Plat-Arch-204시험패스가능한공부문제, Plat-Arch-204테스트자료

참고: PassTIP에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료, 최신 Plat-Arch-204 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ml_YOs1SJVS0i_7UEwfh0Ruhc6IMIKha

PassTIP에서 Salesforce인증 Plat-Arch-204덤프를 구입하시면 퍼펙트한 구매후 서비스를 제공해드립니다. Salesforce인증 Plat-Arch-204덤프가 업데이트되면 업데이트된 최신버전을 무료로 서비스로 드립니다. 시험에서 불합격성적표를 받으시면 덤프구매시 지불한 덤프비용은 환불해드립니다.

Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 시험요강:

주제소개
주제 1
  • Build Solution: This domain covers implementing integrations including API design considerations, choosing outbound methods, building scalable solutions, implementing error handling, creating security solutions, and ensuring resilience during system updates.
주제 2
  • Evaluate Business Needs: This domain addresses gathering functional and non-functional requirements, classifying data by sensitivity, identifying CRM success factors, and understanding how business growth and regulations impact integration choices.
주제 3
  • Translate Needs to Integration Requirements: This domain involves converting business needs into technical specifications by documenting systems and patterns, evaluating constraints, defining security requirements, and determining performance needs like volumes, response times, and latency.

>> Plat-Arch-204시험패스 가능한 공부문제 <<

Plat-Arch-204테스트자료 & Plat-Arch-204덤프데모문제

예를 들어Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 덤프를 보면 어떤 덤프제공사이트에서는 문항수가 아주 많은 자료를 제공해드리지만 저희Salesforce Plat-Arch-204덤프는 문항수가 적은 편입니다.왜냐하면 저희는 더 이상 출제되지 않는 오래된 문제들을 삭제해버리기 때문입니다. 문제가 많으면 고객들의 시간을 허비하게 됩니다. PassTIP는 응시자에게 있어서 시간이 정말 소중하다는 것을 잘 알고 있습니다.

최신 Salesforce Certified Administrator Plat-Arch-204 무료샘플문제 (Q129-Q134):

질문 # 129
A customer is migrating from an old legacy system to Salesforce. As part of the modernization effort, the customer would like to integrate all existing systems that currently work with its legacy application with Salesforce. Which constraint/pain-point should an integration architect consider when choosing the integration pattern/mechanism?

정답:A

설명:
When migrating from a legacy environment to a multi-tenant cloud platform like Salesforce, Data volume and processing volume represent the most critical technical constraints. Legacy systems often operate without the strict governor limits found in Salesforce, meaning they may push large datasets or high-frequency updates that could easily overwhelm standard Salesforce APIs.
An integration architect must evaluate these volumes to determine the appropriate integration pattern:
Pattern Selection: If the daily volume involves millions of records, the architect must recommend the Bulk API rather than standard REST or SOAP APIs to avoid hitting daily API limits.
Synchronous vs. Asynchronous: High processing volumes often necessitate asynchronous patterns (such as Fire-and-Forget or Batch) to prevent user-interface lag and "Concurrent Request Limit" errors.
Data Virtualization: If the legacy data volume is massive but only needs to be viewed occasionally, the architect might consider Salesforce Connect to avoid consuming expensive internal data storage.
While reporting (Option A) and multi-currency (Option C) are important functional requirements, they do not fundamentally dictate the technical "plumbing" or scalability of the integration architecture. By prioritizing the analysis of volume and processing needs, the architect ensures the new modernization effort is stable, performant, and capable of scaling as the business grows within the bounds of the Salesforce platform.


질문 # 130
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to present shipping costs and estimated delivery times to its customers. Shipping services used vary by region and have similar but distinct service request parameters. Which integration component capability should be used?

정답:B

설명:
When dealing with multiple external service providers (like different regional shippers) that have varying API requirements, the most scalable architectural choice is an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) or middleware solution. This scenario describes a classic "Orchestration" and "Transformation" use case.
An ESB excels at:
1. Routing/Mediation: The ESB can receive a single, standardized request from Salesforce ("Get Shipping Rates") and use business logic to determine which regional carrier's API should be called.
2. Transformation: Each carrier likely has a distinct XML or JSON schema. The ESB can transform the common data model sent by Salesforce into the specific format required by the chosen shipper.
3. Protocol Bridging: If one shipper uses SOAP and another uses REST, the ESB handles these technical differences, allowing Salesforce to interact with a single, simplified interface.
Option A (Apex REST) would require the Salesforce team to maintain custom code for every new shipping provider added, leading to high technical debt and maintenance challenges. Option C is incorrect because an ESB is a back-end infrastructure component, not a user interface tool.
By utilizing an ESB, Northern Trail Outfitters decouples Salesforce from the complexities of the shipping providers' APIs. This "Hub and Spoke" model means that adding a new regional shipper in the future only requires configuration within the ESB, rather than a full code deployment in Salesforce. This provides the agility and architectural separation necessary for a global retail operation.


