What's more, part of that Prep4cram 212-89 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MZuCHnplH0apkHjnrV-yjK_h3QR2_2XL
Compared with the book version, our 212-89 exam dumps is famous for instant access to download, and if you receive your downloading link within ten minutes, and therefore you don’t need to spend extra time on waiting the arriving of the exam materials. Furthermore, 212-89 training materials are edited and verified by professional experts, therefore the quality can be guaranteed. We offer you free update for one year for 212-89 Study Materials, and the update version will be sent to your email automatically. If you choose us, you just choose to pass your exam just one time!
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Handling and Response to Malware Incidents | 18% | - Malware Handling Tools
|
| First Response | 14% | - First Response Concepts
|
| Handling and Response to Network Security Incidents | 15% | - Network Incident Response
|
| Handling and Response to Cloud Security Incidents | 15% | - Cloud Incident Response
|
| Handling and Response to Web Application Security Incidents | 15% | - Web Application Incident Response
|
| Incident Handling and Response Process | 18% | - Incident Handling and Response Concepts
|
| Handling and Response to Email Security Incidents | 15% | - Email Security Incidents
|
>> Latest 212-89 Study Notes <<
With the help of the EC-COUNCIL 212-89 brain dumps and preparation material provided by Prep4cram, you will be able to get 212-89 certified at the first attempt. Our experts have curated an amazing 212-89 exam guide for passing the 212-89 exam. You can get the desired outcome by preparing yourself from the 212-89 Exam Dumps material provided by Prep4cram. We frequently update our 212-89 exam preparation material to reflect the latest changes in the 212-89 exam syllabus.
NEW QUESTION # 292
Liam, a senior incident responder at a manufacturing company, is alerted to an email campaign distributing malware through fake invoice attachments. He confirms that some users opened the attachment, resulting in system slowdown and unauthorized access attempts. He disconnects affected machines, scans and removes malware, disables compromised accounts, restores systems from clean backups, and documents file hashes, sender IPs, and malicious domains. Which of the following best describes Liam's objective?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (ECIH-aligned):
This scenario clearly aligns with the eradication phase of the ECIH malware incident handling lifecycle.
After detection and containment, eradication focuses on completely removing malicious artifacts and ensuring the threat cannot re-emerge.
Option D is correct because Liam's actions-malware removal, account disabling, system restoration, and IOC documentation-are all aimed at fully eliminating the malware and attacker footholds. ECIH emphasizes that eradication must address malware binaries, persistence mechanisms, compromised credentials, and residual indicators.
Option B (forensic preservation) would avoid system changes, which Liam does not do. Option A is a training activity unrelated to response. Option C is infrastructure improvement, not incident handling.
ECIH explicitly states that failure to eradicate all traces often leads to reinfection or continued attacker access.
Liam's comprehensive approach ensures the environment is returned to a trusted state and prepares detection systems for future prevention.
NEW QUESTION # 293
Zaimasoft, a prominent IT organization, was attacked by perpetrators who directly targeted the hardware and caused irreversible damage to the hardware. In result, replacing or reinstalling the hardware was the only solution.
Identify the type of denial-of-service attack performed on Zaimasoft.
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Permanent Denial-of-Service (PDoS) attack, also known as "phlashing," is a form of attack that targets hardware, causing irreversible damage to the hardware components, thereby making the device unusable without a replacement or significant hardware intervention. In the scenario described with Zaimasoft, the attackers' actions leading to the damage of hardware components align with the characteristics of a PDoS attack. Unlike Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) or Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, which generally aim to overwhelm a system's resources temporarily, or DRDoS (Distributed Reflection Denial of Service), which involves amplification techniques using third-party servers, aPDoS attack directly damages the physical hardware, necessitating its replacement or reinstallation. This makes PDoS particularly severe due to its permanent impact on the targeted organization's hardware infrastructure.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) educational resources detail various types of denial-of-service attacks, including PDoS, highlighting the distinct nature of each attack and its implications on the affected systems, with PDoS being noted for its physical, irreparable impact on hardware components.
NEW QUESTION # 294
Who is mainly responsible for providing proper network services and handling network-related incidents in each cloud service model?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 295
A regional airport recently upgraded its operations with smart IoT-based baggage handling and security camera systems. During a routine cyber resilience drill mimicking device disruption, operational staff experienced confusion in executing assigned duties and lacked clarity in the communication flow. There was uncertainty about who should engage with third-party vendors, how to retrieve diagnostic logs from affected systems, and which units required priority attention to maintain continuity. Which of the following would best address these preparedness gaps?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The EC-Council Incident Handler (ECIH) curriculum stresses that preparation is the most critical phase of incident response. Organizations must establish clearly defined roles, communication channels, escalation procedures, and documented response workflows before an incident occurs. The scenario highlights confusion during a resilience drill-specifically unclear stakeholder responsibilities, communication breakdowns, and uncertainty in vendor coordination and log retrieval.
ECIH emphasizes that conducting realistic simulations, tabletop exercises, and red/blue team drills strengthens organizational readiness. These exercises help validate escalation paths, clarify third-party engagement protocols, and ensure that evidence collection procedures-such as retrieving diagnostic logs- are well understood by operational teams.
Option A (automated alerts) improves detection but does not solve role ambiguity. Option B (firmware patching) addresses vulnerability management but not communication gaps. Option D (manual fallback mode) supports business continuity but does not resolve the confusion in responsibilities and escalation paths identified in the drill.
ECIH guidance clearly states that effective first response depends on documented playbooks, defined stakeholder responsibilities, vendor coordination procedures, and continuous testing of incident response plans. Simulation-based training exposes procedural weaknesses and ensures each department understands its operational and communication duties.
Therefore, conducting realistic simulations and clearly documenting responsibilities for each stakeholder is the most appropriate corrective action to close the preparedness gaps identified during the exercise.
NEW QUESTION # 296
Allan performed a reconnaissance attack on his corporate network as part of a red-team activity. He scanned the IP range to find live host IP addresses. What type of technique did he use to exploit the network?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Ping sweeping is a technique used in network reconnaissance to identify which IP addresses in a range are active or live. By sending ICMP echo requests ("ping") to multiple hosts and observing which ones respond, an attacker or, in this case, a red team member like Allan, can determine which systems are up and potentially vulnerable to further exploration or attack. This method is foundational for mapping the network before deploying more targeted exploits or scans.
References:EC-Council's Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) program discusses various reconnaissance techniques, including ping sweeping, as a preliminary step in network analysis and vulnerability assessment.
NEW QUESTION # 297
......
You can take advantage of several perks if you buy Prep4cram’s bundle package of EC-COUNCIL 212-89 dumps. The bundle package is cost-effective and includes all three formats of EC Council Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) exam preparation material EC-COUNCIL 212-89 PDF Dumps Questions Answers, and EC-COUNCIL 212-89 Practice Test software (online and offline). EC-COUNCIL 212-89 Dumps are worth trying while preparing for the exam. You will be sure of what EC-COUNCIL 212-89 exam questions will be asked in the exam.
212-89 Exam Online: https://www.prep4cram.com/212-89_exam-questions.html
P.S. Free & New 212-89 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Prep4cram: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MZuCHnplH0apkHjnrV-yjK_h3QR2_2XL