BONUS！！！ Jpexam AgilePM-Practitionerダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RClhOMKLwi5GVsBBCQI9Ry1pLIlB83nn
私たちのウェブサイトから見ると、AgilePM-Practitioner学習教材は3つのバージョンがあります。PDF、ソフトウェアとオンライン版です。AgilePM-Practitioner PDF版は印刷できます。ソフトウェアとオンライン版はコンピュータで使用できます。コンピュータで学ぶことが難しい場合は、AgilePM-Practitioner学習教材の印刷資料で勉強できます。また、AgilePM-Practitioner学習教材の価格は合理的に設定されています。
| Certification Vendor: | APMG-International |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Agile Project Management (AgilePM®) Practitioner Exam |
| Exam Number: | AgilePM-Practitioner |
| Available Languages: | English, German, Polish, Italian |
| Related Certifications: | Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Foundation |
| Exam Format: | No negative marking, Open book (only official AgilePM manual allowed), Objective / Scenario-based questions |
| Real Exam Qty: | 4 scenario-based questions |
| Passing Score: | 50% (30/60 for v3; 40/80 for v2) |
| Exam Duration: | 120 - 150 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Certification lifetime; Registered status valid 5 years |
| Exam Price: | approx. $450 - $550 USD (varies by region) |
| Recommended Training: | APMG Accredited Training Organizations |
| Exam Registration: | APMG International Public Exam Portal |
| Sample Questions: | APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or in-person at accredited centers |
| Pre Condition: | Must hold valid AgilePM Foundation certification (same version) |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://apmg-international.com/product/agile-project-management-agilepm%C2%AE-certification |
>> AgilePM-Practitioner日本語版と英語版 <<
本当にAgilePM-Practitioner試験に合格するつもりなら、当社APMG-Internationalのソフトウェアは迅速かつ便利な学習を提供し、最高の学習教材を取得し、試験の非常に良い準備をします。 AgilePM-Practitionerガイド急流の内容は習得が容易であり、重要な情報を簡素化しました。さらに、AgilePM-Practitioner準備急流は、より重要な情報をより少ない質問と回答で伝えます。 AgilePM-Practitioner試験問題により、学習はリラックスして非常に効率的です。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
質問 # 161
Answer the following questions about the acceptance criteria within the project.
Decide whether the approach to setting and using acceptance criteria has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.
When specifying high-level prioritised requirements during Foundations, the Business Visionary has suggested that acceptance criteria for the requirement to "temporarily weatherproof the roof" should NOT be set until Solution Development Timebox A.
Is this an appropriate approach to setting high-level acceptance criteria?
正解：D
解説：
C: No, because by the end of Foundations the quality expectations and overall acceptance criteria for at least the first increment should have been set, and high-level acceptance criteria set for later increments.
Rationale:
In Agile Project Management, it's important to establish high-level acceptance criteria early in the project to guide development and ensure that the solution meets the business needs and quality expectations. The Foundations phase is when the project's scope, objectives, and methods are defined, including the acceptance criteria for the first increment and at a high level for subsequent increments. This ensures that everyone has a clear understanding of what "done" looks like before development begins, reducing the risk of misalignment and rework.
質問 # 162
Review sessions have been scheduled at end of Investigation, Refinement and Consolidation for the later Timeboxes to ensure that the mistakes made in Timebox A do not happen again.
Which Agile principle MOST influences this course of action?
正解：A
解説：
Topic 1, Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project
Scenario:
Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project
(Note:
Hoy Hall, a historic, timber-framed building dating from the 17th century, was originally the residence of the Lords of the Manor of Hoytown. The building is registered as a Heritage Building of Special Interest and is subject to restrictions in terms of development. Used as a hotel for over a century, it has recently fallen into disrepair, and for two years it has been completely unused, accelerating its deterioration. The local community has formed the Action Group "Hoy for Hoy Hall" to save the building, and wants to be closely involved in its future success.
After much discussion Hoy Hall has been purchased by Architecture Angels (AA), a small company whose directors are experienced hoteliers. Five years ago they decided to move into the property renovation business and have recently restored two other similarly-endangered buildings for use as hotels.
Architecture Angels are keen to both support local businesses and to have local people run their hotels, giving them a significant amount of autonomy to do this.
To maintain core consistency, the hotels use Architecture Angels' Head Office services, such as IT operations, accounting, payroll, stocktaking, compliance, human resources and property management. The Head Office is based 80 miles from Hoy Hall.