질문 # 131
Universal Containers (UC) is currently managing a custom monolithic web service that runs on an on-premise server. This monolithic web service is responsible for Point-to-Point (P2P) integrations between Salesforce and a legacy billing application, a cloud-based ERP, and a data lake. UC has found that the tight interdependencies are causing failures. What should an integration architect recommend to decouple the systems and improve performance?

정답:C

설명:
The primary architectural flaw in UC's current landscape is the reliance on a monolithic P2P integration layer. In such designs, any failure in one integration thread or a surge in volume for one system can monopolize resources (CPU, memory, threads), causing the entire service-and thus all other integrations-to fail. This lack of isolation leads to the "tight interdependencies" described.
To effectively decouple these systems, the architect should recommend a Microservices Architecture. By breaking the monolithic service into smaller, independent, and modular components, each integration (Billing, ERP, Data Lake) becomes its own isolated service. This approach provides several key architectural benefits:
Isolation of Failure: If the connection to the legacy billing application fails or times out, it no longer impacts the ERP or Data Lake integrations.
Independent Scalability: If the Data Lake integration requires high throughput, that specific microservice can be scaled horizontally without wasting resources on the others.
Technology Agility: Each microservice can be updated or patched independently, allowing for faster maintenance cycles.
Furthermore, moving a "monolithic" service to the cloud (Option B) is simply a "lift and shift" that preserves the underlying fragility. While the Bulk API (Option A) is excellent for high-volume data loading, it does not solve the fundamental problem of system interdependency and orchestration failure. Transitioning to a modular, service-oriented design allows UC to implement modern integration patterns, such as asynchronous queuing between the microservices, which significantly improves the overall resilience and performance of the Salesforce-to-back-office landscape.


질문 # 132
A media company recently implemented an IAM system supporting SAML and OpenId. The IAM system must integrate with Salesforce to give new self-service customers instant access to Salesforce Community Cloud. Which requirement should Salesforce Community Cloud support for self-registration and SSO?

정답:B

설명:
To provide "instant access" for new customers via an external IAM system using SAML, Salesforce provides a declarative feature called Just-in-Time (JIT) provisioning.
When a customer attempts to log in to the Community (Experience Cloud) through the IAM system, the IAM system (acting as the Identity Provider) sends a SAML assertion to Salesforce. If JIT provisioning is enabled, Salesforce parses the user information contained in that assertion-such as name, email, and federation ID. If a corresponding User record does not exist, Salesforce automatically creates one on-the-fly and then logs the user in. This eliminates the need for a manual registration step or pre-provisioning accounts.
Option A is slightly incorrect because Registration Handlers are specifically associated with Authentication Providers (which use OpenID Connect/OAuth), not SAML SSO. Option C is incorrect because JIT provisioning is a feature of SAML, while Authentication Providers use the Registration Handler class to achieve the same result. For a "self-service" scenario where speed to market and standard protocols are key, SAML SSO with JIT provisioning is the architect's primary choice for automating user management and providing a seamless single-entry point for subscribers.


질문 # 133
Universal Containers (UC) is a leading provider of management training globally. UC embarked on a Salesforce transformation journey to allow students to register for courses in the Salesforce Community. UC has a learning system that masters all courses and student registration. UC requested a near real-time feed of student registration from Salesforce to the learning system. The integration architect recommends using Salesforce Platform Events. Which API should be used for the Salesforce pl1atform event solution?

정답:C

설명:
Salesforc30e Platform Events are built on top of a highly scalable, event-driven messaging architecture designed to enable real-time communication between apps. To consume these events from outside Salesforce-such as from a legacy learning system-clients must use the Streaming API.
The Streaming API is the technical foundation for receiving event notifications in a Publish/Subscribe model. It utilizes the CometD protocol or the newer gRPC-based Pub/Sub API to maintain a persistent connection between the external client and Salesforce. When a student registers for a course in the Salesforce Community, a Platform Event is "published" to the event bus. The learning system, acting as a "subscriber," remains connected via the Streaming API and receives the event message instantly without needing to poll Salesforce for updates.
This architecture is ideal for "near real-time" requirements because it eliminates the overhead of traditional point-to-point integrations. While the REST and SOAP APIs (Options A and B) can be used to publish events into Salesforce, they are not designed to receive unsolicited notifications from the platform. By using the Streaming API, the integration architect ensures the solution is both responsive and efficient, as Salesforce only pushes data when a relevant event occurs. Furthermore, because Platform Events provide a retention window, the Streaming API allows the learning system to use a Replay ID to catch up on any registration events missed during a brief network outage.


질문 # 134
......

우리PassTIP가 제공하는 최신, 최고의Salesforce Plat-Arch-204시험관련 자료를 선택함으로 여러분은 이미 시험패스성공이라고 보실수 있습니다.

Plat-Arch-204테스트자료: https://www.passtip.net/Plat-Arch-204-pass-exam.html

2026 PassTIP 최신 Plat-Arch-204 PDF 버전 시험 문제집과 Plat-Arch-204 시험 문제 및 답변 무료 공유: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ml_YOs1SJVS0i_7UEwfh0Ruhc6IMIKha