這幾年IT行業發展非常之迅速，那麼學IT的人也如洪水猛獸般迅速多了起來，他們為了使自己以後有所作為而不斷的努力，Relativity的RCA考試認證是IT行業必不可少的認證，許多人為想通過此認證而感到苦惱。今天我告訴大家一個好辦法，就是選擇VCESoft Relativity的RCA考試認證培訓資料，它可以幫助你們通過考試獲得認證，而且我們可以保證通過率100%，如果沒有通過，我們將保證退還全部購買費用，不讓你們有任何損失。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Setup and Management | 30-35% | - Applications and Workflows
|
| Data Manipulation and Interaction | 25-30% | - Mass Operations and Tools
|
| Search and Analytics | 20-25% | - Structured Analytics and AI
|
| Data In and Out | 10-15% | - Data Export
|
我們都是平平凡凡的普通人，有時候所學的所掌握的東西沒有那麼容易徹底的吸收，所以經常忘記，當我們需要時就拼命的補習，當你看到VCESoft Relativity的RCA考試培訓資料是，你才明白這是你必須要購買的，它可以讓你毫不費力的通過考試，也可以讓你不那麼努力的補習，相信VCESoft，相信它讓你看到你的未來美好的樣子，再苦再難，只要VCESoft還在，總會找到希望的光明。
問題 #81
How should data be promoted to a review workspace to take advantage of the reduced data costs offered by the repository workspace?
答案：B
解題說明：
The correct answer is C. Use Integration Points with the Links Only option for natives. Relativity's repository workspace documentation explicitly says that to take advantage of reduced repository data costs, they strongly recommend promoting sets of documents via links only to standard review workspaces instead of storing duplicates of the files in the review workspace . The repository workflow page describes using Integration Points to move selected documents to the review workspace, and the billing guidance explains that if you promote actual files instead of links only, you incur both repository and review storage charges.
That makes option C the documented best practice. Uninstalling the repository application is actually listed as a condition that can affect repository billing adversely, so option A is incorrect. Exporting and re-importing with Import/Export duplicates the files and defeats the reduced-cost repository workflow. ARM restore is also not the recommended method for promoting data into active review while preserving the repository cost advantages. Therefore, the correct answer is use Integration Points with Links Only for natives .
問題 #82
What option cannot be configured when you create a new production data source?
答案：B
解題說明：
The correct answer is A. The field to use for production numbering. Relativity's documentation distinguishes between production set settings and production data source settings . The production set defines overarching settings such as document numbering , appearance of numbering, and related production-wide behaviors. By contrast, the production data source page includes settings such as production type , placeholder image format , burn redactions , burn native redactions , burn PDF redactions , and markup set .
This means the field used for production numbering is not configured at the individual data source level; it belongs to the production set itself. The other options are all part of production data source configuration.
The documentation explicitly shows Burn Redactions and Markup Set , and placeholder behavior is also configured within the production data source settings.
Therefore, the option that cannot be configured when creating a new production data source is the field to use for production numbering , because that is a production-set-level setting rather than a data-source-level one.
問題 #83
How many files can you upload at one time using Simple File Upload?
答案：B
解題說明：
The correct answer is C. 100 . According to Relativity's official Simple File Upload documentation, the SFUMaxFilesToUpload instance setting determines the maximum number of documents a user can upload at one time using Simple File Upload. Relativity states that administrators can configure this setting up to 100 files , and when the setting is at its maximum, users can upload up to 100 files at one time . If a user selects more than 100 files, Relativity uploads only the first 100 selected files and does not upload the remainder.
Relativity also indicates that a warning message appears in the upload window when more than 100 files are selected.
This makes the answer operationally important for administrators because Simple File Upload is designed for lightweight, direct document uploads within a workspace, not for large-scale ingestion jobs. For more substantial data loading exercises, administrators typically use Relativity's broader import workflows rather than relying on Simple File Upload. From an RCA perspective, knowing this limit helps with user support, upload troubleshooting, and setting expectations for workspace users who need to add small batches of documents quickly. Therefore, among the options given, 100 is the only choice that aligns with the official Relativity behavior for Simple File Upload.
問題 #84
You grant the permissions below so that a reviewer on your team can begin creating and running aiR for Review projects. What problem will this reviewer encounter when attempting to analyze documents using aiR for Review?
Object Security:
* aiR for Review Project: View, Edit, Add
* aiR for Review Prompt Criteria: View, Edit, Add
Tab Visibility:
* aiR for Review Projects
答案：B
解題說明：
The correct answer is A . Relativity's official aiR for Review permissions documentation states that to create and run an aiR for Review project, a user needs object permissions for aiR for Review Project and aiR for Review Prompt Criteria , tab visibility for aiR for Review Projects , and the Run aiR for Review Job permission under Other Settings. The documentation also explicitly states that a user can run the job without permissions for the analysis types, but will not be able to see the results . The analysis-type objects listed by Relativity are aiR Relevance Analysis , aiR Issue Analysis , aiR Key Analysis , and aiR Summaries .
That is exactly the problem in this scenario: the reviewer has enough permissions to create the project shell and prompt criteria, but no permissions were granted for the analysis result objects themselves. As a result, they can initiate work but will not be able to see the analysis results. Option B is incorrect because Viewer highlighting also depends on having analysis-type view permissions. Option C is incorrect because instance- level jobs visibility is a separate permission model. Option D is also incorrect because the provided permissions already include the aiR for Review Projects tab, and the missing issue is not dashboard tab access but the lack of object security for the individual analysis result types . Therefore, the reviewer's main issue is that they will not be able to view any aiR for Review results without the required analysis- type object permissions .
問題 #85
What is the best way to convert an existing workspace in Relativity to a repository workspace?
答案：D
解題說明：
The correct answer is D. Install the Repository application to the workspace. Relativity's official repository workspace documentation states that when installed to an existing workspace, the RelativityOne repository workspace application converts the workspace into a streamlined repository workspace for early case assessment and lower-cost storage of data not actively under review. The documentation also provides a dedicated section called Converting a review workspace to a repository workspace , where the conversion steps are simply to access the RelativityOne Repository Workspace application from the Application Library and install the application to the desired workspace .
This makes option D the exact documented conversion method. Option A describes moving data to another repository workspace, which is a different workflow and does not convert the existing workspace itself.
Option B involving ARM restore is used in some repository-related workflows, especially around templates or archived workspaces, but it is not the primary documented method for converting an existing workspace.
Option C is incorrect because repository mode is not enabled by editing a status field. Relativity also notes that if you convert an existing review workspace by installing the Repository application, the workspace remains classified for billing as a review workspace until the beginning of the next calendar month, which further confirms that application installation is the actual conversion mechanism.
問題 #86
......
最近，VCESoft開始提供給大家很多關於IT認證考試的最新的資料。比如RCA考古題都是根據最新版的IT認證考試研發出來的。可以告訴大家最新的與考試相關的消息。考試的大綱有什麼變化，以及考試中可能會出現的新題型，這些內容都包括在了資料中。所以，如果你想參加IT考試，最好利用VCESoft的資料。因為只有這樣你才能更好地準備考試。
RCA考試: https://www.vcesoft.com/RCA-pdf.html