BONUS!!! Download part of PrepAwayETE Data-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ySSk344ftvu18U2gNVgm4oCexfs0YESP
We can guarantee that our study materials will be suitable for all people and meet the demands of all people, including students, workers and housewives and so on. If you decide to buy and use the Data-Engineer-Associate study materials from our company with dedication on and enthusiasm step and step, it will be very easy for you to pass the exam without doubt. We sincerely hope that you can achieve your dream in the near future by the Data-Engineer-Associate Study Materials of our company.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Store Management | 26% | - Manage data lifecycle
|
| Topic 2: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Apply programming concepts
|
| Topic 3: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Monitor data pipelines
|
| Topic 4: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Apply authentication and authorization
|
>> Data-Engineer-Associate Valid Cram Materials <<
Our expert team will check the update Data-Engineer-Associate learning prep and will send the update version automatically to the clients if there is the update. We provide free updates for our worthy customer within one year after purchase. So the clients can enjoy the convenience of our wonderful service and the benefits brought by our superior Data-Engineer-Associate Guide materials. What is more, if you want to buy the Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions one year later, you can enjoy 50% discounts off.
NEW QUESTION # 190
A data engineer must orchestrate a series of Amazon Athena queries that will run every day. Each query can run for more than 15 minutes.
Which combination of steps will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively? (Choose two.)
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
Option A and B are the correct answers because they meet the requirements most cost-effectively. Using an AWS Lambda function and the Athena Boto3 client start_query_execution API call to invoke the Athena queries programmatically is a simple and scalable way to orchestrate the queries. Creating an AWS Step Functions workflow and adding two states to check the query status and invoke the next query is a reliable and efficient way to handle the long-running queries.
Option C is incorrect because using an AWS Glue Python shell job to invoke the Athena queries programmatically is more expensive than using a Lambda function, as it requires provisioning and running a Glue job for each query.
Option D is incorrect because using an AWS Glue Python shell script to run a sleep timer that checks every 5 minutes to determine whether the current Athena query has finished running successfully is not a cost- effective or reliable way to orchestrate the queries, as it wastes resources and time.
Option E is incorrect because using Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow (Amazon MWAA) to orchestrate the Athena queries in AWS Batch is an overkill solution that introduces unnecessary complexity and cost, as it requires setting up and managing an Airflow environment and an AWS Batch compute environment.
References:
* AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 5: Data Orchestration, Section 5.2: AWS Lambda, Section 5.3: AWS Step Functions, Pages 125-135
* Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 5: Data Orchestration, Lesson 5.1: AWS Lambda, Lesson 5.2: AWS Step Functions, Pages 1-15
* AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Lambda Developer Guide, Working with AWS Lambda Functions, Configuring Function Triggers, Using AWS Lambda with Amazon Athena, Pages 1-4
* AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Step Functions Developer Guide, Getting Started, Tutorial:
Create a Hello World Workflow, Pages 1-8
NEW QUESTION # 191
A hotel management company receives daily data files from each of its hotels. The company wants to upload its data to AWS. The company plans to use Amazon Athena to access the files. The company needs to protect the files from accidental deletion. The company will develop an application on its on-premises servers to automatically forward the files to a fully managed AWS ingestion service.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (150-250 words)
Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a fully managed data ingestion service that enables reliable and scalable delivery of streaming and batch data into Amazon S3 with minimal operational overhead. This directly satisfies the requirement for a fully managed AWS ingestion service while avoiding the need to provision, scale, or manage infrastructure.
By using the Amazon Kinesis Agent on the on-premises servers, the company can automatically forward daily data files to Kinesis Data Firehose. Firehose handles buffering, retry logic, scaling, and delivery without requiring administrative effort. Delivering the data to Amazon S3 allows seamless integration with Amazon Athena, which natively queries data stored in S3 without requiring data movement or transformation.
Enabling Amazon S3 versioning protects files from accidental deletion by preserving previous versions of objects. This aligns with AWS best practices for data durability and governance, especially for analytics workloads and compliance requirements.
Other options introduce unnecessary operational complexity. AWS DataSync with Amazon EFS is not optimized for Athena-based analytics. AWS Glue jobs and Amazon RDS are unsuitable for file-based analytical access. A self-managed Apache Kafka solution with Amazon MSK significantly increases operational overhead.
Therefore, option B is the most efficient, scalable, and operationally optimal solution according to AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate best practices.
NEW QUESTION # 192
A data engineer needs Amazon Athena queries to finish faster. The data engineer notices that all the files the Athena queries use are currently stored in uncompressed .csv format. The data engineer also notices that users perform most queries by selecting a specific column.
Which solution will MOST speed up the Athena query performance?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena supports various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset of columns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
Therefore, changing the data format from CSV to Parquet and applying Snappy compression will most speed up the Athena query performance. Parquet is a column-oriented format that allows Athena to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. Snappy is a compression algorithm that reduces the data size without compromising the query speed, as it is splittable and does not require decompression before reading. This solution will also reduce the cost of Athena queries, as Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned from S3.
The other options are not as effective as changing the data format to Parquet and applying Snappy compression. Changing the data format from CSV to JSON and applying Snappy compression will not improve the query performance significantly, as JSON is also a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or encoding techniques. Compressing the CSV files by using Snappy compression will reduce the data size, but it will not improve the query performance significantly, as CSV is still a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or encoding techniques. Compressing the CSV files by using gzjg compression will reduce the data size, but it willdegrade the query performance, as gzjg is not a splittable compression algorithm and requires decompression before reading. References:
Amazon Athena
Choosing the Right Data Format
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 5: Data Analysis and Visualization, Section 5.1: Amazon Athena
NEW QUESTION # 193
A company is migrating on-premises workloads to AWS. The company wants to reduce overall operational overhead. The company also wants to explore serverless options.
