resides (e.g., VehicleIncidentDV). The exhibit lists
"Not Applicable" in the "Name of DV or LV" column. This is incorrect because providing the DV name ensures the error message is displayed contextually next to the field rather than as a generic page-level error, improving the user experience.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Option A:The LOB column is used for filtering, reporting, and release management. Even if the rule logic checks the policy type, the LOB column is required metadata and should not be removed.
* Option B:While the first requirement (the calculation) lacks a DV name (which it should have), it is a Business Rule(assignment), not a validation. Therefore, it doesnotgenerate an error or warning message for the user, so the second part of Option B is incorrect.
* Option E:The "Rules" column is exactly where the calculation logic (Date of Loss - Date of Birth) belongs. The developer needs this information to implement the automation.
NEW QUESTION # 38
A Business Analyst (BA) noticed that one of the User Story Card files for the project indicated that it had recently been modified. The BA wanted to see who changed it, what was changed, and why it was changed.
Where on the Story Card can the BA go to determine the changes recently made to it?
Answer: D
Explanation:
In the standard Guidewire User Story Card template (an Excel-based tool used for requirements gathering), version control is manually tracked to ensure auditability and clarity among the project team.
* Document Control Tab (Option C):This is typically the first tab in the Story Card workbook. It contains a section specifically forAmendment History(or Revision History).
* Content:This section is designed to capture:
* Who:The author of the change.
* When:The date of the change.
* What/Why: A description of the modification (e.g., "Updated Acceptance Criteria based on Workshop feedback").
This provides the specific "Who, What, and Why" requested in the scenario.
Why other options are incorrect:
* File > Properties (A):This is standard Excel metadata. It shows the "Last Modified By" user and date, but it cannot explainwhatspecific cells were changed orwhy(the business context).
* Action Items (B):This tab tracks open questions or tasks, not the revision history of the document requirements.
* UI Fields (D):This tab tracks the requirements for screen fields, but does not serve as a changelog for the entire document.
NEW QUESTION # 39
Succeed Insurance requires that all vehicles involved in collisions be evaluated to determine if the vehicle is a total loss. A vehicle claim is deemed a total loss using a calculation based on points earned for selecting specific vehicle information.
What are two examples of acceptance criteria for this business requirement? (Choose two.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Acceptance Criteria (AC) are specific conditions that the software must satisfy to be accepted by the user. In the context of a User Story, AC must be written as testable outcomes or verification steps (pass/fail conditions), not as implementation tasks for the developer.
* Option D (Testable Outcome):"Validate the assignment to the Salvage Group when calculated points are 25 or greater."This is a perfect example of AC. It describes a specific scenario (Points >= 25) and the expected system behavior (Assign to Salvage Group). A tester can run this scenario and objectively determine if the system passes or fails.
* Option A (Testable Outcome):"Ensure that the business rule generates the Review for Salvage Activity."Similarly, this describes the expectedresultof the logic. It does not tell the developerhowto write the code, but it tells the QA team what to look for (the creation of a specific Activity) to confirm the requirement is met.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Option B ("Add a question..."):This is anImplementation Task. It describes work the developer must do ("Add a question"), but it is not a criterion for verifying the end-to-end business value.
* Option C ("Create a business rule..."):This is also anImplementation Task. A user cannot "test" that a rule was created; they test theeffectof that rule (which is described in A and D). Acceptance criteria focus on the "What" (behavior), while tasks focus on the "How" (configuration).
Here are the 100% verified answers for Question 16 and Question 17, formatted as requested.
NEW QUESTION # 40
Succeed Insurance needs the ability to associate a primary hospital with an injury incident if the injured party received treatment. When treatment is needed, the primary hospital name should display on the injury incident screen along with other details about the injury and treatment received.
The primary hospital should be added to the injury incident in one of the following ways:
. Select the name from a list of medical care organizations already associated with the claim.
. Enter the contact details directly in the incident.
. Search the Address Book from the incident to locate a hospital.
Which two requirements must be documented to associate the primary hospital with the claim? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
To implement the functionality of associating a specific contact (the "Primary Hospital") with an entity (the
"Injury Incident") in Guidewire ClaimCenter, two core configuration components are required:
* A new primary hospital role (Option B):In ClaimCenter, the relationship between a Contact and a Claim (or Incident) is defined by aRole. While the contact itself might be a "Medical Care Organization" (existing subtype), thecontextof its relationship to this specific incident is that it is the
"Primary Hospital". Defining this role allows the system to distinguish this hospital from other medical providers on the same claim.
* A new field on the incident screen (Option C):To allow the user to select, add, or view this contact, a UI element (specifically aClaim Contact Pickeror Input widget) must be added to the Injury Incident screen. This field will be configured to store the relationship and allows the user to perform the required actions: selecting from existing contacts (filtered by the role), entering new ones, or searching the Address Book.
Why other options are incorrect:
* A (New Subtype):The base product already includes the MedicalCareOrg contact subtype, which is sufficient to store hospital data. Creating a new subtype is unnecessary unless the data structure (fields) of a hospital is fundamentally different from other medical providers.
* D (Address Book Field):Contacts in the Address Book are typically identified by tags or their Subtype, not by adding a custom field just to identify them as a vendor/hospital.
NEW QUESTION # 41
......
Latest ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Test Cost: https://www.testinsides.top/ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts-dumps-review.html
P.S. Free & New ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TestInsides: https://drive.google.com/open?id=17Vo2pwos8yX03hkVyyLQ0nEtDQM1GEqi