If you want to clear the Central Finance in BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting (F5CAB5) test, then you need to study well with real BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting (F5CAB5) exam dumps of Test4Sure. These F5 F5CAB5 exam dumps are trusted and updated. We guarantee that you can easily crack the BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting (F5CAB5) test if use our actual Central Finance in BIG-IP Administration Support and Troubleshooting (F5CAB5) dumps.
| Certification Vendor: | F5 Networks |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | BIG-IP Administrator |
| Exam Number: | 101 |
| Related Certifications: | F5 Certified Solution Expert - Security F5 Certified Solution Expert - LTM |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Exam Price: | USD $160 |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based, Multiple Choice |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Available Languages: | Japanese, English |
| Exam Duration: | 90 minutes |
| Sample Questions: | F5 F5CAB5 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or at Pearson VUE testing center |
| Pre Condition: | F5 recommends completing F5 BIG-IP Administrator certification training or having equivalent hands-on experience with BIG-IP LTM |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://support.f5.com/csp/education-certification |
>> F5CAB5 New Cram Materials <<
With our excellent F5CAB5 exam questions, you can get the best chance to obtain the F5CAB5 certification to improve yourself, for better you and the better future. With our F5CAB5 training guide, you are acknowledged in your profession. The F5CAB5 exam braindumps can prove your ability to let more big company to attention you. Then you have more choice to get a better job and going to suitable workplace. Why not have a try on our F5CAB5 Exam Questions, you will be pleasantly surprised our F5CAB5 exam questions are the best praparation material.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 73
Pool /Common/testpool member /Common/10.120.0.5:8090 monitor status down.
[ /Common/http: up, /Common/http2: down; last error: ] [ was up for
lhr:0min:43sec ]
Why is this pool member being marked down?
Answer: D
Explanation:
This log entry indicates that multiple monitors are assigned to the pool member, and the member is failing one of them.
Understanding Monitor Logic: By default, if multiple monitors are assigned to a pool or pool member without a "Minimum To Up" (Availability Requirement) setting, the system requires all monitors to pass for the member to be marked "Up".
Analyzing the Log: The log clearly states: [ /Common/http: up, /Common/http2: down; ... ]. This means the standard HTTP monitor is successful, indicating the member is serving HTTP traffic, but the http2 monitor has failed.
Conclusion: Since the http monitor is "up" but the member as a whole is "down," we can conclude the member is successfully responding to standard HTTP requests but not HTTP2 requests.
Therefore, the member is currently only serving standard HTTP traffic.
NEW QUESTION # 74
Refer to the exhibit.
A BIG-IP Administrator configured a virtual server with a pool of 3 members and selected the Round Robin load balancing method to evenly distribute traffic across the pool members. During initial testing, traffic was not evenly distributed and the pool member 172.16.20.3 received more traffic than the other pool members.
Refer to the exhibit and the virtual server configuration provided below:
Plaintext
ltm virtual http.vs {
destination 10.10.1.100:http
ip-protocol tcp
mask 255.255.255.255
persist {
source_addr { default yes }
}
pool http.pool
profiles {
tcp{}
}
serverssl-use-sni disabled
source 0.0.0.0/0
source-address-translation {
type automap
}
translate-address enabled
}
What is the most likely cause of this behavior?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The primary reason for the uneven traffic distribution is the presence of a Persistence Profile in the virtual server configuration.
Load Balancing vs. Persistence: While the Round Robin method is designed to distribute new connections sequentially among pool members, Persistence overrides this logic for existing clients.
Source Address Persistence: The configuration shows source_addr persistence is enabled. This ensures that once a client (identified by their source IP) is mapped to a pool member, all subsequent connections from that same IP will be sent to the same member for the duration of the persistence record.
Uneven Distribution Logic: If one source IP address generates significantly more connections or longer-lived sessions than others--or if many clients appear behind a single NAT/Proxy IP--that specific pool member (in this case, 172.16.20.3) will receive a disproportionate amount of traffic compared to the others.
