P.S. Free & New SC-500 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Itexamguide: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BzdJYPhgc8a-19PTQrV-4mpV3a3PvRkv
Itexamguide offers a free demo of Microsoft SC-500 exam dumps before the purchase to test the features of the products. Itexamguide also offers 12 months of free Microsoft SC-500 Exam Questions updates if the SC-500 certification exam content changes after purchasing our SC-500 exam dumps.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Manage identity, access, and governance | 20-25% | - Secure access to resources using Microsoft Entra ID - Implement governance with Azure Policy and Defender for Cloud - Secure secrets and keys using Azure Key Vault |
| Topic 2: Secure storage, databases, and networking | 25-30% | - Implement security for storage accounts - Implement security for databases - Implement security for Azure network services |
| Topic 3: Secure compute | 20-25% | - Implement security for AI workloads - Implement security for servers and virtual machines (VMs) - Implement security for application platform services |
| Topic 4: Manage and monitor security posture | 20-25% | - Implement activity and event collection in Microsoft Sentinel - Manage security posture using Microsoft Defender for Cloud - Implement Microsoft Security Copilot configuration |
>> Reliable SC-500 Test Voucher <<
We are impassioned, thoughtful team. So our SC-500 exam torrents will never put you under great stress but solve your problems with efficiency. Otherwise if you fail to pass the exam unfortunately with our SC-500 test braindumps, we will return your money fully or switch other versions for you. So by using our SC-500 exam torrents made by excellent experts, the learning process can be speeded up to one week. They have taken the different situation of customers into consideration and designed practical SC-500 Test Braindumps for helping customers save time. As elites in this area they are far more proficient than normal practice materials’ editors, you can trust them totally.
NEW QUESTION # 166
You have an Azure Functions app named App1 that uses an HTTP trigger, runs on an Elastic Premium plan, and uses virtual network integration.
A partner application sends requests to App1 from a public IP address of xxx.xxx.xxx.xx.
You need to ensure that the requests are accepted from only xxx.xxx.xxx.xx.
What should you do?
Answer: E
Explanation:
Configure an inbound access restriction on App1 that explicitly allows the partner ' s public IP address.
Azure Functions running on App Service infrastructure support access restriction rules that operate as an inbound network ACL. Microsoft states that these rules can contain individual IPv4/IPv6 addresses or ranges and that once one or more rules are configured, unmatched traffic can be denied. This directly supports the requirement to accept HTTP requests only from the specified partner IP.
The existing virtual network integration does not control inbound access. Microsoft specifically defines VNet integration as an outbound networking capability. Consequently, an NSG associated with the integration subnet affects traffic originating from the Function App but does not filter requests arriving at the Function App ' s public endpoint.
A private endpoint would eliminate normal public access and therefore would not support a partner that connects from a public Internet IP unless additional private connectivity were implemented. Azure Bastion is for administrative connectivity to VMs, while NAT Gateway controls outbound source addressing.
The SC-500 study guide explicitly includes configuring Azure Functions authentication and network access under Secure compute.
NEW QUESTION # 167
You need to configure the AKS1 and ID 1 managed identities to meet the technical requirements. The solution must follow the principle of least privilege.
Which role should you assign to each identity? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
AKS1: AcrPull; ID1: Contributor
AKS1 needs to pull images from Azure Container Registry, so AcrPull is the least-privilege registry role for the cluster identity. ID1 requires Contributor in the visible answer area because the referenced technical requirement requires resource changes beyond a read-only or pull-only role. The important distinction is scope: AKS image retrieval should not receive Contributor, while the separate managed identity receives the broader role only for its implementation task. This domain is tested through precise scope control: tenant, subscription, resource, application, and data-plane authorization are not interchangeable. The correct choice applies the smallest identity or governance control that enforces the stated requirement. Options that only add users, create registrations, or provide broad administrator access fail because they do not directly enforce the requested access behavior. The result is a direct exam-style implementation choice: it changes the required security behavior without relying on unrelated monitoring, manual cleanup, or excessive privilege. Official Microsoft source/topic: SC-500 Study Guide > AKS and managed identities; Microsoft Learn > ACR pull role and Azure RBAC.
NEW QUESTION # 168
You have a Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management (Defender EASM) resource for a company named Contoso. Ltd.
You need to update the Defender EASM workflow to meet the following requirements:
*Assets from a business domain that Contoso no longer owns must be removed from inventory.
*Findings that do NOT apply to confirmed inventory must NOT affect reported counts.
What should you do for each requirement? To answer, drag the appropriate actions to the correct requirements. Each action may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Inventory cleanup: Remove the seed and remove the assets discovered by using that seed; Finding suppression: Mark the observations as non-applicable
When a seed domain is no longer owned, the clean inventory action is to remove the seed and remove assets discovered from that seed. Leaving those assets as dependencies or merely labeling them would keep stale assets in the inventory. For findings that do not apply to confirmed inventory, marking the observations as non-applicable prevents them from influencing finding counts while retaining the operational history needed for audit and review. For this domain, least privilege means granting only the required data operation or allowing only the required network flow. The correct response avoids shared keys, broad peering, general contributor roles, or log-only controls when the scenario demands prevention, routing, event triggering, or account-specific configuration. The result is a direct exam-style implementation choice: it changes the required security behavior without relying on unrelated monitoring, manual cleanup, or excessive privilege.
Official Microsoft source/topic: SC-500 Study Guide > Defender EASM; Microsoft Learn > inventory and observation state management.
NEW QUESTION # 169
You use Microsoft Security Copilot.
Users are assigned either the Security Copilot Contributor role or the Security Copilot Owner role.
A contributor enables a custom plugin that is NOT approved, and some Security Copilot features in embedded experiences no longer function.
You need to ensure that plugins affecting all users can only be added by owners.
What should you do in the Plugin settings?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 170
You have an Azure management group named MG1 that contains two subscriptions named Sub1 and Sub2. Both subscriptions are linked to a Microsoft Entra tenant that contains a security group named Group1.
You need to ensure that the members of Group1 can assign roles to the resources in Sub1 and Sub2. The solution must follow the principle of least privilege.
Which role should you assign to Group1?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The User Access Administrator role permits members of Group1 to manage role assignments without granting them permission to modify the underlying Azure resources. Assigning the role at the MG1 scope causes the permission to be inherited by both Sub1 and Sub2 and their resources, providing centralized least-privilege access management.
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/role-definitions
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/elevate-access-global-admin?tabs=azure-portal%2Centra-audit-logs
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/scope-overview
NEW QUESTION # 171
......
If you face any problem while using the offline or online software Implementing End-to-End Security Controls for Cloud and AI Workloads (SC-500) practice exam of Itexamguide, contact our customer service team. Our team of experts is available 24/7 for your assistance while using updated SC-500 Exam Prep material. Many takers of the Implementing End-to-End Security Controls for Cloud and AI Workloads (SC-500) practice test suffer from money loss because it introduces new changes in the content of the test.
Dumps SC-500 Guide: https://www.itexamguide.com/SC-500_braindumps.html
What's more, part of that Itexamguide SC-500 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BzdJYPhgc8a-19PTQrV-4mpV3a3PvRkv