Recently Architecture Angels commenced an Agile project to renovate Hoy Hall, which has a large downstairs hall and reception area, and 20 potential bedrooms upstairs. The roof requires extensive repairs and the electrical and plumbing installations require complete replacement. The 40 acres of land around the site are overgrown and need to be restored, and the driveway needs re-laying.
In the hotel industry, the trend for direct customer bookings via the internet has had a major impact on the growth of those hotels with this facility. Online booking now accounts for around 80% of room bookings, with only 20% being made via walk-in and telephone enquiries. Before Hoy Hall can open for business, a reservation system must be fully operational.
Architecture Angels use contractors to manage such work and have good
relationships with two local companies: Timber Tigers (TT) who will handle the internal works, and Earth Excavations (EE) who will handle the gardens.
A Project Manager, who has since left the company, started the Feasibility phase. This phase has been continued by the Senior Management Team, which consists of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors and the Chief Executive.
This was scheduled to take a month and has almost been completed. A
Feasibility Assessment has been produced. An Outline Business Case has been completed which assessed the project as being viable.
The Architecture Angels Senior Management Team will be responsible for
Steering the project.
The table below shows the appointments planned for the project team and is subject to change.
Additional Information:
The project is approaching the end of Feasibility. The original Project Manager was involved in drafting a Delivery Plan for the project but not in the outline refurbishment options.
The Senior Management Team generated several options for the refurbishment.
All the options included a landscaping solution for the gardens and re-laying of the driveway, as the solution will not be acceptable without these. However, the best solution for the refurbishment is still under debate. The new Project Manager has suggested that a Feasibility Prototype could consist of paper-based drawings for each option. The "Hoy for Hoy Hall" Action Group thinks that a physically-built representation is mandatory for a prototype and wants a small-scale model of the recommendation for the building. The time available to produce this, however, is limited.
Contracts for resources have not yet been signed and will be postponed until the chosen outline solution has been agreed.
質問 # 163
Using the additional information provided for this question in the Scenario Booklet, answer the following question about the actions the Sales Director should take to develop an effective Sales management team, according to the five dysfunctions that characterize an ineffective team identified by Patrick Lencioni.
Lines 1 to 4 in the table below consist of an assertion statement and a reason statement. For each line identify the appropriate option, from options A to E, that applies.
Each option can be used once, more than once or not at all.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:
1. Assertion: The Sales Director's plan is an appropriate way to address the team dysfunction exhibited in Point (1).
Reason: Having a clear shared commitment to the outputs required of them is necessary for a team to be truly effective.
* Analysis:Patrick Lencioni's first dysfunction is the absence of trust. Point (1) outlines issues of commitment due to internal conflicts and lack of alignment. The Sales Director's plan addresses these issues by bringing the team together for a shared vision and commitment. This ensures clarity of expectations and alignment.
* Since the assertion and reason are true and explain the behavior, the correct answer is A.
2. Assertion: The Sales Director's plan is an appropriate way to address the team dysfunction exhibited in Point (2).
Reason: Team working is enhanced by taking constructive action to avoid debates that risk damaging team relationships.
* Analysis:Dysfunction (2) addresses fear of conflict. The Sales Director plans to clarify individual roles and responsibilities. This proactive action avoids unnecessary debates about overlapping work and ensures constructive conflict resolution, essential for building relationships.
* Since the assertion and reason are true and explain the behavior, the correct answer is A.
3. Assertion: The Sales Director's plan is an appropriate way to address the team dysfunction exhibited in Point (3).
Reason: Team leaders should define the problem-solving and decision-making processes for their teams to support commitment to change tasks.
* Analysis:Point (3) highlights a lack of accountability, one of the dysfunctions. The Sales Director's plan acknowledges unfulfilled tasks and seeks joint agreement on future actions. This creates structured accountability by defining processes and ensuring follow-through on commitments.
* Since the assertion and reason are true and explain the behavior, the correct answer is A.
4. Assertion: The Sales Director's plan is an appropriate way to address the team dysfunction exhibited in Point (4).
Reason: Teams that have trust amongst the members when collaborating, tend to make more efforts to avoid letting other team members down.
* Analysis:Dysfunction (4) is inattention to results. Point (4) highlights resistance to adopting the required changes for selling mobile applications. The plan to cross-collaborate with other departments builds trust and understanding among team members, ensuring shared accountability for results.