The company's current workloads use Apache Pig, Apache Oozie, Apache Spark, Apache Hbase, and Apache Flink. The on-premises workloads process petabytes of data in seconds. The company must maintain similar or better performance after the migration to AWS.
Which extract, transform, and load (ETL) service will meet these requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
AWS Glue is a fully managed serverless ETL service that can handle petabytes of data in seconds. AWS Glue can run Apache Spark and Apache Flink jobs without requiring any infrastructure provisioning or management. AWS Glue can also integrate with Apache Pig, Apache Oozie, and Apache Hbase using AWS Glue Data Catalog and AWS Glue workflows. AWS Glue can reduce the overall operational overhead by automating the data discovery, data preparation, and data loading processes. AWS Glue can also optimize the cost and performance of ETL jobs by using AWS Glue Job Bookmarking, AWS Glue Crawlers, and AWS Glue Schema Registry. References:
* AWS Glue
* AWS Glue Data Catalog
* AWS Glue Workflows
* [AWS Glue Job Bookmarking]
* [AWS Glue Crawlers]
* [AWS Glue Schema Registry]
* [AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide]
NEW QUESTION # 194
A manufacturing company collects sensor data from its factory floor to monitor and enhance operational efficiency. The company uses Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to publish the data that the sensors collect to a data stream. Then Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose writes the data to an Amazon S3 bucket.
The company needs to display a real-time view of operational efficiency on a large screen in the manufacturing facility.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LOWEST latency?
Answer: C
Explanation:
This solution will meet the requirements with the lowest latency because it uses Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink to process the sensor data in real time and write it to Amazon Timestream, a fast, scalable, and serverless time series database. Amazon Timestream is optimized for storing and analyzing time series data, such as sensor data, and can handle trillions of events per day with millisecond latency. By using Amazon Timestream as a source, you can create an Amazon QuickSight dashboard that displays a real-time view of operational efficiency on a large screen in the manufacturing facility. Amazon QuickSight is a fully managed business intelligence service that can connect to various data sources, including Amazon Timestream, and provide interactive visualizations and insights123.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
* A. Use Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (previously known as Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) to process the sensor data. Use a connector for Apache Flink to write data to an Amazon Timestream database. Use the Timestream database as a source to create a Grafana dashboard. This option is similar to option C, but it uses Grafana instead of Amazon QuickSight to create the dashboard.
Grafana is an open source visualization tool that can also connect to Amazon Timestream, but it requires additional steps to set up and configure, such as deploying a Grafana server on Amazon EC2, installing the Amazon Timestream plugin, and creating an IAM role for Grafana to access Timestream.
These steps can increase the latency and complexity of the solution.
* B. Configure the S3 bucket to send a notification to an AWS Lambda function when any new object is created. Use the Lambda function to publish the data to Amazon Aurora. Use Aurora as a source to create an Amazon QuickSight dashboard. This option is not suitable for displaying a real-time view of operational efficiency, as it introduces unnecessary delays and costs in the data pipeline. First, the sensor data is written to an S3 bucket by Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, which can have a buffering interval of up to 900 seconds. Then, the S3 bucket sends a notification to a Lambda function, which can incur additional invocation and execution time. Finally, the Lambda function publishes the data to Amazon Aurora, a relational database that is not optimized for time series data and can have higher storage and performance costs than Amazon Timestream .
* D. Use AWS Glue bookmarks to read sensor data from the S3 bucket in real time. Publish the data to an Amazon Timestream database. Use the Timestream database as a source to create a Grafana dashboard.
This option is also not suitable for displaying a real-time view of operational efficiency, as it uses AWS Glue bookmarks to read sensor data from the S3 bucket. AWS Glue bookmarks are a feature that helps AWS Glue jobs and crawlers keep track of the data that has already been processed, so that they can resume from where they left off. However, AWS Glue jobs and crawlers are not designed for real-time data processing, as they can have a minimum frequency of 5 minutes and a variable start-up time.
Moreover, this option also uses Grafana instead of Amazon QuickSight to create the dashboard, which can increase the latency and complexity of the solution .
1: Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Flink
2: Amazon Timestream
3: Amazon QuickSight
4: Analyze data in Amazon Timestream using Grafana
5: Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose
6: Amazon Aurora
7: AWS Glue Bookmarks
8: AWS Glue Job and Crawler Scheduling
NEW QUESTION # 195
......
If you are considering to get help from the exam braindumps for you to pass the exam, you need to get a reliable and authentic valid Data-Engineer-Associate study material, which will help you to pass exams with an ease. But, this is also a must have updated Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions to save you from the tedious task of collecting resources from multiple sources. And at the same time, the Data-Engineer-Associate learning guide must stand the test of the market and can make the customers understood by all over the world. And these are exactly the advantages of our Data-Engineer-Associate practice engine has. Just come and have a try!
Data-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Simulator: https://www.prepawayete.com/Amazon/Data-Engineer-Associate-practice-exam-dumps.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PrepAwayETE Data-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ySSk344ftvu18U2gNVgm4oCexfs0YESP