NEW QUESTION # 75
Refer to the exhibit. A BIG-IP Administrator creates a new Virtual Server to load balance SSH traffic. Users are unable to log on to the servers. What should the BIG-IP Administrator do to resolve the issue? (Exhibit shows a Standard Virtual Server with an HTTP profile applied).
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From BIG-IP Administration Supp13ort and Troubleshooting documents: When troubleshooting a Virtual Server that is not working as expected, it is critical to ensure that the applied profiles match the type of traffic being processed. SSH (Secure Shell) is a non-HTTP protocol that operates over TCP. The exhibit indicates that an HTTP profile is applied to the Virtual Server14. An HTTP profile instructs the BIG-IP system to parse traffic as HTTP; however, since SSH traffic does not follow HTTP specifications, the BIG-IP's parser will fail to understand the data stream, typically resulting in dropped packets or reset connections15. To fix this, the administrator must set the HTTP profile to "None"16. This allows the Virtual Server to act as a "Standard" or "FastL4" listener that passes the encrypted SSH data transparently to the backend pool members without attempting application-layer inspection. This highlights a common troubleshooting step: verifying that L7 profiles are not inadvertently applied to L4 traffic, which disrupts the expected traffic flow between the client and the server.
NEW QUESTION # 76
Refer to Exhibit:
An organization is reporting slow performance accessing their Intranet website, hosted in a public cloud. All employees use a single Proxy Server with the public IP of 104.219.110.168 to connect to the Internet. What should the BIG-IP Administrator of the Intranet website do to fix this issue?
Answer: D
Explanation:
This scenario describes a classic network performance issue known as the "Mega-Proxy" problem. When an organization routes all employee traffic through a single proxy server, the BIG-IP sees thousands of unique users as having the exact same source IP address. If the administrator has configured "Source Address Affinity" persistence, the BIG-IP will correctly follow the rule but incorrectly route all users to the same single backend pool member. This creates a severe load imbalance where one server is overwhelmed while others remain idle, leading to poor application response times. To resolve this, the administrator must change the persistence profile to "HTTP Cookie". Cookie-based persistence allows the BIG-IP to place a unique identifier in each user's browser, allowing the system to distinguish between individual sessions even if they share the same source IP. This fix ensures that traffic is distributed evenly across the pool members, restoring4 the expect5ed load balancing functionality and resolving the slow performance reported by users behind the corporate proxy.
NEW QUESTION # 77
Plaintext
warning tmm[<pid>]: 011e0002:4: sweeper_segment_cb_any: Aggressive mode /Common/default-eviction- policy activated (0) (global memory). (345209/690176 pages) warning tmm[<pid>]: 011e0003:4: Aggressive mode sweeper: /Common/default-eviction-policy (0) (global memory) 1 Connections killed What is happening when the BIG-IP Administrator sees the messages in the LTM log displayed above? (Pick the 2 correct responses below)
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
These log messages indicate that the BIG-IP system is under significant resource pressure and has activated its Adaptive Connection Management.
* Global Eviction Policy: The message Aggressive mode ... activated (global memory) confirms that the system has reached a memory utilization threshold that triggers the eviction policy. This happens because TMM (the data plane) is running low on available memory pages.
* Sweeper/Reaping: Once in "Aggressive mode," the BIG-IP "sweeper" starts reaping (terminating) connections to free up memory. The log Connections killed confirms this is occurring.
* Impact: The system does not drop all connections; it targets connections based on the eviction policy (e.g., oldest connections or those exceeding limits) to bring memory usage back to safe levels. Thus, some connections will be dropped (Option A), and the cause is TMM memory exhaustion (Option C).
NEW QUESTION # 78
......
Valid F5CAB5 Test Duration: https://www.test4sure.com/F5CAB5-pass4sure-vce.html