* Since the assertion and reason are true and explain the behavior, the correct answer is A.
References:
* Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable.
* Analysis of team collaboration and management strategies applied to organizational development.
質問 # 164
(New food hygiene laws take effect in six months. Sukra Aroon and Wanida Anong are assessing if kitchen remodeling is needed, which may divert Infrastructure Team resources.)
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is C .
In AgilePM, VUCA-based risks are those driven by external volatility, uncertainty, complexity, or ambiguity in the environment. New legislation is a classic example of this because it originates outside the project and can force reprioritization, redesign, resource shifts, and rapid adaptation.
In this scenario, the new food hygiene laws are:
* external to the project ,
* time-bound , since they take effect in six months,
* and capable of creating unplanned work , such as kitchen remodeling and resource diversion.
That makes this a VUCA-based risk , not an approach-based one.
Why C is correct:
The key reason is that the trigger is new legislation , which is an environmental change outside the project team's control. AgilePM recognizes that such external changes can emerge during delivery and require the project to remain adaptable.
The possible impact here includes:
* reassessing scope,
* reassigning Infrastructure Team capacity,
* reviewing compliance obligations,
* and potentially adjusting delivery priorities.
That is exactly the kind of situation where AgilePM's flexibility is valuable.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A). Approach-based, because past Project Increment planning failed to account for regulatory change, causing lack of contingency and resource risks.
This is not the best answer because the scenario does not say the team negligently ignored a known requirement. The key issue is the emergence of new laws , which is primarily an external uncertainty rather than a failure of method.
B). Approach-based, because Sukra Aroon should have tracked evolving legislation from the start to mitigate the risk.
This is also not the best answer. Even though compliance awareness is important, the fundamental source of the risk is still the external regulatory change , not simply Sukra's handling of it.
D). VUCA-based, because gaps in internal compliance cause uncertainty in responding to changing regulations.
This is weaker than C because it shifts the cause toward an internal gap. The scenario itself emphasizes the introduction of new food hygiene laws , which is the main source of uncertainty and disruption.
AgilePM perspective:
AgilePM is designed to help teams respond to changing external conditions without losing focus on business value. Regulatory changes often require:
* rapid reassessment,
* collaborative decision-making,
* flexible reprioritization,
* and attention to compliance without abandoning the overall project goals.
Since this risk is caused by external legislation , the correct classification is VUCA-based .
Therefore, the best answer is C .
質問 # 165
Which 2 actions should the Project Manager take to implement the new Must Have requirement?
正解：C、D
解説：
To effectively implement the new Must Have requirement for financial transaction functionality on the coffee shop insurance product website, the Project Manager should focus on actions that align with their role in planning, execution, and team coordination. The following actions are most appropriate for the Project Manager:
Selected Actions for the Project Manager:
B). Add the tasks required to develop the new financial transaction functionality to the Delivery Plan.
C). Update the Delivery Plan to show the new financial transaction functionality as a deliverable.
B). Integrating the tasks necessary for developing the new functionality into the Delivery Plan is crucial. This ensures that all project activities are accounted for and scheduled, which helps in managing the project's timeline and resources effectively.
C). Reflecting the new financial transaction functionality as a deliverable in the Delivery Plan is important for clarity and focus. It signifies the inclusion of this functionality as a critical component of the project's scope, guiding the team's efforts and priorities.
Why Other Actions Are Less Suitable:
A). While ensuring adherence to documented standards is important, it is typically a collaborative effort involving the Technical Coordinator and Solution Development team, in addition to the Project Manager, to ensure technical compliance.
D). Sourcing and hiring specific expertise, such as a web developer skilled in online financial transactions, is indeed part of the Project Manager's responsibilities. However, the actions related to the Delivery Plan (options B and C) are more directly aligned with the immediate steps for implementing a new requirement in the project's scope.
E). Consolidating and circulating an agenda for the workshop is a logistical task that the Project Manager might oversee or delegate. However, the actions related to planning and updating the Delivery Plan are more critical to the successful implementation of the new requirement.
質問 # 166
......
AgilePM-Practitionerテスト内容: https://www.jpexam.com/AgilePM-Practitioner_exam.html
2026年Jpexamの最新AgilePM-Practitioner PDFダンプおよびAgilePM-Practitioner試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RClhOMKLwi5GVsBBCQI9Ry1pLIlB83nn